In restorative dentistry, the lack of occlusal space may lead to the mutilation of healthy tissue in order to provide sufficient space for the restorative material. Noprep dentistry can be achieved by placing high-bite restorations, followed by Simple Orthodontic Extrusion (SOE) of other teeth to close the created open bite. This rapid, partial orthodontic treatment is well accepted by patients as it can be easily performed using simple buttons, and it takes only a few weeks to reestablish occlusal contacts. The SOE technique is a further development of the Dahl concept. It has the advantages without the disadvantages. Two applications of this technique are presented in this article: the treatment of the severe wear of anterior teeth with no-prep palatal veneers made of Polymer-infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN, \'hybrid ceramic\') material and the realization of no-prep zirconia resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) to replace missing lateral incisors. An original 3D-printed resin guide for correctly positioning RBBs and facilitating the removal of excess composite cement is also presented. This work highlights the considerable advantages of multidisciplinary collaboration in the field of minimally invasive dentistry.

To evaluate the longevity of cantilevered zirconia-based resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) in replacing missing posterior teeth, as well as the quality of life and patient satisfaction experienced by those receiving zirconia RBFPDs.
A prospective single-arm uncontrolled clinical trial was conducted to replace one or more missing premolars or molars with a span of 5 to 8 mm using cantilevered zirconia RBFPDs. Thirty-six participants with 40 prostheses were recruited and underwent a 3-year clinical evaluation. The retainer designs included a minimum thickness of 0.8 mm, a minimum of 200° circumferential wraparound with an occlusal bar, and a connector dimension of 3 × 3 mm. Patient-reported outcomes, including patient satisfaction and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), were assessed.
The average age of participants was 45.8 years, and 72.5 % were women. The success rate of the posterior zirconia RBFPDs was 76.2 %, with an estimated mean success duration of 46.1 months. The survival rate was 88.1 %, with an estimated mean survival duration of 49.4 months. Participants were highly satisfied with the treatment, achieving an average satisfaction score of 80.8 ± 11.9. Participants\' total OHIP scores decreased from 52.3 to 39.6 after 3 years, indicating a significant improvement in oral health-related quality of life (P = 0.009).
After 3 years, a moderately high survival rate and favourable patient-reported outcomes of posterior cantilevered zirconia RBFPDs were achieved. Therefore, it can be recommended as a conservative treatment option to replace missing posterior teeth, provided that retainer design considerations are taken into account.
Cantilevered zirconia RBFPDs for posterior teeth can serve as a conservative treatment option that is both aesthetically pleasing and biocompatible. It offers a more cost-effective alternative compared to dental implants, which are often prohibitively expensive for the majority of patients. This approach has the potential to greatly improve patient-reported outcomes.

Despite the development of implant-supported prostheses, there are still patients for whom conservative treatments such as resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) are more appropriate. This study\'s objective was to analyze the available research on full-ceramic RBFDPs. In this study, Web of Science, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles published in English between 2010 and 2020. A total of 14 studies were reviewed based on the eligibility criteria. The results showed that using a cantilever design with one abutment had an advantage over two abutments. Additionally, it was proposed that preparations designed with retentive aids, such as a proximal box, groove, and pinhole, could improve RBFDP survival rates. IPS e.max ZirCAD, In-Ceram alumina, and zirconia CAD/CAM were the most commonly used framework materials. Most studies used air abrasion, salinization, or hydrofluoric acid for surface treatment. Adhesive resin cements were the most frequently used type of cement. The survival rate of In-Ceram ceramics (85.3%-94.8%) was lower than that of In-Ceram zirconia and IPS e.max ZirCAD. Debonding, followed by framework fracture, was the leading cause of failure. Following 3-10 years follow-up, the survival percentage of all-ceramic RBFDPs ranged from 76% to 100%. Although RBFDPs have demonstrated satisfactory success as a conservative treatment, long-term follow-ups and higher sample sizes in clinical research are required to gain more reliable outcomes on the clinical success rate of various RBFDP designs.

To generate data on the long-term survival of metal-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs).
A total of 89 patients received 94 RBFPDs, 5 of whom (women n = 1; men n = 4) received 2 RBFPDs each. All RBFPDs were fabricated as two-retainer end-abutment metal-ceramic restorations. Clinical follow-ups were performed 6 months after cementation and then annually thereafter. The mean observation time was 7.5 years. Cox regression was performed to test the effects of the variables: gender, location, arch, design, use of rubber dam, and adhesive luting system. Survival and success were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. As a secondary objective, patient and dentist satisfaction with the esthetics and function of the RBFPDs was evaluated. The significance level was set at α = .05 for all calculations.
Estimated Kaplan-Meier failure-free survival was 97.5% (standard error [SE] 1.7) after 5 years and 83.3% (SE 5.3) after 10 years. Calculated intervention-free survival (success) was 90.1% (SE 3.4) after 5 years and 65.5% (SE 6.7) after 10 years. Debonding-free survival was 92.6% (SE 2.9) after 5 years and 80.6% (SE 5.4) after 10 years. Cox regression revealed that none of the four tested variables had a significant effect on the incidence of complications in RBFPDs. Patient and dentist satisfaction with RBFPD esthetics and function was consistently high throughout the observation period.
Within the limitations of an observational study, RBFPDs achieved clinically successful outcomes over a mean observational period of 7.5 years.

