Diverse

多样化
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在不同社区中对阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关生物标志物的检查仍然有限。
    这项研究的目的是扩展先前的工作,以在不同的社区样本中提供ptau181的表征。考虑了合并症对ptau181水平的影响,包括医疗。
    3,228(n=770非洲裔美国人[AA],n=1,231西班牙裔,和n=1,227非西班牙裔白人[NHW])健康和衰老大脑研究-健康差异(HABS-HD)参与者被纳入本研究。进行了ANCOVA,以检查种族和族裔之间ptau181水平的差异。小提琴图也由APOE4载波状态分层产生,淀粉样蛋白PET阳性状态,医学合并症(高血压,血脂异常,慢性肾脏病[CKD],和糖尿病)和通过认知诊断。
    发现Ptau181水平在西班牙裔和NHW之间存在差异,性别,和APOE4状态。所有组的淀粉样蛋白PET阳性与较高的ptau181水平相关。在AA中,APOE4阳性状态仅与ptau181水平显着相关。在所有种族和族裔群体中,诊断为CKD的患者的ptau181水平较高.当按认知诊断分层时,如果认知未受损的西班牙裔人也诊断为CKD或糖尿病,则他们的Ptau181较高.p值≤0.01。
    在不同的社区样本中显示了ptau181水平的差异。即使没有认知障碍,医学合并症对ptau181水平也有不同的影响,尤其是在西班牙裔中。研究结果支持在检查ptau181的实用性时需要考虑合并症条件的未来工作。
    UNASSIGNED: Examination of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) related biomarkers among diverse communities has remained limited.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to expand on prior work to provide a characterization of ptau181 among a diverse community sample. Consideration was taken regarding the impact of comorbidities on ptau181 levels including medical.
    UNASSIGNED: 3,228 (n = 770 African American [AA], n = 1,231 Hispanic, and n = 1,227 non-Hispanic white [NHW]) Health and Aging Brain Study- Health Disparities (HABS-HD) participants were included in this study. ANCOVAs were conducted to examine differences in ptau181 levels across race and ethnic groups. Violin plots were also generated stratified by APOEɛ4 carrier status, Amyloid PET positivity status, medical comorbidity (hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease [CKD], and diabetes) and by cognitive diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Ptau181 levels were found to differ between Hispanics and NHW after covarying for age, sex, and APOEɛ4 status. Amyloid PET positivity was associated with higher ptau181 levels across all groups. APOEɛ4 positivity status was only significantly associated with ptau181 levels among AAs. Across all race and ethnic groups, those with a diagnosis of CKD had higher levels of ptau181. When stratified by cognitive diagnosis, cognitively unimpaired Hispanics had higher ptau181 if they also had a diagnosis of CKD or diabetes. p-values ≤0.01.
    UNASSIGNED: Differences in ptau181 levels were shown in a diverse community sample. Medical comorbidities had a differing effect on ptau181 levels particularly among Hispanics even without cognitive impairment. Findings support the need for future work to consider comorbid conditions when examining the utility of ptau181.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管服务不足的人群——包括来自少数民族社区和生活贫困的人群——健康状况较差,医疗保健经验较差,大多数初级保健研究不能公平地反映这些群体。患者和公众参与(PPI)通常嵌入在英国(UK)的研究中。但往往不能代表服务不足的人群。这项研究与患者和公共贡献者以及当地社区领导人合作,位于社会经济贫困和种族多样化的城市地区,探索初级卫生保健研究中代表性不足的问题。
    方法:我们进行了一个焦点小组,其中包括6名患者和公众参与小组(PPIG)的成员,采访了4位社区领袖(代表布莱克,南亚,罗姆人和社会经济贫困社区)。使用基于模板分析的迭代分析过程。焦点组1进行了快速分析,和创建的模板。研究结果在焦点小组2中提出,模板进一步发展。文化创伤概念被应用于模板,以提供更广泛的理论视角。然后根据模板对焦点小组和访谈进行深入分析。
    结果:更广泛的社会和历史影响降低了服务不足人群对学术和医疗机构的信任。随着更实际的考虑,信任是参与研究的个人动机的基础。研究人员需要投入时间和资源,与对他们的研究具有重要意义的社区进行互利接触,包括分享对研究重点的权力和影响力。研究人员对差异权力和文化能力的反思至关重要。利用包括联合制作在内的参与式方法表明了对包容性研究设计的承诺。
    结论:迫切需要重新构建循证医学,使其对健康负担最高的服务不足人群更有用和更相关。初级医疗保健研究中缺乏代表性反映了更广泛的社会不平等,文化创伤提供了一个有用的镜头。然而,研究人员可以采取一些行动来扩大代表性。这最终将有助于通过加强科学严谨性和研究的普遍性来实现增加健康公平性的目标。
