Differentially methylated regions

差异甲基化区域
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:耳鸣,没有任何外部声源的声音感知,是一个普遍的听力健康问题。越来越多的证据表明,遗传的融合,环境,生活方式因素可影响耳鸣的发病机制。我们假设DNA甲基化的改变,发生在胞嘧啶-磷酸-鸟嘌呤(CpG)二核苷酸位点的胞嘧啶处的表观遗传修饰,S-腺苷甲硫氨酸的甲基被转移到胞嘧啶的第五个碳原子上,可能会导致耳鸣。DNA甲基化模式是组织特异性的,但是与耳鸣有关的组织在人类中不容易接近。这项初步研究使用唾液作为替代组织来鉴定与耳鸣相关的差异甲基化CpG区(DMRs)。这项研究是针对报告双侧持续慢性耳鸣的健康年轻人进行的,以限制与年龄相关的混杂因素和与健康相关的合并症的影响。
    方法:本研究评估了来自24名健康年轻成年人的唾液DNA样本的全基因组甲基化水平,这些成年人患有双侧持续慢性耳鸣(>1岁)和24岁,性别,和没有耳鸣的种族匹配的对照。使用Infinium人甲基化EPICBeadChip评估了>850,000个CpG位点的全基因组DNA甲基化。关联分析使用Bumphunter算法对23例和20例符合质量控制标准的对照进行分析。甲基化水平表示为DMRs内CpG位点的曲线下面积。使用0.05的FDR调整的P值阈值来鉴定与耳鸣相关的统计学显著的DMRs。
    结果:我们获得了25个与耳鸣相关的差异甲基化区域(DMRs)。与耳鸣相关的高甲基化DMRs内或附近的基因包括LCLAT1,RUNX1,RUFY1,NUDT12,TTC23,SLC43A2,C4orf27(STPG2),EFCAB4B与耳鸣相关的低甲基化DMRs内或附近的基因包括HLA-DPB2,PM20D1,TMEM18,SNTG2,MUC4,MIR886,MIR596,TXNRD1,EID3,SDHAP3,HLA-DPB2,LASS3(CERS3),C10orf11(LRMDA),HLA-DQB1,NADK,SZRD1,MFAP2,NUP210L,TPM3、INTS9和SLC2A14。遗传变异的负担可以解释涉及HLA-DPB2,HLA-DQB1和MUC4的DMRs的甲基化水平的差异,表明在大型独立队列中需要复制。
    结论:与有关耳鸣的合并症的文献一致,我们确定了与听觉功能有关的DMRs内或附近的基因,化学依赖性,心血管疾病,精神病,免疫疾病,和代谢综合征。这些结果表明,表观遗传机制可能影响耳鸣,唾液可以很好地替代人类耳鸣的表观遗传基础。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来鉴定表观遗传生物标志物并研究它们对耳鸣表型表达的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus, the perception of sound without any external sound source, is a prevalent hearing health concern. Mounting evidence suggests that a confluence of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors can influence the pathogenesis of tinnitus. We hypothesized that alteration in DNA methylation, an epigenetic modification that occurs at cytosines of cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) dinucleotide sites, where a methyl group from S-adenyl methionine gets transferred to the fifth carbon of the cytosine, could contribute to tinnitus. DNA methylation patterns are tissue-specific, but the tissues involved in tinnitus are not easily accessible in humans. This pilot study used saliva as a surrogate tissue to identify differentially methylated CpG regions (DMRs) associated with tinnitus. The study was conducted on healthy young adults reporting bilateral continuous chronic tinnitus to limit the influence of age-related confounding factors and health-related comorbidities.
    METHODS: The present study evaluated the genome-wide methylation levels from saliva-derived DNA samples from 24 healthy young adults with bilateral continuous chronic tinnitus (> 1 year) and 24 age, sex, and ethnicity-matched controls with no tinnitus. Genome-wide DNA methylation was evaluated for > 850,000 CpG sites using the Infinium Human Methylation EPIC BeadChip. The association analysis used the Bumphunter algorithm on 23 cases and 20 controls meeting the quality control standards. The methylation level was expressed as the area under the curve of CpG sites within DMRs.The FDR-adjusted p-value threshold of 0.05 was used to identify statistically significant DMRs associated with tinnitus.
