The current SARS-COV-2 pandemic led to a drastic drop in liver donation and transplantation in DDLT and LDLT settings. Living donations have decreased more than deceased organ donation due to the need to protect the interest of donors. In the SARS-COV-2 pandemic, major professional societies worldwide recommended against the use of organs from donors with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The basis for these recommendations are; SARS-CoV-2 could be transmitted to the recipient through organ transplantation and can result in severe manifestations; only limited effective targeted therapies are available, risk of transmission to the healthcare professionals, logistical limitations, and ethical concerns. In addition, end-stage liver disease patients on the waiting list represent vulnerable populations and are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 infection. Therefore, deferring life-saving transplants from COVID-positive donors during a pandemic may lead to more collateral damage by causing disease progression, increased death, and dropout from the waitlist. As this SARS-COV-2 pandemic is likely to stay with us for some time, we have to learn to co-exist with it. We believe that utilizing organs from mild/ asymptomatic COVID19 positive donors may expand the organ donor pool and mitigate disruptions in transplantation services during this pandemic.

UNASSIGNED: Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is increasing in India and now constitutes nearly one-third of all liver transplantation procedures performed in the country. There is currently no uniform national system of allocation of deceased donor livers.
UNASSIGNED: A national task force consisting of 19 clinicians involved in liver transplantation from across the country was constituted under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India to develop a consensus document addressing the above issues using a modified Delphi process of consensus development.
UNASSIGNED: The National Liver Allocation Policy consensus document includes 46 statements covering all aspects of DDLT, including minimum listing criteria, listing for acute liver failure, DDLT wait-list management, system of prioritisation based on clinical urgency for adults and children, guidelines for allocation of paediatric organs and allocation priorities for liver grafts recovered from public sector hospitals.
UNASSIGNED: This document is the first step in the setting up of a nationally consistent policy of deceased donor liver allocation.

UNASSIGNED: Data on feasibility, management, and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with pre-existing left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), severe coronary artery disease (CAD) or cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is scarce.
UNASSIGNED: We reviewed outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipients with LVSD (ejection fraction [EF] < 50%) from our series of 1946 LDLT\'s performed between July 2010 and July 2018.
UNASSIGNED: LVSD was detected in 12 male patients with a mean age, BMI and MELD of 52 ± 9 years, 25 ± 5 kg/m2, and 19 ± 4 respectively. Out of these, 6 patients had CAD (2 with previous coronary artery bypass graft, 1 following recent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 2 post myocardial infarction, 1 noncritical CAD), and 6 had CCM. The EF ranged from 25% to 45%. Ethanol was the predominant underlying etiology for cirrhosis (50%). During LDLT, 2 patients developed ventricular ectopic rhythm and were managed successfully with intravenous lidocaine. Stress cardiomyopathy manifested in 3 patients post operatively with decreased EF, of which 2 improved, while 1 needed IABP support and succumbed to multiorgan failure on 8th postoperative day (POD). Another patient died on POD30 due to septic shock. Both these patients had higher MELD scores (actual MELD), extremes of BMI (17.3and 35.8 kg/m2) and were diabetic. There were no long-term cardiac deaths. The 1-year, and 5-year survival were 75%, and 66%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Among potential LT recipients with LVSD, those with stable CAD and good performance status, and well optimized CCM patients may be considered for LDLT after careful risk stratification in experienced centers.