    目标:生活在贫困中的人们,来自少数民族社区的人可能被称为“服务不足”。服务不足的社区从卫生服务中受益较少,以及其他因素,这导致健康不平等。初级保健研究没有包括来自这些社区的足够多的人。这使得健康不平等更加严重。
    这项研究着眼于为什么服务不足社区的人不包括在研究中。它还研究了可能有帮助的东西。我们与患者和公众参与小组(PPIG)的成员进行了焦点小组讨论。这些人没有研究专长,而是利用他们作为病人的生活经历来影响研究过程。这个群体成立于2017年,来自更多的人生活在社会劣势的地区。我们还采访了当地社区领导人。访谈和焦点小组提出开放性问题,所以是探索人们对问题的看法的好方法。我们发现了一个关于文化史如何影响人们可以做什么的有用理论。我们利用这一点来帮助我们了解我们的发现如何改善和扩大服务不足社区的研究参与。
    我们发现信任非常重要。人与组织之间需要信任。还有一些实际原因,来自服务不足社区的人们可能无法参与研究。研究人员需要意识到这些事情,并在研究的所有阶段与这些社区的人合作。长期关系需要在机构和从事研究的人之间发展。了解彼此的文化和历史使我们更容易合作。
    BACKGROUND: Although underserved populations- including those from ethnic minority communities and those living in poverty-have worse health and poorer healthcare experiences, most primary care research does not fairly reflect these groups. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is usually embedded within research studies in the United Kingdom (UK), but often fails to represent underserved populations. This study worked with patient and public contributors and local community leaders, situated in a socio-economically deprived and ethnically diverse urban area, to explore under-representation in primary healthcare research.
    METHODS: We undertook a focus group with a purposive sample of 6 members of a Patient and Public Involvement Group (PPIG), and interviews with 4 community leaders (representing Black, South Asian, Roma and socio-economically deprived communities). An iterative analysis process based on template analysis was used. Focus group 1 was rapidly analysed, and a template created. Findings were presented in focus group 2, and the template further developed. The Cultural Trauma concept was than applied to the template to give a wider theoretical lens. In-depth analysis of focus groups and interviews was then performed based on the template.
    RESULTS: Wider societal and historical influences have degraded trust in academic and healthcare institutions within underserved populations. Along with more practical considerations, trust underpins personal motivations to engage with research. Researchers need to invest time and resources in prolonged, mutually beneficial engagement with communities of importance to their research, including sharing power and influence over research priorities. Researcher reflexivity regarding differential power and cultural competencies are crucial. Utilising participatory methodologies including co-production demonstrates a commitment to inclusive study design.
    CONCLUSIONS: Re-framing evidence-based medicine to be more useful and relevant to underserved populations with the highest burden of ill health is urgently needed. Lack of representation in primary healthcare research reflects wider societal inequalities, to which Cultural Trauma provides a useful lens. However, there are actions that researchers can take to widen representation. This will ultimately help achieve the goal of increased health equity by enhancing scientific rigour and research generalizability.
    OBJECTIVE: People living in poverty, and people from ethnic minority communities may be referred to as ‘underserved’. Underserved communities benefit less from health services, and along with other factors, this leads to health inequalities. Primary care research does not include enough people from these communities. This makes the health inequalities  worse.
