Degenerative

退行性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究调查了颈椎的Hounsfield单位(HU)与颈深椎旁肌萎缩之间的相关性,即多裂和半颈椎(SCer),诊断为退行性脊髓型颈椎病(DCM)的患者。
    方法:作者回顾性分析了136例年龄在50-79岁(男性81例,女性55例)的DCM患者的数据。通过标准化技术获得C4椎骨中松质骨的HU测量值。作者评估了脂肪浸润(FI);分析了C4-5,C5-6和C6-7水平的多裂和SCer的功能和椎骨横截面积(CSA);并分析了Modic变化(MC)的存在和轴性颈部疼痛的发生率。
    结果:患者分为A组(n=56),平均±SDHU为293.3±15.6,B组(n=80),平均±SDHU为389.5±10.6。两组患者术后临床结果均有显著改善(p<0.05);差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组之间观察到颈部疼痛的HU测量值和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的显着差异(p<0.05)。与MCs-1型相关的最高VAS评分(即,T1加权图像上的低信号和T2加权图像上的高信号)。与B组相比,A组的多裂和SCer的功能CSA与椎骨CSA的比率显着降低(p<0.05)。两组肌肉的功能性CSA不对称性没有显著差异(p>0.05)。较低的HU测量值与多裂(p=0.002)和SCer(p=0.035)的FI增加直接相关。此外,发现多裂的功能性CSA与椎骨CSA比率与HU值之间存在很强的正相关(p=0.003),而HU测量值和VAS评分呈负相关(p=0.020)。
    结论:在那些年龄超过50岁的DCM患者中,HU值降低的患者表现出多裂肌和SCer肌的FI水平升高.此外,这些患者表现出明显的肌肉萎缩,这与轴性颈部疼痛有关。在MC和降低的HU值之间也确定了显著的关系。
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the correlation between Hounsfield units (HU) of the cervical vertebrae and atrophy of the cervical deep paraspinal muscles, namely the multifidus and semispinalis cervicis (SCer), in patients diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
    METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed data from 136 patients aged 50-79 years (81 males and 55 females) who underwent surgical intervention for DCM. HU measurements of the cancellous bone in the C4 vertebra were acquired through standardized techniques. The authors evaluated fatty infiltration (FI); analyzed functional and vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus and SCer at the C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7 levels; and analyzed the presence of Modic changes (MCs) and the incidence of axial neck pain.
    RESULTS: Patients were categorized into group A (n = 56) with mean ± SD HU of 293.3 ± 15.6 and group B (n = 80) with mean ± SD HU of 389.5 ± 10.6. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in postoperative clinical outcomes (p < 0.05); however, no statistically significant difference was observed (p > 0.05). Significant disparities in HU measurements and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck pain were observed between the groups (p < 0.05). The highest VAS score correlated with MCs-1 type (i.e., low signal on T1-weighted images and high signal on T2-weighted images). The functional CSA to vertebral CSA ratios of the multifidus and SCer in group A were markedly reduced compared to those of group B (p < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in functional CSA asymmetry between the groups for both muscles (p > 0.05). Lower HU measurements directly correlated with increased FI in the multifidus (p = 0.002) and SCer (p = 0.035). Furthermore, a strong positive association was found between the functional CSA to vertebral CSA ratio of the multifidus and HU values (p = 0.003), whereas HU measurements and VAS scores exhibited a negative correlation (p = 0.020).
