Although dental patterns are unique, the use of bitemark analysis in personal identification remains controversial. To accurately reproduce and compare three-dimensional models of bitemarks and dental arches, intraoral three-dimensional scans, commonly utilized in clinical dental practice for precise and stable digital impressions, are recommended. This study aims to compare two different techniques for bitemark analysis: a digital method based on the superimposition of digital scans of dental patterns and lesions, and a visual method based on the physical superimposition of impressions and resin casts produced by 3D printing. A sample of 12 volunteers (6 males and 6 females) with a mean age of 26 years was collected as biters. Each subject was asked to bite on custom supports made from semi-rigid water bottles covered with imprintable dental wax. The dental arches and bitemarks were then recorded using an intraoral scanner and dental impressions. Scan superimposition analysis was conducted using CloudCompare software, while resin casts were printed using a 3D printer and physically superimposed on the bitemark impressions by a blind operator, who was not involved in sample collection, bite test execution, prior cast acquisition, or CloudCompare analysis. Both superimposition techniques relied on the selection of 10 corresponding landmarks (on canines and central and lateral incisors of the upper and lower arches) between the dental arches and impressions. The digital superimposition showed an average concordance of 92.5% for the upper arch landmarks and 85% for the lower arch landmarks, with an overall average concordance of 88.8% for both arches combined. In contrast, the visual analysis of resin casts showed an average concordance of 77.5% for the upper arch and 76.7% for the lower arch, with an overall average of 77.1% for both arches combined. In the analysis performed using CloudCompare, the maxillary arch demonstrated the best superimposition, with 4 landmarks (R0, R1, R2, R5) consistently overlapping. The digital analysis outperformed the visual analysis in all four quadrants, particularly in the upper right arch compared to the lower left arch, thereby supporting the integration of digital techniques in forensic applications. Further studies are necessary to validate the digital technique on a larger sample, including subjects with different dental characteristics, bite dynamics, and varying types of supports and substrates.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effect of the \"cut-out rescan\" strategy on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans from 25° convergent implants positioned at two distinct depths.
METHODS: Two customized models were fabricated, each designated to receive two posterior converged implant fixtures: one at a depth of 1 mm and the other at a depth of 4 mm. Initially, the models were scanned as reference casts using a lab scanner. The test group was involved in scanning the 1-mm and 4-mm implant models using an intraoral scanner in the following order: (1) scanning the 1-mm (T1; n=10) and (2) 4-mm (T4; n=10) implant groups with scan bodies connected to both fixtures in each model; (3) cut-out rescan (COR) in the 1-mm (COR1; n=10) and (4) 4-mm (COR4; n=10) models, leading to 40 digital files in standard tessellation language format. The mean absolute deviation (MAD), in terms of trueness and precision, between the experimental and control scans was assessed through the alignment of their respective datasets using three-dimensional analysis software. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Levene\'s tests were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: The COR4 group exhibited the highest MAD, indicative of both trueness and precision (Mean ±SD: 55.659 ±34.802). In contrast, the T1 group demonstrated the lowest MAD (Mean ±SD: 43.225 ±19.237). However, the ANOVA analysis showed no significant influence of depth (P=0.506) or type of scan (P=0.442) on the MAD. Precision also did not differ significantly across groups (P=0.071).
CONCLUSIONS: The cut-out rescan approach demonstrated an accuracy comparable to that of the one-time scan method.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital intraoral scanning provides clinicians with a range of tools to navigate challenging conditions in which conventional methods may prove difficult, such as cases involving angled adjacent implants. In these scenarios, the cut-out rescan tool serves as a valuable resource, aiding clinicians in overcoming the challenges associated with impression-making owing to the convergence of placed implants.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of intraoral scanning is critical for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing workflows in dentistry. However, data regarding the scanning accuracy of various adjacent restorative materials and intraoral scanners are lacking. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of adjacent restorative material type and CEREC\'s intraoral scanners on the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for inlay cavities.
METHODS: The artificial tooth was prepared with an occlusal cavity depth of 2 mm, a proximal box width at the gingival floor of 1.5 mm, and an equi-gingival margin extended disto-occlusally at the transition line angle on both the lingual and buccal sides for an inlay restoration. The adjacent teeth were veneered with crowns made of gold and zirconia, and an artificial tooth (resin) was utilized as the control group. The inlay cavity and adjacent teeth (Gold, Zirconia, and resin) were scanned 10 times using Chairside Economical Restoration of Esthetic Ceramics (CEREC) Primescan (PS), Omnicam (OC), and Bluecam (BC). A reference scan was obtained using a laboratory scanner (3-shape E3). Scanning was performed according to the manufacturer\'s instructions, including powder application for the BC group. Standard tesselation language files were analyzed using a three-dimensional analysis software program. Experimental data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey\'s post-hoc comparison test.
