BACKGROUND: Extending graft survival after heart transplant (HT) is of paramount importance to achieve survival well into adulthood for childhood recipients. Acute rejection is a significant adverse event, and biopsy remains the most specific means for diagnosing acute cellular rejection (ACR) versus antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).
METHODS: All children in the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) Registry who underwent HT between 1/2015 and 6/2022 and had ≥1 episode of treated rejection were included. Survival after rejection was compared between those with AMR and those with ACR-only. Secondary outcomes of infection, malignancy, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) were assessed. Risk factors for graft loss after AMR were identified using Cox proportional hazard modeling.
RESULTS: Among 906 children treated for rejection during follow-up through 12/2022, 697 (77%) with complete biopsy information were included. AMR was present on biopsy in 261 (37%) patients; ACR-only was present in 436 (63%) patients. Time to treated rejection was earlier in those with AMR, median time from HT to rejection 0.11 versus 0.29 years, p=0.0006. When rejection occurred within the 1st year, survival after AMR was lower than survival after ACR-only. Predictors of graft loss after AMR were younger age at HT, diagnosis of congenital heart disease, and rejection with hemodynamic compromise. There was no difference in time to CAV, infection, or malignancy after treated rejection between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The largest analysis of pediatric HT recipients treated for rejection with biopsy data to identify AMR underscores the continued importance of AMR on survival. AMR is associated with higher graft loss versus ACR when occurring in the first-year post HT. Predictors of graft loss after AMR identify patients who may benefit from increased surveillance, more aggressive rejection treatment, or augmented maintenance immunosuppression.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression reduction for BK polyoma virus (BKV) must be balanced against risk of adverse alloimmune outcomes. We sought to characterize risk of alloimmune events after BKV within context of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch (mMM) risk score.
METHODS: This single-center study evaluated 460 kidney transplant patients on tacrolimus-mycophenolate-prednisone from 2010-2021. BKV status was classified at 6-months post-transplant as \"BKV\" or \"no BKV\" in landmark analysis. Primary outcome was T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR). Secondary outcomes included all-cause graft failure (ACGF), death-censored graft failure (DCGF), de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Predictors of outcomes were assessed in Cox proportional hazards models including BKV status and alloimmune risk defined by recipient age and molecular mismatch (RAMM) groups.
RESULTS: At 6-months post-transplant, 72 patients had BKV and 388 had no BKV. TCMR occurred in 86 recipients, including 27.8% with BKV and 17% with no BKV (p = .05). TCMR risk was increased in recipients with BKV (HR 1.90, (95% CI 1.14, 3.17); p = .01) and high vs. low-risk RAMM group risk (HR 2.26 (95% CI 1.02, 4.98); p = .02) in multivariable analyses; but not HLA serological MM in sensitivity analysis. Recipients with BKV experienced increased dnDSA in univariable analysis, and there was no association with ABMR, DCGF, or ACGF.
CONCLUSIONS: Recipients with BKV had increased risk of TCMR independent of induction immunosuppression and conventional alloimmune risk measures. Recipients with high-risk RAMM experienced increased TCMR risk. Future studies on optimizing immunosuppression for BKV should explore nuanced risk stratification and may consider novel measures of alloimmune risk.

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Sensitized lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies, which have been associated with acute and chronic rejection. Perioperative intravenous immune globulin has been used in sensitized individuals to down-regulate antibody production.
We compared patients with a pre-transplant calculated panel reactive antibody ≥25% who did not receive preemptive immune globulin therapy to a historical control that received preemptive immune globulin therapy. Our cohort included 59 patients, 17 patients did not receive immune globulin therapy and 42 patients received therapy.
Donor specific antibody development was numerically higher in the non-immune globulin group compared to the immune globulin group (58.8% vs 33.3%, respectively, odds ratio 2.80, 95% confidence interval [0.77, 10.79], p = 0.13). Median time to antibody development was 9 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 19) and 28 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 58) in the non-immune globulin and immune globulin groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 12 months.
These findings are hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for larger, randomized studies to determine association of immune globulin therapy with clinical outcomes.

Although kidney transplantation is the best treatment for end stage kidney disease, the benefits are limited by factors such as the short fall in donor numbers, the burden of immunosuppression and graft failure. Although there have been improvements in one-year outcomes, the annual rate of graft loss beyond the first year has not significantly improved, despite better therapies to control the alloimmune response. There is therefore a need to develop alternative strategies to limit kidney injury at all stages along the transplant pathway and so improve graft survival. Complement is primarily part of the innate immune system, but is also known to enhance the adaptive immune response. There is increasing evidence that complement activation occurs at many stages during transplantation and can have deleterious effects on graft outcome. Complement activation begins in the donor and occurs again on reperfusion following a period of ischemia. Complement can contribute to the development of the alloimmune response and may directly contribute to graft injury during acute and chronic allograft rejection. The complexity of the relationship between complement activation and allograft outcome is further increased by the capacity of the allograft to synthesise complement proteins, the contribution complement makes to interstitial fibrosis and complement\'s role in the development of recurrent disease. The better we understand the role played by complement in kidney transplant pathology the better placed we will be to intervene. This is particularly relevant with the rapid development of complement therapeutics which can now target different the different pathways of the complement system. Combining our basic understanding of complement biology with preclinical and observational data will allow the development and delivery of clinical trials which have best chance to identify any benefit of complement inhibition.

