DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy

DAPT,双重抗血小板治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:高出血风险(HBR)和复杂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)持续时间的主要决定因素。
    未经评估:本研究的目的是评估HBR和复杂PCI对短期与标准DAPT的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:在STOPDAPT-2(Verulam's洗脱钴铬支架-2后双重抗血小板治疗的短期和最佳持续时间)总队列中,根据学术研究联盟定义的HBR和复杂PCI进行了亚组分析,将1个月DAPT后的氯吡格雷单药治疗与PCI后的12个月DAPT联合阿司匹林和氯吡格雷进行随机比较。主要终点是心血管疾病(心血管死亡,心肌梗塞,明确的支架血栓形成,或中风)或出血(心肌梗死溶栓[TIMI]主要或次要)1年终点。
    未经评估:无论HBR(n=1,893[31.6%])和复杂PCI(n=999[16.7%]),1个月DAPT相对于12个月DAPT的风险对于主要终点(HBR,5.01%对5.14%;非HBR,1.90%vs2.02%;P交互作用=0.95)(复杂PCI,3.15%vs4.07%;非复杂PCI,2.78%vs2.82%;P交互作用=0.48)和心血管终点(HBR,4.35%对3.52%;非HBR,1.56%vs1.22%;P交互作用=0.90)(复杂PCI,2.53%vs2.52%;非复杂PCI,2.38%vs1.86%;P交互作用=0.53),而出血终点较低(HBR,0.66%对2.27%;非HBR,0.43%vs0.85%;P交互作用=0.36)(复杂PCI,0.63%vs1.75%;非复杂PCI,0.48%vs1.22%;P交互作用=0.90)。有HBR的患者在1个月和12个月DAPT之间的出血绝对差异在数字上大于无HBR的患者(-1.61%vs-0.42%)。
    未经评估:1个月DAPT相对于12个月DAPT的影响是一致的,无论HBR和复杂PCI。1个月DAPT比12个月DAPT在减少大出血方面的绝对益处在HBR患者中的数值上大于无HBR患者。复杂PCI可能不是PCI后DAPT持续时间的适当决定因素。(依维莫司洗脱钴铬支架-2[STOPDAPT-2]后双重抗血小板治疗的短期和最佳持续时间,NCT02619760;ACS患者在依维莫司洗脱钴铬支架-2后双重抗血小板治疗的短和最佳持续时间[STOPDAPT-2ACS],NCT03462498)。
    UNASSIGNED: High bleeding risk (HBR) and complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are major determinants for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of HBR and complex PCI on short vs standard DAPT.
    UNASSIGNED: Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of Academic Research Consortium-defined HBR and complex PCI in the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Verulam\'s-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2) Total Cohort, which randomly compared clopidogrel monotherapy after 1-month DAPT with 12-month DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel after PCI. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or stroke) or bleeding (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] major or minor) endpoints at 1 year.
    UNASSIGNED: Regardless of HBR (n = 1,893 [31.6%]) and complex PCI (n = 999 [16.7%]), the risk of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT was not significant for the primary endpoint (HBR, 5.01% vs 5.14%; non-HBR, 1.90% vs 2.02%; P interaction = 0.95) (complex PCI, 3.15% vs 4.07%; noncomplex PCI, 2.78% vs 2.82%; P interaction = 0.48) and for the cardiovascular endpoint (HBR, 4.35% vs 3.52%; and non-HBR, 1.56% vs 1.22%; P interaction = 0.90) (complex PCI, 2.53% vs 2.52%; noncomplex PCI, 2.38% vs 1.86%; P interaction = 0.53), while it was lower for the bleeding endpoint (HBR, 0.66% vs 2.27%; non-HBR, 0.43% vs 0.85%; P interaction = 0.36) (complex PCI, 0.63% vs 1.75%; noncomplex PCI, 0.48% vs 1.22%; P interaction = 0.90). The absolute difference in the bleeding between 1- and 12-month DAPT was numerically greater in patients with HBR than in those without HBR (-1.61% vs -0.42%).
