OBJECTIVE: VEXAS syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic mutation of UBA1 and affects multiple organ systems. Involvement of the kidneys is not well characterized. We aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors and histopathologic features of acute kidney injury (AKI) in VEXAS syndrome.
METHODS: Patients with genetically confirmed UBA1 mutation consistent with VEXAS were included. Charts were manually reviewed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with time-to-first acute kidney injury (AKI) event. For patients with a kidney biopsy, histopathologic findings were reviewed.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included, all white men, with a mean age of 66.3±8.6 years. Median (IQR) follow up was 3.5 (2.1-5.2) years during which 20 (25%) developed AKI and 22% died. AKI relapsed in 90% of cases for a median of 6 times during the follow up period. Cumulative incidence estimates (95% CI) for AKI at 1, 3 and 5 years were 6.2% (0.80-11.3%), 16.7% (7.5-25.0%) and 27.9% (14.9-38.9%), respectively. Age and baseline C-reactive protein were significantly associated with time-to-first AKI event. Six patients underwent a kidney biopsy. Findings included, plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis (n = 3), neutrophilic-rich interstitial inflammation (n = 1), leukocytoclastic peritubular capillaritis (n = 1), and acute tubular injury (n = 1). AKI responded well to treatment with glucocorticoids but had relapse upon tapering.
CONCLUSIONS: AKI is an underrecognized feature of VEXAS occurring in 25% of patients in this cohort. Age at diagnosis and CRP were associated with time to first AKI event during follow up. Plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis was the most common histopathologic finding.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis can be classified according to ACPA and RF status. ACPA status may be associated with other pathophysiological differences, e.g., the cytokines driving inflammation. Obesity influences the course of RA, likely involving leptin; the exact mechanisms are not completely understood. This study investigates BMI influence on RA cytokine profiles and the possibility of predicting ACPA status and disease activity measured by Power-Doppler sonography (PDS).
METHODS: Patients were examined using a multi-biomarker disease assay and PDS examination of wrists and MCP and PIP joints and stratified according to ACPA status and BMI, using prediction precision to determine BMI cutoff. Analysis was performed using elastic net regularization of logistic and multiple regression. We then attempted to predict ACPA status/PDS activity based on a bootstrap approach.
RESULTS: A total of 120 measurements from 95 patients were performed. ACPA status prediction peaked at BMI 26 kg/m2, with AUC 0.82. PDS activity prediction had a mean average error of < 1.6 PDS points for all groups. In obese patients, cytokine profiles appear to align in ACPA-positive and -negative patients, with leptin playing a greater role in predicting PDS activity, but with some remaining differences.
CONCLUSIONS: When stratified according to BMI, cytokine patterns can predict ACPA status and PDS activity in RA with a high degree of precision. This indicates that studies into the pathophysiology of RA should take BMI into account, to differentiate between disease- and obesity-associated phenomena. The underlying pathological processes of ACPA-negative and -positive RA appear different. Multi-cytokine evaluations may provide a deeper understanding of disease processes. Key Points • A multi-cytokine approach combined with ultrasonography and modern mathematical methods can contribute to a deeper understanding of the relationship between systemic and joint inflammation. • BMI influences cytokine profiles in rheumatoid arthritis and appears to \"override\" disease-specific processes. • Using cytokines only, and adjusting for BMI, it is possible to predict the ACPA status and joint inflammation with considerable precision.

OBJECTIVE: OA is characterized by cartilage degeneration and persistent pain. The majority of OA patients present with synovitis, which is associated with increased cartilage damage. Activated synovial macrophages are key contributors to joint destruction. Therefore, a marker that reflects the activation of these cells could be a valuable tool to characterize the destructive potential of synovitis and benefit monitoring of OA. Here, we aimed to investigate the use of CD64 (FcγRI) as a marker to characterize the damaging potential of synovitis in OA.
METHODS: Synovial biopsies were obtained from end-stage OA patients that underwent joint replacement surgery. CD64 protein expression and localization was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence and quantified using flow cytometry. qPCR was performed to measure the expression of FCGR1 and OA-related genes in synovial biopsies, and in primary chondrocytes and primary fibroblasts stimulated with OA conditioned medium (OAS-CM).
RESULTS: Our data exposed a wide range of CD64 expression in OA synovium and showed positive correlations between FCGR1 and S100A8, S100A9, IL1B, IL6 and MMP1/2/3/9/13 expression. CD64 protein correlated with MMP1, MMP3, MMP9, MMP13 and S100A9. Furthermore, we observed that synovial CD64 protein levels in source tissue for OAS-CM significantly associated with the OAS-CM-induced expression of MMP1, MMP3 and especially ADAMTS4 in cultured fibroblasts, but not chondrocytes.
CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results indicate that synovial CD64 expression is associated with the expression of proteolytic enzymes and inflammatory markers related to structural damage in OA. CD64 therefore holds promise as marker to characterize the damaging potential of synovitis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore prognostic and predictive markers of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) outcomes in a phase 3 trial (focuSSced) and prognostic markers in a real-world cohort (SMART).
METHODS: The focuSSced SSc-ILD subgroup included 68 of 106 placebo-treated and 68 of 104 tocilizumab-treated patients. The SMART cohort included 505 patients with SSc-ILD. Linear mixed-effect models were used to identify factors associated with change in forced vital capacity (FVC). Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression were used for time-to-event analyses.
RESULTS: In placebo-treated focuSSced patients, sex was a significant prognostic factor for FVC decline; males had increased risk for absolute decline ≥10% in percent-predicted FVC (ppFVC) and 0.22% faster weekly FVC decline than females (P = 0.0001). FVC was 9.8% lower in patients with CRP >6 mg/ml vs those with CRP ≤6 mg/ml (P = 0.0059). Tocilizumab reduced the risk for ≥10% decline in ppFVC in patients who were male, had earlier disease (<2 years duration), had IL-6 levels <10 pg/ml, or had anti-topoisomerase antibodies (ATA). In the SMART cohort, prognostic factors for ppFVC <70% were male sex, ATA, and low baseline FVC. Males had 3.3% lower FVC 1 year after disease onset (P < 0.001) and 0.6% faster yearly decline (P = 0.03) than females.
CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic markers in SSc-ILD were similar between focuSSced and SMART. Male sex and inflammatory markers were associated with lower FVC but IL-6 ≥10 pg/ml was not predictive of response to tocilizumab.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02453256.

