目标:在分娩室工作的助产士工作满意度的证据很少。
背景:在分娩室工作的助产士的工作满意度可能在最近几十年中由于孕产妇健康的医疗化而发生了变化。
目的:分析在分娩室工作的助产士的工作满意度水平。
方法:我们搜索了WebofScience,Scopus,MEDLINE,CUIDEN和CINAHL用于观察性和混合方法研究。文献检索时间为2022年9月至10月。
结果:共有13项研究纳入系统评价。对12项研究中的变量“助产士”“工作满意度”进行了荟萃分析。助产士对他们的工作满意度给予积极评价:DME,CI(95%)=1.24[0.78,1.69]。第1子组:DME,CI(95%)=2.41[2.05,2.76]);亚组2:DME,CI(95%)=0.76[0.65,0.86];第3亚组:DME,CI(95%)=1.11[0.95,1.27];第4亚组:DME,CI(95%)=0.10[-0.11,0.31]。
结论:尽管助产士表现出很高的满意度,仪器的异质性,缺乏特异性和发现的研究数量有限限制了结局。
结论:在劳动病房工作的助产士中,没有具体的衡量手段来评估工作满意度,因此,这些数据可能与现实不符,因为它们没有考虑到该实践领域中的特定专业方面。
OBJECTIVE: There is little documented evidence of job satisfaction in midwives who work in birthing rooms.
BACKGROUND: Job satisfaction in midwives who work in birthing rooms may have changed in recent decades due to the medicalization of maternal health.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse job satisfaction levels among midwives working in birthing rooms.
METHODS: We searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, CUIDEN and CINAHL for observational and mixed method studies. The literature search was carried out from September to October 2022.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of the variable \"midwives\' job satisfaction\" was performed on 12 of the studies. Midwives rated their job satisfaction positively: DME, CI (95%) = 1.24 [0.78, 1.69]. Subgroup 1: DME, CI (95%) = 2.41 [2.05, 2.76]); Subgroup 2: DME, CI (95%) = 0.76 [0.65, 0.86]; subgroup 3: DME, CI (95%) = 1.11 [0.95, 1.27]; subgroup 4: DME, CI (95%) = 0.10 [-0.11, 0.31].
CONCLUSIONS: Although midwives show high levels of satisfaction, the heterogeneity of instruments, lack of specificity and limited number of studies found restrict the outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: There are no specific measurement instruments for assessing job satisfaction among midwives working in labour wards, so it is possible that these data do not correspond to reality as they do not take into account specific professional aspects within this field of practice.