DL, deep learning

DL,深度学习
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    1)开发一种深度学习(DL)管道,允许在低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)上量化COVID-19肺部病变。2)评估DL驱动病变量化的预后价值。
    这项单中心回顾性研究包括了144和30名患者的训练和测试数据集,分别。参考是3个标签的手动分割:正常肺,毛玻璃不透明度(GGO)和固结(缺点)。模型性能用技术指标进行了评估,疾病的体积和程度。记录了观察员之间的协议。使用C统计量在1621名不同患者中评估了DL驱动的疾病程度的预后价值。终点是定义为死亡的综合结果,住院时间>10天,重症监护病房住院或氧疗。
    病变(GGOCons)分割的Dice系数为0.75±0.08,超过了人类观察者之间的值(0.70±0.08;0.70±0.10)和观察者内部测量值(0.72±0.09)。DL驱动的病变量化与观察者之间或观察者之间的测量相比,与参考的相关性更强。在逐步选择和调整临床特征后,定量显着提高了模型的预后准确性(0.82vs.0.90;p<0.0001)。
    DL驱动模型可在LDCT上提供可重复且准确的COVID-19病变分割。自动病变量化对于识别高危患者具有独立的预后价值。
    UNASSIGNED: 1) To develop a deep learning (DL) pipeline allowing quantification of COVID-19 pulmonary lesions on low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). 2) To assess the prognostic value of DL-driven lesion quantification.
    UNASSIGNED: This monocentric retrospective study included training and test datasets taken from 144 and 30 patients, respectively. The reference was the manual segmentation of 3 labels: normal lung, ground-glass opacity(GGO) and consolidation(Cons). Model performance was evaluated with technical metrics, disease volume and extent. Intra- and interobserver agreement were recorded. The prognostic value of DL-driven disease extent was assessed in 1621 distinct patients using C-statistics. The end point was a combined outcome defined as death, hospitalization>10 days, intensive care unit hospitalization or oxygen therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: The Dice coefficients for lesion (GGO+Cons) segmentations were 0.75±0.08, exceeding the values for human interobserver (0.70±0.08; 0.70±0.10) and intraobserver measures (0.72±0.09). DL-driven lesion quantification had a stronger correlation with the reference than inter- or intraobserver measures. After stepwise selection and adjustment for clinical characteristics, quantification significantly increased the prognostic accuracy of the model (0.82 vs. 0.90; p<0.0001).
    UNASSIGNED: A DL-driven model can provide reproducible and accurate segmentation of COVID-19 lesions on LDCT. Automatic lesion quantification has independent prognostic value for the identification of high-risk patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头颈部放疗引起重要的毒性,其疗效和耐受性因患者而异。放射治疗技术的进步,随着图像引导质量和频率的提高,提供一个独特的机会,根据成像生物标志物个性化放疗,目的是提高辐射功效,同时降低其毒性。整合临床数据和影像组学的各种人工智能模型在头颈部癌症放射治疗中的毒性和癌症控制结果预测方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果。这些模型的临床实施可能会导致个性化的基于风险的治疗决策,但目前研究的可靠性有限。理解,需要验证这些模型并将其扩展到更大的多机构数据集,并在临床试验的背景下对其进行测试,以确保安全的临床实施。这篇综述总结了用于预测头颈部癌症放疗结果的机器学习模型的最新技术。
    Head and neck radiotherapy induces important toxicity, and its efficacy and tolerance vary widely across patients. Advancements in radiotherapy delivery techniques, along with the increased quality and frequency of image guidance, offer a unique opportunity to individualize radiotherapy based on imaging biomarkers, with the aim of improving radiation efficacy while reducing its toxicity. Various artificial intelligence models integrating clinical data and radiomics have shown encouraging results for toxicity and cancer control outcomes prediction in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Clinical implementation of these models could lead to individualized risk-based therapeutic decision making, but the reliability of the current studies is limited. Understanding, validating and expanding these models to larger multi-institutional data sets and testing them in the context of clinical trials is needed to ensure safe clinical implementation. This review summarizes the current state of the art of machine learning models for prediction of head and neck cancer radiotherapy outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮冠状动脉介入治疗已成为冠心病患者的标准治疗策略,技术和技术不断进步。特别是人工智能和深度学习的应用目前正在推动介入解决方案的发展,提高诊断和治疗的效率和客观性。不断增长的数据量和计算能力以及尖端算法为将深度学习整合到临床实践中铺平了道路。彻底改变了成像处理中的介入工作流程,解释,和导航。这篇综述讨论了深度学习算法的发展及其相应的评估指标,以及它们的临床应用。先进的深度学习算法为高度自动化的精确诊断和定制治疗创造了新的机会,减少辐射,并加强风险分层。概括,可解释性,和监管问题仍然是需要通过多学科社区的共同努力来解决的挑战。
