DBS (deep brain stimulation)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    该病例介绍了一名被诊断为多系统萎缩帕金森病患者的66岁妇女的情况,该妇女接受了深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗,随后进行了两次自杀尝试。尽管接受了治疗和广泛的心理治疗,她的病情没有好转,导致一年内的自杀行为。值得注意的是,她对DBS治疗的有效性抱有不切实际的信念,对其结果表示不满。家庭动态很复杂,患者在应对日益恶化的健康状况的同时隐瞒自己的心理困扰。这种严重的痛苦最终导致在相对较短的时间内两次自杀企图。我们的精神科小组迅速介入,实施自杀方案并调整她的用药方案。尽管文献中记录了自杀意念的普遍性和DBS后的尝试,确切的原因仍然不确定,与神经免疫或神经通路有关。这个案例有助于科学的理解,因为它揭示了无效的DBS干预后的自杀企图。通过神经伦理分析,强调患者有权了解潜在的自杀风险和辅助自杀的可能性。因此,我们的案例强调了对DBS患者进行精神病学评估和干预以防止进一步自杀的重要性,专注于针对患者自主性和神经伦理原则的多学科方法。
    This case presents the situation of a 66-year-old woman diagnosed with Multiple System Atrophy Parkinsonian Type who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy and subsequently made two suicide attempts. Despite receiving treatment and extensive psychotherapy, her condition did not improve, leading to suicidal behavior over the course of a year. Notably, she held unrealistic beliefs about the effectiveness of DBS therapy, expressing dissatisfaction with its outcomes. Family dynamics were complex, with the patient concealing her psychological distress while coping with her worsening health condition. This severe distress culminated in two suicide attempts within a relatively short timeframe. Our psychiatric team promptly intervened, implementing a suicidality protocol and adjusting her medication regimen. Despite a documented prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempts post-DBS in the literature, the exact causes remain uncertain, with the suggested involvement of neuroimmune or neurological pathways. This case contributes to scientific understanding by shedding light on suicide attempts following ineffective DBS interventions, emphasizing the patient\'s right to be informed about potential suicide risks and the possibility of assisted suicide through a neuroethical analysis. Therefore, our case underlines the importance of psychiatric evaluation and intervention in DBS patients to prevent further suicidality, focusing on a multidisciplinary approach tailored to the patient\'s autonomy and neuroethical principles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在帕金森病患者中植入深部脑刺激(DBS)电极通常会导致非感染性的出现,迟发性水肿随时间消失。然而,DBS电极和DBS刺激装置植入物之间的时间窗口通常用于记录局部场电位(LFP),用于更好地了解基底神经节的病理生理学和改善DBS治疗。在这项工作中,我们调查了8例植入丘脑下DBS电极的晚期帕金森病患者术后水肿是否与LFP记录质量相关.对植入手术8.5±1.5天后的大脑磁共振扫描进行分段,并计算两个大脑半球的电极周围水肿体积。我们发现低β波段(11-20Hz)的左侧局部场电位与同侧水肿体积之间存在相关性(ρ=-0.81,p<0.0218,Spearman相关系数)。半球之间没有发现其他显着差异。尽管样本量有限,我们的结果表明,对LFP的影响可能与水肿定位有关,因此表明了一种涉及大脑网络的机制,而不是电极-组织界面的简单变化。
    Implanting deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in patients with Parkinson\'s disease often results in the appearance of a non-infectious, delayed-onset edema that disappears over time. However, the time window between the DBS electrode and DBS stimulating device implant is often used to record local field potentials (LFPs) which are used both to better understand basal ganglia pathophysiology and to improve DBS therapy. In this work, we investigated whether the presence of post-surgery edema correlates with the quality of LFP recordings in eight patients with advanced Parkinson\'s disease implanted with subthalamic DBS electrodes. The magnetic resonance scans of the brain after 8.5 ± 1.5 days from the implantation surgery were segmented and the peri-electrode edema volume was calculated for both brain hemispheres. We found a correlation (ρ = -0.81, p < 0.0218, Spearman\'s correlation coefficient) between left side local field potentials of the low beta band (11-20 Hz) and the edema volume of the same side. No other significant differences between the hemispheres were found. Despite the limited sample size, our results suggest that the effect on LFPs may be related to the edema localization, thus indicating a mechanism involving brain networks instead of a simple change in the electrode-tissue interface.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诸如脑计算机接口(BCI)和深部脑刺激器(DBS)之类的植入式神经技术设备是治疗或探索神经和精神疾病的潜在治疗方法的越来越多的部分。虽然只有少数设备被批准,许多有希望的未来设备的前景正在调查中。参与临床试验的决定可能具有挑战性,考虑到各种风险。在同意过程中,潜在参与者可能缺乏考虑这些风险的语言,感到毫无准备,或者根本不知道该问什么问题。帮助参与者在同意过程中发挥更积极作用的一个工具是问题提示列表(QPL)。QPL是沟通工具,可以提示参与者和患者阐明潜在的问题。他们提供了一份结构化的疾病清单,治疗,或研究干预特定的问题,研究参与者可以使用作为问题提问的支持。虽然QPL已被研究为改善癌症治疗期间的同意过程的工具,在本文中,我们建议它们对神经技术研究有帮助,并提供QPL作为神经技术设备试验中知情同意工具模板的示例。
    Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future devices are under investigation. The decision to participate in a clinical trial can be challenging, given a variety of risks to be taken into consideration. During the consent process, prospective participants might lack the language to consider those risks, feel unprepared, or simply not know what questions to ask. One tool to help empower participants to play a more active role during the consent process is a Question Prompt List (QPL). QPLs are communication tools that can prompt participants and patients to articulate potential concerns. They offer a structured list of disease, treatment, or research intervention-specific questions that research participants can use as support for question asking. While QPLs have been studied as tools for improving the consent process during cancer treatment, in this paper, we suggest they would be helpful in neurotechnology research, and offer an example of a QPL as a template for an informed consent tool in neurotechnology device trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    无线数据传输技术的最新进展有可能彻底改变临床神经科学。今天有感应能力的电刺激器,被称为“双向设备”,用于在自然环境中从人类获得慢性大脑活动。然而,随着无线传输的到来,数据传输中的潜在故障,并且并非所有可用的设备都能正确地解决丢失的数据或为发生数据丢失提供精确的时间。我们无法精确重建时域神经信号,因此很难应用后续的神经信号处理技术和分析。这里,我们的目标是准确重建无线传输过程中受数据丢失影响的时域神经信号.为此,我们开发了一种称为丢失包周期估计(PELP)的方法。PELP利用刺激伪影的高度周期性性质来精确地确定何时发生数据丢失。使用添加到人体脑电图数据的模拟刺激波形,我们表明PELP对一系列刺激波形和噪声特性具有鲁棒性。然后,我们将PELP应用于使用植入式,双向DBS平台在各种遥测带宽下运行。通过有效地考虑缺失数据的时间,PELP能够分析通过无线传输收集的神经时间序列数据,这是更好地理解神经和精神疾病背后的大脑行为关系的先决条件。
    Recent advances in wireless data transmission technology have the potential to revolutionize clinical neuroscience. Today sensing-capable electrical stimulators, known as \"bidirectional devices\", are used to acquire chronic brain activity from humans in natural environments. However, with wireless transmission come potential failures in data transmission, and not all available devices correctly account for missing data or provide precise timing for when data losses occur. Our inability to precisely reconstruct time-domain neural signals makes it difficult to apply subsequent neural signal processing techniques and analyses. Here, our goal was to accurately reconstruct time-domain neural signals impacted by data loss during wireless transmission. Towards this end, we developed a method termed Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets (PELP). PELP leverages the highly periodic nature of stimulation artifacts to precisely determine when data losses occur. Using simulated stimulation waveforms added to human EEG data, we show that PELP is robust to a range of stimulation waveforms and noise characteristics. Then, we applied PELP to local field potential (LFP) recordings collected using an implantable, bidirectional DBS platform operating at various telemetry bandwidths. By effectively accounting for the timing of missing data, PELP enables the analysis of neural time series data collected via wireless transmission-a prerequisite for better understanding the brain-behavior relationships underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    病理性焦虑是导致焦虑症(AD)的主要功能损害和对常规治疗的抵抗力的原因,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)。局灶性神经调节疗法,如经颅磁刺激(TMS),正在开发经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)来治疗这些疾病。
    我们进行了维度系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估TMS疗效的证据,TDCS和DBS在减少广告中的焦虑症状,PTSD和MDD。报告是通过PubMed/Medline系统搜索确定的,Scopus和Cochrane图书馆(成立至2020年11月),然后根据PRISMA指南进行审查。对照临床试验,检查脑刺激技术对AD患者的一般焦虑症状的有效性,选择PTSD或MDD。
    19项研究(RCT)符合纳入标准,其中包括589名参与者。总的来说,与对照组相比,局灶性脑活动调节干预与焦虑水平降低更大相关[SMD:-0.56(95%CI,-0.93~-0.20,I2=77%].亚组分析揭示了TMS在各种疾病中的积极作用,以及广泛性焦虑症和PTSD的局灶性神经调节。在活动条件下,临床反应和缓解率较高。然而,在大多数研究中,偏倚风险较高.