UNASSIGNED: Prosthodontics are often performed to treat patients with malocclusion and dentition defects. However, single prosthodontics cannot properly correct the disharmony of teeth, dental arch and other parts affected by malocclusion, and some patients may have difficulty in recovering the occlusal function due to poor prosthodontics.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to investigate the effect of orthodontics combined with fibre-reinforced composite resin-bonded fixed partial denture (FRC-RBFPD) on anterior dentition defects with minimal vertical intermaxillary space.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty-two patients with anterior dentition defects with minimal vertical mandibular space admitted to our hospital between March 2021 and May 2023 were enrolled in this study. The participants were divided into the observation group (31 cases) and the control group (31 cases), according to the treatment plan. The control group was treated with traditional therapy, and the observation group was treated with orthodontic combined FRC-RBFPD therapy. Periodontal conditions (periodontal pocket depth [PD], the plaque index [PLI], the sulcus bleeding index [SBI]), levels of inflammatory factors in gingival crevicular fluid (high mobility group box 1 [HMGB1]), myeloid cell triggering receptor-1 (TREM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), pain (visual analogue scale [VAS]), the clinical response rate and the incidence of adverse reactions were collected and compared.
UNASSIGNED: After 1, 3, 5 and 9 months following treatment, the scores of the PD, PLI, SBI, HMGB1, VAS, TREM-1 and MCP-1 in the observation group were found to be lower than those in the control group (FPD treatment= 352.532, FPLI score treatment= 112.341, FSBI score treatment= 79.479, FVAS score treatment= 96.132, FHMGB1 treatment= 52.532, FTREM-1 score treatment= 64.593, FMCP-1 score treatment= 53.582, and they were all statistically significant P< 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the response rate between the two groups (97.77% vs. 80.65%, χ2= 4.026, P= 0.045). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (6.45% vs. 16.13%, χ2= 1.449, P= 0.229).
UNASSIGNED: Orthodontics combined with FRC-RBFPD shows an ideal restorative effect on patients with anterior dentition defects and minimal vertical intermaxillary space.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: When young patients are congenitally missing anterior teeth, different treatment modalities can be used to complement the dental arch. This article proposes a new treatment modality for the replacement of anterior teeth, the cantilever contact-point resin bonded bridge (CCP-RBB).
METHODS: In this proof of principle study, CCP-RBB\'s delivered by one operator were clinically assessed. Patients who were missing maxillary incisors and had suitable intra-oral conditions for a contact-point cantilever RBB were included. Three cases are presented to describe all adhesive steps. This proof of principle clinical study is presented with up to 60 months follow-up of the cantilever contact resin bonded bridges.
RESULTS: A total of 19 CCP-RBB\'s were evaluated after a mean period of 29.8 months. None of the restorations exhibited failure, carious lesions or fractures during the follow-up periods, demonstrating an absence of restoration debonding or the need for repair.
CONCLUSIONS: The new cantilever contact-point resin bonded bridge exhibited an excellent treatment modality without failure or debonding up to 5 years. More and extended duration in vivo studies are needed to evaluate this new treatment modality.
CONCLUSIONS: In this proof of principle the new cantilever contact-point resin bonded bridge obtained excellent results up to 5 years of clinical follow-up.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical survival rates and influence factors of different types of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPD) used in anterior missing teeth restoration. Methods: Ninety-three RBFPD were delivered to 92 patients [92 patients,43 males and 49 females, average age (46.1±12.8) years] who visited Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 2006 to December 2021 for restoration of 1 or 2 anterior missing teeth. Altogether 32 cases of glass fiber reinforced RBFPD, 39 cases of glass-based ceramic RBFPD and 22 cases of porcelain-fused-to-metal RBFPD were retrospectively analyzed. The complete survival rate, functional survival rate, patients\' satisfaction and color matching of the restorations were recorded and evaluated every year since the replacement with RBFPD. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve method was used for survival analysis, and the Log-rank analysis was used to compare the effect of the number of missing teeth, position (maxillary or mandibular), cantilever or non-cantilever and gender on the survival rate of the restorations. Results: The overall survival time for the 93 RBFPD was 13.7 years (95%CI: 12.3-15.1 years). There was a decreasing trend in complete survival and functional survival for all three material RBFPD from year to year, but complete and functional survival rates exceeded 90% at year 5 and exceeded 80% at year 10. The complete survival rate of the glass-ceramic RBFPD was higher than the other two during the follow-up period, with a complete survival rate of 90% (35/39) at year 15. The porcelain-fused-to-metal RBFPD had a higher functional survival rate in years 1-8, but the complete and functional survival rates showed a substantial decrease after year 9. The single-factor Log-rank analysis showed that the success rate of porcelain-fused-to-metal RBFPD was significantly higher than that of glass fiber reinforced RBFPD (χ²=7.33, P=0.007), and the success rate of RBFPD with 1 missing tooth restored was significantly higher than that of RBFPD with 2 missing teeth restored (χ²=3.23, P=0.072). The differences in success rates between different restoration positions (maxillary and mandibular), cantilever or non-cantilever, and gender factors were not statistically significant (χ²=2.26, P=0.133; χ²=0.68, P=0.411; χ²=1.07, P=0.300). Conclusions: For the restoration of individual missing anterior teeth, both porcelain-fused-to-metal RBFPD and glass-based ceramic RBFPD achieve a high long-term clinical success rate, with glass-based ceramic RBFPD being more able to ensure long-term restorative result.
目的： 评价粘接固定义齿（RBFPD）修复前牙缺失的长期临床应用效果并分析其影响因素。 方法： 对2006年1月至2021年12月于北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科就诊的1或2颗前牙缺失患者［92例，男性43例，女性49例，年龄（46.1±12.8）岁］的RBFPD（93件）进行回顾性分析，包括玻璃纤维增强树脂RBFPD（32件）、玻璃陶瓷RBFPD（39件）以及镍铬合金烤瓷RBFPD（22件）。统计修复后RBFPD的完全存活率和功能存活率，利用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线法进行生存分析，Log-rank检验比较缺牙数、修复位置（上颌或下颌）、单端或双端修复以及性别因素对修复体生存率的影响。 结果： 93件RBFPD的总体生存时间为13.7年（95%CI：12.3~15.1年）。3种材料RBFPD的完全存活率及功能存活率呈逐年下降趋势，但修复后5年完全存活率和功能存活率均超过90%，修复后10年完全存活率和功能存活率均超过80%。随访期间玻璃陶瓷RBFPD的完全存活率均高于其他两种RBFPD，修复后15年完全存活率为90%（35/39）。修复后1~8年镍铬合金烤瓷RBFPD功能存活率较高，但修复后9年镍铬合金烤瓷RBFPD完全存活率和功能存活率出现大幅度降低。单因素分析显示，镍铬合金烤瓷RBFPD的生存率显著大于玻璃纤维增强树脂RBFPD（χ²=7.33，P=0.007），修复1颗缺失牙的RBFPD生存率显著大于修复2颗缺失牙的RBFPD（χ²=3.23，P=0.072）；而修复位置（上颌或下颌）、单端或双端修复以及性别因素对生存率的影响差异无统计学意义（χ²=2.26，P=0.133；χ²=0.68，P=0.411；χ²=1.07，P=0.300）。 结论： 对于个别前牙缺失，镍铬合金烤瓷RBFPD和玻璃陶瓷RBFPD均可取得较长期的临床成功率，玻璃陶瓷RBFPD能保证长期修复效果。.

