Developmental Language Disorder

发育性语言障碍
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大约50%的发育性语言障碍(DLD)幼儿也有言语产生问题。关于语音发展和语音产生困难的临床诊断的研究主要集中在准确性上;它将儿童的语音实现与成人模型联系起来。与这些关系分析相反,独立分析表明,儿童产生的声音和结构与准确性无关。这样的分析可能会更深入地了解孩子的语音优势和局限性,因此可以为治疗提供更好的线索。
    目的:Ram(1)通过包括独立和相关分析,为更全面地概述荷兰儿童DLD的语音发展做出贡献,(2)制定一项独立的措施来评估这些儿童的言语生产能力;(3)检查DLD儿童的独立言语生产措施和关系言语生产措施之间的关系。
    方法:我们描述了82名2岁之间有DLD和语音产生困难的儿童的两个图片命名任务中引起的单词的音节结构和声音;7和6;8。将儿童分为四个年龄组,以横断面方式检查发育模式。提供了关于独立和关系措施的儿童作品概述。我们进行了Spearman相关性分析,以检查准确性和独立测量之间的关系。
    结果:概述显示,与目标位置无关,这些孩子能够产生更多种类的音节结构和辅音,而不是在目标中正确产生。对于4岁以下的儿童尤其如此;5。数据表明,患有DLD的儿童难以产生集群,摩擦,液体和鼻翼(/lot/)。根据现有文献和我们的结果,我们设计了一个独立衡量单词复杂性的荷兰语版本,最初设计用于英语(单词复杂性度量-WCM),其中单词产生接收特定单词的点数,音节和声音特征,不管准确性。我们发现准确性得分与该独立测量得分之间存在很强的正相关性。
    结论:结果表明,使用独立措施,包括拟议的WCM,通过指示孩子可以产生哪些声音和音节结构来补充传统的关系度量(无论正确性如何)。因此,所提出的措施可用于监测DLD儿童的语音发展,并更好地确定治疗目标,结合现有的关系措施。
    结论:可以通过不同的方式评估已经知道的语音产生技能:(1)使用分析来指示儿童产生的结构和声音,而不考虑准确性,也就是说,性能分析;以及(2)使用分析表明儿童的生产与成人目标的关系,也就是说,准确性分析。在科学研究以及临床实践中,重点通常是准确性分析。因此,我们不知道如果孩子的准确性分数没有提高,在这些分析中未捕捉到的其他语音方面有所改善,但可以通过性能分析来捕获。这项研究增加了现有知识的内容概述显示,这些孩子能够产生更多种类的音节结构和辅音,而与目标位置无关,而不是在目标中正确产生。因此,添加性能分析到现有的准确性分析提供了一个孩子的语音发展的更完整的图片。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?我们提出了一个荷兰版本的WCM,最初是为英语设计的,其中单词产生接收单词结构的点数,音节结构和声音,不管准确性。荷兰临床医生可以使用这项措施来监测DLD儿童的语音发育,并制定更好的治疗目标,除了已经使用的准确性措施。
    BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of all young children with a developmental language disorder (DLD) also have problems with speech production. Research on speech sound development and clinical diagnostics of speech production difficulties focuses mostly on accuracy; it relates children\'s phonological realizations to adult models. Contrarily to these relational analyses, independent analyses indicate the sounds and structures children produce irrespective of accuracy. Such analyses are likely to provide more insight into a child\'s phonological strengths and limitations, and may thus provide better leads for treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: Ram (1) To contribute to a more comprehensive overview of the speech sound development of young Dutch children with DLD by including independent and relational analyses, (2) to develop an independent measure to assess these children\'s speech production capacities; and (3) to examine the relation between independent and relational speech production measures for children with DLD.