    CONCLUSIONS: Among those patients older than 50 years with DCM, those with decreased HU values demonstrated elevated FI levels in the multifidus and SCer muscles. Moreover, these patients presented with pronounced muscle atrophy, which correlated with axial neck pain. A significant relationship was also identified between MCs and diminished HU values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于有症状的神经根型颈椎病,常需要手术减压。在颈椎上,微创后路颈经孔切开术(MIS-PCF)和前路经骨入路(ATCA)是外科医生可用的现代技术.本系统评价和单臂荟萃分析旨在评估MIS-PCF和ATCA治疗神经根型颈椎病的手术和患者报告结果。
    方法:使用1)Ovid;2)Epub在打印和过程中,数据审查和其他非索引引文;以及3)Scopus数据库,报告了使用MIS-PCF或ATCA进行宫颈减压后的结局。具体来说,基线特征,手术结果,并评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)颈痛评分的变化。使用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行观察性研究,对研究质量进行分级。
    结果:确定了40项研究,涉及1661名患者。两种技术的比较分析显示并发症没有显着差异(7%,95%CI5%-10%,p=0.75)或再手术率(5%,95%CI3%-7%,p=0.41)。此外,估计失血量没有显着差异(55.39,95%CI44.62-66.16ml,p=0.55)或手术时间(85.15,95%CI65.38-104.92分钟,p=0.05)。手术后,ATCA在VAS颈部疼痛评分方面显着改善(p<0.01)(ATCA点降低6.7,95%CI6.0-7.5点与MIS-PCF3.0,95%CI1.0-5.0点)。
    结论:ATCA和MIS-PCF是神经根病外科治疗的有效现代技术。两种方法都显示出相当的术后结果,包括并发症和再手术率。然而,ATCA显示可显著改善VAS颈痛评分.
    OBJECTIVE: Surgical decompression is often indicated for symptomatic cases of cervical radiculopathy. In the cervical spine, minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MIS-PCF) and the anterior transcorporeal approach (ATCA) are modern techniques available to surgeons. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to assess surgical and patient-reported outcomes of MIS-PCF and ATCA for cervical radiculopathy.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using 1) Ovid; 2) Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations; and 3) Scopus databases, which reported outcomes following cervical decompression using MIS-PCF or the ATCA. Specifically, baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, and changes in visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score were assessed. The quality of the studies was graded using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
    RESULTS: Forty studies with 1661 patients were identified. The comparative analysis of both techniques revealed no significant differences in complication (7%, 95% CI 5%-10%, p = 0.75) or reoperation rates (5%, 95% CI 3%-7%, p = 0.41). Additionally, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss (55.39, 95% CI 44.62-66.16 ml, p = 0.55) or operative time (85.15, 95% CI 65.38-104.92 minutes, p = 0.05). The ATCA showed significantly greater improvement (p < 0.01) in VAS neck pain scores following surgery (ATCA point reduction 6.7, 95% CI 6.0-7.5 points vs MIS-PCF 3.0, 95% CI 1.0-5.0 points).
    CONCLUSIONS: The ATCA and MIS-PCF are effective modern techniques for the surgical treatment of radiculopathy. Both approaches showed comparable postoperative outcomes, including complication and reoperation rates. However, the ATCA was shown to provide significantly greater improvement in VAS neck pain scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    该病例报告描述了一名58岁女性的成功全膝关节置换术(TKA),该女性有多次膝关节手术史。该患者先前有三次外科手术。病人的第一次手术是部分膝关节置换术,患者接受的第二次手术是关节镜半月板切除术,第三次手术是胫骨高位截骨术(HTO),给她留下了大量的疤痕组织和身体结构的变化。当疤痕组织在关节上方或靠近关节时,通过这种收缩或收缩,周围的组织被向内拉。作为这种紧密度的结果,关节可能经历受限的运动。在Ehlers-Danlos综合征患者中,关节伸展和过度灵活是常见的。如果你需要缝合伤口,这可能会成为一个问题,因为皮肤往往不够坚固,无法支撑它们。患者之前已经接受了三次手术,但仍显示出严重疼痛的迹象,肿胀,和僵硬的膝盖,这使得患者在休息姿势时遭受更多的痛苦,有时也使它变得如此困难,以至于影响了日常任务。在这种情况下,当病人咨询医生时,患者被建议接受TKA.TKA是骨科手术技术的方法,是最一致的成功和非常有效的。终末期退行性膝骨关节炎患者可能会期望该手术获得可靠的结果。该病例显示了术前计划,手术方法,和术后护理需要成功治疗复杂的患者概况。遵循医院协议,和病人的手术是在适当的护理和卫生。