RESULTS: The restorative materials of the adjacent teeth significantly affected the accuracy of the intraoral digital impressions (p < .05). The zirconia group exhibited the highest trueness deviation, followed by the resin and gold groups, with each demonstrating a statistically significant difference (p < .05). The resin group demonstrated the highest maximum positive deviation and deviation in precision. Gold exhibited the lowest average deviation value for trueness compared with those of the other adjacent restorative materials. Intraoral scanner type significantly influenced the trueness and precision of the scan data (p < .05). The average deviation of trueness according to the intraoral scanner type increased in the following order: BC > PS > OC. The average deviation in precision increased in the following order: PS>OC>BC (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The restorative materials of the adjacent tooth and the type of intraoral scanner affect the accuracy of the intraoral digital impression. The trueness of the digital images of the BC group, obtained by spraying the powder, was comparable to that of the PS group. Among the adjacent restorative materials, zirconia exhibited the lowest trueness. In contrast, PS demonstrated the highest precision among the intraoral scanners, while resin displayed the lowest precision among the adjacent restorative materials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect of three impression methods, conventional, closed-mouth, and tissue conditioner, on complete denture fabrication.
METHODS: 60 subjects (edentulous with severely resorbed alveolar ridges - Atwood classification III or IV) who visited the Prosthodontic Department of Wuxi Stomatology Hospital, China, between January 2022 and June 2023, were selected for this study. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups of 20: a conventional impression group (CI group), a closed-mouth impression group (CM group), and a tissue conditioner group (TC group). Three months after denture restoration was completed, denture quality was assessed by clinicians in terms of marginal extension, retention, and stability. In addition, patients completed the oral health impact profile-edentulous (OHIP-EDENT) questionnaire to provide subjective satisfaction evaluations of the final denture restoration outcomes.
RESULTS: The comprehensive denture quality evaluation results showed that the TC group had the lowest score, which was significantly lower than that of the CM (P= 0.014) and CI (P< 0.001) groups. The average score of the CM group was also significantly lower than that of the CI group (P= 0.004), indicating that tissue conditioner restoration was the most effective method. The OHIP-EDENT scores gradually decreased across the groups from CI to CM to TC (P= 0.001), indicating patients\' oral health was significantly improved using tissue conditioner.
CONCLUSIONS: Tissue conditioner is a suitable dynamic functional impression method. It can significantly improve the effects for edentulous patients and increase their satisfaction.

Axial displacement of prosthetic components is a major concern in implant dentistry, particularly during screw tightening. However, implant manufacturers provide different recommended torques for tightening implant prosthetic components, which can lead to errors in prosthesis fit before and after impression making. Implant-abutment connection angle or abutment geometries can affect axial displacement. This study aimed to compare the axial displacement between conventional and digital components based on the tightening torque and differences in the implant-abutment connection angles and geometries. The results showed that scan bodies with different implant-abutment connection geometries exhibited smaller axial displacement with increasing tightening torque than other prosthetic components. Except for the scan bodies, there was no difference in the axial displacement of prosthetic components when tightened with the same torque. However, regardless of the use of digital or conventional method of impression making, the axial displacement between the impression making component and the abutment when tightened to the recommended torques were significantly different. In addition, axial displacement was affected by the internal connection angle. The results of this study indicate that the tightening torque and geometry of prosthetic components should be considered to prevent possible misfits which can occur before and after impression making.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mucosal morphological difference in distal-extension area of mandibular dentition defect taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression techniques.
METHODS: Seventeen patients with Kennedy Class I and Class II dentition defect in lower jaw were included, including twenty-two distal-extensions. Intraoral digital scanning and functional impression technique were taken in each patients, respectively. Laboratory cast scanner was used to scan the plaster casts made from the selective pressure impression to obtain the three-dimensional data. All the data were stored in STL format. The 3D data collecting from intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression from the same patient were compared by Geomagic Control 2014 software. Root mean square of 2.5mm diameter area was calculated in 5,10,15 mm from terminal tooth. Pearson\'s correlation test was used to analyze the correlation of the distance and morphological difference with SPSS 20.0 software package.
RESULTS: Mean mucosal morphological difference of jaw distal-extension edentulous area taken by intra-oral digital scanning and selective pressure impression techniques was (0.37±0.12) mm. There was positive correlation between distance from terminal tooth and mucosal morphological difference(P＜0.05). Morphological differences in 5, 10, 15 mm from terminal tooth were (0.14±0.11) mm, (0.22±0.13) mm and (0.39±0.16) mm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was positive correlation between the length of distal-extension edentulous area and mucosal morphological difference, while the kind of ridge defect and mucosal thickness may also affect the morphological difference quantity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trueness of dental arches digitised by two intraoral scanning (IOS) technologies from patients presenting crowding, diastema, and bilateral posterior edentulous space with tilted molar.
METHODS: Conventional impressions and dental stone models were generated from three patients presenting the aforementioned dental arch conditions. These models were digitised on a desktop scanner, and the resulting mesh was used as reference. Subsequently, the patients were scanned using confocal based (CF; iTero Element 2) and blue laser-multiscan (BLM; Virtuo Vivo) imaging IOS technology, totalling thirty scans. The meshes from the scans were exported in Standard Tessellation Language format and analysed using Geomagic Control X software. Root mean square (RMS) indicated deviation magnitude. Differences in IOS technologies were evaluated with paired t-tests, and dental arch conditions compared using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (α=0.05).