    METHODS: We describe the syllable structures and sounds of words elicited in two picture-naming tasks of 82 children with DLD and speech production difficulties between ages 2;7 and 6;8. The children were divided into four age groups to examine developmental patterns in a cross-sectional manner. Overviews of the children\'s productions on both independent and relational measures are provided. We conducted a Spearman correlation analysis to examine the relation between accuracy and independent measures.
    RESULTS: The overviews show these children are able to produce a greater variety of syllable structures and consonants irrespective of target positions than they can produce correctly in targets. This is especially true for children below the age of 4;5. The data indicate that children with DLD have difficulty with the production of clusters, fricatives, liquids and the velar nasal (/ŋ/). Based on existing literature and our results, we designed a Dutch version of an independent measure of word complexity, originally designed for English (word complexity measure-WCM) in which word productions receive points for specific word, syllable and sound characteristics, irrespective of accuracy. We found a strong positive correlation between accuracy scores and scores on this independent measure.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the use of independent measures, including the proposed WCM, complement traditional relational measures by indicating which sounds and syllable structures a child can produce (irrespective of correctness). Therefore, the proposed measure can be used to monitor the speech sound development of children with DLD and to better identify treatment goals, in combination with existing relational measures.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Speech production skills can be assessed in different ways: (1) using analyses indicating the structures and sounds a child produces irrespective of accuracy, that is, performance analyses; and (2) using analyses indicating how the productions of a child relate to the adult targets, that is, accuracy analyses. In scientific research as well as in clinical practice the focus is most often on accuracy analyses. As a consequence, we do not know if children who do not improve in accuracy scores, improve in other phonological aspects that are not captured in these analyses, but can be captured by performance analyses. What this study adds to the existing knowledge The overviews show these children are able to produce a greater variety of syllable structures and consonants irrespective of target positions than they can produce correctly in targets. Consequently, adding performance analyses to existing accuracy analyses provides a more complete picture of a child\'s speech sound development. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? We propose a Dutch version of a WCM, originally designed for English, in which word productions receive points for word structures, syllable structures and sounds, irrespective of accuracy. This measure may be used by Dutch clinicians to monitor the speech sound development of children with DLD and to formulate better treatment goals, in addition to accuracy measures that are already used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前的证据表明,患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童在单词学习活动中受益于间隔检索。相对于使用替代单词学习程序的回忆,单词回忆是相当好的。然而,绝对召回可以进一步提高;许多研究报告说,只有不到三分之二的单词是学习的,即使在学习活动期间有间隔检索的帮助。在本文中,我们确定了间隔检索的详细信息,这些详细信息不太了解,以通过检索实践促进更有效的学习。
    我们讨论了一些因素的重要性,例如:(a)将即时检索与间隔检索试验相结合;(b)确定相对于相等的间距,逐渐增加间距是否具有短期收益;(c)发现成功检索的数量足以确保以后的回忆;(d)使用间隔检索以避免在以后的回忆测试中语音细节受到侵蚀;(e)记录良好的儿童与特定单词形式学习困难的DLD我们还推测了一些可能的原因,为什么间隔检索首先是有益的。
    尽管许多患有DLD的儿童通过包含间隔检索的程序在单词学习中取得了收益,这个过程中有许多细节可以改变它的成功。在我们更好地理解间隔检索有效性的界限之前,我们不会充分利用这个有希望的单词学习程序。
    间隔的检索活动可能是对临床医生和教育工作者可用来帮助儿童学习单词的资源的重要补充。随着对这里讨论的问题有了更深入的了解,我们应该能够更多地使用间隔检索。
    UNASSIGNED: Current evidence shows that children with developmental language disorder (DLD) benefit from spaced retrieval during word learning activities. Word recall is quite good relative to recall with alternative word learning procedures. However, recall on an absolute basis can be improved further; many studies report that fewer than two-thirds of the words are learned, even with the assistance of spaced retrieval during the learning activities. In this article we identify details of spaced retrieval that are less well understood in an effort to promote more effective learning through retrieval practice.