    This case report describes the successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a 58-year-old female with a prior history of multiple knee surgeries. The patient had three prior surgical procedures. The first surgery of the patient was a partial knee replacement, the second surgery the patient underwent was an arthroscopic meniscectomy, and the third surgery was a high tibial osteotomy (HTO) that left her with an extensive amount of scar tissue and a change in physical structure. When scar tissue develops over or close to a joint, the surrounding tissues are pulled inward by this shrinking or contraction. A joint may experience restricted movement as a result of this tightness. Stretchy and excessively flexible joints are common in people with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. This may become an issue if you need sutures for a wound because the skin is frequently not strong enough to support them. The patient already undergone three surgeries prior but still showed signs of severe pain, swelling, and stiffness in the knee which made the patient suffer more during rest position and also made it sometimes so difficult that it affected everyday tasks. In this situation when the patient consulted the doctors, the patient was suggested to undergo TKA. TKA is the method of orthopedic surgical technique that is most consistently successful and highly effective. Patients with end-stage degenerative knee osteoarthritis might expect reliable results from this surgery. The case demonstrates the preoperative planning, surgical methods, and postoperative care needed to successfully treat a complicated patient profile. Hospital protocols were followed, and the patient\'s surgery was done with proper care and hygiene.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究比较了接受一到三级腰椎融合术治疗退行性病变的镰状细胞病(SCD)患者和无镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的术后结局。
    方法:使用PearlDiver数据库确定了2010-2021年接受一到三级腰椎融合术治疗退行性病变的患者。患者分为1)SCD和2)非SCD组,年龄倾向匹配1:1,性别,Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI),手术方法,和各种合并症。使用卡方和Mann-WhitneyU检验通过单水平和多水平程序分别分析并发症。
    结果:倾向评分匹配确定了1,934名接受单级别融合的SCD和非SCD患者以及2,094名接受多级别融合的SCD和非SCD患者。跨单层融合,患有SCD的患者神经血管受损的风险明显更高(p<0.001),静脉血栓栓塞(p=0.004),肺炎(p=0.032),尿路感染(UTI)(p=0.001),术后阿片类药物的使用增加到12个月(p=0.018)。跨多层次融合,SCD具有较高的神经血管损害风险(p<0.001),肺炎(p=0.010),和UTI(p<0.001)。所有SCD患者术后1个月(p=0.001)和6个月(p=0.009)的阿片类药物使用率均明显升高。
    结论:接受腰椎融合术的SCD患者显示出较高的凝血障碍风险,缺血,和感染相关的并发症,以及术后长期使用阿片类药物。了解SCD患者独特的并发症情况可能有助于指导外科医生完善围手术期管理策略,以优化SCD患者的预后。
    OBJECTIVE: The present study compares postoperative outcomes between patients with and without sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing one- to three-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent one- to three-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative pathologies from 2010-2021 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients were separated into 1) SCD and 2) non-SCD groups and were propensity-matched 1:1 for age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), surgical approach, and various comorbidities. Complications were separately analyzed by single- and multi-level procedures using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U testing.
    RESULTS: Propensity-score matching identified 1,934 SCD and non-SCD patients who underwent single-level fusion and 2,094 SCD and non-SCD patients who underwent multi-level fusion. Across single-level fusions, those with SCD had a significantly higher risk of neurovascular compromise (p < 0.001), venous thromboembolism (p = 0.004), pneumonia (p = 0.032), urinary tract infections (UTI) (p = 0.001), and greater postoperative opioid usage out to twelve months (p = 0.018). Across multi-level fusions, SCD carried higher risk for neurovascular compromise (p < 0.001), pneumonia (p = 0.010), and UTI (p < 0.001). All SCD patients had significantly higher opioid use at one month (p = 0.001) and at six months (p = 0.009) postoperatively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCD undergoing lumbar spinal fusion demonstrate higher risks for coagulopathic, ischemic, and infectious-related complications, as well as long-term postoperative opioid use. Awareness of the unique complication profile in SCD patients may help guide surgeons in refining perioperative management strategies to optimize outcomes in patients with SCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:接受深部脑刺激(DBS)的帕金森病(PD)患者的术前MR图像通常显示偶然的影像学异常(RA)。这些发现范围从微小的变化到严重的病理。这些发现对患者临床结局的影响尚不清楚。作者对接受DBS的PD患者的RA进行了表征,并评估了临床结果。
