UNASSIGNED: Consumption of injectable antibiotics is not widely studied, despite injectables constitute a major share of antibiotic cost. This study aimed to understand the share of oral and injectable antibiotic consumption and cost at the national level in India, and the public and private sector shares in the provision and cost of injectables in Kerala state.
UNASSIGNED: We used the PharmaTrac private sector sales dataset and the Kerala Medical Services Corporation public sector procurement dataset. Using WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classifications, we estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per defined daily dose (DDD), and per-capita spending on injectables.
UNASSIGNED: Although 94.9% of total antibiotics consumed at the national level were oral preparations, 35.8% of total spending were on injectables. In Kerala , around 33% of total antibiotic spending in the private sector were for injectables, compared to around 25% in the public sector. The public sector used fewer injectable antibiotic formulations (n=21) compared the private sector (n=69). The cost per DDD was significantly higher in the private sector as compared to the public sector. Despite only accounting for 6.3% of the cost share, the public sector provided 31.4% of injectables, indicating very high efficiency. Across both sectors, Watch group antibiotics were significantly more consumed and at a significantly higher cost than Access group antibiotics, for example in nearly double the quantity and at 1.75 times the price per DDD in the private sector. Reserve group antibiotics made up the lowest consumption share (0.61% in the private sector), but at the highest cost per DDD (over 16 times that of Access).
UNASSIGNED: Public sector showed higher cost efficiency in antibiotic provisioning compared to private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use cannot be achieved through drug price control alone but requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.
This study tried to understand the share of public and private sectors in the volume and cost of antibiotic injections in India, particularly in the state of Kerala. We used drug sales data (PharmaTrac) and Kerala government procurement data for the analysis. The study was conducted by researchers at Boston University (USA), Public Health Foundation of India (India), Center for Global Development (UK and USA), and INSEAD (France), and was supported by a Wellcome grant. We analysed data using the World Health Organization classification of antibiotics into Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe), which is based on the risk of emergence of resistance. We estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per-dose, and per-capita spending on injectables. We found that although antibiotic injections were less than six percent of total antibiotics consumed nationally, they accounted for more than 35% of total spending. Kerala data showed that the public sector showed higher efficiency by providing one-third of antibiotic injection doses using fewer formulations, with only six percent of the cost share. Reserve group antibiotics, which made up the lowest consumption share, had the highest cost per dose (over 16 times that of Access antibiotics). In conclusion, public sector showed higher cost efficiency in injectable antibiotic provisioning compared with private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.

UNASSIGNED: Earlier reports suggested high rates of antibiotic utilization among COVID-19 patients despite the lack of direct evidence of their activity against viral pathogens. Different trends in antibiotic consumption during 2020 compared to 2019 have been reported.
UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic consumption in the presence of active Antibiotic Stewardship Program.
UNASSIGNED: This study represented a five years assessment of the consumption of the commonly prescribed antibiotics measured as DDDs/100-Bed Days. We analyzed the data by using nonparametric Friedman and Friedman tests to compare the antibiotic consumption before and during the three subsequent waves of COVID-19.
UNASSIGNED: Antibiotic consumption through the DDDs/100-BD has shown reduction in the median of antibiotics consumption of most antibiotics during the period of COVID-19 as compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, which was significant for meropenem and ciprofloxacin, except colomycin that slightly increased. Significant reduction in the consumption of imipenem and meropenem during the second and third waves as compared to the pre-COVID period. Throughout the years, significant reductions were observed between 2018 and 2019 (p=<.001), 2018 and 2020 (p=0.008), and 2018 and 2022 (p=0.002).
UNASSIGNED: The reduction in antibiotic consumption is attributed to the strong influence if the ASP and the reluctance of people to visit hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other related COVID-19 precautions such as physical distance, good hand hygiene, facemasks, that resulted in the prevention of secondary bacterial infections have contributed to the reduction in antibiotic utilization during the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic consumption is a driver for the increase of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study is to analyze variations in antibiotic consumption and its appropriate use in Brazil from 2014 to 2019.
METHODS: We conducted a time series study using the surveillance information system database (SNGPC) from the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. Antimicrobials sold in retail pharmacies were evaluated. All antimicrobials recorded for systemic use identified by the active ingredient were eligible. Compounded products and formulations for topic use (dermatological, gynecological, and eye/ear treatments) were excluded. The number of defined daily doses (DDDs)/1,000 inhabitants/day for each antibiotic was attributed. The number of DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DDIs) was used as a proxy for consumption. Results were stratified by regions and the average annual percentage change in the whole period studied was estimated. We used the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) framework to categorize antimicrobial drugs.
RESULTS: An overall increase of 30% in consumption from 2014 to 2019 was observed in all Brazilian regions. Amoxicillin, azithromycin and cephalexin were the antimicrobials more consumed, with the Southeast region responsible for more than 50% of the antibiotic utilization. Among all antimicrobials analyzed 45.0% were classified as watch group in all Brazilian regions.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant increase in antibiotics consumption from 2014 to 2019 in Brazil restricted to the Northeast and Central West regions. Almost half of the antibiotics consumed in Brazil were classified as watch group, highlighting the importance to promote rational use in this country.

