DNA Extraction

DNA 提取
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在DNA分析之前收集和保存生物材料对于生物医学研究至关重要,医学诊断,法医和生物多样性保护。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种内部配制的缓冲液,称为法医DNA实验室缓冲液(FDL缓冲液),用于在室温下长期保存生物材料。人类唾液在缓冲液中储存了8年,保存了3年的人类血液和来自水母Pelagianoctiluca梳子果冻Beroesp.的精致动物组织。,分别储存4年和6年,始终如一地产生高质量的DNA。FDL缓冲液与标准有机,盐析和旋转柱萃取方法,使其用途广泛,适用于广泛的应用,包括自动化。
    [方框:见正文]。
    The collection and preservation of biological material before DNA analysis is critical for inter alia biomedical research, medical diagnostics, forensics and biodiversity conservation. In this study, we evaluate an in-house formulated buffer called the Forensic DNA Laboratory-buffer (FDL-buffer) for preservation of biological material for long term at room temperature. Human saliva stored in the buffer for 8 years, human blood stored for 3 years and delicate animal tissues from the jellyfish Pelagia noctiluca comb jelly Beroe sp., stored for 4 and 6 years respectively consistently produced high-quality DNA. FDL-buffer exhibited compatibility with standard organic, salting out and spin-column extraction methods, making it versatile and applicable to a wide range of applications, including automation.
    [Box: see text].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Octocorals是海洋环境中萜类化合物最多产的来源,迄今为止,从门中已知的4000多种不同的化合物。然而,其生产的生化和遗传起源仍然难以捉摸,直到最近的研究表明,八角珊瑚在其自身的染色体DNA中编码负责萜类化合物生物合成的基因,而不是最初提出的来自微生物共生体。鉴定出的珊瑚基因包括编码一组新的I类萜烯环化酶(TC)的基因,这些酶聚集在其他定制酶的候选类别中。系统发育分析将八珊瑚TC确立为单系进化枝,与植物的TC不同,细菌,和其他生物。新发现的TC群似乎在八珊瑚中无处不在,并且在进化上很古老。鉴于最近发现的八珊瑚萜类生物化学和目前只有有限的基因组数据,从八角珊瑚中发现用于萜烯生产的新生物合成途径具有很大的潜力。下一章概述了八珊瑚DNA和RNA提取的实际实验程序,基因组和转录组组装和挖掘,TC克隆和基因表达,蛋白质纯化,和体外分析。
    Octocorals are the most prolific source of terpenoids in the marine environment, with more than 4000 different compounds known from the phylum to date. However, the biochemical and genetic origin of their production remained elusive until recent studies showed that octocorals encode genes responsible for the biosynthesis of terpenoids in their own chromosomal DNA rather than from microbial symbionts as originally proposed. The identified coral genes include those encoding a new group of class I terpene cyclases (TCs) clustered among other candidate classes of tailoring enzymes. Phylogenetic analyses established octocoral TCs as a monophyletic clade, distinct from TCs of plants, bacteria, and other organisms. The newly discovered group of TCs appears to be ubiquitous in octocorals and is evolutionarily ancient. Given the recent discovery of octocoral terpenoid biochemistry and only limited genomic data presently available, there is substantial potential for discovering new biosynthetic pathways from octocorals for terpene production. The following chapter outlines practical experimental procedures for octocoral DNA and RNA extraction, genome and transcriptome assembly and mining, TC cloning and gene expression, protein purification, and in vitro analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    隐孢子虫作为全球水传播疾病的一个原因,对公众健康构成重大风险。由于无症状和轻度症状感染,隐孢子虫病的临床监测在很大程度上被低估。临床误诊,以及进入测试的障碍。废水监测克服了这些局限性,可以作为在人群水平上识别隐孢子虫病的有效工具。尽管有潜力,缺乏对隐孢子虫的标准化废水监测方法。挑战实施设计和研究之间的可比性。因此,这项研究比较和对比了浓缩废水卵囊的隐孢子虫废水监测方法,提取卵囊DNA,并检测隐孢子虫遗传标记。评估的浓缩方法包括电负性膜过滤,Envirocheck高压胶囊过滤,离心,和纳米粒子微生物组,具有和不具有额外的免疫磁性分离纯化(除了Nanotrap微生物组颗粒)。评估了DNeasyPowersoilPro试剂盒和QIAampDNAMini试剂盒的卵囊DNA提取,并评估了珠打和冻融预处理对DNA回收率的影响。测试了通过针对隐孢子虫18SrRNA基因或隐孢子虫卵囊壁蛋白基因的qPCR测定的遗传检测。离心的卵囊回收率最高(39-77%),其次是纳米阱微生物组颗粒(24%),电负性过滤与PBST洗脱(22%),和Envirocheck高压胶囊过滤(13%)。由于废水基质的干扰,发现免疫磁分离纯化不合适。打珠预处理可提高DNeasyPowersoilPro试剂盒(314gc/μLDNA)和QIAampDNAMini试剂盒(238gc/μLDNA)的DNA回收率。相比之下,冻融预处理将DNA回收率降低到92gc/μL以下,可能是通过DNA降解。最后,而两种qPCR检测都是隐孢子虫的特异性。,18SrRNA测定的检测限低5倍,可以检测更广泛的隐孢子虫.比隐孢子虫卵囊壁蛋白测定。