    方法:回顾了作者机构从2010年到2022年接受DBS电极植入MRI检查的PD患者的记录。从官方术前MRI报告中确定了RA。RA分为四个一般类别(缺血变化,萎缩或退行性变化[ADC],结构异常,和肿瘤)并与临床结果(包括主观临床反应,左旋多巴等效剂量[LED],和统一的帕金森病评定量表第三部分[UPDRS]评分)在1年和最后一次可用的随访中。
    结果:在这篇综述中,160名患者被确定为初步分析,135个呈现≥1个RA。在这135名患者中,69.4%(111/160)有缺血性血管改变,39.4%(63/160)有ADC,16.9%(27/160)发生结构变化,1.9%(3/160)有肿瘤。这些组之间的术前LED或UPDRS评分没有差异。在DBS之后,在1年和最后一次随访时间点,有RA的患者和没有RA的患者之间的结局没有差异。包括死亡率和时间。结构性病变与较低的死亡率相关(OR0.1,p=0.04)。ADC与1年(OR0.50,p=0.04)和最后(OR0.49,p=0.03)随访时主观临床反应较差相关,但是主观上较差的反应与较差的客观结果指标无关。
    结论:大多数RA对接受DBS的PD患者的临床结局没有显著影响。广义ADC可能与较差的主观反应相关,如果在术前MRI诊断,可能需要与患者进一步讨论。
    OBJECTIVE: Preoperative MR images obtained in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) often reveal incidental radiographic abnormalities (RAs). These findings range from small changes to gross pathologies. The effect of these findings on patients\' clinical outcomes is unknown. The authors characterized RAs in patients with PD who underwent DBS and assessed clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: Records of patients at the authors\' institution with PD who underwent MRI for DBS electrode implantation from 2010 through 2022 were reviewed. RAs were identified from the official preoperative MRI reports. RAs were grouped into four general categories (ischemic changes, atrophy or degenerative changes [ADCs], structural abnormalities, and tumors) and correlated with clinical outcomes (including subjective clinical response, levodopa equivalent dose [LED], and Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale Part III [UPDRS] score) at the 1-year and last available follow-ups.
    RESULTS: In this review, 160 patients were identified for initial analysis, with 135 presenting with ≥ 1 RAs. Of these 135 patients, 69.4% (111/160) had ischemic vascular changes, 39.4% (63/160) had ADCs, 16.9% (27/160) had structural changes, and 1.9% (3/160) had tumors. No differences in preoperative LED or UPDRS score were observed between these groups. After DBS, no differences in outcomes were observed between patients with RAs and those without RAs for both the 1-year and last follow-up time points, including mortality rates and times. Structural lesions were associated with lower mortality rates (OR 0.1, p = 0.04). ADCs were associated with a worse subjective clinical response at the 1-year (OR 0.50, p = 0.04) and last (OR 0.49, p = 0.03) follow-ups, but subjectively worse responses were not correlated with worse objective outcome measures.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most RAs have no significant effect on clinical outcomes in PD patients undergoing DBS. Generalized ADCs may be associated with poorer subjective responses and may warrant further discussion with the patient if diagnosed on preoperative MRI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:椎间孔和椎间孔外腰椎间盘突出症(FELDH)是导致腰椎神经根病的重要病理条件。Reulen和Wiltse引入的椎旁肌肉分裂方法是一种合理的手术技术。还引入了使用管状牵开器系统的微创手术。然而,FELDH的手术治疗比中央或关节下腰椎间盘突出症(LDHs)更具挑战性。一些研究人员提出了通过后外侧入路单孔椎间孔外内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术作为FELDH的替代方法,但是已经报道了异质性的临床结果。最近,已建议将双门静脉内窥镜(BE)椎旁入路作为替代方法。这项研究的目的是比较BE和显微管状(MT)椎旁入路对FELDH患者进行减压椎间孔切开术和腰椎间盘切除术(paraLD)的临床效果。
    方法:91例单侧腰椎神经根病和FELDH患者接受paraLD治疗。收集人口统计学和围手术期数据。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估背部和腿部疼痛的临床结果。脊柱残疾的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),和改良的Macnab患者满意度标准。术后并发症和再手术率也进行了评估。
    结果:总计,最终分析包括76例患者。其中,43例接受BEparaLD(A组),其余33例接受MTparaLD(B组)。两组之间的人口统计学和术前数据没有统计学差异。所有患者VAS背部均有显著改善,VAS支腿,和ODI评分与基线值相比(p<0.05)。术后第2天,A组的VAS背部评分改善明显优于B组(p<0.001)。然而,术后1年,两组患者的临床指标具有可比性(p>0.05)。根据修改后的Macnab标准,86.1%和72.7%的患者在A组和B组中有优异或良好的预后,分别。没有观察到组间差异(p=0.367)。此外,手术总时间或手术引流量无差异.术后并发症在两组间无显著差异(p=0.301);B组的再手术率明显高于对照组(p=0.035)。
    结论:BEparaLD是FELDH的有效治疗方法,是MTparaLD的替代方法。特别是,BEparaLD具有早期改善术后背痛和低再手术率的优点。