UNASSIGNED: Lockdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with changes in the pattern of use of antimicrobials, but persistence of changes after lockdowns has not been described. The objective was to describe the number of patients with dispensed antibiotic treatment and consumption of antibiotics in outpatients from primary care in Catalonia 18 months after the end of the emergency period.
UNASSIGNED: Data for the COVID-19 pandemic period was obtained from March 2020 to December 2021. Four high transmission rate (Rt > 100) periods were established. To compare data, a simple Bayesian structural time series model was used.
UNASSIGNED: The observed number of patients with dispensed antibiotics decreased respect to the estimated, especially during the four high transmission rate periods: April-May 2020 (lockdown period) (-42.57% and -42.68%); December 2020-February 2021 (-41.65%, -49.97% and -43.64%); October 2021 (-16.23%), and December 2021 (-20.16%). Overall antibiotic consumption was reduced by 23.37% (p = 0.002). These differences were mainly observed in those ≤ 15 years.
UNASSIGNED: We describe the reduction in the number of patients with dispensed antibiotics and antibiotic consumption after the COVID-19 lockdown persisted in a period of recovery of healthcare accessibility. This information may help to improve antimicrobial use at the primary care level.

Our aim was to determine the impact of antimicrobial stewardship tools (ASTs) and the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic consumption (AC). We used the national software Consores® to determine AC in DDD/1000 days of hospitalization from 2017 to 2022 in voluntary private hospitals in France. The ASTs considered were: 1. internal guidelines; 2. the list of antibiotics with restricted access; 3. the presence of an antibiotic referent or 4. an ID specialist; and 5. proof of an annual meeting on antimicrobial resistance. Institutions with dedicated units for COVID-19 patients were specified. In 30 institutions, the total AC varied from (means) 390 to 405 DDD/1000 DH from 2017 to 2022. Fluoroquinolones and amoxicillin/clavulanate consumption decreased from 50 to 36 (p = 0.003) and from 112 to 77 (p = 0.025), respectively, but consumption of piperacillin/tazobactam increased from 9 to 21 (p < 0.001). Over the study period, 10 institutions with ≤2 AST had lower AC compared to 20 institutions with ≥3 AST (p < 0.01). COVID-19 units opened in 10 institutions were associated with a trend toward higher macrolide consumption from 15 to 25 from 2017 to 2020 (p = 0.065) and with an acceleration of piperacillin/tazobactam consumption from 2020 to 2022 (p ≤ 0.003). Antibiotic consumption in 30 private hospitals in France was inversely related to the number of AST. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with limited impact on AC, but special attention should be paid to piperacillin/tazobactam consumption.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in elderly patients with hypertension and at risk of fractures has been in the limelight because of accumulating evidence that localized RAS activation in bone tissue leads to osteoclastic bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis. This study set out to investigate the association between RASi use and fracture incidence in a large cohort.
METHODS: We employed a nested case-control design to investigate the association between RASi use and newly developed fractures. A case was defined as a patient newly diagnosed with a fracture between January 2004 and December 2015. We selected 1,049 cases and controls using 1:1 propensity score matching. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association between RASi exposure and fracture incidence.
RESULTS: Overall, RASi usage was significantly associated with lower odds for fracture incidence (ever-users vs never-users: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91). We found that ARB-only users experienced fewer fractures than RASi-never users (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), whereas ACEi-only users or ARB/ACEi-ever users did not. In subgroup analysis, RASi-ever users without cerebrovascular disease, those with a BMI exceeding 23, and statin exposure had significantly lower ORs.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study established a significant association between RASi use and reduced fracture incidence, thus highlighting the potential clinical utility of RASi use as a preventive strategy in elderly patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures.