    RESULTS: We obtained 25 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with tinnitus. Genes within or in the proximity of the hypermethylated DMRs related to tinnitus included LCLAT1, RUNX1, RUFY1, NUDT12, TTC23, SLC43A2, C4orf27 (STPG2), and EFCAB4B. Genes within or in the proximity of hypomethylated DMRs associated with tinnitus included HLA-DPB2, PM20D1, TMEM18, SNTG2, MUC4, MIR886, MIR596, TXNRD1, EID3, SDHAP3, HLA-DPB2, LASS3 (CERS3), C10orf11 (LRMDA), HLA-DQB1, NADK, SZRD1, MFAP2, NUP210L, TPM3, INTS9, and SLC2A14. The burden of genetic variation could explain the differences in the methylation levels for DMRs involving HLA-DPB2, HLA-DQB1, and MUC4, indicating the need for replication in large independent cohorts.
    CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the literature on comorbidities associated with tinnitus, we identified genes within or close to DMRs involved in auditory functions, chemical dependency, cardiovascular diseases, psychiatric conditions, immune disorders, and metabolic syndromes. These results indicate that epigenetic mechanisms could influence tinnitus, and saliva can be a good surrogate for identifying the epigenetic underpinnings of tinnitus in humans. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to identify epigenetic biomarkers and investigate their influence on the phenotypic expression of tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    山霉疫霉是一种新兴的卵菌病原体,在包括大豆在内的许多农业物种中引起根腐病。然而,截至目前,在大豆中只发现了一个潜在的抗性基因,我们对大豆中的遗传和表观遗传调控如何有助于对抗这种病原体的理解在很大程度上仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们对两个大豆品系进行了全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序(WGBS),Colfax(抗性)和Williams82(易感)在两个时间点(接种后4和16小时)响应于桑索巴氏疟原虫,以比较它们的甲基化变化。我们的研究结果表明,全基因组CG没有显著变化,CHG(H=A,T,或C),和CHH甲基化。然而,我们观察到局部甲基化变化,特别是在接种后基因和转座因子(TEs)周围的CHH甲基化增加,在易感品系中发生得更早,在抗性品系中发生得更晚。接种后,我们在Colfax和Williams82中确定了差异甲基化区域(DMRs),其中主要存在于TE中.值得注意的是,我们的数据还表明,与耐药品系相比,在易感品系中,更多的TEs显示其甲基化组的变化.此外,我们在Colfax的772个差异表达基因(DEGs)内或侧翼发现837个DMRs,在Williams82的138个DEGs内或侧翼发现166个DMRs.这些DEG有不同的功能,Colfax主要表现出参与代谢过程,防御反应,植物和病原体的相互作用,阴离子和核苷酸结合,和催化活性,而威廉姆斯82表现出与光合作用的显着关联。这些发现表明,在抗性和易感大豆品系中,对山松假单胞菌感染的分子反应不同。
    Phytophthora sansomeana is an emerging oomycete pathogen causing root rot in many agricultural species including soybean. However, as of now, only one potential resistance gene has been identified in soybean, and our understanding of how genetic and epigenetic regulation in soybean contributes to responses against this pathogen remains largely unknown. In this study, we performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) on two soybean lines, Colfax (resistant) and Williams 82 (susceptible) in response to P. sansomeana at two time points: 4 and 16 hours post inoculation to compare their methylation changes. Our findings revealed that there were no significant changes in genome-wide CG, CHG (H = A, T, or C), and CHH methylation. However, we observed local methylation changes, specially an increase in CHH methylation around genes and transposable elements (TEs) after inoculation, which occurred earlier in the susceptible line and later in the resistant line. After inoculation, we identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in both Colfax and Williams 82, with a predominant presence in TEs. Notably, our data also indicated that more TEs exhibited changes in their methylomes in the susceptible line compared to the resistant line. Furthermore, we discovered 837 DMRs within or flanking 772 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Colfax and 166 DMRs within or flanking 138 DEGs in Williams 82. These DEGs had diverse functions, with Colfax primarily showing involvement in metabolic process, defense response, plant and pathogen interaction, anion and nucleotide binding, and catalytic activity, while Williams 82 exhibited a significant association with photosynthesis. These findings suggest distinct molecular responses to P. sansomeana infection in the resistant and susceptible soybean lines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:印记障碍是由印记基因表达改变引起的罕见疾病,表现出通过差异DNA甲基化调节的亲本起源特异性表达模式。印迹障碍患者的一个亚组在多个印迹基因座处具有DNA甲基化变化,一种被称为多基因座印记干扰(MLID)的条件。MLID在大多数但不是所有的印记障碍中被识别,并且在具有非典型临床特征的个体中也被发现;MLID的存在经常改变受影响的人的管理或预后。一些MLID病例是由反式作用遗传变异引起的,通常不是在病人身上,而是在他们的母亲身上,具有咨询意义。目前对MLID的定义没有共识,临床适应症提示测试,表观遗传和遗传诊断的分子程序和方法,实验室报告的建议,咨询的考虑,以及对预后和管理的影响。因此,这项研究的目的是涵盖这一尚未满足的需求。
    方法:进行了全面的文献检索,鉴定了100多篇文章,这些文章构成了两个工作组的讨论基础,重点是临床诊断(n=12名成员)和分子检测(n=19名成员)。经过八个月的准备和定期的在线讨论,来自11个国家的专家汇编了初步文件,并确定了在面对面会议上需要解决的问题,专家们和四名患者倡导组织的代表出席了会议。
    结果:根据现有证据和专家共识,我们制定了16项建议和8项建议,作为MLID临床和分子诊断的中期指导.