    OBJECTIVE: Foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation (FELDH) is an important pathological condition that can lead to lumbar radiculopathy. The paraspinal muscle-splitting approach introduced by Reulen and Wiltse is a reasonable surgical technique. Minimally invasive procedures using a tubular retractor system have also been introduced. However, surgical treatment is considered more challenging for FELDH than for central or subarticular lumbar disc herniations (LDHs). Some researchers have proposed uniportal extraforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy through a posterolateral approach as an alternative for FELDH, but heterogeneous clinical results have been reported. Recently, the biportal endoscopic (BE) paraspinal approach has been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of BE and microscopic tubular (MT) paraspinal approaches for decompressive foraminotomy and lumbar discectomy (paraLD) in patients with FELDH.
    METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy and FELDH underwent paraLD. Demographic and perioperative data were collected. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for spinal disability, and the modified Macnab criteria for patient satisfaction. Postoperative complications and reoperation rates were also evaluated.
    RESULTS: In total, 76 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 43 underwent BE paraLD (group A) and the remaining 33 underwent MT paraLD (group B). The demographic and preoperative data were not statistically different between the groups. All patients showed significant improvements in VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI scores compared with baseline values (p < 0.05). The improvement in VAS back scores was significantly better in group A than in group B on postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001). However, all clinical parameters were comparable between the two groups after postoperative year 1 (p > 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, 86.1% and 72.7% of the patients had excellent or good outcomes in groups A and B, respectively. No intergroup differences were observed (p = 0.367). In addition, there were no differences in the total operation time or amount of surgical drainage. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.301); however, reoperation rates were significantly higher in group B (p = 0.035).
    CONCLUSIONS: BE paraLD is an effective treatment for FELDH and is an alternative to MT paraLD. In particular, BE paraLD has advantages of early improvement in postoperative back pain and low reoperation rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较骨椎弓根后路固定(CPPF)装置与传统椎弓根螺钉在成人退变性腰椎滑脱减压融合术中的稳定性。
    方法:在经过验证的1级L4-L5脊椎滑脱模型中使用有限元分析(FEA)来比较单行椎板切除术后的节段稳定性,椎弓根螺钉固定椎板切除术,或椎板切除术与CPPF装置固定。在模型上施加了500N的从动件载荷,并通过在不同方向上施加7.5Nm的力来模拟不同的功能运动。结果包括运动程度,CCPPF装置承受的拉力,和周围皮质骨的应力。
    结果:在最大负载时,单独的椎板切除术显示屈曲运动范围从6.35°增加到7.39°。椎弓根螺钉固定和CPPF装置固定的椎板切除术在所有运动范围的最大载荷下都将脊柱节段运动减小至≤1°。包括屈曲(0.94°和1.09°),延伸(-0.85°和-1.08°),横向弯曲(-0.56°和-0.96°),和扭转(0.63°和0.91°),分别。在最大载荷下,椎弓根螺钉固定和CPPF装置固定之间的节段稳定性没有显着差异,在任何运动范围内差异≤0.4°。在最大载荷期间,CPPF装置中的拉伸力保持≤失效极限载荷(487N)的51%,周围皮质骨中的应力保持≤皮质骨极限应力(125.4MPa)的84%。
    结论:CPFF固定显示与传统椎弓根螺钉固定相似的节段稳定性,而周围皮质骨的拉力和应力保持在失效负荷以下。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the stability of a corticopedicular posterior fixation (CPPF) device with traditional pedicle screws for decompression and fusion in adult degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    METHODS: Finite element analysis (FEA) was used in a validated model of grade 1 L4-L5 spondylolisthesis to compare segmental stability after laminectomy alone, laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation, or laminectomy with CPPF device fixation. A 500-N follower load was applied to the model and different functional movements were simulated by applying a 7.5-Nm force in different directions. Outcomes included degrees of motion, tensile forces experienced in the CPPF device, and stresses in surrounding cortical bone.