    Percutaneous coronary intervention has been a standard treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease with continuous ebullient progress in technology and techniques. The application of artificial intelligence and deep learning in particular is currently boosting the development of interventional solutions, improving the efficiency and objectivity of diagnosis and treatment. The ever-growing amount of data and computing power together with cutting-edge algorithms pave the way for the integration of deep learning into clinical practice, which has revolutionized the interventional workflow in imaging processing, interpretation, and navigation. This review discusses the development of deep learning algorithms and their corresponding evaluation metrics together with their clinical applications. Advanced deep learning algorithms create new opportunities for precise diagnosis and tailored treatment with a high degree of automation, reduced radiation, and enhanced risk stratification. Generalization, interpretability, and regulatory issues are remaining challenges that need to be addressed through joint efforts from multidisciplinary community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心血管疾病的患病率在世界范围内不断增加。然而,该技术正在发展,可以随时随地使用低成本传感器进行监控。这个课题正在研究中,不同的方法可以自动识别这些疾病,帮助患者和医疗保健专业人员进行治疗。本文对疾病识别进行了系统综述,分类,和ECG传感器识别。该评论的重点是2017年至2022年在不同科学数据库中发表的研究。包括PubMedCentral,Springer,Elsevier,多学科数字出版研究所(MDPI),IEEEXplore,和边界。对103篇科学论文进行了定量和定性分析。该研究表明,不同的数据集可以在线获得,其中包含与各种疾病有关的数据。在研究中确定了几种基于ML/DP的模型,其中卷积神经网络和支持向量机是应用最多的算法。这篇综述可以让我们确定可以在促进患者自主性的系统中使用的技术。
    The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases is increasing around the world. However, the technology is evolving and can be monitored with low-cost sensors anywhere at any time. This subject is being researched, and different methods can automatically identify these diseases, helping patients and healthcare professionals with the treatments. This paper presents a systematic review of disease identification, classification, and recognition with ECG sensors. The review was focused on studies published between 2017 and 2022 in different scientific databases, including PubMed Central, Springer, Elsevier, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), IEEE Xplore, and Frontiers. It results in the quantitative and qualitative analysis of 103 scientific papers. The study demonstrated that different datasets are available online with data related to various diseases. Several ML/DP-based models were identified in the research, where Convolutional Neural Network and Support Vector Machine were the most applied algorithms. This review can allow us to identify the techniques that can be used in a system that promotes the patient\'s autonomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    固有无序区域(IDR)的关键特征之一是它们与广泛的伴侣分子相互作用的能力。鉴定了多种类型的相互作用的IDR,包括分子识别片段(MoRFs),短线性序列基序(SLiM),和蛋白质-,核酸和脂质结合区。近年来,蛋白质序列中结合IDR的预测势头越来越大。我们调查了38个靶向与不同伴侣相互作用的结合IDR的预测因子,如肽,蛋白质,RNA,DNA和脂质。我们提供了历史视角,并强调了推动开发这些方法的关键事件。这些工具依赖于各种预测架构,包括评分函数,正则表达式,传统和深度机器学习和元模型。最近的努力集中在开发基于深度神经网络的架构,并将覆盖范围扩展到RNA,DNA和脂质结合IDR。我们分析了这些方法的可用性,并表明提供实现和Web服务器会导致更高的引用/使用率。我们还提出了一些建议,以利用现代深度网络架构,开发捆绑多种不同类型绑定IDR预测的工具,并研究对所得复合物的结构进行建模的算法。