    结论:MLID是一种分子名称,对于MLID和非典型表型的患者,我们提出了替代术语多位点印记综合征。由于MLID的内在可变性,该指南强调了让各个领域的专家参与以确保自信的诊断方法的重要性,咨询,和关心。作者倡导全球,在基础研究和转化研究方面的合作努力,以解决目前缺乏答案的许多关键问题,并建议在未来3-5年内重新召开会议,以评估研究进展,并根据需要更新本指南。
    BACKGROUND: Imprinting disorders are rare diseases resulting from altered expression of imprinted genes, which exhibit parent-of-origin-specific expression patterns regulated through differential DNA methylation. A subgroup of patients with imprinting disorders have DNA methylation changes at multiple imprinted loci, a condition referred to as multi-locus imprinting disturbance (MLID). MLID is recognised in most but not all imprinting disorders and is also found in individuals with atypical clinical features; the presence of MLID often alters the management or prognosis of the affected person. Some cases of MLID are caused by trans-acting genetic variants, frequently not in the patients but their mothers, which have counselling implications. There is currently no consensus on the definition of MLID, clinical indications prompting testing, molecular procedures and methods for epigenetic and genetic diagnosis, recommendations for laboratory reporting, considerations for counselling, and implications for prognosis and management. The purpose of this study is thus to cover this unmet need.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted resulting in identification of more than 100 articles which formed the basis of discussions by two working groups focusing on clinical diagnosis (n = 12 members) and molecular testing (n = 19 members). Following eight months of preparations and regular online discussions, the experts from 11 countries compiled the preliminary documentation and determined the questions to be addressed during a face-to-face meeting which was held with the attendance of the experts together with four representatives of patient advocacy organisations.
    RESULTS: In light of available evidence and expert consensus, we formulated 16 propositions and 8 recommendations as interim guidance for the clinical and molecular diagnosis of MLID.
