METHODS: A technical note and retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: Highly upward-migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is challenging due to its problematic access and incomplete removal. The most used interlaminar approach may cause extensive bony destruction. We developed a novel translaminar approach using the unilateral portal endoscopic (UBE) technique, emphasizing effective neural decompression, and preserving the facet joint\'s integrity.
METHODS: This retrospective study included six patients receiving UBE translaminar discectomy for highly upward-migrated LDHs from May 2019 to June 2021. The migrated disc was removed through a small keyhole on the lamina of the cranial vertebra. The treatment results were evaluated by operation time, hospital stays, complications, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and modified MacNab criteria.
RESULTS: The mean pre-operative VAS for back pain (5.0 ± 4.9), VAS for leg pain (9.2 ± 1.0), JOA score (10.7 ± 6.6), and ODI (75.7 ± 25.3) were significantly improved to 0.3 ± 0.5, 1.2 ± 1.5, 27.3 ± 1.8, 5.0 ± 11.3 respectively at the final follow-up. Five patients had excellent, and one patient had good outcomes according to the Modified MacNab criteria. The hospital stay was 2.7 ± 0.5 days. No complication was recorded. The MRI follow-up showed complete disc removal, except for one patient with an asymptomatic residual disc.
CONCLUSIONS: UBE translaminar discectomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for highly upward-migrated LDH with satisfactory treatment outcomes and nearly 100% facet joint preservation.

To compare the clinical efficacy of interlaminar endoscopic surgical system delta (iLESSYS-Delta) discectomy with that of classical fenestration discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation. Patients who underwent iLESSYS-Delta or fenestration discectomy were enrolled in this study. Baseline information and clinical indicators were collected. The baseline data were matched using propensity score matching. Fifty-two patients were in each group. In the iLESSYS-Delta cohort, the volume of intraoperative bleeding was 18.17 ± 4.20 ml, the length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.16 ± 2.29 days, and the length of postoperative off-bed activity was 1.58 ± 0.88 days. In contrast, in the fenestration group, the volume of intraoperative bleeding was 32.50 ± 17.13 ml, the length of postoperative hospital stay was 6.66 ± 2.44 days, and the length of postoperative off-bed activity was 3.18 ± 1.28 days. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The operation time was 88.90 ± 19.14 min in the iLESSYS-Delta group and 67.63 ± 19.32 min in the fenestration group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Regarding the pain visual analogue scale scores at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery, patients in the iLESSYS-Delta group had less pain than did those in the fenestration group (P < 0.05). The Oswestry disability indices of postoperative patients in both groups significantly improved at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05); however, there was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative ODI scores between the two surgery groups (P > 0.05). The two groups showed no significant differences in clinical effects, postoperative recurrence rates, or perioperative complications. iLESSYS-Delta can cause less intraoperative bleeding and faster recovery than fenestration discectomy.

The authors report their experience with twenty-one consecutive patients who presented with symptoms and imaging characteristics of a herniated lumbar disc; of whom, at the time of surgery had a vascular loop instead. The procedure was performed on 14 women and seven men with a mean age of 39 years. Clinical complaints included lumbar aching with one limb overt radiculopathy in all patients; with additional sphincter dysfunction in two cases. Symptoms had developed within a mean period of three months. In all patients, the disc was exposed through an L5-S1 (n = 10); L4-L5 (n = 5) and L3-L4 (n = 6) open minimal laminotomy. In 16 patients, rather than a herniated disc they had a lumbar epidural varix, while an arterio-venous fistula was found in the remaining five cases. In all cases, the vascular disorder was resected and its subjacent disc was left intact. One patient had a postoperative blood transfusion. While the radiculopathy dysfunction improved in all patients, four patients reported lasting lumbar pain following surgery. The postoperative imaging confirmed the resolution of the vascular anomaly and an intact disc. The mean length of the follow-up period was 47 months. Either epidural varix or arterio-venous fistula in the lumbar area may mimic a herniated disc on imaging studies. With the usual technique they can be operated safely. Resection of the anomaly can be sufficient for alleviating radiculopathy symptoms.