    UNASSIGNED: We discuss the importance of factors such as: (a) integrating immediate retrieval with spaced retrieval trials; (b) determining whether gradual increases in spacing have more than short-term benefits relative to equal spacing; (c) discovering the number of successful retrievals sufficient to ensure later recall; (d) using spaced retrieval to avoid erosion of phonetic details on later recall tests; and (e) whether the well-documented difficulties with learning word forms might be tied to a particular subgroup of children with DLD. We also speculate on some of the possible reasons why spaced retrieval is beneficial in the first place.
    UNASSIGNED: Although many children with DLD make gains in word learning through procedures that incorporate spaced retrieval, there are numerous details involved in the process that can alter its success. Until we have a better understanding of the boundaries of spaced retrieval\'s effectiveness, we will not be taking full advantage of this promising addition to word learning procedures.
    UNASSIGNED: Spaced retrieval activities can be an important addition to the resources that clinicians and educators have available to assist children in their word learning. With a deeper understanding of the issues discussed here, we should be able to put spaced retrieval to even greater use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童有更高的阅读困难风险。我们调查了COVID-19大流行期间患有DLD的幼儿园儿童和通常发育中的(TD)同龄人的家庭识字环境。
    我们分析了口头语言标准化评估的分数,非语言智力,并结合三个时间点的家庭识字问卷数据进行单词阅读。
    在学校关闭期间或学校重新开放时,参与家庭扫盲活动的频率在不同群体之间没有差异。两组的护理人员都报告说,关闭期间家庭扫盲活动有所增加。当学校重新开放时,参与度恢复到大流行前的水平。对于DLD组,孩子的单词阅读能力和识字兴趣与家庭识字环境呈正相关。语言和/或识字困难的家族史与家庭识字环境呈负相关。对于TD组,只有孩子对识字的兴趣与家庭识字环境呈正相关。
    这些发现阐明了需要进一步研究有关家庭素养和患有DLD的儿童的家庭,重点是确定与儿童和照顾者因素相关的潜在优势和脆弱性。
    UNASSIGNED: Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) are at heightened risk for reading difficulty. We investigated the home literacy environments of kindergarten children with DLD and typically developing (TD) peers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: We analysed scores from standardised assessments of oral language, nonverbal intelligence, and word reading in conjunction with home literacy questionnaire data at three time points.
    UNASSIGNED: Frequency of engagement in home literacy activities did not differ by group during school closures or when schools reopened. Caregivers from both groups reported increased home literacy engagement during closures. Engagement returned to pre-pandemic levels when schools reopened. For the DLD group, the child\'s word reading ability and interest in literacy were positively associated with the home literacy environment. Family history of language and/or literacy difficulty was negatively associated with the home literacy environment. For the TD group, only the child\'s interest in literacy was positively associated with the home literacy environment.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings elucidate the need for further research related to home literacy and families of children with DLD, with a focus on identifying potential strengths and vulnerabilities related to child and caregiver factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:公认的是,患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童表现出动词相关的局限性。虽然以前的大多数研究都集中在时态上,词汇方面的掌握,尤其是心灵感应,并不是很多研究的主要重点。词汇方面是指一个动作是否有一个定义的端点(telic动词)或没有(atelic动词)。
    目的:本研究使用事件相关电位(ERP)技术调查了智利DLD儿童与典型发展(TD)同龄人相比,对动词识别的影响。
    方法:研究设计是一种混合因子设计,其中组间因子为2(DLD/TD),组内因子为2(telic/atelic动词)和2(连贯/不连贯的句子)。参与者是36名学龄儿童(18名DLD,18TD)年龄7至7岁11个月。该任务要求受试者聆听与视频中的动作匹配或不匹配的句子,包括telic或atelic动词的句子。
    结果:研究发现,在处理动词(N400和N400后成分)和直接宾语(N400和P600成分)的方式上,组间存在显著差异。
    结论:患有DLD的儿童难以区分telic和atelic动词,可能是因为他们采用了与事件结构自举模型一致的过度泛化策略。
    BACKGROUND: It is broadly acknowledged that children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) show verb-related limitations. While most previous studies have focused on tense, the mastery of lexical aspect-particularly telicity-has not been the primary focus of much research. Lexical aspect refers to whether an action has a defined endpoint (telic verbs) or not (atelic verbs).