RESULTS: Digital dental arch from blue laser-multiscan technology showed lower trueness compared to confocal based technology for crowding (p = 0.0084) and edentulous spaces (p = 0.0025) conditions. When the types of oral condition were compared, discrepancies were significantly different for both IOS technologies, featuring the arch with diastema showing the lowest trueness, followed by edentulous spaces and crowding.
CONCLUSIONS: Dental arches presenting crowding and edentulous spaces digitised by blue laser-multiscan technology exhibited greater discrepancies compared to confocal based imaging technology. Furthermore, trueness varied among the dental arch conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The IOS technology and patient\'s dental arch condition can influence the trueness of dental arch digitisation. Being aware of these effects allows clinicians to take them into account during scanning procedures, digital planning and manufacturing.

Digital technologies are gradually gaining ground in dentistry. In particular, taking impressions with intraoral scanners is becoming routine; however, even this must often be preceded by the use of retraction cords. This article presents an innovative technique to record digital impressions of natural tooth abutments using interim restorations relined with impression material instead of retraction cords. In the laboratory, using computer-aided design, the technician can segment the internal surface of the interim restoration and use it to replace the abutment of the intraoral scan, thus obtaining an accurate coping that yields more detailed information about the supragingival and intrasulcular surface of the preparation.

To evaluate the fabrication trueness of additively manufactured maxillary definitive casts with various tooth preparations fabricated with different 3-dimensional (3D) printers and print orientations.
A maxillary typodont with tooth preparations for a posterior 3-unit fixed partial denture, lateral incisor crown, central incisor and canine veneers, first premolar and second molar inlays, and a first molar crown was digitized with an industrial scanner. This scan file was used to fabricate definitive casts with a digital light processing (DLP) or stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer in different orientations (0-degree, 30-degree, 45-degree, and 90-degree) (n = 7). All casts were digitized with the same scanner, and the deviations within each preparation site were evaluated. Generalized linear model analysis was used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).
The interaction between the 3D printer and the print orientation affected measured deviations within all preparations (P ≤ 0.001) except for the lateral incisor crown and canine veneer (P ≥ 0.094), which were affected only by the main factors (P < 0.001). DLP-90 mostly led to the highest and DLP-0 mostly resulted in the lowest deviations within posterior tooth preparations (P ≤ 0.014). DLP-30 led to the lowest deviations within the first premolar inlay and DLP-45 led to the lowest deviations within the central incisor veneer preparation (P ≤ 0.045).
Posterior preparations of tested casts had the highest trueness with DLP-0 or DLP-30, while central incisor veneer preparations had the highest trueness with DLP-45. DLP-90 led to the lowest trueness for most of the tooth preparations.
Definitive casts with tooth preparations fabricated with the tested DLP 3D printer and the print orientation adjusted on tooth preparation may enable well-fitting restorations. However, 90-degree print orientation should be avoided with this 3D printer, as it led to the lowest fabrication trueness.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the application of digital impression and resin model technology in removable partial dentures (RPD) for Kennedy classⅠandⅡdentition defects.
METHODS: Patients with Kennedy classⅠorⅡdental defect were selected and grouped in accordance with the following denture production processes: digital impression/resin model/cast cobalt-chromium alloy framework group (group A), digital impression/resin model/laser printed titanium framework group (group B), alginate impression/plaster model/cast cobalt-chromium alloy framework group (group C), and alginate impression/plaster model/laser printed titanium framework group (group D), with 40 cases in each group. The final RPD was examined in place in the mouth, and the evaluation indicators included the retention force of clamp ring, the tightness of connector and base, and the accuracy of occlusion. The evaluation scores of each index were used for analysis on the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the score of each index was found among the four groups in RPD.
CONCLUSIONS: The cast cobalt-chromium alloy and laser-printed titanium framework RPD using digital impression and resin model can meet the clinical restoration requirements of patients with Kennedy classⅠandⅡdentition defects.
目的: 评估肯氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ类牙列缺损数字化印模及树脂模型技术在可摘局部义齿（RPD）中的应用效果。方法: 选择肯氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ类牙列缺损患者，按照义齿制作流程分组：数字化印模/树脂模型/钴铬合金铸造支架组（A组）、数字化印模/树脂模型/激光打印钛支架组（B组）、藻酸盐印模/石膏模型/钴铬合金铸造支架组（C组）、藻酸盐印模/石膏模型/激光打印钛支架组（D组），每组40例。对最终完成的RPD在口内就位情况进行检查，评估指标包括卡环固位力、连接体和基托在口内的密合度、咬合准确度，各项指标评估分值使用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验进行分析。结果: 4组RPD各项指标的评分值差异无统计学意义。结论: 利用数字化印模及树脂模型完成的铸造钴铬合金和激光打印钛支架式RPD能够满足肯氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ类牙列缺损患者的临床修复要求。.