    Cryptosporidium poses significant public health risks as a cause of waterborne disease worldwide. Clinical surveillance of cryptosporidiosis is largely underreported due to the asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic infections, clinical misdiagnoses, and barriers to access testing. Wastewater surveillance overcomes these limitations and could serve as an effective tool for identifying cryptosporidiosis at the population level. Despite its potential, the lack of standardized wastewater surveillance methods for Cryptosporidium spp. challenges implementation design and the comparability between studies. Thus, this study compared and contrasted Cryptosporidium wastewater surveillance methods for concentrating wastewater oocysts, extracting oocyst DNA, and detecting Cryptosporidium genetic markers. The evaluated concentration methods included electronegative membrane filtration, Envirocheck HV capsule filtration, centrifugation, and Nanotrap Microbiome Particles, with and without additional immunomagnetic separation purification (except for the Nanotrap Microbiome Particles). Oocyst DNA extraction by either the DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit and the QIAamp DNA Mini kit were evaluated and the impact of bead beating and freeze-thaw pretreatments on DNA recoveries was assessed. Genetic detection via qPCR assays targeting either the Cryptosporidium 18S rRNA gene or the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein gene were tested. Oocyst recovery percentages were highest for centrifugation (39-77 %), followed by the Nanotrap Microbiome Particles (24 %), electronegative filtration with a PBST elution (22 %), and Envirocheck HV capsule filtration (13 %). Immunomagnetic separation purification was found to be unsuitable due to interference from the wastewater matrix. Bead-beating pretreatment enhanced DNA recoveries from both the DNeasy Powersoil Pro kit (314 gc/μL DNA) and the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (238 gc/μL DNA). In contrast, freeze-thaw pretreatment reduced DNA recoveries to under 92 gc/μL DNA, likely through DNA degradation. Finally, while both qPCR assays were specific to Cryptosporidium spp., the 18S rRNA assay had a 5-fold lower detection limit and could detect a wider range of Cryptosporidium spp. than the Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein assay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在宏基因组学研究领域,DNA提取方法的选择在塑造微生物群落数据的可靠性和可解释性方面起着关键但经常被低估的作用。这项研究探讨了五种市售DNA提取试剂盒对牛粪便微生物群分析的影响。认识到准确的DNA提取在阐明微生物群落动力学中的重要性,我们系统地评估了DNA产量,质量,以及使用16SrRNA基因测序的这些试剂盒中的微生物组成。值得注意的是,FastDNA自旋土壤试剂盒产生了最高的DNA浓度,而在不同的试剂盒中观察到质量的显著差异。此外,差异丰度分析揭示了影响分类单元代表性的试剂盒特异性偏差。微生物的丰富度和多样性受到提取试剂盒选择的显著影响,用QIAampDNA大便minikit,QIAampPowerPro,和DNeasyPowerSoil优于粪便DNA试剂盒。主坐标分析揭示了基于DNA分离程序的不同聚类,特别突出了源自粪便DNA试剂盒的独特微生物群落组成。这项研究还解决了实际意义,证明试剂盒选择如何影响样品中革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌分类群的浓度。这项研究强调了在宏基因组研究中需要考虑DNA提取试剂盒,为致力于提高反刍动物微生物群分析精度和深度的研究人员提供有价值的见解。