    One of the key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is their ability to interact with a broad range of partner molecules. Multiple types of interacting IDRs were identified including molecular recognition fragments (MoRFs), short linear sequence motifs (SLiMs), and protein-, nucleic acids- and lipid-binding regions. Prediction of binding IDRs in protein sequences is gaining momentum in recent years. We survey 38 predictors of binding IDRs that target interactions with a diverse set of partners, such as peptides, proteins, RNA, DNA and lipids. We offer a historical perspective and highlight key events that fueled efforts to develop these methods. These tools rely on a diverse range of predictive architectures that include scoring functions, regular expressions, traditional and deep machine learning and meta-models. Recent efforts focus on the development of deep neural network-based architectures and extending coverage to RNA, DNA and lipid-binding IDRs. We analyze availability of these methods and show that providing implementations and webservers results in much higher rates of citations/use. We also make several recommendations to take advantage of modern deep network architectures, develop tools that bundle predictions of multiple and different types of binding IDRs, and work on algorithms that model structures of the resulting complexes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    食管癌和胃癌(OeGC)患者的治疗以疾病分期为指导,患者表现状况和偏好。淋巴结(LN)状态是OeGC患者的最强预后因素之一。然而,在相同疾病阶段和LN状态的患者之间,生存率不同。我们最近表明,OeGC患者的LN大小也可能具有预后价值,因此,LN的轮廓对于大小估计和其他成像生物标志物的提取是必不可少的。我们假设机器学习工作流程能够:(1)找到包含LN的数字H&E染色载玻片,(2)创建一个评分系统,为结果提供一定程度的确定性,和(3)在那些图像中描绘LN。为了训练和验证管道,我们使用了OE02试验的1695个H&E幻灯片。数据集分为训练(80%)和验证(20%)。在来自OE05试验的826个H&E载玻片的外部数据集上测试该模型。U-Net体系结构用于生成预测图,从中提取预定义的特征。这些特征随后用于训练XGBoost模型以确定区域是否真正包含LN。凭借我们的创新方法,当使用阈值化U-Net预测的标准方法得出二元掩码时,验证数据集上的LN检测的平衡准确度为0.93(测试数据集上的0.83),而验证(测试)数据集上的LN检测的平衡准确度为0.81(0.81).我们的方法允许创建一个“不确定”类别,并部分限制了外部数据集上的假阳性预测。对于验证(测试)数据集,平均Dice评分为0.73(0.60)/图像和0.66(0.48)/LN。我们的管道比传统方法更准确地检测LN的图像,LN的高通量划分可以促进未来对大型数据集的LN内容分析。
    Treatment of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer (OeGC) is guided by disease stage, patient performance status and preferences. Lymph node (LN) status is one of the strongest prognostic factors for OeGC patients. However, survival varies between patients with the same disease stage and LN status. We recently showed that LN size from patients with OeGC might also have prognostic value, thus making delineations of LNs essential for size estimation and the extraction of other imaging biomarkers. We hypothesized that a machine learning workflow is able to: (1) find digital H&E stained slides containing LNs, (2) create a scoring system providing degrees of certainty for the results, and (3) delineate LNs in those images. To train and validate the pipeline, we used 1695 H&E slides from the OE02 trial. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%). The model was tested on an external dataset of 826 H&E slides from the OE05 trial. U-Net architecture was used to generate prediction maps from which predefined features were extracted. These features were subsequently used to train an XGBoost model to determine if a region truly contained a LN. With our innovative method, the balanced accuracies of the LN detection were 0.93 on the validation dataset (0.83 on the test dataset) compared to 0.81 (0.81) on the validation (test) datasets when using the standard method of thresholding U-Net predictions to arrive at a binary mask. Our method allowed for the creation of an \"uncertain\" category, and partly limited false-positive predictions on the external dataset. The mean Dice score was 0.73 (0.60) per-image and 0.66 (0.48) per-LN for the validation (test) datasets. Our pipeline detects images with LNs more accurately than conventional methods, and high-throughput delineation of LNs can facilitate future LN content analyses of large datasets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:选择感兴趣区域(ROI)进行左心耳(LAA)填充缺陷评估可能耗时且容易产生主观性。这项研究旨在开发和验证一种新型的人工智能(AI),基于深度学习(DL)的临床和亚临床心房颤动(AF)患者CT图像自动填充缺陷评估框架。