Antimicrobial use (AMU) is critical to preserving animal health and welfare. However, the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a public health threat. Although most antimicrobials used on the farm require a veterinarian prescription, farmworkers make daily on-farm treatment decisions. Therefore, farmworker training is vital to promote responsible AMU. This research project aimed to evaluate the effect of farmworker antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) training on the quantity of AMU on dairy farms in Ohio and California. We hypothesized that farms receiving AMS training would have reduced AMU in dairy cattle compared with farms where training wasn\'t administered. We designed a quasiexperimental study with 18 conventional dairy farms enrolled in Ohio and California. Twelve farms received AMS training, and 6 farms did not. The AMS program included a 12-wk training focused on accurate identification of cows requiring antimicrobial treatment. We quantified AMU by collecting used drug containers, manually counted by researchers during farm visits. Treatment incidence (TI) was calculated using animal daily doses (ADD), and Poisson regression models were used to analyze the TI data. Disease incidence rate (DIR) in lactating cows was 2.2, 1.5, 1.0, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.03/1,000 cow-days for mastitis, lameness, metritis, pneumonia, retained placenta, diarrheas, and other diseases (e.g., conjunctivitis, injuries), respectively. The highest TI by antimicrobial class (provided in ADD/1,000 cow-days) was cephalosporin (5.9), penicillin (5.2), tetracyclines (0.4), lincosamides (0.2), and sulfonamides (0.1). Among the trained farms using a within-treatment group analysis, no significant differences were observed in TI pre-intervention (10.9 ADD/1,000 cow-days) compared with TI postintervention (10.3 ADD/1,000 cow-days). Treatment incidence from the training group was 10.8 ADD/1,000 cow-days and although numerically lower, it was not significantly different compared with TI in the control groups at 13.9 ADD/1,000 cow-days (rate ratio = 0.77, CI = 0.25-2.38). Future research on AMS should incorporate farmworker training with social science approaches to overcome barriers and promote on-farm responsible use.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem antibiotics are a pivotal solution for severe infections, particularly in hospital settings. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria owing to the irrational and extensive use of carbapenems underscores the need for meticulous management and rational use. Clinical pharmacists, with their specialized training and extensive knowledge, play a substantial role in ensuring the judicious use of carbapenem. This study aimed to elucidate the patterns of carbapenem use and shed light on the integral role played by clinical pharmacists in managing and promoting the rational use of carbapenem antibiotics at Wenzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze carbapenem use patterns in our hospital and role of clinical pharmacists in managing and promoting their rational use.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of carbapenem use at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. Several key indicators, including the drug utilization index, defined daily doses (DDDs), proportion of antimicrobial drug costs to total hospitalization expenses, antibiotic utilization density, and utilization rates in different clinical departments were comprehensively analyzed.
RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2021, there was a consistent decline in the consumption and sales of imipenem-cilastatin sodium, meropenem (0.3 g), and meropenem (0.5 g). Conversely, the DDDs of imipenem-cilastatin sodium for injection increased in 2020 and 2021 vs 2019, with a B/A value of 0.67, indicating a relatively higher drug cost. The DDDs of meropenem for injection (0.3 g) exhibited an overall upward trend, indicating an increasing clinical preference. However, the B/A values for 2020 and 2021 were both > 1, suggesting a relatively lower drug cost. The DDDs of meropenem for injection (0.5 g) demonstrated a progressive increase annually and consistently ranked first, indicating a high clinical preference with a B/A value of 1, signifying good alignment between economic and social benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem use in our hospital was generally reasonable with a downward trend in consumption and sales over time. Clinical pharmacists play a pivotal role in promoting appropriate use of carbapenems.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance killed 1.27 million people in 2019, so urgent actions are desperately needed. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are essential to optimize antimicrobial use. The objective was to acknowledge the current role of clinical pharmacists engaged in ASP activities in Catalonia.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey shared through the Catalan Infection Control Programme (VINCat). The survey consisted of four sections and was sent by e-mail.
RESULTS: A total of 69.0% of the centres answered. Pharmacists dedicated a median of 5.0 h per week (2.1 h/week/100 acute care beds), representing 0.15 full time equivalents. The ASP lacked information technology (IT) support, as only 16.3% of centres automatically calculated defined daily doses and days of therapy. Those with less than 15% of their time available for ASPs conducted fewer clinical activities, especially prospective audits and feedback. Those without official infectious diseases training also performed fewer clinical activities, but training was less determinant than IT support or time. Pharmacists performed interventions mostly through annotation in the medical records.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical pharmacists from Catalonia dedicated to ASPs present an important lack of time and IT support to perform clinical activities. Pharmacists should also improve their clinical skills and try to conduct clinical advice to prescribers, either by phone or face-to-face.

Given the overuse of antimicrobials and increasing antimicrobial resistance, the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend antimicrobial stewardship programmes to measure and assess the use of antimicrobials. Several antimicrobial use metrics have been described, including days of therapy, defined daily doses and standardized antimicrobial administration ratio. Understanding these metrics, including the advantages and disadvantages, can help antimicrobial stewardship programmes to monitor antimicrobial use at their institution, and assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship efforts. This review discusses the three commonly used antimicrobial use metrics, their pros and cons, and how antimicrobial stewardship programmes can use these metrics to help assess the use of antimicrobials.