Resin-bonded bridges are one of the main options for replacing missing teeth for hypodontia patients. This technique offers several advantages for these patients, who are often young, have unrestored abutment teeth, and have had tooth positions optimised by orthodontic treatment. However, the replacement of missing teeth can be challenging due to tooth positions and anomalies of abutment tooth shape and size.These patients are often young adults at the time of restoration, making the minimally invasive nature and predictable long-term success of resin-bonded bridges advantageous over other treatment methods.This paper in the hypodontia themed issue discusses the importance of case selection and gives practical advice for the design and provision of resin-bonded bridges.

OBJECTIVE: Addressing a single-tooth gap in the anterior region, resulting from aplasia or trauma, poses both esthetic and functional challenges. This case report presents the restoration of a young adult with a cleft, exhibiting anterior hypoplasia and aplasia in the canine and incisor regions, using all-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses.
METHODS: After verification of esthetic and functional considerations through a diagnostic wax-up and an intraoral mock-up, three anterior all-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses made of veneered zirconium dioxide were planned in the region of the maxillary right lateral incisor and maxillary left canine. The impression was made with an intraoral scanner. The framework fit was evaluated. Glaze firing and full adhesive cementation under rubber dam followed.
RESULTS: The final restoration met the patients\' expectations and restored facial esthetics and function.
CONCLUSIONS: All-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses offer a promising minimally invasive therapeutic option for cleft patients.