OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively assess the clinical efficacy of the anterolateral thigh flap in lower limb reconstruction (LLR) surgeries and explore its application value via a meta-analysis.
METHODS: Published articles on the efficacy of anterolateral thigh flap in LLR were retrieved in English databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library, which were searched from their inception to November 2023. The search terms included \"anterolateral thigh flaps\", \"lower extremity\", \"free muscle\" and \"reconstruction\". Subsequently, data extraction of eligible studies was carried out, and data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS: The final selection comprised 12 appropriate studies, encompassing a total of 577 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated that negligible differences existed in the length of hospital stay among patients treated with different types of flaps (mean difference (MD) =-0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) =-0.400.20, P>0.05). Additionally, the occurrence of complications differed slightly (Risk difference (RD) =-0.02, 95% CI=-0.090.05, P>0.05). The incidence of secondary surgeries also demonstrated non-significant differences (RD=-0.04, 95% CI=-0.11-0.04, P>0.05). Nevertheless, patients who underwent anterolateral thigh flap transplantation exhibited a drastic decrease in donor site morbidity (Odds ratio (OR) =0.22, 95% CI=0.10-0.49, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy of the anterolateral thigh flap in LLR surgeries shows no significant differences in hospital stay, complication rates, or the need for secondary surgeries compared to other flaps. However, using anterolateral thigh flap in LLR significantly reduces donor site morbidity.

BACKGROUND: The scapula free flap is becoming increasingly more utilized in head and neck reconstruction due to its natural geometry and soft tissue versatility. This study reviews the incidence rate, risk factors, and treatments of complications of scapula donor site morbidity.
METHODS: A review was performed for articles published between October 1990 and November 2022 in Medline (OVID), PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. After screening, 24 articles meeting the criteria were included.
RESULTS: Overall, 660 head and neck surgeries with the scapula donor bone across 24 studies were included. Twenty studies of 612 scapula free flaps reported a pooled postoperative complication rate of 10.7%, with no major complications. Seven studies of 199 scapula reconstructions showed a mean Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score of 14.39/100.
CONCLUSIONS: With its low rate of morbidity, the scapula flap presents itself as a good alternative for patients at risk for poor healing.

BACKGROUND: Peroneus longus has proved to be a promising graft for ACL reconstruction due to its high tensile strength, and ease of harvesting. While multiple studies have assessed the functional outcomes of the knee after ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus autograft, we aimed to evaluated donor site morbidity among the Indian population.
UNASSIGNED: This was a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Preoperative AOFAS and Karlsson-Peterson scores were obtained, and patients were followed up after surgery for a period of 6-months using the same scoring systems and strength testing with a hand-held Chatillon MSE-100-M dynamometer. Pedobarographs were done using Diers Pedoscan Plantar Pressure Measurement System on a subset of seven patients.
RESULTS: 20 patients participated in the study. Mean AOFAS and Karlsson-Peterson scores pre-operatively were 99.7 ± 1.34 and 98.5 ± 4.62 respectively. On completing 6- months of follow-up these scores were found to be 95.6 ± 9.43 and 88.75 ± 18.42 respectively. Deterioration of mean evertor strength was noted at all follow-ups compared to the opposite side. Static pedobarographs showed significant decreased in total surface area of contact and pressure over the posterior aspect of the operated side by 3-months which improved later at 6-months. Dynamic pedobarographs showed decreased mean average plantar pressure while walking on the operated side and significant increase in mean surface area of contact of the operated side (191.886±22.678 cm2) at 6-months of follow-up compared to the opposite side (184.471 ± 22.218 cm2). Five patients showed deviation of the point of maximum pressure while walking on the operated foot making it lateral to the COP with increased lateral plantar/ medial plantar pressure ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: While the use of peroneus longus tendon autografts in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction does not seem problematic on short-term subjective assessment, there is objective evidence in keeping with evertor weakness, weakness of first ray plantar flexion and possible ankle instability.
METHODS: Level lll.

UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of the literature on the donor site morbidity in patients undergoing Maxillofacial reconstruction was performed. The two widely used flaps namely free fibula flap (FFF) and DCIA flap were compared to answer the following questions: (1) Is donor site morbidity significantly different in patients undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction with FFF and DCIA flap? (2) Should donor site morbidity be considered as the criteria for choosing the flap for reconstruction.
UNASSIGNED: The search strategy was based on PRISMA guidelines. Various electronic databases were searched. On reviewing the seven articles included in our systematic review, we found out oral squamous cell carcinoma to be the most common pathology leading to the defects in head and neck region requiring reconstruction with free flaps.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 531 participants were investigated who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction using FFF and DCIA flap. The study included both the genders. The participants were assessed for short- and long-term donor site morbidity after the microvascular surgery. Mean age is 45-60 years. Three out of seven studies showed DCIA to have lesser complications at donor site than fibula group. While other two studies proved FFF to be better than DCIA. One study proved low donor site morbidity with regard to both the flap.
UNASSIGNED: The free fibula being the flap of choice in head and neck reconstruction has a comparable donor site morbidity to DCIA. The advantages of the iliac artery flap include natural curvature, abundant vertical and horizontal bone height for bone contouring and osseointegration, hidden scar, low incidence of wound healing problems and minimal effect on function and quality of life at long-term follow-up. Thus, it makes it the free flap of choice that one cannot avoid. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021268949).

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the healing of the quadriceps tendon donor site after partial thickness graft harvesting through ultrasound imaging at a short-term follow-up of 6-month following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to investigate the clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Between March 2019 and August 2020, 61 knees were retrospectively included in this study. Intraoperatively, the length, width and thickness of the harvested QT graft were measured. At a 6-month follow-up, patients were assessed by one of five radiologists, following the same protocol to calculate the defect volume, and patients performed a self-evaluation of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS).
UNASSIGNED: Intraoperatively, the QT grafts had a volume of 4635.4 ± 912.5 mm3. Postoperatively, ultrasound was performed at 6.5 ± 0.7 months, and the defect volume was 323.3 ± 389.2 mm3, representing a healing rate of 93% ± 9% of the donor site. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, IKDC was 61.6 ± 16 and KOOS was 70.2 ± 16.6. Age was significantly associated with the healing rate (β: -0.005; p = 0.032).
UNASSIGNED: At 6 months follow-up, the defect size of the QT donor site had healed by 93 ± 9% leaving a mean defect volume of 323.3 mm3 according to ultrasound measurements. This suggests that the QT has a high capacity for healing after graft harvesting, with 10 patients reaching full defect closure 6 months after surgery. The clinical relevance of these findings is that the quadriceps tendon donor site has high rates of healing, but surgeons should be aware of lower healing rates in older patients.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV, retrospective case series.

This study compares patient-reported functional and aesthetic outcomes of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) versus hatchet flap closure of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site.
Patients with RFFF (2015-2020) were retrospectively identified. Those willing to participate in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) filled out Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ).
198 patients met our inclusion criteria and 81 participated in PRO. There was a higher rate of tendon exposure in STSG versus hatchet flap (11 vs. 1, p = 0.0019), but a lower rate of skin necrosis (5 vs. 16, p = 0.0190) and epidermolysis (1 vs. 12, p = 0.0028). Scar quality in STSG was superior to hatchet flap in all domains of POSAS. MHOQ scores were similar between both groups with no statistical difference in overall scores (p = 0.2165).
STSG appeared to have less compromise in activities of daily living, better satisfaction and improved scar quality than hatchet flap, but a higher rate of tendon exposure.
3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

UNASSIGNED: Temporoparietal flap (TPF) is recommended when thin delicate tissue for medium sized defect is needed. The most used form of this flap is for auricle reconstruction. In this article usage of this flap for facial reconstruction other than auricle is discussed, emphasing on donor site morbidity.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, archived files of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran were evaluated from 2016-2020. Patients whom TPF was used for facial reconstruction were included. Flap survival was checked and donor site morbidity was evaluated in the form of skin scar and frontal nerve branch injury.
UNASSIGNED: This flap was used in 8 patients for facial reconstruction. All the cases had experienced Alopecia and this was the greatest when the skin of scalp was also included. All of the patients could elevate the eyebrow that means intact frontal branch of facial nerve.
UNASSIGNED: TPF is a versatile flap for facial reconstruction. However, alopecia is high in composite fasciocutaneous form of this flap.