    UNASSIGNED:总共443,053个CT图像用于DL模型开发和测试。图像由AI框架和专家心脏病学家/放射科医生进行分析。使用Dice系数评估LAA分割性能。使用组内相关系数(ICC)分析评估手动和自动LAAROI选择之间的一致性。基于计算的LAA与升主动脉Hounsfield单位(HU)比率,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来评估充盈缺陷。
    未经证实:共210名患者(第1组:亚临床房颤,n=105;第2组:临床房颤伴中风,n=35;第3组:用于导管消融的AF,n=70)。LAA体积分割达到0.931-0.945Dice评分。LAAROI选择与测试集上的手动选择表现出极好的一致性(ICC≥0.895,p<0.001)。自动框架在填充缺陷评估中实现了0.979的优异AUC评分。用于填充缺陷检测的ROC导出的最佳HU比率阈值为0.561。
    UNASSIGNED:新颖的基于AI的框架可以准确地分割左心耳区域并选择ROI,同时有效地避免小梁用于填充缺陷评估,实现接近专家的表现。该技术可能有助于预先检测房颤患者的潜在血栓栓塞风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Selecting region of interest (ROI) for left atrial appendage (LAA) filling defects assessment can be time consuming and prone to subjectivity. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL) based framework for automatic filling defects assessment on CT images for clinical and subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 443,053 CT images were used for DL model development and testing. Images were analyzed by the AI framework and expert cardiologists/radiologists. The LAA segmentation performance was evaluated using Dice coefficient. The agreement between manual and automatic LAA ROI selections was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess filling defects based on the computed LAA to ascending aorta Hounsfield unit (HU) ratios.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 210 patients (Group 1: subclinical AF, n = 105; Group 2: clinical AF with stroke, n = 35; Group 3: AF for catheter ablation, n = 70) were enrolled. The LAA volume segmentation achieved 0.931-0.945 Dice scores. The LAA ROI selection demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC ≥0.895, p < 0.001) with manual selection on the test sets. The automatic framework achieved an excellent AUC score of 0.979 in filling defects assessment. The ROC-derived optimal HU ratio threshold for filling defects detection was 0.561.
    UNASSIGNED: The novel AI-based framework could accurately segment the LAA region and select ROIs while effectively avoiding trabeculae for filling defects assessment, achieving close-to-expert performance. This technique may help preemptively detect the potential thromboembolic risk for AF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:开发使用OCT成像检测玻璃体后脱离(PVD)的自动化算法。
    UNASSIGNED:诊断测试或技术的评估。
    未经评估:总的来说,回顾性回顾了2020年10月至2021年12月在学术视网膜诊所使用海德堡光谱从464名患者的865只眼获得的42385幅连续OCT图像(865个体积OCT扫描)。
    UNASSIGNED:我们开发了一种基于图像滤波和边缘检测的定制计算机视觉算法,用于检测玻璃体后部皮质,以确定PVD状态。还训练了基于卷积神经网络和ResNet-50架构的第二深度学习(DL)图像分类模型,以从OCT图像中识别PVD状态。训练数据集包括674个OCT体积扫描(33026个OCT图像),而验证测试集包括73张OCT容积扫描(3577张OCT图像)。总的来说,118个OCT体积扫描(5782个OCT图像)用作单独的外部测试数据集。
    未经评估:准确性,灵敏度,特异性,F1分数,测量受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)以评估自动算法的性能。
    UNASSIGNED:定制的计算机视觉算法和DL模型结果与经过训练的分级者标记的PVD状态在很大程度上一致。对于OCT容积扫描的PVD检测,DL方法实现了90.7%的准确度和0.932的F1评分,灵敏度为100%,特异性为74.5%。对于DL模型,AUROC在图像水平为89%,在体积水平为96%。定制的计算机视觉算法在同一任务中获得了89.5%的准确性和0.912的F1评分,灵敏度为91.9%,特异性为86.1%。
    UNASSIGNED:应用于OCT成像的计算机视觉算法和DL模型都能够可靠地检测PVD状态,展示了基于OCT的自动PVD状态分类以协助玻璃体视网膜手术计划的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED:在参考文献之后可以找到专有或商业披露。
    UNASSIGNED: To develop automated algorithms for the detection of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) using OCT imaging.