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of telicity on verb recognition in Chilean children with DLD compared to their typically developing (TD) peers using the Event-Related Potential (ERP) technique.
    METHODS: The research design is a mixed factorial design with between-group factors of 2 (DLD/TD) and within-group factors of 2 (telic/atelic verbs) and 2 (coherent/incoherent sentences). The participants were 36 school-aged children (18 DLD, 18 TD) aged 7 to 7 years and 11 months. The task required subjects to listen to sentences that either matched or did not match an action in a video, with sentences including telic or atelic verbs.
    RESULTS: The study found notable differences between groups in how they processed verbs (N400 and post-N400 components) and direct objects (N400 and P600 components).
    CONCLUSIONS: Children with DLD struggled to differentiate telic and atelic verbs, potentially because they employed overgeneralization strategies consistent with the Event Structural Bootstrapping model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童存在情绪识别和调节困难,但是目前尚无已知的干预措施可以增强该人群的情绪意识。本研究通过父母主导的在线情绪识别(ER)干预,探讨了父母对DLD情绪理解儿童的看法的影响。10名年龄在6-11岁的DLD儿童的父母参加了这项研究。采用了非并发多基线设计,允许对父母信仰随着时间的变化进行严格的分析。每周的数据是通过父母对儿童情绪的信念问卷收集的。还进行了采访,以更深入地了解父母对孩子的ER技能的看法。结果表明,父母对指导和支持孩子的ER技能的需求的信念在干预后增加。采访也支持这一点,并产生了三个主要主题。干预计划提高了父母对(a)ER对DLD儿童的重要性的认识,(b)以情感为中心的沟通和与孩子的互动,(c)将情绪融入日常生活。这项研究是第一个已知的研究,探索父母对具有DLDER技能的孩子的信念,强调通过可获得的干预措施支持父母的重要性。
    Many children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have emotion recognition and regulation difficulties, but there are currently no known interventions enhancing emotional awareness in this population. This study explores the impact of parents\' perspectives regarding children with DLD emotional understanding through a parent-led online emotion recognition (ER) intervention. Ten parents of children with DLD aged 6-11 participated in the study. A nonconcurrent multiple baseline design was employed, allowing for a rigorous analysis of changes in parental beliefs over time. Weekly data were collected through the Parents\' Beliefs About Children\'s Emotions Questionnaire. Interviews were also conducted to gain deeper insights into parents\' perceptions regarding the ER skills of their children. Results indicated that parents\' beliefs about the need for guiding and supporting their child\'s ER skills increased over the intervention. Interviews also supported this, and three main themes were generated. The intervention program increased parents\' awareness of (a) the importance of ER for children with DLD, (b) emotion-focused communication and engagement with their child, and (c) the integration of emotions into daily life. This study is the first known study that explores parents\' beliefs about children with DLD ER skills, highlighting the importance of supporting parents through accessible interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前研究的目的是评估患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童和典型发育中(TD)的儿童在工作记忆中执行功能的表现之间的差异,抑制控制,和认知灵活性。
    我们对PubMed进行了系统搜索,Embase,科克伦,和WebofScience病例对照研究(1950年1月1日至2023年10月11日以英文出版)比较了DLD和TD儿童执行功能表现的差异。
