Percutaneous liver biopsy is a relatively safe procedure with low complication rates. Infections following liver biopsy are uncommon and can lead to a poor outcome. There are limited data on liver biopsy-related infections among liver transplant (LT) recipients. Also, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics in LT patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. We report a case of systemic sepsis following percutaneous liver biopsy in a LT recipient with choledochojejunal anastomosis. This was followed by severe rejection and deterioration of liver function and recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) to the extent that he has been listed for retransplantation. This case report emphasizes the potential risk of sepsis in LT recipients with bilioenteric anastomosis undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. This increased risk may warrant periprocedural broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis, in this subgroup of patients.

Accidental or suicidal poisoning with yellow phosphorus or metal phosphides (YPMP) such as aluminum (AlP) zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) commonly cause acute liver failure (ALF) and cardiotoxicity. These are used as household, agricultural and industrial rodenticides and in production of ammunitions, firecrackers and fertilizers. In absence of a clinically available laboratory test for diagnosis or toxin measurement or an antidote, managing their poisoning is challenging even at a tertiary care center with a dedicated liver intensive care unit (LICU) and liver transplant facility.
METHODS: Patients with YPMP related ALF were monitored using standardized clinical, hemodynamic, biochemical, metabolic, neurological, electrocardiography (ECG) and SOFA score and managed using uniform intensive care, treatment and transplant protocols in LICU. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical and biochemical parameters and scores were summarized and compared between 3 groups i.e. spontaneous survivors, transplanted patients and non-survivors. Predictors of spontaneous survival and the need for liver transplant are also evaluated.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients with YPMP related ALF were about 32 years old (63.2% females) and presented to us at a median of 3 (0 - 10) days after poisoning. YPMP related cardiotoxicity was rapidly progressive and fatal whereas liver transplant was therapeutic for ALF. Spontaneous survivors had lower dose ingestion (<17.5 grams), absence of cardiotoxicity, < grade 3 HE, lactate < 5.8, SOFA score < 14.5, and increase in SOFA score by < 5.5. Patients with renal failure need for CVVHDF and KCC positivity on account of PT-INR > 6.5 had higher mortality risk. Patients undergoing liver transplant and with spontaneous recovery required longer ICU and hospital stay. At median follow-up of 3.4 (2.6 - 5.5) years, all spontaneous survivors and transplanted patients are well with normal liver function.
CONCLUSIONS: Early transfer to a specialized center, pre-emptive close monitoring, and intensive care and organ support with ventilation, CVVHDF, plasmapheresis and others may maximize their chances of spontaneous recovery, allow accurate prognostication and a timely liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to study the determinants of nonadherence to immunosuppressant drugs in liver transplant (LT) recipients using personalised interview and questionnaire methods.
METHODS: The study was conducted on adult LT recipients (deceased donor liver transplant [DDLT] and living donor liver transplant [LDLT]) from the Indian subcontinent, at post-LT clinic visit between July and December 2016. Recipient details included baseline demography, comorbidity, psychological status, details of addiction, indication and type of transplant. Details on financial support for transplantation, admissions for rejection, infection and posttransplant complications were obtained from the hospital records. An adherence questionnaire was completed by direct interview and using a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven LT recipients (56 males, median age 48.17 years) constituted the study group. Overall, 11 patients (16.47%) were nonadherent to treatment. LDLT recipients were more adherent than DDLT recipients. Nonadherent recipients were believers in alternative systems of medicine. Medication-related factors such as improper dosing, meagre drug knowledge difficulty in remembering drug dose and timings and economic constraints in continuing medical treatment were statistically significant in nonadherent recipients. Although variation in the tacrolimus levels were significantly more common in the nonadherent group, acute cellular rejection and infection were not statistically different.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of nonadherence was 16.5%. Determinants of nonadherence were DDLT, belief in alternative medications, high regimen complexity, poor knowledge about medications and cost issues with long-term medications.

