Detection rate of prostate cancer

前列腺癌检出率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在调查临床怀疑前列腺癌(PCa)但活检前多参数磁共振成像阴性的男性进行系统活检(SB)所需的核数量,并测试前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度作为SB降低的指标。
    方法:对二百七十四例患者进行分析,从机构数据库中提取。通过使用Fisher精确检验,比较了不同减少活检方案中任何PCa和临床意义(CS)PCa的检出率。
    结果:总计,12核SB在103名男性(37.6%)中显示PCa。减少活检方案的检出率为74(27%,6核)和82核(29.9%,8核)。关于CSPCa,12核SB的检出率为26(9.5%)。减少活检方案检测到较少的CSPCa:15(5.5%)和18(6.6%),分别。所有差异均有统计学意义,p<0.05。PSA密度≥0.15无助于筛选出活检减少可能就足够的男性。
    结论:与减少活检方案相比,十二核SB在所有PCa和CSPCa中仍具有最高的检出率。如果研究者和患者同意-基于个人风险计算-进行活检,无论PSA密度如何,该SB应包含至少12个芯。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the number of cores needed in a systematic biopsy (SB) in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) but negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and to test prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density as an indicator for reduced SB.
    METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients were analyzed, extracted from an institutional database. Detection rates of any PCa and clinically significant (CS) PCa for different reduced biopsy protocols were compared by using Fisher\'s exact test.
    RESULTS: In total, 12-core SB revealed PCa in 103 (37.6%) men. Detection rates of reduced biopsy protocols were 74 (27%, 6-core) and 82 (29.9%, 8-core). Regarding CSPCa, 12-core SB revealed a detection rate of 26 (9.5%). Reduced biopsy protocols detected less CSPCa: 15 (5.5%) and 18 (6.6%), respectively. All differences were statistically significant, p < 0.05. PSA density ≥0.15 did not help to filter out men in whom a reduced biopsy may be sufficient.
    CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-core SB still has the highest detection rate of any PCa and CSPCa compared to reduced biopsy protocols. If the investigator and patient agree - based on individual risk calculation - to perform a biopsy, this SB should contain at least 12 cores regardless of PSA density.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于磁共振成像/经直肠超声(MRI/TRUS)-融合靶向前列腺活检(tBx)的学习曲线的数据有限。
    目的:本研究的目的是调查一位有经验的泌尿科医生和初学住院医师进行tBx检查的前列腺癌(PCa)检出率的差异。
    方法:从2012年到2016年,共有183例患者接受tBx治疗,共518个tBx核心。本研究中的活检由经验丰富的泌尿科医师(研究者A)或新手住院医师(研究者B)进行。结果是在tBx上检测到PCa。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,我们估计了检测PCa的比值比.使用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)来平衡患者的基线特征并比较PCa的检出率。在tBx性能之前,所有患者均接受MRI检查。
    结果:关于多变量逻辑回归分析,研究者经验与PCa检出几率较高相关(OR=1.003;95%置信区间1.002-1.006,p=0.037).IPTW调整后,研究者A(23%)和研究者B(32%;p=0.457)的检出率无显著差异.
    结论:数据显示,研究者经验与PCa检测的几率呈正相关,尽管研究者的检出率没有差异。
    BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the learning curve of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS)-fusion targeted prostate biopsies (tBx).
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate between an experienced urologist and novice resident performing tBx.
    METHODS: A total of 183 patients underwent tBx from 2012 to 2016 for a total of 518 tBx cores. Biopsies in this study were performed by an experienced urologist (investigator A) or a novice resident (investigator B). The outcome was the detection of PCa on tBx. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, we estimated odds ratios for the detection of PCa. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance patients\' baseline characteristics and compare detection rates of PCa. Before performance of tBx, all patients underwent MRI.
    RESULTS: On multivariable logistic regression analysis, investigator experience was associated with a higher odds of detection of PCa (OR = 1.003; 95% confidence interval 1.002-1.006, p = 0.037). After IPTW adjustment, there was no significant difference between the detection rate of investigator A (23%) and investigator B (32%; p = 0.457).
    CONCLUSIONS: Data revealed a positive association between investigator experience and the odds of PCa detection, although there was no difference in the detection rates of the investigators.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号