BACKGROUND: This study focused on identifying factors influencing recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) by analyzing demographic data, body mass index (BMI), and radiologic disc properties in patients undergoing single-level unilateral lumbar disc herniation surgery.
METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included 2 groups from our clinic: Group 1 (n = 41) with patients experiencing RLDH requiring a second surgery, and Group 2 (n = 73) with patients having a single surgery and no recurrence over at least a 5-year follow-up. We assessed age, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), BMI, Pfirrmann disc degeneration type, herniation types (protrusion, extrusion, and sequestration), and surgical level.
RESULTS: The mean ages of Groups 1 and 2 were 48.93 ± 13.47 and 44.4 ± 11.79 years, respectively, with no significant age difference (P = 0.064). Gender distribution was also not significantly different, with 63.41% males in Group 1 and 56.16% in Group 2 (P = 0.450). DM prevalence was similar in both groups (P = 0.727). Notably, HT was significantly lower in Group 2 (P = 0.018). The average BMI was comparable between groups (P = 0.607), and no significant difference in Pfirrmann disc degeneration scores was observed (P = 0.547). Radiologic disc type distributions did not significantly differ (P = 0.448). Most surgeries in both groups were at the L4-5 level, with no significant differences in surgical levels (P = 0.456).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that factors like gender, age, DM, obesity, surgical level, disc degeneration, and disc types do not significantly impact RLDH. However, the higher occurrence of HT in recurrent cases indicates a potential area for further research.

UNASSIGNED: Intradiscal gas is frequently observed in older patients with disc degeneration and can occasionally result in nerve root compression.
UNASSIGNED: A 79-year-old male patient presented with increasing left lower extremity sciatica. Lumbar computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images revealed a left paramedian L5-S1 gas-containing disc herniation. Utilizing an interlaminar approach, a full-endoscopic discectomy (FED) was performed at L5-S1. During disc removal, we countered intradiscal gas bubbles. Postoperatively, the patient\'s symptoms/signs fully resolved, and follow-up MR and CT images revealed total resection of the disc herniation, and no further gas.
UNASSIGNED: Through an interlaminar FED, we effectively removed an L5-S1 MR/CT-documented gas-containing disc herniation.

Corroborative evidence for discectomy in pediatric or adolescent patients remains scarce, with this single-arm meta-analysis investigating discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) within this population. PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies reported pediatric patients under 21 years of age with a diagnosis of LDH that was treated surgically with discectomy. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023463358). Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria (n=1182). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain at baseline were 5.34 (95% CI: 4.48, 6.20, I2=98.9%). Postoperative VAS back pain scores after 12 months were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.19, I2=95.6%). VAS scores for leg pain at baseline were 7.03 (95% CI: 6.63, 7.43, I2=93.5%). Postoperative VAS leg pain scores after 12 months were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.36, I2=97.0%). Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at baseline were 55.46 (95% CI: 43.69, 67.24, I2=99.9%). Postoperative ODI scores after 12 months were 7.82 (95% CI: 4.95, 10.69, I2=99.4%). VAS back, VAS leg and ODI scores demonstrated a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at all postoperative points. Perioperative outcomes demonstrated operative time as 85.71 mins (95% CI: 73.96, 97.46, I2=99.4%) and hospital length of stay as 3.81 days (95% CI: 3.20, 4.41, I2=98.5%). The postoperative reoperation rate at the same level was 0.01 (95% CI: <0.00, 0.02, I2=0%). Discectomy appears safe and effective in pediatric and adolescent patients suffering from LDH. The findings here provide groundwork for future randomized control trials against conservative measures to elaborate on optimal management and elucidate long-term outcomes.

