(1) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is common, while treatment is difficult, and mortality is high. Kinase inhibitors are promising to enhance the effects of radiotherapy. We compared the effects of the PARP inhibitors talazoparib and niraparib and that of the DNA-PKcs inhibitor AZD7648, combined with ionizing radiation. (2) Seven HNSCC cell lines, including Cal33, CLS-354, Detroit 562, HSC4, RPMI2650 (HPV-negative), UD-SCC-2 and UM-SCC-47 (HPV-positive), and two healthy fibroblast cell lines, SBLF8 and SBLF9, were studied. Flow cytometry was used to analyze apoptosis and necrosis induction (AnnexinV/7AAD) and cell cycle distribution (Hoechst). Cell inactivation was studied by the colony-forming assay. (3) AZD7648 had the strongest effects, radiosensitizing all HNSCC cell lines, almost always in a supra-additive manner. Talazoparib and niraparib were effective in both HPV-positive cell lines but only consistently in one and two HPV-negative cell lines, respectively. Healthy fibroblasts were not affected by any combined treatment in apoptosis and necrosis induction or G2/M-phase arrest. AZD7648 alone was not toxic to healthy fibroblasts, while the combination with ionizing radiation reduced clonogenicity. (4) In conclusion, talazoparib, niraparib and, most potently, AZD7648 could improve radiation therapy in HNSCC. Healthy fibroblasts tolerated AZD7648 alone extremely well, but irradiation-induced effects might occur. Our results justify in vivo studies.

The effectiveness of radiotherapy depends on the sensitivities of \'normal\' and cancer cells to the administered radiation dose. Increasing the radiosensitivity of cancers by inhibiting DNA damage repair is a goal of much current research, however success depends on avoiding concomitant sensitization of normal tissues inevitably irradiated during therapy. In this study we investigated the mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors by examining the impacts on proliferating vs quiescent cell populations. Experiments were performed in BRCA1/2null and wild-type parental cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Overall AZD7648 has greater radiosensitizing activity relative to Olaparib, with BRCA2-deficient models showing the greatest sensitivity. However, DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 also produced greater toxicity in all irradiated mice. While both DNA-PK and PARP inhibition sensitizes wild type tumor cells to radiation, in BRCA1/2 deficient cells PARP inhibition by Olaparib had limited radiosensitization capacity. Quiescent cells are more radioresistant than proliferating cells, and these were also effectively sensitized by AZD7648 while Olaparib was unable to increase radiation-induced cell kill, even in BRCA1/2null cells. These findings underscore the distinct mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors. While DNA-PK inhibitors are able to target both proliferating and non-proliferating tumor cells for greater overall anti-cancer benefit, their application is limited by exacerbation of normal tissue toxicities. Conversely, PARP inhibitors exhibit selective activity for proliferating cells, providing a mechanism for targeting activity to cancers, but due to poor activity in non-proliferating cells they have an overall reduced impact on tumor growth control. This study highlights the importance of creating a therapeutic ratio with DNA damage repair inhibition radiation sensitizing strategies.

Inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) in the non-homologous end-joining repair pathway reportedly increases the radiation sensitivity of cancer cells. We have recently reported that BR101801, a novel triple inhibitor of PI3K-gamma (γ), delta (δ), and DNA-PK, functions as an efficient sensitizer of radiation-induced DNA damage in various human solid cancer cells and a xenograft mouse model. Given that the p53 tumor suppressor gene plays an important role in radiotherapeutic efficacy, in the current study, we focused on the impact of the p53 status on BR101801-induced radiosensitization using isogenic HCT116 p53+/+ and HCT116 p53-/- human colorectal cancer cell lines. In vitro, HCT116 p53+/+ and HCT116 p53-/- human colorectal cancer cells were pretreated with 1 μM BR101801 for 24 h before exposure to ionizing radiation (IR), followed by assays to analyze colony formation, DNA damage, cell cycle changes, senescence, autophagy, apoptosis, and DNA damage response-related proteins. Xenograft mouse models were constructed to examine the potential synergistic effects of BR101801 (50 mg/kg, orally administered once daily) and fractionated IR (2 Gy × 3 days) on tumor growth inhibition in vivo. BR101801 inhibited cell proliferation and prolonged DNA damage in both HCT116 p53+/+ and HCT116 p53-/- human colorectal cancer cells. Combined treatment with BR101801 and IR robustly induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and cellular senescence in HCT116 p53-/- cells when compared with treatment with IR alone. Furthermore, BR101801 synergistically inhibited tumor growth in the HCT116 p53-/- xenograft mouse model. BR101801 enhanced the radiosensitivity of HCT116 human colorectal cancer cells regardless of their p53 status. Moreover, BR101801 exerted robust synergistic effects on IR-induced cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and tumor growth inhibition, even in radioresistant HCT116 p53-/- cells. Overall, these findings provide a scientific rationale for combining BR101801 with IR as a new therapeutic strategy to overcome radioresistance induced by p53 deficiency.

