BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified genetic variants associated with human disease. Various statistical approaches based on penalized and machine learning methods have recently been proposed for disease prediction. In this study, we evaluated the performance of several such methods for predicting asthma using the Korean Chip (KORV1.1) from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES).
RESULTS: First, single-nucleotide polymorphisms were selected via single-variant tests using logistic regression with the adjustment of several epidemiological factors. Next, we evaluated the following methods for disease prediction: ridge, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, elastic net, smoothly clipped absolute deviation, support vector machine, random forest, boosting, bagging, naïve Bayes, and k-nearest neighbor. Finally, we compared their predictive performance based on the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves, precision, recall, F1-score, Cohen\'s Kappa, balanced accuracy, error rate, Matthews correlation coefficient, and area under the precision-recall curve. Additionally, three oversampling algorithms are used to deal with imbalance problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that penalized methods exhibit better predictive performance for asthma than that achieved via machine learning methods. On the other hand, in the oversampling study, randomforest and boosting methods overall showed better prediction performance than penalized methods.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a latent, insidious autoimmune disease, and with the development of gene sequencing in recent years, our study aims to develop a gene-based predictive model to explore the identification of SLE at the genetic level. First, gene expression datasets of SLE whole blood samples were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. After the datasets were merged, they were divided into training and validation datasets in the ratio of 7:3, where the SLE samples and healthy samples of the training dataset were 334 and 71, respectively, and the SLE samples and healthy samples of the validation dataset were 143 and 30, respectively. The training dataset was used to build the disease risk prediction model, and the validation dataset was used to verify the model identification ability. We first analyzed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and then used Lasso and random forest (RF) to screen out six key genes (OAS3, USP18, RTP4, SPATS2L, IFI27 and OAS1), which are essential to distinguish SLE from healthy samples. With six key genes incorporated and five iterations of 10-fold cross-validation performed into the RF model, we finally determined the RF model with optimal mtry. The mean values of area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy of the models were over 0.95. The validation dataset was then used to evaluate the AUC performance and our model had an AUC of 0.948. An external validation dataset (GSE99967) with an AUC of 0.810, an accuracy of 0.836, and a sensitivity of 0.921 was used to assess the model\'s performance. The external validation dataset (GSE185047) of all SLE patients yielded an SLE sensitivity of up to 0.954. The final high-throughput RF model had a mean value of AUC over 0.9, again showing good results. In conclusion, we identified key genetic biomarkers and successfully developed a novel disease risk prediction model for SLE that can be used as a new SLE disease risk prediction aid and contribute to the identification of SLE.

In this paper, we propose feature extraction method for prediction model for at the early stage of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression. DKD needs continuous treatment; however, a hospital visit interval of a patient at the early stage of DKD is normally from one month to three months, and this is not a short time period. Therefore it makes difficult to apply sophisticated approaches such as using convolutional neural networks because of the data limitation. The propose method uses with hierarchical clustering that can estimate a suitable interval for grouping inputted sequences. We evaluate the proposed method with a real-EMR dataset that consists of 30,810 patient records and conclude that the proposed method outperforms the baseline methods derived from related work.