    In the field of metagenomic research, the choice of DNA extraction methods plays a pivotal yet often underestimated role in shaping the reliability and interpretability of microbial community data. This study delves into the impact of five commercially available DNA extraction kits on the analysis of bovine fecal microbiota. Recognizing the importance of accurate DNA extraction in elucidating microbial community dynamics, we systematically assessed DNA yield, quality, and microbial composition across these kits using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Notably, the FastDNA spin soil kit yielded the highest DNA concentration, while significant variations in quality were observed across kits. Furthermore, differential abundance analysis revealed kit-specific biases that impacted taxa representation. Microbial richness and diversity were significantly influenced by the choice of extraction kit, with QIAamp DNA stool minikit, QIAamp Power Pro, and DNeasy PowerSoil outperforming the Stool DNA Kit. Principal-coordinate analysis revealed distinct clustering based on DNA isolation procedures, particularly highlighting the unique microbial community composition derived from the Stool DNA Kit. This study also addressed practical implications, demonstrating how kit selection influences the concentration of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial taxa in samples. This research highlights the need for consideration of DNA extraction kits in metagenomic studies, offering valuable insights for researchers striving to advance the precision and depth of microbiota analyses in ruminants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:淡色库蚊是欧洲人畜共患虫媒病毒的主要载体,在鸟类宿主之间的植物性传播中起放大作用,并作为鸟类宿主和哺乳动物之间的桥梁载体。该物种由两种形式组成,使用形态学方法无法区分,但具有影响其媒介容量的不同生态和生理特征。在这项研究中,我们验证了可用于从Cx的单个p中提取痕量DNA的方法。pipiens用于样品的分子形态。通过使用实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)测定的总产率测量和成功鉴定来比较这些DNA提取方法。
    结果:最初使用乙醇沉淀法从菌落衍生的个体中提取基因组DNA,两种市售DNA提取试剂盒:DNeasy®血液和组织试剂盒(Qiagen,英国)和Wizard®SV基因组DNA纯化系统(Promega,英国)和直接实时PCR方法。羽化和p处理之间的时间显着影响Cx。pipiens形式鉴定为核酸浓度和PCR扩增成功率随时间的增加而降低。实时PCR扩增成功,然而,三种提取方法之间没有显着差异,所有方法都成功识别了所有样本,但是直接实时PCR方法的扩增成功率较低,为70%(每种处理n=20)。当使用现场衍生的漏洞时,产生了更多可变的结果,在四种方法中发现的实时PCR扩增成功率没有显着差异,并且总的成功率较低,为55-80%。
    结论:本研究显示集落和田地来源的Cx。pipienspual可作为痕量DNA的有用非侵入性来源,可在羽化后至少24小时内进行准确的生物型分化。该技术在Cx的生态和行为研究中的意义和实用性。pipiens进行了讨论,并根据实验情况提出了使用建议。
    BACKGROUND: Culex pipiens L. is a principal vector of zoonotic arboviruses in Europe, acting in both an amplification role in enzootic transmission between avian hosts and as a bridge vector between avian hosts and mammals. The species consists of two forms which are indistinguishable using morphological methods but possess varying ecological and physiological traits that influence their vector capacity. In this study we validate methods that can be used to extract trace DNA from single pupal exuviae of Cx. pipiens for use in molecular speciation of samples. These DNA extraction methods are compared using measurement of the total yield and successful identification using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.