The non-homologous end joining pathway is vital for repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), with DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) playing a critical role. Altered DNA damage response (DDR) in chronic (CML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) offers potential therapeutic opportunities. We studied the therapeutic potential of AZD-7648 (DNA-PK inhibitor) in CML and AML cell lines. This study used two CML (K-562 and LAMA-84) and five AML (HEL, HL-60, KG-1, NB-4, and THP-1) cell lines. DDR gene mutations were obtained from the COSMIC database. The copy number and methylation profile were evaluated using MS-MLPA and DDR genes, and telomere length using qPCR. p53 protein expression was assessed using Western Blot, chromosomal damage through cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay, and γH2AX levels and DSB repair kinetics using flow cytometry. Cell density and viability were analyzed using trypan blue assay after treatment with AZD-7648 in concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 µM. Cell death, cell cycle distribution, and cell proliferation rate were assessed using flow cytometry. The cells displayed different DNA baseline damage, DDR gene expressions, mutations, genetic/epigenetic changes, and p53 expression. Only HEL cells displayed inefficient DSB repair. The LAMA-84, HEL, and KG-1 cells were the most sensitive to AZD-7648, whereas HL-60 and K-562 showed a lower effect on density and viability. Besides the reduction in cell proliferation, AZD-7648 induced apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and DNA damage. In conclusion, these results suggest that AZD-7648 holds promise as a potential therapy for myeloid leukemias, however, with variations in drug sensitivity among tested cell lines, thus supporting further investigation to identify the specific factors influencing sensitivity to this DNA-PK inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) plays a key role in the repair of DNA double strand breaks via nonhomologous end joining. Inhibition of DNA-PK can enhance the effect of DNA double strand break inducing anticancer therapies. Peposertib (formerly \"M3814\") is an orally administered, potent, and selective small molecule DNA-PK inhibitor that has demonstrated radiosensitizing and antitumor activity in xenograft models and was well-tolerated in monotherapy. This phase 1 trial (National Clinical Trial 02516813) investigated the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and tolerability of peposertib in combination with palliative radiation therapy (RT) in patients with thoracic or head and neck tumors (arm A) and of peposertib in combination with cisplatin and curative-intent RT in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (arm B).
METHODS: Patients received peposertib once daily in ascending dose cohorts as a tablet or capsule in combination with palliative RT (arm A) or in combination with intensity modulated curative-intent RT and cisplatin (arm B).
RESULTS: The most frequently observed treatment-emergent adverse events were radiation skin injury, fatigue, and nausea in arm A (n = 34) and stomatitis, nausea, radiation skin injury, and dysgeusia in arm B (n = 11). Based on evaluations of dose-limiting toxicities, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data, RP2D for arm A was declared as 200 mg peposertib tablet once daily in combination with RT. In arm B (n = 11), 50 mg peposertib was declared tolerable in combination with curative-intent RT and cisplatin. However, enrollment was discontinued because of insufficient exposure at that dose, and the RP2D was not formally declared.
CONCLUSIONS: Peposertib in combination with palliative RT was well-tolerated up to doses of 200 mg once daily as tablet with each RT fraction. When combined with RT and cisplatin, a tolerable peposertib dose yielded insufficient exposure.

Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer includes chemoradiation and surgery, but patient response to treatment is variable. Patients who have a complete response have improved outcomes; therefore, there is a critical need to identify mechanisms of resistance to circumvent them. DNA-PK is involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by radiation, which we found to be increased in rectal cancer after treatment. We hypothesized that inhibiting this complex with a DNA-PK inhibitor, Peposertib (M3814), would improve treatment response. We assessed pDNA-PK in a rectal cancer cell line and mouse model utilizing western blotting, viability assays, γH2AX staining, and treatment response. The three treatment groups were: standard of care (SOC) (5-fluorouracil (5FU) with radiation), M3814 with radiation, and M3814 with SOC. SOC treatment of rectal cancer cells increased pDNA-PK protein and increased γH2AX foci, but this was abrogated by the addition of M3814. Mice with CT26 tumors treated with M3814 with SOC did not differ in average tumor size but individual tumor response varied. The clinical complete response rate improved significantly with the addition of M3814 but pathological complete response did not. We investigated alterations in DNA repair and found that Kap1 and pATM are increased after M3814 addition suggesting this may mediate resistance. When the DNA-PK inhibitor, M3814, is combined with SOC treatment, response improved in some rectal cancer models but an increase in other repair mechanisms likely diminishes the effect. A clinical trial is ongoing to further explore the role of DNA-PK inhibition in rectal cancer treatment.

DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), an essential component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, plays an important role in DNA damage repair (DDR). Therefore, DNA-PK inhibition is a promising approach for overcoming radiotherapy or chemotherapy resistance in cancers. In this study, we demonstrated that BR101801, a potent DNA-PK inhibitor, acted as an effective radiosensitizer in various human solid cancer cells and an in vivo xenograft model. Overall, BR101801 strongly elevated ionizing radiation (IR)-induced genomic instability via induction of cell cycle G2/M arrest, autophagic cell death, and impairment of DDR pathway in human solid cancer cells. Interestingly, BR101801 inhibited not only phosphorylation of DNA-PK catalytic subunit in NHEJ factors but also BRCA2 protein level in homologous recombination (HR) factors. In addition, combination BR101801 and IR suppressed tumor growth compared with IR alone by reducing phosphorylation of DNA-PK in human solid cancer xenografts. Our findings suggested that BR101801 is a selective DNA-PK inhibitor with a synergistic radiosensitizing effect in human solid cancers, providing evidence for clinical applications.