    本研究纳入了40项符合条件的研究(N=3,168名参与者)。与TD儿童相比,DLD儿童在所有六个口头工作记忆任务中表现出明显较差的表现(向后数字回忆任务,SMD-1.4321,95%CI-2.2692至-0.5950;听力回忆任务,SMD-1.4469,95%CI-1.7737至-1.1202;计算召回任务,SMD-0.9192,95%CI-1.4089至-0.4295;数字召回任务,SMD-1.2321,95%CI-1.4397至-1.0244;单词列表回忆任务,SMD-1.1375,95%CI-1.5579至-0.7171;非单词回忆任务,SMD-1.5355,95%CI-1.8122至-1.2589)。然而,关于抑制控制和认知灵活性,DLD和TD儿童之间的差异取决于具体情况。在所有口头工作记忆任务的亚组分析中,在单语英语和单语非英语组中,DLD儿童的表现明显低于TD儿童,在学龄前儿童和学龄儿童群体中。
    这项研究证明,言语工作记忆缺陷可以看作是DLD儿童的标志,并且不受年龄或语言类型的影响。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?RecordID=391070,CRD42023391070。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of the current study was to assess the differences between children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and typically developing (TD) children in their performance of executive functions from working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematical search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for case control studies (published in English between January 1, 1950, and October 11, 2023) comparing the differences in the performance of executive functions between DLD and TD children.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty eligible studies were included in the present study (N = 3,168 participants). In comparison with TD children, DLD children exhibited significantly poorer performances in all six verbal working memory tasks (backward digit recall task, SMD -1.4321, 95% CI -2.2692 to -0.5950; listening recall task, SMD -1.4469, 95% CI -1.7737 to -1.1202; counting recall task, SMD -0.9192, 95% CI -1.4089 to -0.4295; digit recall task, SMD -1.2321, 95% CI -1.4397 to -1.0244; word list recall task, SMD -1.1375, 95% CI -1.5579 to -0.7171; non-word recall task, SMD -1.5355, 95% CI -1.8122 to -1.2589). However, regarding inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, the differences between DLD and TD children depended on specific circumstances. In subgroup analyses of all verbal working memory tasks, DLD children presented notably lower performance than TD children in both the monolingual English and monolingual non-English groups, and in both the preschooler and school-aged groups.
    UNASSIGNED: This study proves that verbal working memory deficits can be seen as a marker for children with DLD and are not affected by age or language type.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=391070, CRD42023391070.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童无缘无故地努力学习母语。虽然对该疾病的神经生物学基础的研究集中在皮质纹状体系统的作用上,关于小脑在DLD中的作用知之甚少。皮质小脑回路可能与该疾病有关,因为它们有助于复杂的感觉运动技能学习,包括口语的习得。这里,我们使用来自77名典型发育中的儿童和54名患有DLD的儿童的弥散加权成像数据,并进行了概率纤维束成像来识别小脑的白质束:下,中间,和上小脑梗.DLD患儿在小脑下段(ICP)表现出较低的各向异性分数(FA),通过下橄榄到小脑进行运动和感觉输入的纤维束。DLD中的较低FA由较低的轴向扩散系数驱动。通过更复杂的扩散数据建模来进一步探索这一点,我们发现DLD患儿ICP的取向离散度较高,但神经突密度无差异。因此,降低的FA不太可能反映髓鞘形成的微观结构差异,相反,这些途径中轴突的组织被破坏。在我们的样本中,ICP微观结构与语言或运动协调能力无关。我们也没有发现中间和上花梗的差异,连接小脑和皮质的主要途径。最后,DLD的特征不是皮质小脑,而是非典型的小脑小脑白质连接,并表明小脑小脑系统参与言语和语言的习得和发展。
    Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) struggle to learn their native language for no apparent reason. While research on the neurobiological underpinnings of the disorder has focused on the role of corticostriatal systems, little is known about the role of the cerebellum in DLD. Corticocerebellar circuits might be involved in the disorder as they contribute to complex sensorimotor skill learning, including the acquisition of spoken language. Here, we used diffusion-weighted imaging data from 77 typically developing and 54 children with DLD and performed probabilistic tractography to identify the cerebellum\'s white matter tracts: the inferior, middle, and superior cerebellar peduncles. Children with DLD showed lower fractional anisotropy (FA) in the inferior cerebellar peduncles (ICP), fiber tracts that carry motor and sensory input via the inferior olive to the cerebellum. Lower FA in DLD was driven by lower axial diffusivity. Probing this further with more sophisticated modeling of diffusion data, we found higher orientation dispersion but no difference in neurite density in the ICP of children with DLD. Reduced FA is therefore unlikely to be reflecting microstructural differences in myelination, rather the organization of axons in these pathways is disrupted. ICP microstructure was not associated with language or motor coordination performance in our sample. We also found no differences in the middle and superior peduncles, the main pathways connecting the cerebellum with the cortex. To conclude, it is not corticocerebellar but atypical olivocerebellar white matter connections that characterize DLD and suggest the involvement of the olivocerebellar system in speech and language acquisition and development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的儿童在执行功能(EF)和心理理论(ToM)方面存在困难。这些困难可以用以下理论来解释:儿童的概念理解在单词含义结构的五个阶段发生变化,从具体和上下文相关到抽象和精确。我们提供了一项多案例研究,研究了DLD儿童中词义结构与EF和ToM的关系。
    参与者是5名年龄在9-12岁的DLD儿童和5名年龄相配的发育中的儿童,性别,和非语言智力。使用新的动态测试评估词义结构。使用动物园地图任务和EF的行为评级清单评估EF。使用ToM测试评估ToM,Frith-Happe动画,和Bermond-Vorst述情障碍问卷.使用儿童行为清单测量行为问题。对父母进行了Anamnestic访谈,以描述病例历史。
    对于患有DLD的儿童,与匹配的同龄人相比,在单词意义结构任务中观察到的分数较低,没有应用统计检验。词义结构与EF和ToM呈正相关,但不是行为问题。在个例描述中讨论了单词含义结构与EF和ToM分离的实例。
    通过将语言与概念开发联系起来,词义结构的变化可能解释了DLD儿童的一些EF和ToM困难。
    本研究为未来研究词义结构之间的关系提供了基础,EF,和ToM。
    UNASSIGNED: Many children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have difficulties in executive functioning (EF) and theory of mind (ToM). These difficulties might be explained by the theory that children\'s conceptual understanding changes over five stages of word meaning structure, from concrete and context-dependent to abstract and precise. We present a multiple case study examining how word meaning structure relates to EF and ToM in children with DLD.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants were five children with DLD aged 9-12 and five typically developing children matched for age, gender, and nonverbal intelligence. Word meaning structure was assessed using new dynamic test. EF was assessed using the Zoo Map Task and Behavioral Rating Inventory for EF. ToM was assessed using the ToM test, Frith-Happé Animations, and Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire. Behavioral problems were measured using the Child Behavior Checklist. Anamnestic interviews with the parents were conducted to describe the case histories.
    UNASSIGNED: For the children with DLD, lower scores in the word meaning structure task were observed compared to those observed for their matched peers, with no statistical test applied. Word meaning structure related positively to EF and ToM, but not to behavioral problems. Instances in which word meaning structure dissociates from EF and ToM are discussed in individual case descriptions.