    CONCLUSIONS: MLID is a molecular designation, and for patients with MLID and atypical phenotypes, we propose the alternative term multi-locus imprinting syndrome. Due to the intrinsic variability of MLID, the guidelines underscore the importance of involving experts from various fields to ensure a confident approach to diagnosis, counselling, and care. The authors advocate for global, collaborative efforts in both basic and translational research to tackle numerous crucial questions that currently lack answers, and suggest reconvening within the next 3-5 years to evaluate the research advancements and update this guidance as needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖,以多余脂肪的积累为特征,是遗传因素和表观遗传因素共同作用而产生的复杂状况。最近的研究已经发现DNA甲基化和细胞分化之间的对应关系,表明前者在细胞命运决定中的作用。关于前脂肪细胞分化的基础缺乏全面的理解,特别是当细胞经历终末分化(TD)时。为了深入了解动态全基因组甲基化,3T3L1前脂肪细胞通过激素混合物分化。从未分化细胞中分离基因组DNA,分化后2天细胞,和15天的TD细胞。我们采用全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序(WGBS)来确定前脂肪细胞分化时单碱基分辨率的全局基因组DNA甲基化改变。DNA甲基化的全基因组分布在前,post-,和终末分化的脂肪细胞,根据WGBS分析。分化开始后4小时DNA甲基化减少,随着细胞接近TD,甲基化获得。研究揭示了与脂肪生成相关的新型差异甲基化区域(DMRs)。DMR分析表明,尽管DNA甲基化是全球性的,在被称为“热点”的特定地点观察到明显的变化。“热点是富含转录因子(TF)结合位点的基因组区域,并表现出甲基化依赖性TF结合。随后的分析表明热点是DMRs的一部分。分化脂肪细胞的关键成脂基因的基因表达谱取决于环境,因为我们发现启动子DNA甲基化与基因表达之间存在正反关系。
    Obesity, characterized by the accumulation of excess fat, is a complex condition resulting from the combination of genetic and epigenetic factors. Recent studies have found correspondence between DNA methylation and cell differentiation, suggesting a role of the former in cell fate determination. There is a lack of comprehensive understanding concerning the underpinnings of preadipocyte differentiation, specifically when cells are undergoing terminal differentiation (TD). To gain insight into dynamic genome-wide methylation, 3T3 L1 preadipocyte cells were differentiated by a hormone cocktail. The genomic DNA was isolated from undifferentiated cells and 4 hours, 2 days postdifferentiated cells, and 15 days TD cells. We employed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) to ascertain global genomic DNA methylation alterations at single base resolution as preadipocyte cells differentiate. The genome-wide distribution of DNA methylation showed similar overall patterns in pre-, post-, and terminally differentiated adipocytes, according to WGBS analysis. DNA methylation decreases at 4 hours after differentiation initiation, followed by methylation gain as cells approach TD. Studies revealed novel differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with adipogenesis. DMR analysis suggested that though DNA methylation is global, noticeable changes are observed at specific sites known as \"hotspots.\" Hotspots are genomic regions rich in transcription factor (TF) binding sites and exhibit methylation-dependent TF binding. Subsequent analysis indicated hotspots as part of DMRs. The gene expression profile of key adipogenic genes in differentiating adipocytes is context-dependent, as we found a direct and inverse relationship between promoter DNA methylation and gene expression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    DNA甲基化是参与基因调控的重要表观遗传修饰。下一代测序技术的进步使得能够以单碱基分辨率检索DNA甲基化信息。然而,由于测序过程和分离的DNA数量有限,DNA甲基化数据通常是嘈杂和稀疏的,这使得差异甲基化区域(DMRs)的鉴定变得复杂,特别是当很少的重复是可用的。我们提出了一种通过使用单碱基分辨甲基化信息来检测DMR的变系数模型。该模型同时平滑甲基化谱,并允许检测DMRs,同时考虑额外的协变量。所提出的模型通过使用β-二项分布来考虑可能的过度分散。过度分散本身可以被建模为基因组区域和解释变量的函数。我们通过将其应用于两个现实生活中的案例研究来说明所提出模型的属性。
    DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification involved in gene regulation. Advances in the next generation sequencing technology have enabled the retrieval of DNA methylation information at single-base-resolution. However, due to the sequencing process and the limited amount of isolated DNA, DNA-methylation-data are often noisy and sparse, which complicates the identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs), especially when few replicates are available. We present a varying-coefficient model for detecting DMRs by using single-base-resolved methylation information. The model simultaneously smooths the methylation profiles and allows detection of DMRs, while accounting for additional covariates. The proposed model takes into account possible overdispersion by using a beta-binomial distribution. The overdispersion itself can be modeled as a function of the genomic region and explanatory variables. We illustrate the properties of the proposed model by applying it to two real-life case studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基因组印记是哺乳动物中的表观遗传调控,其中一小部分基因依赖于其亲本来源而单等位基因表达。一个巨大的印记域,SGCE/PEG10基因座,位于人染色体7q21s和小鼠近端染色体6。然而,牛SGCE/PEG10簇的基因组印迹尚未得到系统研究。在这项研究中,我们使用基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的测序方法研究了牛体细胞组织和足月胎盘中SGCE/PEG10基因座的14个基因的等位基因表达。除了SGCE和PEG10,在人和小鼠中两个保守的父系表达基因,另外5个基因(TFPI2、GNG11、ASB4、PON1和PON3)呈父系表达。三个基因,BET1,COL1A2和CASD1表现出组织特异性单等位基因表达。CALCR在组织中显示单等位基因表达,但在胎盘中显示双等位基因表达。三个基因,GNGT1,PPP1R9A,和PON2,在牛中显示双等位基因表达。发现五个差异甲基化区域(DMRs)与TFPI2,COL1A2,SGCE/PEG10,PON3和ASB4基因的等位基因表达有关,分别。SGCE/PEG10DMR是一种母体高度甲基化的种系DMR,但TFPI2、COL1A2、PON3和ASB4DMRs是次要DMRs。总之,我们在SGCE/PEG10基因座鉴定了五个新的牛印迹基因(GNG11,BET1,COL1A2,CASD1和PON1)和四个次级DMR。
    Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic regulation in mammals in which a small subset of genes is monoallelically expressed dependent on their parental origin. A large imprinted domain, SGCE/PEG10 locus, is located on human chromosome 7q21s and mouse proximal chromosome 6. However, genomic imprinting of bovine SGCE/PEG10 cluster has not been systematically studied. In this study, we investigated allele expression of 14 genes of the SGCE/PEG10 locus in bovine somatic tissues and term placenta using a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based sequencing method. In addition to SGCE and PEG10, two conserved paternally expressed genes in human and mice, five other genes (TFPI2, GNG11, ASB4, PON1, and PON3) were paternally expressed. Three genes, BET1, COL1A2, and CASD1, exhibited tissue-specific monoallelic expression. CALCR showed monoallelic expression in tissues but biallelic expression in the placenta. Three genes, GNGT1, PPP1R9A, and PON2, showed biallelic expression in cattle. Five differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were found to be associated with the allelic expression of TFPI2, COL1A2, SGCE/PEG10, PON3, and ASB4 genes, respectively. The SGCE/PEG10 DMR is a maternally hypermethylated germline DMR, but TFPI2, COL1A2, PON3, and ASB4 DMRs are secondary DMRs. In summary, we identified five novel bovine imprinted genes (GNG11, BET1, COL1A2, CASD1, and PON1) and four secondary DMRs at the SGCE/PEG10 locus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多倍体是一种重要的进化力量,然而表观遗传机制,比如DNA甲基化,对重复基因的全基因组表达的调控在很大程度上仍然未知。这里,我们使用Tragopogon(菊科)作为模型系统来发现最近形成的多倍体中DNA甲基化的模式和时间动态。在最近的95-100年中,由亲本二倍体Tragopogondubius和T.pratensis形成了天然存在的异源四倍体Tragopogonmiscellus。我们使用全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序对这三个物种的DNA甲基化进行了分析。T.miscellus的全基因组甲基化水平介于其二倍体亲本之间。然而,非加性CG和CHG甲基化发生在转座因子(TE)中,TE类型之间存在差异。大多数差异甲基化区域(DMRs)显示出亲本遗产,但是在多倍体中检测到一些新的DMRs。还鉴定和表征了差异甲基化基因(DMG)。这项研究首次评估了最近的天然异源多倍体中DNA甲基化的整体和基因座特异性模式,并表明多倍体形成后可以迅速产生新的甲基化变体。一起,这些结果表明,调控重复基因表达的机制可能在异源多倍体形成后不久就出现,并且这些机制因基因而异。
    Polyploidy is an important evolutionary force, yet epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, that regulate genome-wide expression of duplicated genes remain largely unknown. Here, we use Tragopogon (Asteraceae) as a model system to discover patterns and temporal dynamics of DNA methylation in recently formed polyploids. The naturally occurring allotetraploid Tragopogon miscellus formed in the last 95-100 yr from parental diploids Tragopogon dubius and T. pratensis. We profiled the DNA methylomes of these three species using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Genome-wide methylation levels in T. miscellus were intermediate between its diploid parents. However, nonadditive CG and CHG methylation occurred in transposable elements (TEs), with variation among TE