    RESULTS: Genomic DNA was initially extracted from colony-derived individuals using an ethanol precipitation method, two commercially available DNA extraction kits: DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, UK) and Wizard® SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega, UK) and a direct real-time PCR method. Time elapsed between eclosion and processing of pupae significantly influenced Cx. pipiens form identification as nucleic acid concentration and PCR amplification success decreased with increased time elapsed. Real-time PCR amplification success, however, was not shown to vary significantly between the three extraction methods, with all methods successfully identifying all samples, but the direct real-time PCR method achieved a lesser amplification success rate of 70% (n = 20 for each treatment). More variable results were produced when field-derived exuviae were used, with no significant difference in real-time PCR amplification success found across the four methods and a lower overall rate of successful identification of 55-80%.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that both colony and field derived Cx. pipiens pupal exuviae can be a useful non-invasive source of trace DNA permitting accurate biotype differentiation for at least twenty-four hours post-eclosion. The significance and utility of this technique in ecological and behavioural studies of Cx. pipiens is discussed and recommendations made for use according to experimental scenario.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    卡波西肉瘤(KS)是一种影响皮肤和内脏器官的癌症,卡波西肉瘤相关疱疹病毒(KSHV)是其必要原因。先前的工作通过使用即时护理(POC)设备对皮肤活检中的KSHVDNA进行定量来进行KS诊断,该设备执行定量环介导的等温扩增(LAMP)。这些先前的研究表明,从患者活检中提取DNA是其他快速过程中的限速步骤。在这项研究中,一个简化的,与POC相容的碱性DNA提取,冷射,针对0.75mm人类皮肤穿孔活检进行了优化。优化的ColdSHOT提取在没有重要设备的情况下,在1小时内从3mg样品中每5μl反应始终产生40,000+个DNA拷贝-产量与标准旋转柱提取相当。估计DNA产量足以从KS阳性患者活检中检测到KSHV,在未纯化的样品中,LAMP测定不受非靶组织的影响。此外,通过ColdSHOT获得的产量对于在DNA提取之前在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)或Tris-EDTA(TE)缓冲液中的样品储存是稳健的,提取后DNA样品稳定。这项研究的结果表明,可以使用亚毫米活检样本进行ColdSHOTDNA提取,以简化和加速基于LAMP的卡波西肉瘤诊断。
    Kaposi\'s sarcoma (KS) is a cancer affecting skin and internal organs for which the Kaposi\'s sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is a necessary cause. Previous work has pursued KS diagnosis by quantifying KSHV DNA in skin biopsies using a point-of-care (POC) device which performs quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). These previous studies revealed that extracting DNA from patient biopsies was the rate limiting step in an otherwise rapid process. In this study, a simplified, POC-compatible alkaline DNA extraction, ColdSHOT, was optimized for 0.75 mm human skin punch biopsies. The optimized ColdSHOT extraction consistently produced 40,000+ copies of DNA per 5 µl reaction from 3 mg samples-a yield comparable to standard spin column extractions-within 1 h without significant equipment. The DNA yield was estimated sufficient for KSHV detection from KS-positive patient biopsies, and the LAMP assay was not affected by non-target tissue in the unpurified samples. Furthermore, the yields achieved via