Technological advances in the field of histocompatibility have allowed us to define anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificity at the allelic level. However, how allele-specific antibodies affect organ allocation is poorly studied. We examined allelic specificities of class I HLA antibodies in 6726 consecutive serum samples from 2953 transplant candidates and evaluated their impact on the corresponding crossmatch and organ allocation. Out of 17 class I HLA antigens represented by >1 allele in the LABScreen single antigen bead assay, 12 had potential allele-specific reactivity. Taking advantage of our unbiased cohort of deceased donor-candidate testing (123,135 complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches between 2014 and 2017), we estimated that the presence of allele-specific antibody detected using a single antigen bead assay (median fluorescence intensity, >3000) against only the rare allele was a poor predictor of a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, with a positive predictive value of 0% to 7%, compared with 52.5% in allele-concordant class I HLA antibodies against A or B locus antigens. Further, we confirmed allele-specific reactivity using flow crossmatch in 3 scenarios: A11:01/A11:02, A68:01/A68:02, and B44:02/B44:03. Our results suggest that allele-specific antibodies may unnecessarily exclude transplant candidates (up to 10%) from organ offers by overcalling unacceptable antigens; incorporation of selective reactivity pattern in allocation may promote precision matching and more equitable allocation.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective procedures are needed for those who demand urgent transplantation and have no other donor options. We here retrospectively analyzed 13 patients with DSAs successfully treated with desensitization of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin (IVIg) before HaploSCT from March 2017 to July 2022. All 13 patients had DSA mean fluorescence intensity >4000 of at least 1 loci before desensitization. Of the 13 patients, 10 patients were with the initial diagnosis of malignant hematological diseases, and 3 were diagnosed with aplastic anemia. Patients were treated with 1 (n = 3) or 2 (n = 10) doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2 for 1 dose). All patients receive the same total dose of 0.4 g/kg of IVIg within 72 hours before haploidentical stem cell administration to neutralize the remaining DSA. All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and 12 patients achieved primary platelet engraftment. The patient with primary platelet engraftment failure received purified CD34-positive stem cell infusion nearly 1 year after transplantation and achieved platelet engraftment thereafter. The estimated 3-year overall survival is 73.4%. Although further studies on larger numbers of patients are needed, it is clear that the combination of IVIg and rituximab is an effective way to clear DSA and has a strong effect on promoting engraftment and survival for patients with DSA. It is a practical and adaptable combination of treatment options.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch is a powerful biomarker of rejection. Few studies have explored its use in assessing rejection risk in heart transplant recipients. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of HLA Epitope Mismatch Algorithm (HLA-EMMA) and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithms can improve risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Class I and II HLA genotyping were performed by next-generation sequencing on 274 recipient/donor pairs enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children (CTOTC). Using high-resolution genotypes, we performed HLA molecular mismatch analysis with HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Patients without pre-formed donor specific antibody (DSA) (n=100) were used for correlations with post-transplant DSA and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Risk cut-offs were determined for DSA and ABMR using both algorithms. HLA-EMMA cut-offs alone predict the risk of DSA and ABMR; however, if used in combination with PIRCHE-II, the population could be further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II enables more granular immunological risk stratification. Intermediate-risk cases, like low-risk cases, are at a lower risk of DSA and ABMR. This new way of risk evaluation may facilitate individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative therapy for various kinds of hematological malignancies and disorders. Recently, HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo HSCT) has been widely performed due to its safety and favorable immune recovery. However, graft rejection remains an obstacle to PTCy-haplo HSCT. Donor specific antibody (DSA) is considered to be a major factor of graft rejection of haplo HSCT. We herein present a case of graft rejection after PTCy haplo-HSCT due to DSA induced by pretransplant platelet transfusion after donor selection. The patient was dependent on platelet transfusion and had not received cytotoxic chemotherapy because he was diagnosed as myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable. We retrospectively confirmed the level of DSA just before the first transplantation and found that it was dramatically elevated, which was enough to cause graft rejection. We successfully performed cord blood transplantation of the HLA that was not the target of DSA, as salvage transplantation without any desensitization. This case illustrates that we have to confirm the presence of DSA immediately before the haplo-HSCT, particularly in high risk patients who are dependent on platelet transfusion and have no cytotoxic chemotherapy before HSCT.