types. Most differentially methylated regions (DMRs) showed parental legacy, but some novel DMRs were detected in the polyploid. Differentially methylated genes (DMGs) were also identified and characterized. This study provides the first assessment of both overall and locus-specific patterns of DNA methylation in a recent natural allopolyploid and shows that novel methylation variants can be generated rapidly after polyploid formation. Together, these results demonstrate that mechanisms to regulate duplicate gene expression may arise soon after allopolyploid formation and that these mechanisms vary among genes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:DNA甲基化是一种生化过程,其中将甲基添加到DNA分子上的胞嘧啶-磷酸-鸟嘌呤(CpG)位点而不改变DNA序列。某个基因组区域中的多个CpG位点可以跨表型差异甲基化。鉴定这些与表型相关的差异甲基化CpG区(DMRs)有助于疾病预测和精准医学发展。
    结果:我们提出了一种新颖的DMR检测算法,gbdmr.与线性回归框架下的现有方法相比,gbdmr假设DNA甲基化水平遵循广义β分布。我们通过模拟和实际数据分析将gbdmr与替代方法进行比较,包括DMRff,一种新的DMR检测方法,在竞争对手中显示出有希望的性能,以及专注于单个CpG站点的传统EWAS。我们的模拟表明,当相邻CpG位点之间的相关性强时,gbdmr优于其他两个,而当相关性较弱时,dmrff显示更高的功率。我们从理论的角度对这些现象进行了解释。我们进一步将这三种方法应用于多个真实DNA甲基化数据集。一个是在怀特岛进行的出生队列研究,英国,另外两个来自基因表达综合数据库存储库。总的来说,gbdmr比dmrff识别更多与表型相关的DMRCpG,模拟结果支持这一发现。
    结论:Gbdmr是一种基于广义β回归检测DMRs的创新方法。与dmrff和传统的EWAS相比,它具有明显的优势,特别是当相邻的CpG表现出中等到强的相关性时。我们的真实数据分析和模拟结果强调了gbdmr作为强大的DMR检测工具的可靠性。gbdmr方法可由R在GitHub上访问和实现:https://github.com/chengzhouwu/gbdmr。
    BACKGROUND: DNA methylation is a biochemical process in which a methyl group is added to the cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) site on DNA molecules without altering the DNA sequence. Multiple CpG sites in a certain genome region can be differentially methylated across phenotypes. Identifying these differentially methylated CpG regions (DMRs) associated with the phenotypes contributes to disease prediction and precision medicine development.
    RESULTS: We propose a novel DMR detection algorithm, gbdmr. In contrast to existing methods under a linear regression framework, gbdmr assumes that DNA methylation levels follow a generalized beta distribution. We compare gbdmr to alternative approaches via simulations and real data analyses, including dmrff, a new DMR detection approach that shows promising performance among competitors, and the traditional EWAS that focuses on single CpG sites. Our simulations demonstrate that gbdmr is superior to the other two when the correlation between neighboring CpG sites is strong, while dmrff shows a higher power when the correlation is weak. We provide an explanation of these phenomena from a theoretical perspective. We further applied the three methods to multiple real DNA methylation datasets. One is from a birth cohort study undertaken on the Isle of Wight, United Kingdom, and the other two are from the Gene Expression Omnibus database repository. Overall, gbdmr identifies more DMR CpGs linked to phenotypes than dmrff, and the simulated results support the findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gbdmr is an innovative method for detecting DMRs based on generalized beta regression. It demonstrated notable advantages over dmrff and traditional EWAS, particularly when adjacent CpGs exhibited moderate to strong correlations. Our real data analyses and simulated findings highlight the reliability of gbdmr as a robust DMR detection tool. The gbdmr approach is accessible and implemented by R on GitHub: https://github.com/chengzhouwu/gbdmr .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌构成了全球健康挑战,需要先进的诊断来改善结果。正在进行密集的努力,以查明早期检测的生物标志物,如基因组变异和DNA甲基化,提高诊断精度。我们对一名肺腺癌患者的癌性组织和邻近的非癌组织进行了长读测序。我们通过整合来自各种SV调用方法和差异甲基化区域(DMRs)的数据来鉴定对肺癌具有特异性的体细胞结构变异(SV),这些数据在这两个组织样本之间是不同的。揭示了与肺癌相关的独特甲基化模式。这项研究发现了超过40,000个体细胞SVs和超过180,000个DMRs与肺癌有关。通过综合分析,我们确定了大约700个显著相关的基因,包括与许多肺癌密切相关的基因,如NOTCH1、SMOC2、CSMD2等。此外,我们观察到体细胞SVs和DMRs在几个途径中基本上富集,如轴突引导信号通路,这表明在各种生物学研究水平上,多组学对肺癌进展的全面影响。这些数据集可以潜在地用作早期肺癌检测的生物标志物,并且在临床诊断和治疗应用中可能具有重要价值。