ColdSHOT were robust to sample storage in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer prior to DNA extraction, and the DNA sample was stable after extraction. The results presented in this study indicate that the ColdSHOT DNA extraction could be implemented to simplify and accelerate the LAMP-based diagnosis of Kaposi\'s sarcoma using submillimeter biopsy samples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Laboulbeniales(子囊,Pezizomycotina)由于其微小的尺寸而受到阻碍多年,无法在无菌培养中生长,缺乏可靠且经济高效的DNA提取方案。特别是,Laboulbenia属因DNA提取和聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增的成功率低而臭名昭著。这归因于黑色素的存在,一种已知抑制PCR的分子,在细胞里。我们通过将推荐量的试剂减半以降低每次提取的成本并在多重置换扩增步骤期间添加牛血清白蛋白(BSA)以逆转黑色素的作用来评估标准的基于单细胞的DNA提取方案的功效。共抽取196次,第111章成功我们发现,将基于单细胞的提取试剂盒中使用的试剂减半不会显着影响成功提取DNA的可能性。使用减半的协议降低了成本和资源消耗。此外,根据是否添加BSA,成功提取DNA的概率没有显着差异,表明存在于thallus细胞中的黑色素的量对PCR没有主要的抑制作用。我们从五个基因座产生了277个序列,但是内部转录间隔区的扩增,线粒体小亚基rDNA,蛋白质编码基因仍然具有挑战性。从Laboulbeniales中成功提取DNA的可能性也受到标本储存方法的影响,与储存在70%乙醇和干燥材料中的材料相比,在>95%乙醇中保存的材料产生更高的成功率。我们强调适当保存材料的重要性,并提出了Laboulbeniales特异性引物的设计,以克服引物错配和污染物的问题。我们的新见解不仅适用于Laboulbenia属;通常对Laboulbeniales的研究不足,绝大多数物种仍未测序。新的和平易近人的分子发展将有利于Laboulbeniales的研究,有助于阐明这些特殊的微真菌的真正多样性和进化关系。
    Molecular studies of fungi within the order Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota, Pezizomycotina) have been hampered for years because of their minute size, inability to grow in axenic culture, and lack of reliable and cost-efficient DNA extraction protocols. In particular, the genus Laboulbenia is notorious for low success with DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. This is attributed to the presence of melanin, a molecule known to inhibit PCR, in the cells. We evaluated the efficacy of a standard single cell-based DNA extraction protocol by halving the recommended amount of reagents to reduce the cost per extraction and adding bovine serum albumin (BSA) during the multiple displacement amplification step to reverse the effect of melanin. A total of 196 extractions were made, 111 of which were successful. We found that halving the reagents used in the single cell-based extraction kit did not significantly affect the probability of successful DNA extraction. Using the halved protocol reduces cost and resource consumption. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the probability of successfully extracting DNA based on whether BSA was added or not, suggesting that the amount of melanin present in cells of the thallus has no major inhibitory effect on PCR. We generated 277 sequences from five loci, but amplification of the internal transcribed spacer region, the mitochondrial small subunit rDNA, and protein-coding genes remains challenging. The probability of successfully extracting DNA from Laboulbeniales was also impacted by specimen storage methods, with material preserved in > 95% ethanol yielding higher success rates compared to material stored in 70% ethanol and dried material. We emphasize the importance of proper preservation of material and propose the design of Laboulbeniales-specific primers to overcome the problems of primer mismatches and contaminants. Our new insights apply not only to the genus Laboulbenia; Laboulbeniales generally are understudied, and the vast majority of species remain unsequenced. New and approachable molecular developments will benefit the study of Laboulbeniales, helping to elucidate the true diversity and evolutionary relationships of these peculiar microfungi.