    UNASSIGNED: The effects of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT were consistent regardless of HBR and complex PCI. The absolute benefit of 1-month DAPT over 12-month DAPT in reducing major bleeding was numerically greater in patients with HBR than in those without HBR. Complex PCI might not be an appropriate determinant for DAPT durations after PCI. (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2 [STOPDAPT-2], NCT02619760; Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2 for the Patients With ACS [STOPDAPT-2 ACS], NCT03462498).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直到最近,冠状动脉旁路移植术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗已被认为是稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的标准选择,特别是对于有重大缺血负担的患者。然而,结合最近的大规模临床试验,辅助药物治疗的显着进展和对其长期预后的更深入的了解,包括ISCHEMIA(国际医疗和侵入方法比较健康有效性研究),稳定CAD的方法发生了巨大变化。尽管最近随机临床试验的最新证据可能会修改未来临床实践指南的建议,亚洲仍有一些尚未解决和未解决的问题,那里的流行和实践模式与西方国家明显不同。在这里,作者讨论了以下观点:1)评估稳定型CAD患者的诊断概率;2)非侵入性影像学检查的应用;3)药物治疗的开始和滴定;4)现代血运重建程序的演变.
    Until recently, coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention has been regarded as the standard choice for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly for patients with a significant burden of ischemia. However, in conjunction with remarkable advances in adjunctive medical therapy and a deeper understanding of its long-term prognosis from recent large-scale clinical trials, including ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), the approach to stable CAD has changed drastically. Although the updated evidence from recent randomized clinical trials will likely modify the recommendations for future clinical practice guidelines, there are still unresolved and unmet issues in Asia, where prevalence and practice patterns are markedly different from those in Western countries. Herein, the authors discuss perspectives on: 1) assessing the diagnostic probability of patients with stable CAD; 2) application of noninvasive imaging tests; 3) initiation and titration of medical therapy; and 4) evolution of revascularization procedures in the modern era.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    38岁的特纳综合征患者因多支血管自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)并发左心室游离壁破裂而出现急性心肌梗死。对SCAD实行保守管理。她因渗出型左心室游离壁破裂而接受了无缝合修复。以前没有在特纳综合征中报道过SCAD。(难度等级:高级。).
    A 38-year-old with Turner syndrome presented with acute myocardial infarction due to multivessel spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) complicated by left ventricular free wall rupture. Conservative management for SCAD was pursued. She underwent sutureless repair for an oozing-type left ventricular free wall rupture. SCAD has not been previously reported in Turner syndrome. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们描述了尽管治疗升级,但多血管巨大冠状动脉瘤并发急性冠状动脉综合征的不寻常病例。一名65岁的高血压和高胆固醇血症患者因4个月以上的非典型胸痛出现在临床上。门诊计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)显示涉及所有3条主要冠状动脉的巨大冠状动脉瘤。门诊冠状动脉造影结果与CTCA一致,无明确的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病。心肌灌注显像正常。他开始接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。6个月时,患者出现胸痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死.重复冠状动脉造影显示第一个间隔LAD分支闭塞,以前有动脉瘤扩张。DAPT改为长期口服抗凝治疗。他在18个月内仍然很好。此病例强调了多模态成像在冠状动脉瘤的诊断和检查中的重要性以及管理方面的挑战;需要个性化的方法。
    We describe an unusual case of multi-vessel giant coronary artery aneurysms complicated by acute coronary syndrome despite escalation of therapy. A 65-year-old man with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia presented to clinic with atypical chest pain over 4 months. Outpatient computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) demonstrated giant coronary aneurysms involving all 3 major coronary arteries. Outpatient coronary angiogram findings were in concordance with the CTCA with no definite obstructive coronary disease. Myocardial perfusion imaging was normal. He was commenced on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). At 6 months, he presented with chest pain and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Repeat coronary angiogram demonstrated occluded first septal LAD branch which previously had aneurysmal dilatation. DAPT was changed to long-term oral anticoagulation. He remains well at 18 months. This case highlights the importance of multi-modality imaging in the diagnosis and workup of coronary artery aneurysms and challenges in management; an individualized approach is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名67岁的女性,先前进行了经导管主动脉瓣置换术,呼吸困难恶化。影像学显示经导管主动脉瓣血栓形成和主动脉瓣狭窄。尽管口服抗凝,她逐渐恶化并出现心源性休克。我们强调了心脏团队在治疗这种不寻常的晚期血栓形成中的作用。(难度等级:中级。).