    Lung cancer poses a global health challenge, necessitating advanced diagnostics for improved outcomes. Intensive efforts are ongoing to pinpoint early detection biomarkers, such as genomic variations and DNA methylation, to elevate diagnostic precision. We conducted long-read sequencing on cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous tissues from a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. We identified somatic structural variations (SVs) specific to lung cancer by integrating data from various SV calling methods and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that were distinct between these two tissue samples, revealing a unique methylation pattern associated with lung cancer. This study discovered over 40,000 somatic SVs and over 180,000 DMRs linked to lung cancer. We identified approximately 700 genes of significant relevance through comprehensive analysis, including genes intricately associated with many lung cancers, such as NOTCH1, SMOC2, CSMD2, and others. Furthermore, we observed that somatic SVs and DMRs were substantially enriched in several pathways, such as axon guidance signaling pathways, which suggests a comprehensive multi-omics impact on lung cancer progression across various biological investigation levels. These datasets can potentially serve as biomarkers for early lung cancer detection and may hold significant value in clinical diagnosis and treatment applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    差异甲基化区域(DMRs)可作为头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的诊断,精准医学工作流程中的预后和治疗目标。将来自21个HNSCC和10个健康口腔组织样品的DNA与全基因组平铺阵列杂交以鉴定发现队列中的DMR。下游分析确定了口服启动子DNA甲基化模式的差异,与肿瘤分化相关的喉和口咽解剖区域,淋巴结参与和生存。全基因组DMR分析显示,这三个亚位点共有2,565个DMRs。共有738个DMRs是喉癌特有的(n=7),889个DMRs是口腔癌特有的(n=10),363个DMRs是咽癌特有的(n=6)。基于全基因组分析和基因本体论分析,选择10个候选基因来测试预后价值和与临床病理特征的关联。TIMP3与口腔癌的肿瘤分化有关(P=0.039),DAPK1与咽喉癌淋巴结转移相关(P=0.017),PAX1与喉癌肿瘤分化相关(P=0.040)。总共选择了五个候选基因,DAPK1,CDH1,PAX1,CALCA和TIMP3,用于更大的验证队列中的患病率研究:口腔癌样本(n=42),咽癌组织(n=25)和喉癌样本(n=52)。PAX1超甲基化在HNSCC解剖亚位点之间存在差异(P=0.029),主要在喉癌中发现。Kaplan-Meier生存分析(P=0.043)和总生存Cox回归分析(P=0.001)显示DAPK1甲基化与HNSCC的预后相关。本研究的结果表明,HNSCC亚位点口腔,咽部和喉部在异常的DNA甲基化模式中显示出实质性的差异,它可以作为预后生物标志物和治疗靶点。
    Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) can be used as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic targets in precision medicine workflows. DNA from 21 HNSCC and 10 healthy oral tissue samples was hybridized to a genome-wide tiling array to identify DMRs in a discovery cohort. Downstream analyses identified differences in promoter DNA methylation patterns in oral, laryngeal and oropharyngeal anatomical regions associated with tumor differentiation, nodal involvement and survival. Genome-wide DMR analysis showed 2,565 DMRs common to the three subsites. A total of 738 DMRs were unique to laryngeal cancer (n=7), 889 DMRs were unique to oral cavity cancer (n=10) and 363 DMRs were unique to pharyngeal cancer (n=6). Based on the genome-wide analysis and a Gene Ontology analysis, 10 candidate genes were selected to test for prognostic value and association with clinicopathological features. TIMP3 was associated with tumor differentiation in oral cavity cancer (P=0.039), DAPK1 was associated with nodal involvement in pharyngeal cancer (P=0.017) and PAX1 was associated with tumor differentiation in laryngeal cancer (P=0.040). A total of five candidate genes were selected, DAPK1, CDH1, PAX1, CALCA and TIMP3, for a prevalence study in a larger validation cohort: Oral cavity cancer samples (n=42), pharyngeal cancer tissues (n=25) and laryngeal cancer samples (n=52). PAX1 hypermethylation differed across HNSCC anatomic subsites (P=0.029), and was predominantly detected in laryngeal cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P=0.043) and Cox regression analysis of overall survival (P=0.001) showed that DAPK1 methylation is associated with better prognosis in HNSCC. The findings of the present study showed that the HNSCC subsites oral cavity, pharynx and larynx display substantial differences in aberrant DNA methylation patterns, which may serve as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号