UNASSIGNED: Results of Sofosbuvir based regimens for hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation are available from well-designed clinical trials. Most of the data is from deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) setting, and data on \"real world\" experience for HCV recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is limited.
UNASSIGNED: Consecutive 78 patients who completed Sofosbuvir based HCV treatment after liver transplantation were included. Following Sofosbuvir based regimens were used; Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin (n = 58), Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 5), Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 15). Treatment was given for 12 weeks (triple therapy) or 24 weeks (dual therapy).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 74/78 (94.8%) patients achieved end of treatment response (ETR) while 4 did not achieve ETR. A total of 68/76 (89.4%) patients achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12). while 2 are waiting for 12 weeks follow up after ETR. Twelve patients had history of failed previous treatment with Peginterferon and Ribavirin after LDLT, all these patients achieved ETR and 11/12 had SVR12. There was no statistical difference in response rates between genotype 1 or 3. Eighteen patients (16 on Ribavirin) had hemoglobin < 8 g/dl; two patients complained fatigue in absence of anemia.
UNASSIGNED: Sofosbuvir based regimens are safe and highly effective in treatment of HCV recurrence after LDLT.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with newer directly acting antivirals (DAAs) and lead to sustained viral response (SVR) in majority of patients and SVR has been documented to be associated with reversal of liver cirrhosis. The improved SVR rates and safety profiles of DAAs have led to the treatment of patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Several clinical trials of DAAs in decompensated HCV patients have recently demonstrated SVR rates above 80%, which have been associated with significant improvements, in the Child-Pugh-Turcotte scores/or model for end-stage liver disease scores in a proportion of patients. Moreover, it has been shown that HCV RNA becomes negative after 2-4 weeks of treatment, and those who are transplanted after becoming HCV RNA negative will be have very low the risk of HCV recurrence after transplantation. Some of the patients may have reached the \"point of no return\" and may proceed to worsening of decomposition over time. To avoid the risk of worsening, there is an additional option of treating these patients after LT should they develop recurrent HCV infection. Currently there are no guidelines as to select patients who would benefit from treatment prior to LT as opposed to those who will be better off being treated after the transplant surgery. The article discusses a possible approach for such selection.

As the liver transplant journey in India reaches substantial numbers and suggests quality technical expertise, it is time to dispassionately look at the big picture, identify problems, and consider corrective measures for the future. Several features characterize the current scenario. Although the proportion of deceased donor liver transplants is increasing, besides major regional imbalances, the activity is heavily loaded in favor of the private sector and live donor transplants. The high costs of the procedure, the poor participation of public hospitals, the lack of a national registry, and outcomes reporting are issues of concern. Organ sharing protocols currently based on chronology or institutional rotation need to move to a more justiciable severity-based system. Several measures can expand the deceased donor pool. The safety of the living donor continues to need close scrutiny and focus. Multiple medical challenges unique to the Indian situation are also being thrown up. Although many of the deficits demand state intervention and policy changes the transplant community needs to take notice and highlight them. The future of liver transplantation in India should move toward a more accountable, equitable, and accessible form. We owe this to our citizens who have shown tremendous faith in us by volunteering to be living donors as well as consenting for deceased donation.

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor (DDLT) and living donor (LDLT) liver transplant (LT) is in vogue in several centers in India. Most centers are resorting to LDLT as a preferred surgery due to shortage of deceased donor liver. The risk of infection and its effect on survival in both groups of recipients from the Indian subcontinent are not known. The study was conducted to compare the bacterial infection rates among LDLT and DDLT recipients and their impact on survival at a tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Retrospective data on 67 LT recipients were reviewed. Data on pre-, per-, and postoperative bacterial infection rates and the common isolates were obtained.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had LDLT and 32 had DDLT. The prevalence of pre-operative bacterial infection and the isolates was similar in both groups. The perioperative bacterial infection rates were significantly higher in DDLT recipients (P < 0.01) (relative risk: 1.44 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.9). In both LDLT and DDLT, the common source was urinary tract followed by bloodstream infection. The common bacterial isolates in either transplant were Klebsiella followed by Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp. and nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria. Six patients (four LDLT; two DDLT) were treated for tuberculosis. Among the risk factors, cold ischemic time, and duration of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly higher for DDLT (p < 0.01). The death rates were not significantly different in the two groups. However, the odds for death were significantly high at 26.8 (p < 0.05) for postoperative bacterial infection and 1.8 (p < 0.001) for past alcohol.
CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients are at high-risk for bacterial infection irrespective of type of transplant, more so in DDLT.