    A 67-year-old woman with prior transcatheter aortic valve replacement presented with worsening dyspnea. Imaging revealed transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis and aortic stenosis. Despite oral anticoagulation, she progressively deteriorated and developed cardiogenic shock. We highlight the Heart Team\'s role in treating this unusual late thrombosis. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:有关发病率的数据,预测因素,在亚洲队列中,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后出血的临床结局有限.
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在评估TAVR术后晚期出血的预测因子和预后影响。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究使用日本多中心注册数据分析了2,518例接受TAVR的患者(平均年龄:84.3±5.2岁)。晚期出血定义为TAVR后任何出院后出血事件。基线特征,预测因素,对有或无晚期出血事件的患者进行临床结局评估,包括死亡和再住院.
    UNASSIGNED:所有和严重晚期出血和缺血性卒中的累积发生率为7.4%,5.2%,和3.4%,分别,TAVR后3年。晚期出血的独立预测因素为低血小板计数,临床虚弱量表得分高(≥4),和纽约心脏协会功能等级III/IV。晚期出血患者3年的累积死亡率明显高于无出血患者(P<0.001)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,晚期出血,作为时变协变量包含在模型中,与TAVR后死亡风险增加相关(HR:5.63;95%CI:4.28-7.41;P<0.001)。
    未经证实:TAVR术后迟发性出血并非罕见并发症,它显著增加了长期死亡率。应该小心管理,特别是当它在高风险人群中是可以预测的时候,即使手术成功,也应努力减少出血并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Data regarding the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) bleeding is limited in the Asian cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: This study sought to assess the predictors and prognostic impact of post-TAVR late bleeding.
    UNASSIGNED: This study used the Japanese multicenter registry data to analyze 2,518 patients (mean age: 84.3 ± 5.2 years) who underwent TAVR. Late bleeding was defined as any postdischarge bleeding events after TAVR. Baseline characteristics, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes including death and rehospitalization were assessed in patients with and without late bleeding events.
    UNASSIGNED: The cumulative incidence rate of all and major late bleeding and ischemic stroke were 7.4%, 5.2%, and 3.4%, respectively, 3 years after TAVR. The independent predictive factors of late bleeding were low platelet count, high score (≥4) on the clinical frailty scale, and a New York Heart Association functional class III/IV. The cumulative mortality rates up to 3 years were significantly higher in patients with late bleeding than in those without bleeding (P < 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that late bleeding, included as a time-varying covariate in the model, was associated with an increased risk of mortality following TAVR (HR: 5.63; 95% CI: 4.28-7.41; P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Late bleeding after TAVR was not a rare complication, and it significantly increased long-term mortality. It should be carefully managed, especially when it is predictable in the high-risk cohort, and efforts should be taken to reduce bleeding complications even after a successful procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    第二代(G2)药物洗脱支架(DES)与第一代(G1)DES相比,与双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)持续时间相关的长期支架相关不良事件的数据有限。
    本研究旨在比较G2-DES与G1-DES的长期支架相关结果。
    研究组由15,009例患者组成,这些患者从CREDO-KyotoPCI/CABG(京都经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术中的冠状动脉血运重建证明结果研究)进行了首次冠状动脉血运重建术(第一代药物支架[G1-DES]期;n=5,382-第二药物洗脱支架期;n=9,G2-3主要结局指标为明确的支架内血栓形成(ST)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)。
    G2-DES组明确ST和TVR的累积5年发生率显着低于G1-DES组(分别为0.7%vs1.4%;P<0.001;16.2%vs22.1%;P<0.001)。对于明确的ST和TVR,G2-DES相对于G1-DES的校正风险较低仍然显着(分别为HR:0.53;95%CI:0.37-0.76;P<0.001;和HR:0.74;95%CI:0.68-0.81;P<0.001)。在基于1年DAPT状态的里程碑式分析中,在G1-DES层(HR:0.42;95%CI:0.24~0.76;P=0.004)中,与非DAPT相比,处于DAPT状态的校正风险较低是显著的,但在G2-DES层(HR:0.66;95%CI:0.26~1.68;P=0.38)则不显著(P交互作用=0.14).
