Osteotomy is often necessary for the repair of post-traumatic nasal bone deformities. Typically, tools such as chisels are used for osteotomies; however, we performed osteotomies using Kirschner wires without making a skin incision. Between April 2011 and July 2022, we performed rhinoplasty with external perforated osteotomy using Kirschner wires in 13 patients with post-traumatic nasal bone deformities (9 males and 4 females; mean age, 34 years, range 12-51 years), all of whom exhibited improvement, with only one case showing mild residual cosmetic deformity. None of the patients requested further revision, and all were satisfied with their functional results. The non-incisional external perforated technique is a reasonable method that allows for bone osteotomies along the fracture line and is well-controlled, predictable, and reproducible.

BACKGROUND: Correction of asymmetry and irregularity deformities with autologous grafts, without osteotomies, offers advantages to both plastic surgeons and patients with severe deviation. Various autologous tissues such as fat, bone, and cartilage grafts are viable options for this purpose.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 3 autologous filling materials in patients with bone asymmetry.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 297 patients seeking aesthetic nose surgery between 2015 and 2022. Only primary patients without prior surgery and those with bone asymmetry from trauma, with dorsum protrusion <3 mm, and without osteotomy were included. Patients were divided into fat, cartilage, and bone groups. Grafts were applied to the concave side during closed rhinoplasty, and evaluations were done 12 months after surgery by blinded plastic surgeons and patients using established assessment tools.
RESULTS: Fat, cartilage, and bone grafts were utilized in 74, 127, and 96 patients, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 19 months. The mean graft volumes were 1.0 cc (bone), 1.3 cc (cartilage), and 1.6 cc (fat). The patient self-assessment scores were 75%, 84.9%, and 86.6%, respectively. The Asher-McDade averages were 77.2%, 86.7%, and 88.4%, respectively. Cartilage and bone graft results were statistically similar in patients\' self-evaluation and significantly higher than those of fat grafts. Blinded assessments showed no significant difference between the cartilage and bone groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Placing autologous grafts on the concave side for patients with minimal nasal bone protrusion (<3 mm) yields successful results. Cartilage grafts offer advantages in volume, result estimation, and preparation time, making them suitable for larger patient cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Among the nasal muscles, the levator labii superior alaeque nasi (LLSAN) acts as a transitional muscle that conjugates with other nasal and perinasal muscles. Thus, when treating the nasal region with Botulinum toxin (BTX), it is important to understand local nasal muscular dynamics and how they can influence the muscular dynamics of the entire face.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of cases treated by an injection pattern encompassing the face, including nasal muscles. Photographs were taken at rest and during motion (frontal and oblique views), before and after treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 227 patients have been treated in the last 18 months with the following results: eyebrow tail lifting, softness of crow\'s feet, improvement of the drooping of the tip of the nose, and shortening of the lip philtrum when smiling. We present cases illustrating the use of this approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating the facial muscles globally (including the frontal, corrugators, procerus, orbicularis oculi, platysma, DAO, and nasal muscles) can improve the smile and facial expressions. This is believed to occur because the elevated portion of the upper lip muscle becomes stronger as the nasal part of the LLSAN is paralyzed.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Osteotomy represents a crucial step in structural rhinoplasty; however, there is not a unique approach accepted. Double lateral osteotomy has proven to be effective in the long-term correction of a deviated nose. In this series, we evaluated its aesthetic value also in non-deviated cases.
METHODS: 864 patients who underwent primary structural rhinoplasty from 2012 to 2020 were divided into four groups. Group A and B included patients with a crooked nose treated with asymmetrical double osteotomy and bilateral double osteotomy, respectively. Patients who did not present nasal deviation were divided into group C, including cases treated with bilateral single osteotomy, and group D, including patients who underwent bilateral double osteotomy. Postoperative evaluations were performed by three independent plastic surgeons blinded to the surgical technique. Patient\'s satisfaction was assessed through the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module.
RESULTS: FACE-Q scores reported a satisfaction rate higher than 30% for every item in all groups; however, group B and group D showed statistically higher satisfaction (p < 0.01). According to the evaluations performed by physicians, group B and group D showed the most satisfactory outcomes (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: bilateral double osteotomies represent a significant aesthetic refinement in structural rhinoplasty, not only in crooked noses but also in non-deviated cases, since the reduction in the width of the nose is an aesthetical aspect very appreciated by patients.

UNASSIGNED: Surgeons frequently perform rhinoplasty on individuals who have facial asymmetry. Patients\' discontent following rhinoplasty has been linked to facial asymmetry. On the other hand, correction of a deviated nose is a tough procedure, and it is not the same as septal deviation correction. Surgeons, who often perform rhinoplasty for deviated nose in people with asymmetrical faces, focus primarily on correcting nasal defects and overlook such facial asymmetry.
UNASSIGNED: We aimed to summarize and review the prevalence of facial asymmetry in patients subjected for rhinoplasty for deviated nose correction.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted covering PubMed, Scopus, ISI, and Google Scholar using related key words and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms from 2000 until November 2021 for English published articles.
UNASSIGNED: The majority of subjects had more facial asymmetry such as chin deviation, nasal deviation, and face breadth. Facial asymmetry is typically found in patients undergoing rhinoplasty for a deviated nose, and its presence frequently results in the failure to achieve a straight-looking nose.
UNASSIGNED: Patients considering rhinoplasty frequently have facial asymmetries, and careful attention should be devoted to these elements in both surgical planning and patient counseling. In order to create facial harmony and apparent symmetry after rhinoplasty, it is critical to center the nose on the midglabellar to mid-bow Cupid\'s line.