    UNASSIGNED: By linking language to conceptual development, variations in word meaning structure may explain some EF and ToM difficulties in children with DLD.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study offers a basis for future research on the relationships among word meaning structure, EF, and ToM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究旨在了解具有典型语言发育(TLD)和患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的双语儿童如何在其叙述中使用频繁的单词共同出现。
    我们研究了30名具有和不具有DLD的西班牙语-英语双语儿童(实验组)使用的单词共同出现随时间的变化。另一个规范小组由98名TLD西班牙语-英语双语一年级学生组成。孩子们在幼儿园和一年级讲述了两个西班牙语和两个英语故事。在转录的叙述中使用Python程序,我们提取了所有相邻的两个单词和三个单词的共现。从规范小组来看,提取了90个最常见的两个单词和90个最常见的三个单词的共现。分析了实验组中每个孩子在180个识别出的单词共同出现中产生的单词共同出现的类型和标记。
    总的来说,一年级的孩子比幼儿园产生更多的单词同现类型。患有DLD的儿童使用较少类型的单词共现,但与TLD的同龄人相比,产生它们的频率更高。患有DLD的儿童从幼儿园到一年级的单词同现率增加,尽管频率较低。两组中的儿童在西班牙语和英语中都产生了相似的单词共同出现的类型和标记,除了两个单词共同出现的标记。儿童在英语中产生两个单词的次数比在西班牙语叙述中更频繁。
    结果揭示了DLD儿童在产生单词共现方面的缺陷,间接反映统计模式检测中可能存在的缺陷。
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to understand how bilingual children with typical language development (TLD) and those with developmental language disorder (DLD) use frequent word co-occurrences in their narratives.
    UNASSIGNED: We studied the change over time in the word co-occurrences used by 30 Spanish-English bilingual children with and without DLD (experimental group). An additional normative group consisted of 98 TLD Spanish-English bilingual first graders. Children narrated two Spanish and two English stories in kindergarten and first grade. Employing a Python program on the transcribed narratives, we extracted all adjacent two-word and three-word co-occurrences. From the normative group, the 90 most frequently occurring two-word and 90 most frequently occurring three-word co-occurrences were extracted. The type and tokens of word co-occurrences each child in the experimental group produced out of the 180 identified word co-occurrences were analysed.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, children at first grade produced more word co-occurrences types than in kindergarten. Children with DLD used fewer types of word co-occurrences but produced them as often as than their TLD peers. Children with DLD increased their word co-occurrences from kindergarten to first grade at the same rate although at a lower frequency. Children in both groups produced similar types and tokens of word co-occurrences in both Spanish and English, except tokens of two word co-occurrences. Children produced two word co-occurrences more often in English than in their Spanish narratives.
    UNASSIGNED: The results shed light on children with DLD\'s deficits in production of word co-occurrences, indirectly reflecting possible deficits in statistical pattern detection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经为有视觉障碍的用户探索了数据可视化的可访问性,但是很少考虑有语言障碍的用户的需求。
    目的:这项范围审查综合了有关语言障碍成年人的数据可视化的知识,特别是后天的语言障碍,失语症和发展性语言障碍。它试图提取关键发现,并确定哪些做法支持有效的可视化,以便为语言障碍人士做出决策。
    方法:如果论文调查了数据的可视化,数据可视化的消费者是失语症或发育性语言障碍的人。搜索了七个数据库:CINAHL,学术搜索,Medline,心理信息,奥维德,ACM数字图书馆和IEEEXplore。纳入的研究被绘制成提取标题,作者(S),Year,国家,纸张类型,科学领域,参与者编号(S),参与者组,主要议题,subtopic,方法,任务描述,任务类别,数据可视化,summary,与审查问题相关的关键发现,和指导方针或建议。叙事综合被用来描述语言障碍患者如何与一系列文献中的数据可视化进行交互。
    结果:6项研究(7篇出版物)纳入了综述。一项研究来自健康领域,一项来自残疾人权利合作,四项来自计算机科学。没有满足审查标准的研究探索了发展性语言障碍的数据可视化;然而,五项研究探索了认知障碍的参与者,包括语言障碍,所以这些都包括在内。发现了一系列可视化设计。研究主要探索对可视化的理解(4/6)。一项研究探索了如何直观地表达数据,一个人探索了可视化的用途,为了一个行动,选择,或决定。认知上可访问的数据可视化实践在四篇论文中进行了描述并进行了综合。报道的支持性实践减少了与处理可视化相关的认知负荷,并增加了数据可视化的个人相关性。
    结论:对于患有失语症和发育性语言障碍的成年人的可访问数据可视化仅进行了很少的探索。具体支持语言障碍用户的做法尚不明显。由于数据在日常决策中的使用非常普遍,未来的研究应该探索语言障碍患者如何利用数据可视化。
    结论:关于这一主题的已知内容视觉资源被广泛用于支持有语言障碍的人理解语言。也就是说,图标,映射时间线等等,用于支持听觉处理。然而,例如,没有语言障碍的人经常使用数据可视化来支持日常决策,实时交通数据的可视化用于为用户提供到达目的地的最佳路线。目前尚不清楚是否有任何工作探索了语言障碍患者的数据可视化。本文对现有知识的补充本文汇集了对患有发育性语言障碍或失语症的成年人使用数据可视化的研究,有语言障碍的人。它强调了针对语言障碍的包容性数据可视化设计方面的差距,以及探索在这些人群中使用数据可视化进行决策的最少研究。这项工作的临床意义是什么?对数据的访问可以增强。它有可能使机构参与决策并增加社会参与。因此,关于如何为语言障碍人士设计包容性数据可视化的现有知识差距构成了排斥和对知情决策的威胁的风险。突出当前的文献领域可能会推动研究和临床活动。
    BACKGROUND: Accessibility of data visualization has been explored for users with visual disabilities but the needs of users with language disabilities have seldom been considered.