    UNASSIGNED: This study looks at why people from underserved communities are not included in research. It also looks at what might help. We had focus group discussions with members of a Patient and Public Involvement Group (PPIG). These are individuals who do not have research expertise, but use their lived experience as patients to influence the research process. This group was formed in 2017, from areas where more people live with social disadvantage. We also interviewed local community leaders. Interviews and focus groups ask open questions, so are a good way to explore what people think about an issue. We found a useful theory about how cultural history affects what people can do. We used this to help us to understand how our findings could improve and widen participation in research within underserved communities.
    UNASSIGNED: We found that trust is very important. There needs to be trust between people and organisations. There are also practical reasons people from underserved communities might not be able to get involved in research. Researchers need to be aware of these things, and work with people from these communities throughout all stages of research. Long term relationships need to develop between institutions and people doing research. Understanding each other’s culture and history makes it easier to work together.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们研究青少年是否参与各种体育活动,地点,和/或与各种各样的人有关16个月后的身体活动,以及对多样性的看法是否介导了这些关系。青少年(N=369)完成了表明他们参加的各种体育活动的措施,他们主要参与的地方,他们主要参与的人,在一年中的三个时间点(基线测量的平均值)。8个月后测量对品种的感知。在基线后16个月测量身体活动。中介分析测试了多样性作为多样性支持和身体活动中介的感知。结果表明,通过对多样性的感知,各种活动和各种位置与身体活动间接相关。在青春期期间,在各种地点参加广泛的体育活动与对多样性的看法呈正相关,这与16个月后的身体活动有关。
    We examine whether adolescents\' participating in a variety of physical activities, locations, and/or with a variety of people relates to physical activity 16 months later and whether perceptions of variety mediate these relationships. Adolescents (N = 369) completed measures indicating various physical activities they participated in, where they primarily participated, and with whom they primarily participated, at three time points over a year (averaged for baseline measures). Perceptions of variety was measured 8 months later. Physical activity was measured 16 months after baseline. Mediation analyses tested perceptions of variety as a mediator of variety support and physical activity. Results indicated that variety of activities and variety of locations were indirectly associated with physical activity through perceptions of variety. Participating in a breadth of physical activities in a variety of locations during adolescence is positively associated with perceptions of variety, which relates to physical activity 16 months later.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:人们对开发可扩展的干预措施越来越感兴趣,包括基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT),以满足日益增长的精神卫生服务需求。鉴于全球多样性的增长,iCBT治疗抑郁症的临床试验必须包括不同的样本,至少,报告比赛信息,种族,或其样本的其他背景指标。不幸的是,该领域缺乏关于目前在iCBT文献中报道和代表多样性的数据.
    目标:因此,本系统综述的主要目的是研究已发表的iCBT治疗抑郁症的临床试验中有关种族和族裔身份的总体报告.我们还旨在审查特定种族和族裔少数族裔群体的代表性,并纳入替代背景指标,如移民身份或居住国。
    方法:如果是将iCBT与等待名单进行比较的随机对照试验,照常护理,主动控制,或另一个iCBT。纳入的论文还必须关注急性治疗(例如,4周至6个月)的抑郁症,通过互联网在网站或智能手机应用程序上交付,并使用有指导或无指导的自助。研究最初是从METAPSY数据库(n=59)中确定的,然后扩展到包括2022年之前的论文,论文从Embase检索,PubMed,PsycINFO,和Cochrane(n=3)。偏倚风险评估表明,由于使用自我报告结果测量,报告的研究至少有一些偏倚风险。
    结果:本研究总结了总共62项iCBT随机对照试验,代表17,210名参与者。在这62篇论文中,只有17(27%)的试验报告种族,只有12人(19%)报告了种族。美国以外的报道非常糟糕,在17项报告种族的研究中,美国占15项(88%),在12项报告种族的研究中,美国占9项(75%)。在系统评价中报告的3,623名参与者中,报告最多的种族类别是白人(n=2716,74.9%),其次是亚洲(n=209,5.8%)和黑人(n=274,7.6%)。此外,在美国以外进行的46篇论文中,只有25篇(54%)报道了其他背景人口统计数据.