    有中等质量的证据证明神经调节治疗病理性焦虑的功效。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=233084,标识符:PROSPEROCRD42021233084。它是1月29日提交的,2021年3月1日注册,2021年。没有对记录的议定书进行修改。根据目标大脑区域对亚组分析进行了更改,我们增加了脑活动调节的假定性质(兴奋性/抑制性)。
    UNASSIGNED: Pathological anxiety is responsible for major functional impairments and resistance to conventional treatments in anxiety disorders (ADs), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Focal neuromodulation therapies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are being developed to treat those disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a dimensional systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of the efficacy of TMS, tDCS and DBS in reducing anxiety symptoms across ADs, PTSD and MDD. Reports were identified through systematic searches in PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane library (inception to November 2020), followed by review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Controlled clinical trials examining the effectiveness of brain stimulation techniques on generic anxiety symptoms in patients with ADs, PTSD or MDD were selected.
    UNASSIGNED: Nineteen studies (RCTs) met inclusion criteria, which included 589 participants. Overall, focal brain activity modulation interventions were associated with greater reduction of anxiety levels than controls [SMD: -0.56 (95% CI, -0.93 to-0.20, I 2 = 77%]. Subgroup analyses revealed positive effects for TMS across disorders, and of focal neuromodulation in generalized anxiety disorder and PTSD. Rates of clinical responses and remission were higher in the active conditions. However, the risk of bias was high in most studies.
    UNASSIGNED: There is moderate quality evidence for the efficacy of neuromodulation in treating pathological anxiety.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=233084, identifier: PROSPERO CRD42021233084. It was submitted on January 29th, 2021, and registered on March 1st, 2021. No amendment was made to the recorded protocol. A change was applied for the subgroup analyses based on target brain regions, we added the putative nature (excitatory/inhibitory) of brain activity modulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经调节是临床医生管理耐药癫痫患者的关键治疗工具。多个设备可与长期随访和现实世界的经验。这篇综述的目的是对可用的神经调节技术进行实用总结,以指导模态的选择,专注于患者选择设备,启动编程的常见方法和技术,和门诊管理问题。迷走神经刺激(VNS)丘脑前核深部脑刺激(DBS-ANT),和反应性神经刺激(RNS)都得到了随机对照试验的支持,这些试验显示了安全性和对癫痫发作减少的显着影响,以及降低癫痫(SUDEP)猝死风险的建议。DBS在3个月后观察到癫痫发作显着减少,RNS,和VNS在随机对照试验中,随着对所有模式进行7至10年的随访,疗效似乎有所改善,尽管在不受控制的随访或回顾性研究中。在所有三种方式下,大量患者的无癫痫发作间隔为6个月或更长时间。癫痫灶的数量和位置是影响疗效的重要因素,并伴有严重的情绪或睡眠障碍等合并症,可能会影响模态的选择。编程已经进化-DBS通常在比关键试验中使用的电流/电压更低的电流/电压下启动,而RNS的目标电荷密度较低,然而,可推广的最佳参数尚未定义。非侵入性脑刺激是一种新兴的刺激方式,虽然目前还没有广泛使用。总之,临床实践已经从关键试验中确立的实践演变而来。现在可以为希望扩展其方法的临床医生提供指导,和神经调节技术的选择可以根据他们的癫痫特征为个体患者量身定制,风险承受能力,和偏好。
    Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:2020年3月COVID-19大流行的爆发迫使人们迅速转向远程医疗,并迫使开展远程医疗神经学运动障碍护理专业用例实验。这项研究的目的是量化远程医疗作为帕金森病社区的一种选择的潜在益处,如COVID-19大流行的前9个月所示,并量化缺乏深部脑刺激(DBS)远程医疗选项对DBS患者随访的潜在影响。