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review synthesised what is known about data visualization for adults with language disabilities, specifically the acquired language disability, aphasia and Developmental Language Disorder. It sought to extract key findings and identify what practices support effective visualization for decision making for people with language disabilities.
    METHODS: Papers were included if they investigated visualization of data, and the consumers of the data visualization were people with aphasia or developmental language disability. Seven databases were searched: CINAHL, Academic Search, Medline, PsychINFO, Ovid, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore. Included studies were charted to extract title, author(s), year, country, paper type, scientific field, participant number(s), participant group(s), main topic, subtopic, method, task description, task category, data visualization, summary, key findings relevant to the review question, and guidelines or recommendations. Narrative synthesis was used to describe how people with language disability have interacted with data visualization from a range of literature.
    RESULTS: Six studies (seven publications) were included in the review. One study came from the field of health, one from a disability rights collaboration and four studies from computer science. No studies satisfying the review criteria explored data visualization for Developmental Language Disorder; however, five studies explored participants with cognitive disabilities that included impairments of language, so these were included. A range of visualization designs were found. Studies predominantly explored understanding of visualization (4/6). One study explored how to express data visually, and one explored the use of the visualization that is, for an action, choice, or decision. Cognitively accessible data visualization practices were described in four papers and synthesized. Supportive practices reported were reducing the cognitive load associated with processing a visualization and increasing personal relevance of data visualization.
    CONCLUSIONS: Accessible data visualization for adults with aphasia and Developmental Language Disorder has only minimally been explored. Practices to specifically support users with language disability are not yet apparent. As data use in making everyday decisions is widespread, future research should explore how people with language disabilities make use of data visualization.
    CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on this subject Visual resources are used widely to support people with language disabilities in understanding of language. That is, icons, maps timelines and so forth, are used to support auditory processing. However, data visualization is used routinely by people without a language disability to support everyday decisions for example, visualization of live traffic data is used to provide users with the best route to their destination. It is unclear whether any work has explored data visualization for people with language disabilities.  What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper brings together research on the use of data visualization by adults with either Developmental Language Disorder or aphasia, collectively people with language disabilities. It highlights a gap in the design of inclusive data visualization for language disabilities and the minimal research exploring the use of data visualization for decision making in these populations. What are the clinical implications of this work? Access to data can be empowering. It has potential to enable agency in decisions and increase social participation. The existing gap in knowledge about how to design inclusive data visualization for people with language disabilities thus poses a risk of exclusion and threats to informed decision making. Highlighting the current field of literature may drive research and clinical activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号