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从两栖动物中收集遗传样本的方法有多种,每个人都对研究设计有自己的影响,动物福利,和成本。脚趾修剪是一种常见的方法,但是关于其潜在危害的争论仍在进行中。应该实施侵入性较小的方法,如果有效,因为两栖动物是一个特别脆弱的脊椎动物群体。皮肤和颊拭子是侵入性较小的基因取样方法,但是可能存在污染的可能性和较低的DNA产量。为了比较这些方法,我们采集了皮肤拭子,颊拭子,和来自相对较小的无性系物种的同一个人的脚趾夹,布兰查德的板球青蛙(Acrisblanchardi)。然后我们比较了DNA产量,DNA纯度,扩增成功率,和样本类型之间的基因型数据质量。我们发现脚趾夹和颊拭子产生相似的DNA产量和纯度,与其他样品类型相比,皮肤拭子产生的纯度明显较低的DNA明显较少。与其他样本类型相比,使用脚趾夹的扩增成功率明显更高,尽管颊拭子样本比皮肤拭子更容易扩增。脚趾夹和颊拭子的基因型数据在质量上没有显着差异,但样本类型中皮肤拭子数据质量明显最低。因此,在某些情况下,皮肤擦拭可能会产生错误的数据,但是颊拭子可能是脚趾修剪的有效替代品,即使是小物种。我们的结果可以帮助未来的研究人员选择哪种遗传采样方法最适合他们的研究需求。
    Multiple methods for collecting genetic samples from amphibians exist, each with their own implications for study design, animal welfare, and costs. Toe clipping is one common method, but there is ongoing debate regarding its potential detriment. Less invasive methods should be implemented, if efficacious, as amphibians are a particularly vulnerable vertebrate group. Skin and buccal swabbing are less invasive methods for genetic sampling, but the potential for contamination and a lower yield of DNA may exist. To compare these methods, we gathered skin swabs, buccal swabs, and toe clips from the same individuals of a relatively small anuran species, Blanchard\'s Cricket Frog (Acris blanchardi). We then compared DNA yield, DNA purity, amplification success rate, and genotypic data quality among sample types. We found toe clips and buccal swabs generated similar DNA yield and purity, with skin swabs yielding significantly less DNA of significantly lower purity than the other sample types. Amplification success rate was significantly higher using toe clips compared to the other sample types, though buccal swab samples amplified more readily than skin swabs. Genotypic data from toe clips and buccal swabs did not differ significantly in quality, but skin swab data quality was significantly lowest among sample types. Thus, skin swabbing could produce erroneous data in some situations, but buccal swabbing is likely an effective substitute to toe clipping, even for small species. Our results can help future researchers select which genetic sampling method might best suit their research needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微生物组研究的规模越来越大,以检测环境因素对我们肠道微生物组的潜在小影响,或者微生物组对我们健康的影响。因此,需要快速和可重复的DNA分离方法来处理成千上万的粪便样本。我们使用Chemagic360化学和磁性分离模块I(MSMI)仪器比较了两种样品防腐剂和四种不同的预处理方案,以找到从数千个粪便样品中分离DNA的最佳方法。预处理包括珠子跳动,以管和板格式处理样品,和蛋白酶K孵育。最佳方法提供了足够的高质量DNA产量而没有污染。三个人类粪便样本(成人,高级,和婴儿)提取了技术副本。提取包括阴性对照(OMNIgeneGUT,DNA/RNA屏蔽液,和化学裂解缓冲液1)以检测交叉污染和ZymoBIOMICS肠道微生物组标准作为阳性对照,以模拟人类肠道微生物组和评估提取方法的敏感性。所有样品均使用ChemagicDNAStool200H96试剂盒(PerkinElmer,芬兰)。样品收集在两种防腐剂中,OMNIgeneGUT和DNA/RNA屏蔽液。使用Qubit荧光计测量DNA数量,使用凝胶电泳的DNA纯度和质量,以及基于16SrRNA基因的V3V4和V4区域测序的分类学特征。珠打增加细菌多样性。最大的增加是在布劳特氏菌属中检测到的,双歧杆菌,和Ruminococus.防腐剂显示细菌丰度的微小差异。V3V4和V4区域之间的轮廓差异很大,多样性样本较低。阴性对照显示来自粪便样品中丰富的属的迹象。肠道标准和粪便样本的技术重复显示低变化。所选择的分离方案包括来自制造商的推荐步骤以及珠打浆。发现珠子跳动对于检测难以溶解的细菌是必要的。该方案在不同粪便重复和ZymoBIOMICS肠道微生物组标准中的DNA产量方面是可重复的。96格式的MSM1仪器和预处理提供了自动化和处理大型样品收集的可能性。两种防腐剂在样品处理方面都是可行的,并且在分类特征上具有低变化。16SrRNA靶区域对细菌谱的组成具有高度影响。