    RESULTS: At maximum loading, laminectomy alone demonstrated a 1° increase in flexion range of motion, from 6.35° to 7.39°. Laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation and CPPF device fixation both reduced spinal segmental motion to ≤1° at maximum loading in all ranges of motion, including flexion (0.94° and 1.09°), extension (-0.85° and -1.08°), lateral bending (-0.56° and -0.96°), and torsion (0.63° and 0.91°), respectively. There was no significant difference in segmental stability between pedicle screw fixation and CPPF device fixation during maximum loading, with a difference of ≤0.4° in any range of motion. Tensile forces in the CPPF device remained ≤51% the ultimate load to failure (487 N) and stress in surrounding cortical bone remained ≤84% the ultimate stress of cortical bone (125.4 MPa) during maximum loading.
    CONCLUSIONS: CPFF fixation demonstrated similar segmental stability to traditional pedicle screw fixation whereas tensile forces and stress in surrounding cortical bone remained below the load to failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脊柱退行性疾病对我们的医疗保健系统造成了越来越大的负担,然而,人们对获取和护理的纵向趋势知之甚少。我们的目标是提供加拿大退行性脊柱病理的手术量趋势的基本肖像。
    加拿大健康信息研究所(CIHI)数据库用于识别2006年至2019年因退行性脊柱疾病接受手术的所有患者。干预措施数量的趋势,计划外与计划外住院,工作时间与工作时间外干预,使用线性回归模型对资源利用和不良事件进行回顾性分析.置信区间以预期计数比率量表(CR)报告。
    分析了2006年至2019年期间的338,629例脊柱干预和256,360例住院。选择性住院的患者年平均年龄的平均值和SD为55.5(SD1.6),紧急住院的患者年平均年龄为55.6(SD1.6)。择期住院的女性患者比例为47.8%(91,789/192,027),急诊住院的女性患者比例为41.4%(26,633/64,333)。择期住院平均每年增加2.0%,CR=1.020(95%CI1.017-1.023,p<0.0001),而紧急住院率表现出更快的增长,平均每年3.4%,CR1.034(95%CI1.027-1.040,p<0.0001)。"小时内"手术平均每年增加2.7%,CR1.027(95%CI1.021-1.033,p<0.0001),而“非工作时间”手术每年增长6.1%,CR1.061(95%CI1.051-1.071,p<0.0001)。计划外住院的资源利用率约为计划住院的两倍半。至少有一个不良事件的脊柱干预的比例平均每年增加6.3%,CR1.063(95%CI1.049-1.077,p<0.0001)。
    这项研究为所有提供商和利益相关者提供了至关重要的新数据。紧急非工作时间住院的快速增长表明,这一不断增长的患者群体的需求远远超过了医疗保健资源分配。未来的研究将分析这种系统转变对健康相关的生活质量的影响,并确定获得外科护理的人口和社会经济不平等。
    这项工作由Bob和TrishSaunders脊柱研究基金通过VGH和UBC医院基金会资助。研究的资助者在研究设计中没有作用,数据收集,数据分析,数据解释,或者写手稿。
    UNASSIGNED: Spinal degenerative disease represents a growing burden on our healthcare system, yet little is known about longitudinal trends in access and care. Our goal was to provide an essential portrait of surgical volume trends for degenerative spinal pathologies within Canada.