    UNASSIGNED: Evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 42 385 consecutive OCT images (865 volumetric OCT scans) obtained with Heidelberg Spectralis from 865 eyes from 464 patients at an academic retina clinic between October 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a customized computer vision algorithm based on image filtering and edge detection to detect the posterior vitreous cortex for the determination of PVD status. A second deep learning (DL) image classification model based on convolutional neural networks and ResNet-50 architecture was also trained to identify PVD status from OCT images. The training dataset consisted of 674 OCT volume scans (33 026 OCT images), while the validation testing set consisted of 73 OCT volume scans (3577 OCT images). Overall, 118 OCT volume scans (5782 OCT images) were used as a separate external testing dataset.
    UNASSIGNED: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-scores, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCs) were measured to assess the performance of the automated algorithms.
    UNASSIGNED: Both the customized computer vision algorithm and DL model results were largely in agreement with the PVD status labeled by trained graders. The DL approach achieved an accuracy of 90.7% and an F1-score of 0.932 with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 74.5% for PVD detection from an OCT volume scan. The AUROC was 89% at the image level and 96% at the volume level for the DL model. The customized computer vision algorithm attained an accuracy of 89.5% and an F1-score of 0.912 with a sensitivity of 91.9% and a specificity of 86.1% on the same task.
    UNASSIGNED: Both the computer vision algorithm and the DL model applied on OCT imaging enabled reliable detection of PVD status, demonstrating the potential for OCT-based automated PVD status classification to assist with vitreoretinal surgical planning.
    UNASSIGNED: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UASSIGNED:由于数据集的自然类别不平衡,在基于医学图像的人工智能中,罕见疾病诊断具有挑战性。导致预测模型有偏差。遗传性视网膜疾病(IRD)是一个特别面临这一问题的研究领域。这项研究调查了合成数据在使用生成对抗网络(GAN)改善人工智能对IRD的诊断中的适用性。
    UNASSIGNED:使用深度学习对基因标记的眼底自发荧光(FAF)IRD图像进行诊断研究。
    UNASSIGNED:Moorfields眼科医院(MEH)的15.692张FAF图像数据集来自1800名患者,这些患者的基因诊断为36个IRD基因中的1个。
    UNASSIGNED:在IRD数据集上训练StyleGAN2模型以生成512×512分辨率图像。使用不同的合成增强数据集训练卷积神经网络进行分类,包括真实的IRD图像以及1800和3600合成图像,和一个完全重新平衡的数据集。我们还只使用合成数据进行实验。将所有模型与仅在真实数据上训练的基线卷积神经网络进行比较。
    UNASSIGNED:我们使用视觉图灵测试对来自MEH的4位眼科医生进行了综合数据质量评估。使用特征空间可视化比较了合成图像和真实图像,相似性分析来检测记忆图像,和盲/无参考图像空间质量评估(BRISQUE)得分,用于无参考的质量评估。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和Cohen'sKappa(κ)在保留的测试集上确定卷积神经网络诊断性能。
    UNASSIGNED:从视觉图灵测试获得63%的平均真实识别率和47%的假识别率。因此,相当比例的合成图像被临床专家归类为真实的。相似性分析表明,合成图像不是真实图像的副本,表明复制的真实图像,这意味着GAN能够概括。然而,BRISQUE评分分析表明,合成图像的整体质量明显低于真实图像(P<0.05)。将重新平衡模型(RB)与基线(R)进行比较,平均AUROC和κ没有发现显著变化(R-AUROC=0.86[0.85-88],RB-AUROC=0.88[0.86-0.89],R-k=0.51[0.49-0.53],和RB-k=0.52[0.50-0.54])。合成数据训练模型(S)实现了与基线相似的性能(S-AUROC=0.86[0.85-87],S-k=0.48[0.46-0.50])。
    UNASSIGNED:合成生成逼真的IRDFAF图像是可行的。合成数据增强不会改善分类性能。然而,仅合成数据就能提供与真实数据相似的性能,因此,作为真实数据的代理可能很有用。财务披露:专有或商业披露可以在参考文献之后找到。
    UNASSIGNED: Rare disease diagnosis is challenging in medical image-based artificial intelligence due to a natural class imbalance in datasets, leading to biased prediction models. Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a research domain that particularly faces this issue. This study investigates the applicability of synthetic data in improving artificial intelligence-enabled diagnosis of IRDs using generative adversarial networks (GANs).