UNASSIGNED: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in the perioperative transplant period and is associated with poor outcomes. Few studies reported a reduction in AKI incidence with terlipressin therapy by counteracting the hemodynamic alterations occurring during liver transplantation. However, the effect of terlipressin on posttransplant outcomes has not been systematically reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed. Studies reporting the use of terlipressin in the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation were included. We expressed the dichotomous outcomes as risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) using the random effects model. The primary aim was to assess the posttransplant risk of AKI. The secondary aims were to assess the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressors, effect on hemodynamics, blood loss during surgery, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and in-hospital mortality.
UNASSIGNED: A total of nine studies reporting 711 patients (309 patients in the terlipressin group and 402 in the control group) were included for analysis. Terlipressin was administered for a mean duration of 53.44 ± 28.61 h postsurgery. The risk of AKI was lower with terlipressin (0.6 [95% CI, 0.44-0.8]; P = 0.001). However, on sensitivity analysis including only four randomized controlled trials (I2 = 0; P = 0.54), the risk of AKI was similar in both the groups (0.7 [0.43-1.09]; P = 0.11). The need for RRT was similar in both the groups (0.75 [0.35-1.56]; P = 0.44). Terlipressin therapy reduced the need for another vasopressor (0.34 [0.25-0.47]; P < 0.001) with a concomitant rise in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance by 3.2 mm Hg (1.64-4.7; P < 0.001) and 77.64 dyne cm-1.sec-5 (21.27-134; P = 0.007), respectively. Blood loss, duration of hospital/ICU stay, and mortality were similar in both groups.
UNASSIGNED: Perioperative terlipressin therapy has no clinically relevant benefit.

BACKGROUND: An ideal definition of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of existing EAD definitions, identify the predictors of early graft loss due to EAD, and formulate a new definition, estimating EAD-related mortality in LDLT recipients.
METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective LDLT were analyzed. Patients with technical (vascular, biliary) complications and biopsy-proven rejections were excluded.
RESULTS: There were 19 deaths due to EAD of a total of 304 patients. On applying the existing definitions of EAD, we revealed their limitations of being either too broad with low specificity or too restrictive with low sensitivity in patients with LDLT. A new definition of EAD-LDLT (total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, international normalized ratio [INR] > 1.6 and serum urea >100 mg/dL, for five consecutive days after day 7) was derived after doing a multivariate analysis. In receiver operator characteristics analysis, an AUC for EAD-LDLT was 0.86. The calibration and internal cross-validation of the new model confirmed its predictability.
CONCLUSIONS: The new model of EAD-LDLT, based on total bilirubin >10 mg/dL, INR >1.6 and serum urea >100 mg/dL, for five consecutive days after day 7, has a better predictive value for mortality due to EAD in LDLT recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure caused by the ingestion of yellow phosphorus-containing rodenticide has been increasing in incidence over the last decade and is a common indication for emergency liver transplantation in Southern and Western India and other countries. Clear guidelines for its management are necessary, given its unpredictable course, potential for rapid deterioration and variation in clinical practice.
METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used for developing consensus guidelines under the aegis of the Liver Transplantation Society of India. A detailed review of the published literature was performed. Recommendations for three areas of clinical practice, assessment and initial management, intensive care unit (ICU) management and liver transplantation, were developed.
RESULTS: The expert panel consisted of 16 clinicians, 3 nonclinical specialists and 5 senior advisory members from 11 centres. Thirty-one recommendations with regard to criteria for hospital admission and discharge, role of medical therapies, ICU management, evidence for extracorporeal therapies such as renal replacement therapy and therapeutic plasma exchange, early predictors of need for liver transplantation and perioperative care were developed based on published evidence and combined clinical experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Development of these guidelines should help standardise care for patients with yellow phosphorus poisoning and identify areas for collaborative research.

The survival of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been improved remarkably in short-term. The major causes of mortality in long-term include nonimmunological causes such as cardiovascular, de novo malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and recurrence of primary disease. Rejection-related mortality is rare in the long-term after LT. We discuss nonrejection causes of long-term morbidity/mortality, risk factors, and management strategies in LT recipients. In addition, we discuss osteoporosis, contraception, and pregnancy in LT recipients.