    UNASSIGNED: The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) database was used to identify all patients receiving surgery for a degenerative spinal condition from 2006 to 2019. Trends in number of interventions, unscheduled vs scheduled hospitalizations, in-hours vs out-of-hours interventions, resource utilization and adverse events were analyzed retrospectively using linear regression models. Confidence intervals were reported in the expected count ratio scale (CR).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 338,629 spinal interventions and 256,360 hospitalizations between 2006 and 2019 were analyzed. The mean and SD of the annual mean age of patients was 55.5 (SD 1.6) for elective hospitalizations and 55.6 (SD 1.6) for emergent hospitalizations. The proportion of female patients was 47.8% (91,789/192,027) for elective hospitalizations and 41.4% (26,633/64,333) for emergent hospitalizations. Elective hospitalizations increased an average of 2.0% per year, with CR = 1.020 (95% CI 1.017-1.023, p < 0.0001) while emergent hospitalizations exhibited more rapid growth with an average 3.4% annually, with CR 1.034 (95% CI 1.027-1.040, p < 0.0001). «In-hours » surgeries increased on average 2.7% per year, with CR 1.027 (95% CI 1.021-1.033, p < 0.0001), while « out-of-hours » surgeries increased 6.1% annually, with CR 1.061 (95% CI 1.051-1.071, p < 0.0001). The resource utilization for unscheduled hospitalizations approximates two and a half times that of scheduled hospitalizations. The proportions of spinal interventions with at least one adverse event increased on average 6.3% per year, with CR 1.063 (95% CI 1.049-1.077, p < 0.0001).
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides novel data critical for all providers and stakeholders. The rapid growth of emergent out-of-hours hospitalizations demonstrates that the needs of this growing patient population have far exceeded health-care resource allocations. Future studies will analyze the health-related quality of life implications of this system shift and identify demographic and socioeconomic inequities in access to surgical care.
    UNASSIGNED: This work was funded by the Bob and Trish Saunders Spine Research Fund through The VGH and UBC Hospital Foundation. The funder of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估ChatGPT建议的安全性和准确性,并与北美脊柱协会(NASS)诊断和治疗神经根型颈椎病的循证指南进行比较。
    方法:ChatGPT提示了2011年NASS神经根病临床指南中的问题,并评估了一致性。确定了NASS指南中的选定关键短语。完整性被测量为ChatGPT响应和NASS指南之间的重叠关键短语的数量除以关键短语的总数。一位资深脊柱外科医生评估了ChatGPT反应的安全性和准确性。进一步评估了ChatGPT反应的可读性,相似性,和一致性。测量Flesch阅读轻松评分和Flesch-Kincaid阅读水平以评估可读性。Jaccard相似性指数用于评估ChatGPT反应与NASS临床指南之间的一致性。
    结果:在14个NASS临床指南中总共确定了100个关键短语。ChatGPT-4的平均完整性为46%。ChatGPT-3.5的完整性为34%。ChatGPT-4的表现优于ChatGPT-3.5,幅度为12%。ChatGPT-4.0输出的平均Flesch读数得分为15.24,这非常难以阅读,需要大学研究生教育才能理解。ChatGPT-3.5输出的平均Flesch阅读得分较低,为8.73,这表明它们更加难以阅读,并且需要专业的教育水平才能做到这一点。然而,ChatGPT的两个版本都比NASS指南更易于访问,平均Flesch阅读得分为4.58。此外,以NASS指南为参考,ChatGPT-3.5的平均±SDJaccard相似性指数得分为0.20±0.078,而ChatGPT-4的平均为0.18±0.068。根据医生的评估,来自ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0的输出100%的时间是安全的。根据一位高级脊柱外科医生的说法,14例(92.8%)ChatGPT-3.5反应中的13例和14例(100%)ChatGPT-4.0反应中的14例与当前神经根型颈椎病的最佳临床实践一致。
    结论:ChatGPT模型能够为NASS关于神经根病的临床指南问题提供安全、准确但不完整的响应。尽管作者的结果表明,在ChatGPT可以在临床环境中可靠地部署之前需要改进,未来版本的LLM有望成为神经根型颈椎病指南的更新参考.未来的版本必须优先考虑不同受众的可访问性和可理解性。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and accuracy of ChatGPT recommendations in comparison to the evidence-based guidelines from the North American Spine Society (NASS) for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy.
    METHODS: ChatGPT was prompted with questions from the 2011 NASS clinical guidelines for cervical radiculopathy and evaluated for concordance. Selected key phrases within the NASS guidelines were identified. Completeness was measured as the number of overlapping key phrases between ChatGPT responses and NASS guidelines divided by the total number of key phrases. A senior spine surgeon evaluated the ChatGPT responses for safety and accuracy. ChatGPT responses were further evaluated on their readability, similarity, and consistency. Flesch Reading Ease scores and Flesch-Kincaid reading levels were measured to assess readability. The Jaccard Similarity Index was used to assess agreement between ChatGPT responses and NASS clinical guidelines.