    UNASSIGNED: Diagnostic study of gene-labeled fundus autofluorescence (FAF) IRD images using deep learning.
    UNASSIGNED: Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) dataset of 15 692 FAF images obtained from 1800 patients with confirmed genetic diagnosis of 1 of 36 IRD genes.
    UNASSIGNED: A StyleGAN2 model is trained on the IRD dataset to generate 512 × 512 resolution images. Convolutional neural networks are trained for classification using different synthetically augmented datasets, including real IRD images plus 1800 and 3600 synthetic images, and a fully rebalanced dataset. We also perform an experiment with only synthetic data. All models are compared against a baseline convolutional neural network trained only on real data.
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated synthetic data quality using a Visual Turing Test conducted with 4 ophthalmologists from MEH. Synthetic and real images were compared using feature space visualization, similarity analysis to detect memorized images, and Blind/Referenceless Image Spatial Quality Evaluator (BRISQUE) score for no-reference-based quality evaluation. Convolutional neural network diagnostic performance was determined on a held-out test set using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Cohen\'s Kappa (κ).
    UNASSIGNED: An average true recognition rate of 63% and fake recognition rate of 47% was obtained from the Visual Turing Test. Thus, a considerable proportion of the synthetic images were classified as real by clinical experts. Similarity analysis showed that the synthetic images were not copies of the real images, indicating that copied real images, meaning the GAN was able to generalize. However, BRISQUE score analysis indicated that synthetic images were of significantly lower quality overall than real images (P < 0.05). Comparing the rebalanced model (RB) with the baseline (R), no significant change in the average AUROC and κ was found (R-AUROC = 0.86[0.85-88], RB-AUROC = 0.88[0.86-0.89], R-k = 0.51[0.49-0.53], and RB-k = 0.52[0.50-0.54]). The synthetic data trained model (S) achieved similar performance as the baseline (S-AUROC = 0.86[0.85-87], S-k = 0.48[0.46-0.50]).
    UNASSIGNED: Synthetic generation of realistic IRD FAF images is feasible. Synthetic data augmentation does not deliver improvements in classification performance. However, synthetic data alone deliver a similar performance as real data, and hence may be useful as a proxy to real data. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)是计算机中介设计算法以支持人类智能的数学过程。AI在肝病学中显示出巨大的希望,可以计划适当的管理,从而改善治疗结果。AI领域处于非常早期的阶段,临床应用有限。人工智能工具,如机器学习,深度学习,和“大数据”处于一个连续的进化阶段,目前正在应用于临床和基础研究。在这次审查中,我们总结了各种人工智能在肝病学中的应用,陷阱和人工智能的未来影响。不同的人工智能模型和算法正在研究中,使用临床,实验室,内镜和成像参数,以诊断和管理肝脏疾病和肿块病变。AI有助于减少人为错误并改善治疗方案。未来AI在肝病中的使用需要进一步的研究和验证。
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a mathematical process of computer mediating designing of algorithms to support human intelligence. AI in hepatology has shown tremendous promise to plan appropriate management and hence improve treatment outcomes. The field of AI is in a very early phase with limited clinical use. AI tools such as machine learning, deep learning, and \'big data\' are in a continuous phase of evolution, presently being applied for clinical and basic research. In this review, we have summarized various AI applications in hepatology, the pitfalls and AI\'s future implications. Different AI models and algorithms are under study using clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and imaging parameters to diagnose and manage liver diseases and mass lesions. AI has helped to reduce human errors and improve treatment protocols. Further research and validation are required for future use of AI in hepatology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号