    结论:重要的是要注意,在本研究中观察到的漏报并不一定表明在实际研究人群中存在漏报。然而,这些发现凸显了文献中发现的iCBT抑郁症试验中种族和民族的不良报道.这种缺乏多样性报告可能对这些干预措施的可扩展性产生重大影响。
    BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in developing scalable interventions, including internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), to meet the increasing demand for mental health services. Given the growth in diversity worldwide, it is essential that the clinical trials of iCBT for depression include diverse samples or, at least, report information on the race, ethnicity, or other background indicators of their samples. Unfortunately, the field lacks data on how well diversity is currently reported and represented in the iCBT literature.
    OBJECTIVE: Thus, the main objective of this systematic review was to examine the overall reporting of racial and ethnic identities in published clinical trials of iCBT for depression. We also aimed to review the representation of specific racial and ethnic minoritized groups and the inclusion of alternative background indicators such as migration status or country of residence.
    METHODS: Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials in which iCBT was compared to a waiting list, care-as-usual, active control, or another iCBT. The included papers also had to have a focus on acute treatment (eg, 4 weeks to 6 months) of depression, be delivered via the internet on a website or a smartphone app and use guided or unguided self-help. Studies were initially identified from the METAPSY database (n=59) and then extended to include papers up to 2022, with papers retrieved from Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (n=3). Risk of bias assessment suggested that reported studies had at least some risk of bias due to use of self-report outcome measures.
    RESULTS: A total of 62 iCBT randomized controlled trials representing 17,210 participants are summarized in this study. Out of those 62 papers, only 17 (27%) of the trials reported race, and only 12 (19%) reported ethnicity. Reporting outside of the United States was very poor, with the United States accounting for 15 (88%) out of 17 of studies that reported race and 9 (75%) out of 12 for ethnicity. Out of 3,623 participants whose race was reported in the systematic review, the racial category reported the most was White (n=2716, 74.9%), followed by Asian (n=209, 5.8%) and Black (n=274, 7.6%). Furthermore, only 25 (54%) out of the 46 papers conducted outside of the United States reported other background demographics.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is important to note that the underreporting observed in this study does not necessarily indicate an underrepresentation in the actual study population. However, these findings highlight the poor reporting of race and ethnicity in iCBT trials for depression found in the literature. This lack of diversity reporting may have significant implications for the scalability of these interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究提供了澳大利亚人对不同性别和性身份的最全面的国家患病率估计,以及与五种不同类型的儿童虐待及其重叠(多类型虐待)的关联。使用澳大利亚儿童虐待研究(ACMS)数据(N=8503),9.5%的参与者认同不同的性别,0.9%的参与者认同不同的性别。不同的身份在青年群体中更为普遍,在16-24岁的人群中,有17.7%的人认同不同的性别,2.3%的人认同不同的性别。性别和性多样性也相交——例如,女性(16-24岁和25-44岁)比男性更有可能被认定为双性恋。身体虐待的普遍性,性虐待,情感虐待,对于具有不同性和/或性别认同的人来说,忽视和接触家庭暴力的比例非常高。在具有不同性别身份的青年队列中,虐待最普遍(90.5%经历某种形式的儿童虐待;77%的多类型虐待)或不同的性行为(85.3%报告任何儿童虐待;64.3%的多类型虐待)。虐待儿童与不同的性行为和性别认同之间的紧密联系对于理解这些群体的社会和心理健康脆弱性至关重要。并通知支持他们所需的服务。
    This study presents the most comprehensive national prevalence estimates of diverse gender and sexuality identities in Australians, and the associations with five separate types of child maltreatment and their overlap (multi-type maltreatment). Using Australian Child Maltreatment Study (ACMS) data (N = 8503), 9.5% of participants identified with a diverse sexuality and .9% with a diverse gender. Diverse identities were more prevalent in the youth cohort, with 17.7% of 16-24 years olds identifying with a diverse sexuality and 2.3% with a diverse gender. Gender and sexuality diversity also intersect - for