    RESULTS: A total of 100 key phrases were identified across 14 NASS clinical guidelines. The mean completeness of ChatGPT-4 was 46%. ChatGPT-3.5 yielded a completeness of 34%. ChatGPT-4 outperformed ChatGPT-3.5 by a margin of 12%. ChatGPT-4.0 outputs had a mean Flesch reading score of 15.24, which is very difficult to read, requiring a college graduate education to understand. ChatGPT-3.5 outputs had a lower mean Flesch reading score of 8.73, indicating that they are even more difficult to read and require a professional education level to do so. However, both versions of ChatGPT were more accessible than NASS guidelines, which had a mean Flesch reading score of 4.58. Furthermore, with NASS guidelines as a reference, ChatGPT-3.5 registered a mean ± SD Jaccard Similarity Index score of 0.20 ± 0.078 while ChatGPT-4 had a mean of 0.18 ± 0.068. Based on physician evaluation, outputs from ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 were safe 100% of the time. Thirteen of 14 (92.8%) ChatGPT-3.5 responses and 14 of 14 (100%) ChatGPT-4.0 responses were in agreement with current best clinical practices for cervical radiculopathy according to a senior spine surgeon.
    CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT models were able to provide safe and accurate but incomplete responses to NASS clinical guideline questions about cervical radiculopathy. Although the authors\' results suggest that improvements are required before ChatGPT can be reliably deployed in a clinical setting, future versions of the LLM hold promise as an updated reference for guidelines on cervical radiculopathy. Future versions must prioritize accessibility and comprehensibility for a diverse audience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)在年轻人中很少见。本研究旨在评估全内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(FELD)治疗年轻成人LDH的临床结果,并确定预测FELD治疗年轻成人LDH不良结果的危险因素。
    方法:2015年1月至2021年10月在作者机构进行了一项回顾性的双中心队列研究。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估下腰痛和腿痛的临床结果。最后随访时采用改良的Macnab标准评价临床疗效,全球结果分为4组,即优秀,不错,公平,而且很穷.公平和贫困群体被定义为不利的结果。
    结果:本研究分析了99名患者(平均年龄18.5岁,平均BMI25.1kg/m2,男女性别比2.8)。从症状发作到手术的持续时间通常随着年龄的增长而延长。术后VAS和ODI评分明显改善。根据改良的Macnab标准,195例单段病例中共有17例具有不利结果。外侧椎间盘突出(OR3.72,95%CI1.14-12.12,p=0.029)和术前VAS评分高(OR1.98,95%CI1.13-3.46,p=0.017)被确定为FELD后不良结局的危险因素。
    结论:FELD治疗青壮年LDH是安全有效的。术前VAS评分和外侧椎间盘突出是术后不良预后的危险因素,可能是选择手术方式的有用指标。
    OBJECTIVE: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is rare in young adults. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) for LDH in young adults and to determine the risk factors that predict unfavorable outcomes of FELD for LDH in young adults.
    METHODS: A retrospective two-center cohort study was performed between January 2015 and October 2021 at the authors\' institutions. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low-back pain and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate clinical efficacy at the last follow-up, and the global outcomes were classified into 4 groups, namely excellent, good, fair, and poor. The fair and poor groups were defined as unfavorable outcomes.
    RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients were analyzed in this study (mean age 18.5 years, mean BMI 25.1 kg/m2, male/female sex ratio 2.8). The duration from the onset of symptoms to the operation was in general prolonged with age. The VAS and ODI scores significantly improved after surgery. A total of 17 of 195 single-segment cases had unfavorable outcomes based on the modified Macnab criteria. Lateral disc herniation (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.14-12.12, p = 0.029) and high preoperative VAS score (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.13-3.46, p = 0.017) were identified as risk factors for unfavorable outcomes after FELD.
    CONCLUSIONS: FELD for LDH in young adults is safe and effective. Preoperative VAS score and lateral disc herniation are risk factors of nonfavorable outcomes after surgery and may be a useful index for surgical procedure selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号