    UNASSIGNED:从2020年4月至12月(9个月)到Inova帕金森病和运动障碍中心的新患者就诊进行了回顾性审查,以进行远程健康与面对面,人口统计(年龄,性别,种族,主要保险),首席投诉,先前的运动障碍专家(MDS)咨询,订购的成像测试,和从主要邮政编码到诊所的距离/旅行时间。此外,将2020年4月至12月的DBS编程访问量与2019年4月至12月的DBS编程访问量进行比较。
    未经证实:在看到的1,097名新患者中,85%通过远程医疗(N=932)和15%的人(N=165)。在远程医疗队列中,97.75%以前没有咨询过MDS(N=911),vs.87.9%的人(N=145)。年龄范围为61.8+/-17.9岁(远程医疗),68.8+/-16.0年(当面)。远程医疗的种族细分为60.7%的白人(N=566),10.4%黑色(N=97),7.4%的亚洲人(N=69)和4.5%的西班牙裔人(N=42);当面是70.9%的白人(N=117),5.5%黑色(N=9),7.9%的亚洲人(N=13)和5.5%的西班牙裔人(N=9)。五大咨询理由前10名主要保险提供者和两个队列之间订购的影像学研究相似.主要邮政编码和诊所之间的距离/旅行时间为33.8+/-104.8英里和42.2+/-93.4分钟(远程医疗)与38.1+/-114.7英里和44.1+/-97.6分钟(当面)。与去年同期相比,DBS节目访问下降了24.8%(254次访问,191次访问)。
    UNASSIGNED:基于远程医疗的新患者对运动障碍中心的访问似乎成功地增加了获得专科护理的机会。支持数据的最小差异凸显了面对面访问的潜在均等。DBS访问没有远程医疗选项,在常规DBS管理中观察到显著下降.
    UNASSIGNED: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March of 2020 forced a rapid pivot to telehealth and compelled a use-case experiment in specialty telehealth neurology movement disorders care. The aims of this study were to quantify the potential benefit of telehealth as an option to the Parkinson\'s disease community as shown by the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to quantify the potential impact of the absence of a deep brain stimulation (DBS) telehealth option on DBS patient follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: New patient visits to the Inova Parkinson\'s and Movement Disorder\'s Center from April to December 2020 (9 months) were retrospectively reviewed for telehealth vs. in-person, demographics (age, gender, race, primary insurance), chief complaint, prior movement disorders specialist (MDS) consultation, imaging tests ordered, and distance/travel time from primary zip code to clinic. Additionally, DBS programming visit volume from April to December 2020 was compared to DBS programming visit volume from April to December 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 1,097 new patients seen, 85% were via telehealth (N = 932) and 15% in person (N = 165). In the telehealth cohort, 97.75% had not consulted with an MDS before (N = 911), vs. 87.9% of in-person (N = 145). Age range was 61.8 +/- 17.9 years (telehealth), 68.8 +/- 16.0 years (in-person). Racial breakdown for telehealth was 60.7% White (N = 566), 10.4% Black (N = 97), 7.4% Asian (N = 69) and 4.5% Hispanic (N = 42); in-person was 70.9% White (N = 117), 5.5% Black (N = 9), 7.9% Asian (N = 13) and 5.5% Hispanic (N = 9). Top 5 consultation reasons, top 10 primary insurance providers and imaging studies ordered between the two cohorts were similar. Distance/travel time between primary zip code and clinic were 33.8 +/- 104.8 miles and 42.2 +/- 93.4 min (telehealth) vs. 38.1 +/- 114.7 miles and 44.1 +/- 97.6 min (in-person). DBS programming visits dropped 24.8% compared to the same period the year before (254 visits to 191 visits).