    G2-DES与G1-DES相比,支架相关不良事件的风险显著降低,包括明确的ST和TVR。超过1年的DAPT与G1-DES极晚期ST的风险显着降低相关,但与G2-DES无关。
    UNASSIGNED: There are limited data on the long-term stent-related adverse events as related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in second-generation (G2) drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with first-generation (G1) DES.
    UNASSIGNED: This study sought to compare the long-term stent-related outcomes of G2-DES with those of G1-DES.
    UNASSIGNED: The study group consisted of 15,009 patients who underwent their first coronary revascularization with DES from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) Registry Cohort-2 (first-generation drug-eluting stent [G1-DES] period; n = 5,382) and Cohort-3 (second-generation drug eluting stent [G2-DES] period; n = 9,627). The primary outcome measures were definite stent thrombosis (ST) and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
    UNASSIGNED: The cumulative 5-year incidences of definite ST and TVR were significantly lower in the G2-DES group than in the G1-DES group (0.7% vs 1.4%; P < 0.001; and 16.2% vs 22.1%; P < 0.001, respectively). The lower adjusted risk of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for definite ST and TVR remained significant (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.76; P < 0.001; and HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68-0.81; P < 0.001, respectively). In the landmark analysis that was based on the DAPT status at 1 year, the lower adjusted risk of on-DAPT status relative to off-DAPT was significant for definite ST beyond 1 year in the G1-DES stratum (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.76; P = 0.004) but not in the G2-DES stratum (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.26-1.68; P = 0.38) (P interaction = 0.14).
    UNASSIGNED: G2-DES compared with G1-DES were associated with a significantly lower risk for stent-related adverse events, including definite ST and TVR. DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with a significantly lower risk for very late ST of G1-DES but not for that of G2-DES.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于针对新疗法的多项随机临床试验(RCT)的指南和建议发生了快速变化,急性冠脉综合征后患者的抗血栓治疗,或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,在日常临床实践中变得越来越复杂。在具有里程碑意义的RCT中注册的亚洲人群比例非常低,这限制了试验结果在亚洲国家的临床实践中的直接应用。此外,与高加索患者相比,东亚患者被认为对抗血栓治疗有不同的缺血/出血倾向。被称为“东亚悖论”(即,出血事件较多,但血栓栓塞事件较少)。与西方人群的连续随机对照试验相一致,以优化抗血栓形成策略,现在已经在东亚队列中进行了几项这样的研究.在这里,我们全面总结了这方面的关键RCT,并提出了东亚患者最佳抗血栓治疗的未来方向和观点.
    Because guidelines and recommendations in response to multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of new therapies undergo rapid changes, antithrombotic therapies for patients after acute coronary syndrome, or percutaneous coronary intervention, are becoming more complex in daily clinical practice. The proportion of Asian populations enrolled in landmark RCTs is substantially low, which limits the direct application of trial findings into clinical practice in Asian countries. Moreover, compared with Caucasian patients, East Asian patients are considered to have a different ischemia/bleeding propensity in response to antithrombotic therapy, known as the \"East Asian paradox\" (ie, more bleeding events but fewer thromboembolic events). Coincident with consecutive RCTs in Western populations to optimize antithrombotic strategies, several such studies have now been conducted in East Asian cohorts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive summary of the key RCTs in this regard and propose future directions and perspectives for optimal antithrombotic therapies in East Asian patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几十年来,冠状动脉旁路移植术已被认为是显著左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病血运重建的标准选择.然而,结合设备技术和辅助药理学的显着进步,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)提供了一种更迅速、恢复迅速的方法,对于适当选择的LMCA病患者是一种安全有效的选择.几项具有里程碑意义的随机临床试验表明,使用药物洗脱支架治疗LMCA疾病的PCI是一种安全的选择,其长期生存率与冠状动脉旁路移植术相似。尤其是那些具有低和中等解剖风险的人。尽管预计最近随机临床试验的最新证据将在可预见的未来确定下一个指南,LMCA血运重建和PCI策略仍存在未解决和未解决的问题.本文对LMCA疾病的演变和管理进行了全面回顾。
    For several decades, coronary artery bypass grafting has been regarded as the standard choice of revascularization for significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. However, in conjunction with remarkable advancement of device technology and adjunctive pharmacology, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers a more expeditious approach with rapid recovery and is a safe and effective alternative in appropriately selected patients with LMCA disease. Several landmark randomized clinical trials showed that PCI with drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease is a safe option with similar long-term survival rates to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, especially in those with low and intermediate anatomic risk. Although it is expected that the updated evidence from recent randomized clinical trials will determine the next guidelines for the foreseeable future, there are still unresolved and unmet issues of LMCA revascularization and PCI strategy. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the evolution and an update on the management of LMCA disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:尽管患有严重冠状动脉疾病和主动脉瓣狭窄的患者传统上接受了开放瓣膜置换和旁路移植术,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)被越来越多地考虑.由于缺乏有关PCI/TAVR时机的数据,在本研究中,我们在具有全国代表性的队列中评估了分期PCI/TAVR与结局的相关性.