example, with women (aged 16-24 and 25-44) more likely than men to identify as bisexual. The prevalence of physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect and exposure to domestic violence was very high for those with diverse sexuality and/or gender identities. Maltreatment was most prevalent for participants in the youth cohort with diverse gender identities (90.5% experiencing some form of child maltreatment; 77% multi-type maltreatment) or diverse sexualities (85.3% reporting any child maltreatment; 64.3% multi-type maltreatment). The strong association found between child maltreatment and diverse sexuality and gender identities is critical for understanding the social and mental health vulnerabilities of these groups, and informing services needed to support them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要来自不同人群的数据来告知孕产妇健康公平的干预措施。然而,产后个体的研究招募具有挑战性,特别是在少数族裔和结构边缘化的人群中。
    方法:我们制定了一项招募策略,对新英格兰城市安全网医院的产后个体进行横断面调查,包括那些有语言偏好而不是英语(LPOE)和那些没有参加计划产后访问的人。招聘主要是以前进行的,during,在产科或儿科就诊后。调查可以亲自完成,在电话里,或在线。所有学习材料均为三语(英语,西班牙语,海地克里奥尔语)。在达到我们120人的招聘目标后,我们分析了我们的招聘工作,以确定关键的招聘策略。
    结果:从2022年4月至6月,邀请了245人参加,120人(49%)完成调查,其中119人为本分析提供了招聘数据。大多数参与者(83.1%)自我认定为黑人或西班牙裔,30.2%有LPOE。与整体样本相比,有LPOE的参与者更有可能是亲自招募的(73%对78%),而那些没有参加产后访视的人需要更多的外展尝试(平均2.3对2.6).我们确定了有助于招聘成功的4个关键战略:多语言材料,频繁评估和调整我们的招聘方式,儿科招聘,以及多种时间安排和外展模式。
    结论:使用多阶段,多语言,和多方法招聘策略,包括以儿科为基础的外展,我们招募了不同的产后样本,其中>80%的人有颜色,>30%的人有LPOE。我们的经验可以为更具包容性的产后研究提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: Data from diverse populations are needed to inform interventions for maternal health equity. However, research recruitment of postpartum individuals is challenging, especially in minoritized and structurally marginalized populations.
    METHODS: We developed a recruitment strategy for a cross-sectional survey among postpartum individuals at an urban safety-net hospital in New England, inclusive of those with a language preference other than English (LPOE) and those not attending scheduled postpartum visits. Recruitment was primarily conducted before, during, and after clinic visits in obstetrics or pediatrics. Surveys could be completed in-person, over the phone, or online. All study materials were trilingual (English, Spanish, Haitian Creole). After reaching our recruitment goal of 120 individuals, we analyzed our recruitment efforts to identify key recruitment strategies.
    RESULTS: From April to June 2022, 245 individuals were invited to participate, and 120 (49%) completed the survey, of whom 119 contributed recruitment data to the present analysis. Most participants (83.1%) self-identified as Black or Hispanic, and 30.2% had an LPOE. Compared with the overall sample, participants with an LPOE were more likely to have been recruited in-person (73% versus 78%), while those not attending postpartum visits required more outreach attempts (mean 2.3 versus 2.6). We identified 4 key strategies contributing to recruitment success: multilingual materials, frequent assessment and adjustment of our recruitment approach, pediatrics-based recruitment, and multiple timings and modes of outreach.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using a multi-stage, multilingual, and multi-method recruitment strategy including pediatrics-based outreach, we recruited a diverse postpartum sample with > 80% individuals of color and > 30% with an LPOE. Our experience can inform more inclusive postpartum research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    美国先前的基于人群的研究发现特应性皮炎(AD)严重程度和治疗模式的种族/族裔差异。目前尚不清楚这些差异是来自疾病特征的差异还是差异。在AD患者的不同门诊患者队列中检查严重程度和治疗模式的种族/种族差异(n=833)。报告最高的体表面积没有显著关联(BSA;Fisher精确检验,P=0.19和P=0.44)或医生对种族或民族的全球评估(PGA;P=0.63和P=0.57);种族/民族与性别或年龄的相互作用也不能作为BSA或PGA的预测因子。亚洲和多种族/其他患者比白人或黑人患者更有可能使用局部钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(卡方,P=0.01)。Dupilumab的使用因种族而异(多种族/其他=35.0%;白人=20.1%;亚洲=15.7%;黑人=13.6%;卡方,P=0.03),但不是种族(P=0.88)。口服皮质类固醇的使用(卡方,P=0.74),免疫抑制剂(P=0.98)或GABAergics(P=0.16)或NBUVB(P=0.42)在种族之间没有差异.没有种族/民族与性别或年龄的相互作用作为治疗使用的预测因素。在种族/族裔群体中观察到类似的治疗模式。不过,局部钙调磷酸酶抑制剂更常用于亚洲和多种族/其他患者;dupilumab更常用于多种族/其他患者.