UNASSIGNED: We describe our technique of ex vivo organ perfusion and procurement in donation after deceased brain death (DBD) donors.
UNASSIGNED: This technique comprises warm dissection of liver, kidneys, and heart, in hemodynamically stable DBD donors and perfusing them ex vivo. The cardiac and abdominal dissection can take place simultaneously. As a precaution, the iliac arteries and the abdominal aorta are dissected and kept ready for rapid cannulation and perfusion, should the donor become unstable at any stage.The liver dissection is in principle similar to living donor hepatectomy, where portal dissection is combined with supra and infrahepatic caval dissection to completely mobilize liver to allow it to be removed and perfused ex vivo. The renal dissection is done after hepatic dissection is complete. The sequence of recovery of organ was modified where kidneys were procured first followed by hepatic and cardiac procurement simultaneously.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve multivisceral (liver and kidneys in all and heart in four) procurements have been performed. The average perfusion fluid volume for liver was 3.4 L. All recipients had uneventful postoperative course.
UNASSIGNED: Our technique has not affected recipient outcomes and with benefits of less use of preservation solution, shortening bench surgery time, and decreasing the propensity of procurement injuries by avoiding cold-phase dissection.

UNASSIGNED: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholestatic disorder with liver transplantation (LT) being the only definitive treatment in end-stage disease. Recurrence of PSC after LT is a significant concern which can lead to graft loss. The aim of this study is to find out the disease recurrence and long-term outcome after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in PSC.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing LDLT for PSC at our centre. Of 2268 adult LTs from August 2004 to July 2018, 32 (1.4%) patients underwent LDLT for PSC including 6 with PSC and autoimmune hepatitis overlap. The data were reviewed to look for PSC recurrence, complications, and overall survival. All patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Data are shown as number, percentage, median, and interquartile range (IQR).
UNASSIGNED: The mean age of 32 LDLT recipients was 44 ± 12 years (males 22, females 10). At the time of transplantation, the mean child\'s score was 9 ± 1.6 and model for end-stage liver disease score was 18.9 ± 6.4. Ulcerative colitis was seen in 7 patients and none had cholangiocarcinoma. Majority of patients (n = 29) received right lobe graft and all but 3 underwent hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction. PSC recurrence was seen in 6 (20%) patients during a median follow-up of 59 (29-101) months, after exclusion of 2 patients with early mortality. A total of five patients died during follow-up, and one of these deaths was due to PSC recurrence. There were 2 perioperative deaths due to sepsis and 3 deaths on follow-up (sepsis in 2 and PSC recurrence in 1).
UNASSIGNED: LDLT can be performed in PSC with good overall long-term outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus is spreading rapidly, and there are obvious concerns for the immunocompromised patient population including transplant recipients. Creating awareness and understanding patient concerns will play an important role in protecting this vulnerable group in developing timely and appropriate healthcare interventions.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 23rd March 2020 and 1st April 2020 among 154 liver transplant recipients, transplanted between October 2018 and February 2020. An 18-point questionnaire explored their knowledge of COVID-19, awareness of recipient\'s high-risk status, interventions to minimize cross-infections, and concerns of this patient group regarding the pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: There were 112 (73%) respondents, with median age of 53 years (81% males). There was no difference in demographics between those who responded (n = 112) and those who did not respond to the survey (n = 42). Most of the recipients were aware of the main symptoms of COVID-19, such as fever (92%), breathlessness (86%), and dry cough (87%), but less than half were aware of diarrhea (39%) as a symptom. Awareness about spread from asymptomatic individuals was limited (26%). Majority (95%) understood their high-risk status, but worryingly, 23% of the respondents felt that there was no risk in visiting the hospital for routine clinic visit and blood tests. Concerns were raised by the recipients mostly regarding the uncertainties of COVID-19 infection and its treatment options, the quality of information on social messaging platforms, and lack of access to routine tests/immunosuppression levels because of lockdown/social distancing.
UNASSIGNED: Our liver transplant recipients have a reasonable awareness regarding COVID-19. Problems in accessing the healthcare system during prolonged periods of lockdown was a major concern. It is important for each transplant unit to educate, support, and remain accessible to this vulnerable patient cohort as the pandemic continues to progress worldwide.