    UNASSIGNED: Telehealth-based new patient visits to a Movement Disorders Center appeared successful at increasing access to specialty care. The minimal difference in supporting data highlights the potential parity to in-person visits. With no telehealth option for DBS visits, a significant drop-off was seen in routine DBS management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:冻结步态对特发性帕金森病(PD)患者有害。它的病理生理学代表了皮质运动处理的多层次失败,皮质下,和脑干电路,最终导致脊柱模式发生器的无效电机输出。电生理学研究指出,冰柜中振荡活动的异常,覆盖了包括θ在内的宽频率范围,阿尔法,和贝塔乐队。我们探索了肌肉频域活动相对于冻结,并使用深部脑刺激来调节这些节律,从而评估脊柱上对脊髓运动神经元活动的贡献。
    方法:我们分析了9个PD冰柜和16个健康对照(HC)。我们研究了患者在停止刺激的情况下服用多巴胺能药物过夜后,刺激丘脑底核(STN-DBSionly)或黑质网状(SNr-DBSionly),分别。患者通过狭窄的障碍物进行步行范例。我们分析了“常规步态”和“冷冻”发作期间胫骨前肌(TA)和腓肠肌(GA)的频域频谱。
    结果:在刺激关闭时,在TA和GA中,与HC相比,PD冷冻器显示α和低β带的肌肉活性增加。在直线行走和冻结期间,这种活动增加的程度相似。STN-而不是SNr-DBS降低了这种活性,并与冷冻的临床改善平行。
    结论:我们发现与HC相比,PD冷冻机中α和β带的肌肉激活增加,用STN-DBS减弱。未来的研究可能会使用局部场电位的组合记录,脑电图(EEG),和肌电图(EMG)以询问脊柱模式发生器的病理激活模式的脊柱上回路机制。
    OBJECTIVE: Freezing of gait is detrimental to patients with idiopathic Parkinson\'s disease (PD). Its pathophysiology represents a multilevel failure of motor processing in the cortical, subcortical, and brainstem circuits, ultimately resulting in ineffective motor output of the spinal pattern generator. Electrophysiological studies pointed to abnormalities of oscillatory activity in freezers that covered a broad frequency range including the theta, alpha, and beta bands. We explored muscular frequency domain activity with respect to freezing, and used deep brain stimulation to modulate these rhythms thereby evaluating the supraspinal contributions to spinal motor neuron activity.
    METHODS: We analyzed 9 PD freezers and 16 healthy controls (HC). We studied the patients after overnight withdrawal of dopaminergic medication with stimulation off, stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBSonly) or the substantia nigra pars reticulate (SNr-DBSonly), respectively. Patients performed a walking paradigm passing a narrow obstacle. We analyzed the frequency-domain spectra of the tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GA) muscles in \'regular gait\' and during the \'freezing\' episodes.
    RESULTS: In stimulation off, PD freezers showed increased muscle activity of the alpha and low-beta band compared to HC in both TA and GA. This activity increase was present during straight walking and during the freezes to similar extent. STN- but not SNr-DBS decreased this activity and paralleled the clinical improvement of freezing.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found increased muscle activation of the alpha and lower beta band in PD freezers compared to HC, and this was attenuated with STN-DBS. Future studies may use combined recordings of local field potentials, electroencephalography (EEG), and electromyography (EMG) to interrogate the supraspinal circuit mechanisms of the pathological activation pattern of the spinal pattern generator.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自适应深部脑刺激(aDBS)是一种有前途的新技术,在实验试验中越来越多地用于治疗各种适应症,如运动障碍(帕金森病,特发性震颤),精神疾病(抑郁症,OCD),慢性疼痛和癫痫。在许多aDBS试验中,将感兴趣的神经生物标志物与预定义的阈值进行比较,并且相应地调整刺激幅度。在适应症和植入位置,潜在的生物标志物受睡眠影响很大。成功的慢性嵌入式自适应探测器必须纳入一种策略来考虑睡眠,以避免不必要或意外的算法行为。这里,我们展示了具有两个独立检测器的双算法设计,一个用于跟踪睡眠状态(唤醒/睡眠),另一个用于跟踪帕金森病运动状态(药物引起的波动)。跨越六个半球(四个病人)和47天,我们的探测器在病人睡觉时成功地转换到了睡眠模式,并在患者清醒时恢复运动状态追踪。设计“睡眠感知”aDBS算法对于部署临床有效的完全嵌入aDBS算法至关重要。
    Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a promising new technology with increasing use in experimental trials to treat a diverse array of indications such as movement disorders (Parkinson\'s disease, essential tremor), psychiatric disorders (depression, OCD), chronic pain and epilepsy. In many aDBS trials, a neural biomarker of interest is compared with a predefined threshold and stimulation amplitude is adjusted accordingly. Across indications and implant locations, potential biomarkers are greatly influenced by sleep. Successful chronic embedded adaptive detectors must incorporate a strategy to account for sleep, to avoid unwanted or unexpected algorithm behavior. Here, we show a dual algorithm design with two independent detectors, one used to track sleep state (wake/sleep) and the other used to track parkinsonian motor state (medication-induced fluctuations). Across six hemispheres (four patients) and 47 days, our detector successfully transitioned to sleep mode while patients were sleeping, and resumed motor state tracking when patients were awake. Designing \"sleep aware\" aDBS algorithms may prove crucial for deployment of clinically effective fully embedded aDBS algorithms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号