    UNASSIGNED:使用2016年至2018年全国再入院数据库确定接受TAVR和PCI的成年人。如果PCI/TAVR发生在同一天,患者被认为是伴随的,否则被认为是分期的.如果两者都发生在同一住院中,则将阶段进一步分类为早期阶段,如果TAVR在随后的住院中进行PCI,则将其分类为晚期阶段。建立多变量回归模型来评估TAVR时机与结果的关联。主要终点是院内死亡率,而围手术期并发症,包括急性肾损伤和住院费用则次要考虑。
    未经证实:估计有5843名患者,843例(14.4%)合并,745例(12.7%)和4255例(72.8%)早期和晚期,分别。尽管年龄和TAVR访问相似,合并慢性肾脏病的比例较低,更常接受单血管PCI。分期显示相似的风险校正死亡率,但与合并相比,急性肾损伤的几率更大(早期阶段校正比值比:2.68;95%CI,1.57-4.55,晚期阶段:1.97;95%CI,1.29-2.99)。尽管TAVR后的住院时间相似,分期住院的总时间和费用都有所增加。
    UNASSIGNED:合并PCI/TAVR的院内死亡率相似,但急性肾损伤发生率降低,资源利用率降低。在评估患者特定因素时,合并PCI/TAVR在特定个体中可能是合理的。
    UNASSIGNED: Although patients with significant coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis have traditionally undergone open valve replacement and bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are increasingly considered. Because of the lack of data regarding timing of PCI/TAVR, in the present study we evaluated associations of staged and concomitant PCI/TAVR on outcomes in a nationally representative cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults who underwent TAVR and PCI were identified using the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. If PCI/TAVR occurred on the same day, patients were considered Concomitant and otherwise considered Staged. Staged were further classified as Early-Staged if both occurred in the same hospitalization or Late-Staged if TAVR ensued PCI in a subsequent hospitalization. Multivariable regression models were developed to evaluate the association of TAVR timing on outcomes. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality whereas perioperative complications including acute kidney injury and hospitalization costs were secondarily considered.
    UNASSIGNED: Of an estimated 5843 patients, 843 (14.4%) were Concomitant and 745 (12.7%) and 4255 (72.8%) were Early-Staged and Late-Staged, respectively. Although age and TAVR access were similar, Concomitant had a lower proportion of chronic kidney disease and more commonly underwent single-vessel PCI. Staged showed similar risk-adjusted mortality but greater odds of acute kidney injury (Early-Staged adjusted odds ratio: 2.68; 95% CI, 1.57-4.55 and Late-Staged: 1.97; 95% CI, 1.29-2.99) compared with Concomitant. Although post-TAVR hospitalization duration was similar, total length of stay and costs were increased in Staged.
    UNASSIGNED: Concomitant PCI/TAVR was associated with similar rates of in-hospital mortality but reduced rates of acute kidney injury and lower resource utilization. While evaluating patient-specific factors, concomitant PCI/TAVR might be reasonable in select individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号