    Previous population-based studies in the United States found racial/ethnic differences of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and treatment patterns. It is unclear whether these differences are from differences of disease characteristics or disparities. To examine racial/ethnic differences in severity and treatment patterns in a diverse outpatient patient cohort of AD patients (n = 833). There were no significant associations of highest-reported body surface area (BSA; Fisher\'s exact test, P = 0.19 and P = 0.44) or physician\'s global assessment (PGA; P = 0.63 and P = 0.57) with race or ethnicity; nor interactions of race/ethnicity with gender or age as predictors of BSA or PGA. Asian and multiracial/other patients were more likely than White or Black patients to use topical calcineurin inhibitors (Chi-square, P = 0.01). Dupilumab use differed by race (Multiracial/other = 35.0%; White = 20.1%; Asian = 15.7%; Black = 13.6%; Chi-square, P = 0.03), but not ethnicity (P = 0.88). Use of oral corticosteroids (Chi-square, P = 0.74), immunosuppressants (P = 0.98) or GABAergics (P = 0.16) or NBUVB (P = 0.42) did not differ by race. There were no interactions of race/ethnicity with gender or age as predictors of treatment use. Similar treatment patterns were observed across racial/ethnic groups. Though, topical calcineurin inhibitors were more commonly used in Asian and multiracial/other patients; dupilumab use was more common in multiracial/other patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于视频的远程医疗(仅与音频相比)在各种情况下使用的频率较低,低社会经济地位设置。很少有先前的研究评估远程医疗模式的影响(即,视频与仅音频访问)在临床质量指标上。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估远程医疗的接受和访问方式(面对面与视频和电话访问)对各种初级保健质量指标的影响。通过实施科学透镜实现低社会经济地位设置。
    方法:由RE-AIM通知(到达,有效性,收养,实施,和维护)框架,我们评估了远程医疗的吸收,按就诊方式评估有针对性的初级保健质量指标,并描述了关于远程医疗实施的障碍和促进者的提供者级定性反馈。
    结果:我们发现质量度量稍好(即,血压和抑郁症筛查)用于当面护理与视频和电话访问;在我们的人群中,远程医疗在2年内被取消。
    结论:随着COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗的广泛实施,访问方式对质量结果的影响,提供者和患者偏好,以及历史上边缘化环境中的技术壁垒应该被考虑。
    Video-based telemedicine (vs audio only) is less frequently used in diverse, low socioeconomic status settings. Few prior studies have evaluated the impact of telemedicine modality (ie, video vs audio-only visits) on clinical quality metrics.
    The aim of this study was to assess telemedicine uptake and impact of visit modality (in-person vs video and phone visits) on primary care quality metrics in diverse, low socioeconomic status settings through an implementation science lens.
    Informed by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework, we evaluated telemedicine uptake, assessed targeted primary care quality metrics by visit modality, and described provider-level qualitative feedback on barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation.
    We found marginally better quality metrics (ie, blood pressure and depression screening) for in-person care versus video and phone visits; de-adoption of telemedicine was marked within 2 years in our population.
    Following the widespread implementation of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of visit modality on quality outcomes, provider and patient preferences, as well as technological barriers in historically marginalized settings should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号