Typical Asian deformed nose has many different types: concave nasal dorsum, low nasal dorsum, wide nasal dorsum, deviated nose, convex nasal dorsum, saddle nose, short-nose deformity, and deformities involving irreversible damage of skin/soft tissue envelop are the most representative ones. The key concept in Asian rhinoplasty is augmentation in all different forms of nasal deformities. Augmentation of the nose consists of framework, tip, and dorsal augmentation. Septal extension grafting and tip grafting are 2 maneuvers with profound importance in augmentation of lower two-thirds of the Asian nose. Dorsal augmentation is central concept in beautifying all different types of deformed noses, even the hump nose.

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques for correction of deviated noses have been described. Nevertheless, surgical management is challenging even for experienced rhinosurgeons. Often, a \"residual deformity\" after functional septorhinoplasty (SRP) due to a deviated pyramid syndrome may remain.
OBJECTIVE: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine how frequent functional SRP in patients with a deviated nose results in \"successful\" straightening of the external nose based on standardized angle measurements. Possible influences having a positive or negative effect on the surgical success were identified.
METHODS: Photo documentation of 607 patients with deviated noses (304 women, 303 men, median age 30 years) before and after nasal surgery were retrospectively analyzed using standardized angle measurements. The pre- and postoperative photos of the faces were anthropometrically measured. The median follow-up was 6 months.
RESULTS: A \"straight\" deviated nose (I-type) was present in 225 patients (37%), a C-shaped nose (C-type) in 382 patients (63%). More than 75% of the patients presented a facial asymmetry. Based on angle measurements alone, a total of 452 (75%) noses were straightened or postoperatively improved. 155 noses (25%) still showed a biometric deviation. The I- or C-type had no relevant influence on outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: A purely biometric analysis of crooked noses is difficult and its importance is limited due to commonly pre-existing facial asymmetries. The risk of a \"residual deviation\" after rhinoplasty in patients with deviated noses must not be underestimated. This fact should be addressed as part of the informed consent. In particular, it should be mentioned that the surgical outcome can remain well below the patient\'s aesthetic expectations. Not rarely, a revision surgery may be necessary.

In rhinoplasty, osteotomy is becoming more and more frequent as a way to achieve aesthetically pleasing and functional results, as well as patient satisfaction. In procedures to correct a deviated nose, osteotomy to correct the bone plays an essential role in addition to correction of the septum and cartilage, and osteotomy can reduce the wide nose bridge and give a slightly higher appearance in Asian rhinoplasty. However, osteotomy is relatively invasive, and the nasal bones of Asians are often low and thick, so bleeding or swelling during surgery can be somewhat more severe, and a stuffy nose can occur after surgery if osteotomy is performed incorrectly. Since side effects are possible, it is necessary to have a precise understanding of the relevant anatomy and technique. Several articles have described nasal bone osteotomy in rhinoplasty, and this review article introduces the methods presented in various articles, describes indications and limitations, and reviews the relevant anatomical structures and techniques in an accurate manner. We introduce a method that can increase patients\' satisfaction and the completeness of surgery through accurate osteotomy, as well as reducing the risk of side effects.

Deviated nose is highly challenging in rhinoplasty since the surgeon should consider both aesthetic and functional aspects of the nose. Deviated nose correction is surgically complex, and a thorough understanding of the mechanical and physiological changes of intranasal structures, including the septum and turbinates, is necessary for functional improvement.

BACKGROUND: Deviated noses and asymmetric nostrils can be corrected using corrective rhinoplasty. However, after proper correction, adjacent facial mimetic muscles can cause recurrence of asymmetry because of preoperative habits.
OBJECTIVE: We performed this study to investigate the effects on botulinum toxin on the prevention of recurrence of asymmetry after corrective rhinoplasty.
METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2019, 60 patients underwent corrective rhinoplasty and 30 received botulinum toxin type A injection (Botulax; Hugel Co.) at the depressor septi nasi and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi muscles, bilaterally. Vertical and horizontal deviations were compared preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: Postoperative vertical deviation was 0.20° ± 0.65° in the botulinum toxin-injected group and 1.20° ± 0.53° in the control group (P < 0.0001). Horizontal deviation was 0.80° ± 0.52° in the botulinum toxin-injected group and 2.18° ± 0.42° in the control group (P < 0.005). Differences between preoperative and postoperative vertical deviations at 6 months were 2.30° ± 0.03° in patients who received botulinum toxin injection and 1.10° ± 0.22° in controls (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin effectively restricted the paranasal muscles without any significant adverse events. We recommend injecting botulinum toxin after corrective rhinoplasty to prevent recurrence of deviation by facial mimetic muscles.