In contrast to tangential excision, enzymatic debridement with NexoBrid® selectively removes non-viable tissue, allowing some deep dermal burn wounds to still heal conservatively. In this retrospective study, we investigated the reduction in surgery and associated scarring following enzymatic debridement in definitely deep burns as proven by laser Doppler imaging. One hundred two exclusively laser Doppler imaging-blue regions of interest where there was no doubt at all about the surgical indication, were selected for analysis in 32 patients treated with NexoBrid®. The total surface area of the 102 exclusively blue regions of interest was 5,086.4cm2. NexoBrid® resulted in a substantial reduction in the need for autografts as 1,986.9cm2 (39%) healed with conservative treatment. This corresponded with a significant reduction in patients (56.3%) requiring surgery. Exclusively laser Doppler imaging-blue regions of interest treated surgically with split thickness skin grafts required significantly more time to heal compared to conservative treatment (37.8±17.5 vs. 27.0±10.5 days). A very limited rate of hypertrophic scarring (16.7%) was observed. This is the first paper demonstrating a proven and significant reduction in the extent of autografting as well as in the number of surgical procedures after selective enzymatic debridement in objectively laser Doppler imaging-defined and therefore proven deep burns. Even after extended conservative treatment with prolonged healing times following NexoBrid®, hypertrophic scar formation was limited (5/54 regions of interest, 9.3%). Also in operated patients, the incidence of hypertrophic scarring following a strict regimen of aftercare was low (12/48 regions of interest, 25%).
À la différence de l’excision chirurgicale tangentielle, le débridement enzymatique au Nexobrid® ne s’intéresse qu’au tissu nécrosé ce qui permet la cicatrisation spontanée de certaines brûlures intermédiaires. Dans cette étude rétrospective, nous avons évalué la diminution des interventions chirurgicales (et des séquelles y afférant) en cas d’utilisation de l’excision enzymatique sur des brûlures affirmées comme profondes par Imagerie Laser- Doppler (ILD). Nous avons analysé 102 régions d’intérêt, apparaissant bleues à l’ILD chez 32 patients traités par Nexobrid®, représentant une surface totale de 5 086,4 cm2. Ceci a permis une cicatrisation spontanée de 1 986,9 cm2 (39% de l’ensemble et 56,3% chez les patients ayant dû être opérés). Les patients traités par excision- greffe sont restés significativement plus longtemps que ceux ayant cicatrisé spontanément (37,8 +/- 17,5 j VS 27 +/- 10,5). L’incidence globale des cicatrices hypertrophiques était basse (16,7%). Ceci est la première publication montrant une diminution significative de la surface greffée et du nombre d’interventions chirurgicales après l’utilisation d’une excision enzymatique chez des patients souffrant de brûlures définies comme profondes par ILD. Même après une cicatrisation spontanée longue après Nexobrid®, l’incidence des cicatrices hypertrophiques reste faible (5/54 régions d’intérêt - 9,3%) quand elle s’élève à 25% après excision- greffe (12/48).

OBJECTIVE: Radial Forearm Free flap (RFFF) is widely used in head and neck reconstruction, yet its donor site defect remains a significant drawback. The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap (MSAPFF) is considered an alternative flap to RFFF. This study aims to comprehensively analyze their characteristics, outcomes, and their impact on patient quality of life.
METHODS: All patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction using RFFF and MSAPFF between February 2017 and April 2023 were included in this study. Flap characteristics, outcomes and post-operative complications were recorded and compared. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results, and quality of life were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The study included 76 patients: 37 underwent reconstruction with RFFF, and 39 with MSAPFF. There was no significance difference between the RFFF and MSAPFF regarding the success rate (97.2% vs 97.4%), flap size (4.8 × 8.8 cm2 vs 5 × 9.8 cm2), hospital of stay (15.5 days vs 13.5 days) and recipient site complications (P > 0.05). However, MSAPFF showed larger flap thickness (P = 0.001), smaller arterial caliber (P = 0.008), shorter pedicle length (P = 0.001), and longer harvesting time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the pre-and postoperative ranges of wrist and ankle movements or in recipient site complications. MSAPFF showed a significant difference in donor site morbidity (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The MSAPFF is an excellent alternative to the RFFF for repairing oral cavity defects, with additional advantage of a well-hidden scar on the posterior calf, a larger flap thickness, accepted pedicle length and arterial caliber. However, one should consider the harvesting time and surgical skills required in comparison to the RFFF.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the importance of the MSAPFF as an alternative option for RFFF with less donor site morbidity and high success rate in oral cavity reconstruction and improved patient Quality of life after ablative surgery.

This comprehensive review delves into the intricacies of donor site morbidity and scar outcomes in skin transfer techniques central to the field of reconstructive surgery. The review synthesizes existing literature to illuminate the multifaceted factors influencing outcomes by surveying a broad spectrum of grafting methods, from traditional autografts to cutting-edge tissue engineering approaches. Key findings underscore the complex interplay of graft characteristics, surgical techniques, and patient-specific variables. The implications for clinical practice advocate for a nuanced, patient-centered approach, incorporating emerging minimally invasive procedures and adjuvant therapies. The review concludes with recommendations for future research, emphasizing the importance of longitudinal studies, comparative analyses, patient-reported outcomes, advanced imaging techniques, and exploration of tissue engineering innovations. This synthesis advances our understanding of donor site morbidity and scar outcomes. It provides a roadmap for refining clinical protocols, ultimately enhancing the delicate balance between therapeutic efficacy and patient well-being in reconstructive surgery.