METHODS: Biomechanical testings and finite element analysis.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate how annulus fibrosus (AF) incision size (RIS, Ratio of incision width to AF height) and shape affect intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics.
METHODS: A validated finite element model of lumbar spines simulated various incisions in the middle-right posterior region of the AF, with different sizes and shapes. Simulations included axial compression, flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Parameters assessed included stability, re-herniation, and IVD degeneration by analyzing stress, height, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the range of motion (ROM).
RESULTS: Incision increased AF stress and ROM under 3 Nm moment, with values rising as RIS increased. RIS exceeding 40% resulted in a 20% AF stress increase during compression and extension, while RIS over 50% led to over 20% AF stress increase during other motions. Incision stress also increased with higher RIS, particularly surpassing 50% RIS. IDP rose across all incision shapes. Endplate stress increased (9.9%-48.9%) with larger incisions, with average increases of 12.8%, 12.7%, 30.5%, and 22.8% for circular, oval, square, and rectangular incisions. Compression and rotation minimally affected NP pressure (<15%), while flexion (19.8%-38.8%) and bending (18.5%-43.9%) had a more pronounced effect. ROM increased with RIS (20.0% ∼ 77.4%), especially with an incision RIS exceeding 40%.
CONCLUSIONS: AF injury elevates AF stress, reduces spine stability, heightens degeneration risk with increasing RIS. Reherniation risk rises when RIS exceeds 40%. Circular or oval incisions maintain spine biomechanics better than square or rectangular ones.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylosis (CS), including myelopathy and radiculopathy, is the most common degenerative cervical spine disease. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) compared to those of conventional anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for treating unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial was conducted. The sample consisted of 131 patients who underwent UBE or ACDF was conducted between September 2021 and September 2022. Patients with cervical nerve roots or coexisting spinal cord compression symptoms and imaging-defined unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs were randomized into two groups: a UBE group (n = 63) and an ACDF group (n = 68). The operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay after surgery, and perioperative complications were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, and recovery rate (RR) of the mJOA were utilized to evaluate clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: The hospital stay after surgery was significantly shorter in patients treated with UBE than in those treated with ACDF (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the neck or arm VAS score, NDI score, mJOA score, or mean RR of the mJOA between the two groups (p < 0.05). Only mild complications were observed in both groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.30).
CONCLUSIONS: UBE can significantly relieve pain and disability without severe complications, and most patients are satisfied with this technique. Consequently, this procedure can be used safely and effectively as an alternative to ACDF for treating unilateral cervical radiculopathy or coexisting cervical myelopathy induced by unilateral cervical herniated discs.
BACKGROUND: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 02/08/2023 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn , #ChiCTR2300074273).

UNASSIGNED: Discectomy is the most common surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) disease. However, 5%-24% of patients undergo a second surgery due to recurrent disc herniation.
UNASSIGNED: This study was aimed to identify the risk factors for reoperation after discectomy of lumbar HIVD and recommend treatment for patients with a high risk of reoperation. We recruited patients diagnosed as having single-level lumbar HIVD who underwent open discectomy from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2012 in our hospital. We used a survival curve to inspect the survival time and reoperation rate after surgery. We discussed the correlation of reoperation rate with discectomy level, body mass index, heavy lifting after surgery, sex, and age. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between the experience of a surgeon and the reoperation rate.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 619 patients were enrolled in our study. Most patients were 40-60 years old (48.8%), and most of them had herniation at L4/5 level (48.9%). The 8-year survival rate was 92%. Weight lifting after surgery may increase the reoperation rate by 115 and 18 times for those >60 years and <40 years, respectively. In addition, less experience of the surgeon and female sex had a high reoperation rate.
UNASSIGNED: Postoperative working modification may be very important for preventing patients from recurrent HIVD. For elderly people with HIVD, a more conservative therapy could be selected. If patients with lumbar spine hypermobility or severe degeneration require wide laminectomy, primary fusion should be considered.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate long-term outcomes after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy.
METHODS: Included patients (n = 64) had undergone discectomy during 1989-1998 at Umeå University Hospital. A questionnaire was used to evaluate pre- and postoperative symptoms, postoperative complications, general pain, and subjective opinion about the outcome of the surgery.
RESULTS: The results are based on responses from 47 patients (40 women/7 men), including 36 (30 women/6 men) who completed the questionnaire and 11 (10 women/1 man) who were contacted by telephone and answered selected questions. Seventeen patients were excluded because of death, a move abroad, declining to participate, or no available patient information. Among the respondents, 41 (87%) were satisfied with the results, five (11%) were unsatisfied, and one (2%) patient did not answer the question. The results showed a significant long-term improvement in locking, clicking/crepitation, and pain when chewing or opening the jaw (p = 0.001). The prevalence of headaches had decreased significantly at follow-up (p = 0.001). Reported impaired jaw-opening capacity showed no significant improvement (p = 0.08). Of the 47 respondents, 19 (40%) had asked for additional treatment after the discectomy, and six of the 19 patients (13%) had undergone more surgery of the joint.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective long-term follow-up study indicate that TMJ discectomy has a high success rate, as most patients were satisfied with the postoperative results. Discectomy is thus an effective surgical intervention for patients with disabling TMJ pain and dysfunction when conservative interventions have been unsuccessful.