OBJECTIVE: Inhibitors of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) are effective radiation sensitisers in preclinical tumours, but little is known about risks of normal tissue radiosensitisation. Here, we evaluate radiosensitisation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells by DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 under oxia and anoxia in vitro, and tumour (SCCVII), oral mucosa and small intestine in mice.
METHODS: Radiosensitisation of human (UT-SCC-54C) and murine (SCCVII) HNSCC cells by AZD7648 under oxia and anoxia was evaluated by clonogenic assay. Radiosensitisation of SCCVII tumours in C3H mice by oral AZD7648 (75 mg/kg) was determined by ex vivo clonogenic assay 3.5 days post-irradiation, with evaluation of normal tissue surrogate endpoints using 5-ethynyl-2\'-deoxyuridine to facilitate detection of regenerating crypts in the ileum and repopulating S-phase cells in the ileum and oral mucosa of the same animals.
RESULTS: AZD7648 potently radiosensitised both cell lines, with similar sensitiser enhancement ratios for 10% survival (SER10) under oxia and anoxia. AZD7648 diffused rapidly through multicellular layers, suggesting rapid equilibration between plasma and hypoxic zones in tumours. SCCVII tumours were radiosensitised by AZD7648 (SER10 2.5). AZD7648 also enhanced radiation-induced body weight loss and suppressed regenerating intestinal crypts and repopulating S-phase cells in the ileum and tongue epithelium with SER values similar to SCCVII tumours.
CONCLUSIONS: AZD7648 is a potent radiation sensitiser of both oxic and anoxic tumour cells, but also markedly radiosensitises stem cells in the small intestine and oral mucosa.

UNASSIGNED: This first-in-human Phase I study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamic profile, and preliminary efficacy of CC-115, a dual inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase and DNA-dependent protein kinase.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with advanced solid or hematologic malignancies were enrolled in dose-finding and cohort expansion phases. In dose-finding, once-daily or twice-daily (BID) ascending oral doses of CC-115 (range: 0.5-40 mg/day) in 28-day continuous cycles identified the maximum-tolerated dose for cohort expansion in 5 specified tumor types. Twelve additional patients with mixed solid tumors participated in a bioavailability substudy.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the dose-finding cohort. Dose-limiting toxicity included thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, hyperglycemia, asthenia/fatigue, and increased transaminases. CC-115 10 mg BID was selected for cohort expansion (n=74) in which fatigue, nausea, and decreased appetite were the most frequent toxicities. Dose-proportional PK was found. CC-115 distributed to glioblastoma tissue (mean tumor/plasma concentration ratio: 0.713). Total exposure of CC-115 was similar under fasting and fed conditions. A patient with endometrial carcinoma remained in complete remission >4 years. Partial response (PR; n=2) and stable disease (SD; n=4) were reported in the bioavailability substudy; SD was reached in 53%, 22%, 21%, and 64% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Ewing sarcoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and castration-resistant prostate cancer, respectively. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma showed 38% PR and 25% SD.
UNASSIGNED: CC-115 was well-tolerated, with toxicities consistent with mTOR inhibitors. Together with biomarker inhibition and preliminary efficacy, oral CC-115 10 mg BID is a promising novel anticancer treatment.
UNASSIGNED: NCT01353625.

BACKGROUND: DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors sensitize cancer cells to chemo- and radiotherapy. ETS transcription factors (EWS-FLI1) have been described as biomarkers for PARP-inhibitor sensitivity. Sensitivity to single agent PARP inhibitors has so far been limited to homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficient tumors, exploiting synthetic lethality.
RESULTS: In clonogenic assays, single agent rucaparib LD50 values for continuously exposed cells were similar to those observed in HRR-defective cells (CAPAN-1 cell line, BRCA2 defective); however, both ES cell lines (TC-71, CADO-ES1) had functional HRR. In vivo rucaparib administration (10 mg/kg daily) showed no responses. In clonogenic assays, rucaparib enhanced temozolomide, camptothecin and radiation cytotoxicity, which was most profound for temozolomide (15-29 fold enhancement). NU7441 increased the cytotoxicity of etoposide, doxorubicin and radiation.
METHODS: We assessed PARP1/2 (rucaparib) and DNA-PK (NU7441) inhibitors in Ewing sarcoma (ES) cell lines by performing growth inhibition and clonogenic assays. HRR was measured by RAD51 focus formation. Single agent rucaparib was assessed in an in vivo orthotopic model.
CONCLUSIONS: Single agent rucaparib ES sensitivity in vitro was not replicated in vivo. DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors are good chemo-/radiosensitizers in ES. The future of these inhibitors lies in their combination with chemo-/radiotherapy, which needs to be evaluated in clinical trials.