    目的:下一代测序(NGS)是一种广泛使用的用于确定肠道菌群组成的方法。由于个体之间肠道微生物群组成的差异,微生物组研究已扩展到大型人群研究,以最大程度地检测对微生物-宿主相互作用的小影响。因此,对快速可靠的微生物分析的需求不断增加,使高通量96格式DNA提取的优化整合为基于NGS的下游应用。然而,实验方案容易出现样本收集和存储的偏差和错误,DNA提取,引物选择和测序,和生物信息学分析。方法学偏见可能导致微生物组概况的差异,导致使用不同协议的研究和实验室之间的差异。为了提高测量的一致性和可信度,微生物组分析方法的标准化已经在许多领域得到认可。
    Microbiome studies are becoming larger in size to detect the potentially small effect that environmental factors have on our gut microbiomes, or that the microbiome has on our health. Therefore, fast and reproducible DNA isolation methods are needed to handle thousands of fecal samples. We used the Chemagic 360 chemistry and Magnetic Separation Module I (MSMI) instrument to compare two sample preservatives and four different pre-treatment protocols to find an optimal method for DNA isolation from thousands of fecal samples. The pre-treatments included bead beating, sample handling in tube and plate format, and proteinase K incubation. The optimal method offers a sufficient yield of high-quality DNA without contamination. Three human fecal samples (adult, senior, and infant) with technical replicates were extracted. The extraction included negative controls (OMNIgeneGUT, DNA/RNA shield fluid, and Chemagic Lysis Buffer 1) to detect cross-contamination and ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard as a positive control to mimic the human gut microbiome and assess sensitivity of the extraction method. All samples were extracted using Chemagic DNA Stool 200 H96 kit (PerkinElmer, Finland). The samples were collected in two preservatives, OMNIgeneGUT and DNA/RNA shield fluid. DNA quantity was measured using Qubit-fluorometer, DNA purity and quality using gel electrophoresis, and taxonomic signatures with 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing with V3V4 and V4 regions. Bead beating increased bacterial diversity. The largest increase was detected in gram-positive genera Blautia, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus. Preservatives showed minor differences in bacterial abundances. The profiles between the V3V4 and V4 regions differed considerably with lower diversity samples. Negative controls showed signs from genera abundant in fecal samples. Technical replicates of the Gut Standard and stool samples showed low variation. The selected isolation protocol included recommended steps from manufacturer as well as bead beating. Bead beating was found to be necessary to detect hard-to-lyse bacteria. The protocol was reproducible in terms of DNA yield among different stool replicates and the ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard. The MSM1 instrument and pre-treatment in a 96-format offered the possibility of automation and handling of large sample collections. Both preservatives were feasible in terms of sample handling and had low variation in taxonomic signatures. The 16S rRNA target region had a high impact on the composition of the bacterial profile.
    OBJECTIVE: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a widely used method for determining the composition of the gut microbiota. Due to the differences in the gut microbiota composition between individuals, microbiome studies have expanded into large population studies to maximize detection of small effects on microbe-host interactions. Thus, the demand for a rapid and reliable microbial profiling is continuously increasing, making the optimization of high-throughput 96-format DNA extraction integral for NGS-based downstream applications. However, experimental protocols are prone to bias and errors from sample collection and storage, to DNA extraction, primer selection and sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses. Methodological bias can contribute to differences in microbiome profiles, causing variability across studies and laboratories using different protocols. To improve consistency and confidence of the measurements, the standardization of microbiome analysis methods has been recognized in many fields.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    与不同微生物的共生关系对于昆虫生物学的许多方面至关重要。然而,虽然我们对昆虫分类多样性和昆虫物种在自然群落中的分布的理解是有限的,我们对它们的微生物群知之甚少。在生物多样性迅速下降的时代,随着研究人员越来越多地转向基于DNA的监测,开发和广泛实施对昆虫和昆虫相关微生物多样性的高通量和具有成本效益的表征方法至关重要。我们需要验证诸如高通量条形码之类的方法,一个识别野生昆虫的强大工具,将允许随后在这些标本中重建微生物群。
    高通量条形码(“megabarcoding”)方法通常依赖于非破坏性方法,通过使用诸如HotSHOT之类的碱性缓冲液从昆虫标本中浸出DNA来获得用于PCR扩增的模板DNA。这项研究调查了HotSHOT对微生物丰度估计和重建的细菌群落概况的影响。我们通过比较HotSHOT处理或未处理的16种昆虫物种代表6个订单的16SrRNA扩增子定量测序数据来解决这个问题,并根据个体之间有限变异的预期进行选择。
    我们发现在13个物种中,治疗显著降低了微生物丰度估计,相当于可扩增16SrRNA模板平均减少15倍。另一方面,HotSHOT预处理对微生物群落组成的影响有限。具有已知显著作用的丰富细菌的重建存在没有受到影响。另一方面,我们观察到低丰度微生物的变化,那些接近可靠的检测阈值。α和β多样性分析显示,仅在少数物种中存在成分差异。
    我们的结果表明,HotSHOT预处理的标本仍然适用于微生物群落组成重建,即使丰度可能很难估计。这些结果表明,我们可以经济有效地将条形码与野生昆虫群落的微生物群研究相结合。因此,使用以表征昆虫群落为目标的巨值编码研究获得的凭证样本可用于微生物组表征。这可以大大有助于加速关于丰富和高多样性昆虫物种的微生物组的知识积累。
    UNASSIGNED: Symbiotic relationships with diverse microorganisms are crucial for many aspects of insect biology. However, while our understanding of insect taxonomic diversity and the distribution of insect species in natural communities is limited, we know much less about their microbiota. In the era of rapid biodiversity declines, as researchers increasingly turn towards DNA-based monitoring, developing and broadly implementing approaches for high-throughput and cost-effective characterization of both insect and insect-associated microbial diversity is essential. We need to verify whether approaches such as high-throughput barcoding, a powerful tool for identifying wild insects, would permit subsequent microbiota reconstruction in these specimens.
    UNASSIGNED: High-throughput barcoding (\"megabarcoding\") methods often rely on non-destructive approaches for obtaining template DNA for PCR amplification by leaching DNA out of insect specimens using alkaline buffers such as HotSHOT. This study investigated the impact of HotSHOT on microbial abundance estimates and the reconstructed bacterial community profiles. We addressed this question by comparing quantitative 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data for HotSHOT-treated or untreated specimens of 16 insect species representing six orders and selected based on the expectation of limited variation among individuals.
    UNASSIGNED: We find that in 13 species, the treatment significantly reduced microbial abundance estimates, corresponding to an estimated 15-fold decrease in amplifiable 16S rRNA template on average. On the other hand, HotSHOT pre-treatment had a limited effect on microbial community composition. The reconstructed presence of abundant bacteria with known significant effects was not affected. On the other hand, we observed changes in the presence of low-abundance microbes, those close to the reliable detection threshold. Alpha and beta diversity analyses showed compositional differences in only a few species.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results indicate that HotSHOT pre-treated specimens remain suitable for microbial community composition reconstruction, even if abundance may be hard to estimate. These results indicate that we can cost-effectively combine barcoding with the study of microbiota across wild insect communities. Thus, the voucher specimens obtained using megabarcoding studies targeted at characterizing insect communities can be used for microbiome characterizations. This can substantially aid in speeding up the accumulation of knowledge on the microbiomes of abundant and hyperdiverse insect species.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号