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with/without conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs in RA.
The analyses evaluated two open-label extensions (OLEs): EXTEND and MONARCH OLE, which included patients from six randomized trials. Patients received sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) for at least 264 weeks up to 516 weeks (EXTEND: Sarilumab Monotherapy and Sarilumab + csDMARD groups) or for 276 weeks (MONARCH OLE: Continuation and Switch groups). Primary endpoints included safety, immunogenicity and changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary endpoints included clinical signs and symptoms along with health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires.
The Sarilumab Monotherapy (n = 111), Continuation (n = 165) and Switch (n = 155) groups received sarilumab monotherapy, while the Sarilumab + csDMARD group (n = 1910) received sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs. Incidence of one or more treatment-emergent adverse events was 126 (Sarilumab Monotherapy group), 169 (Sarilumab + csDMARD group), 159 (Continuation group) and 159 (Switch group) events/100 patient-years. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. Neutropenia was not associated with an increased incidence of infections. Most neutropenia cases normalized on-treatment. Adverse events of special interests, such as malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal perforations, were rare. Immunogenicity was low and not associated with hypersensitivity reactions or discontinuations due to lack or loss of efficacy. Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and HRQOL, observed during the initial blinded trials, were maintained throughout the OLE assessment period.
Long-term sarilumab treatment with/without csDMARDs in patients with RA revealed no new safety findings. Efficacy and HRQOL were maintained or further increased over the open-label assessment period.
EXTEND, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01146652, NCT01146652; MONARCH OLE, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02332590, NCT02332590.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to perform an immunoprofiling of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) in order to define biomarkers of clinical use as well as reveal new immune mechanisms.
METHODS: Immunoprofiling of plasma samples from a clinically well-described cohort consisting of 21 sJIA patients as well as 60 age and sex matched healthy controls, was performed by a highly sensitive proteomic immunoassay. Based on the biomarkers being significantly up- or down-regulated in cross-sectional and paired analysis, related canonical pathways and cellular functions were explored by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).
RESULTS: The well-studied sJIA biomarkers, IL6, IL18 and S100A12, were confirmed to be increased during active sJIA as compared to healthy controls. IL18 was the only factor found to be increased during inactive sJIA as compared to healthy controls. Novel factors, including CASP8, CCL23, CD6, CXCL1, CXCL11, CXCL5, EIF4EBP1, KITLG, MMP1, OSM, SIRT2, SULT1A1 and TNFSF11, were found to be differentially expressed in active and/or inactive sJIA and healthy controls. No significant pathway activation could be predicted based on the limited factor input to the IPA. High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), a damage associated molecular pattern being involved in a series of inflammatory diseases, was determined to be higher in active sJIA than inactive sJIA.
CONCLUSIONS: We could identify a novel set of biomarkers distinguishing active sJIA from inactive sJIA or healthy controls. Our findings enable a better understanding of the immune mechanisms active in sJIA and aid the development of future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Because the pathological features of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) include lymphocyte infiltration and fibrotic changes in the lesions, we investigated the significance of fractalkine (CX3CL1) and lymphocyte subsets in patients with IgG4-RD.
Peripheral blood and biopsied samples were obtained from healthy controls (HCs, n = 10), RA (n = 10) and IgG4-RD patients (n = 16) and were analysed by flow cytometry, immunohistology and costimulation assays.
Peripheral CX3CR1+ CD4+ T cells had an approximately 3-fold increase in the IgG4-RD patients (15.4%), compared with the HCs (5.0%). In addition, CX3CR1+ CD4+ T cells were localized in the salivary glands of the IgG4-RD patients but not in those with Sicca syndrome. CX3CR1 was induced on 20% of CD4+ T cells after T-cell receptor (TCR) simulation with IL-12 for five days culture. CX3CR1+ T cells showed high expression of both CXCR5 and CXCR3. Moreover, they co-expressed Bcl-6 and T-bet, the master transcription factors for T helper 1 (Th1) and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells. After secondary stimulation, CX3CR1+ T cells produced both IFN-gamma (IFN-γ) and IL-21. Compared with their CX3CR1- counterparts, CX3CR1+ CD4+ T cells induced plasmablast differentiation from naïve B cells more efficiently (15.0 vs 5.0%) and increased the production of IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 by B cells.
CX3CR1+ CD4+ T cells characteristically increased in the peripheral blood and the affected tissues and were associated with an increase in the serum IgG4 levels of patients with IgG4-RD. This CD4 subset has a Th1/Tfh-like phenotype and a B cell helper function.

This study analyzed the levels at admission of biomarkers for their association with and ability to predict risk of severe outcomes, including admission to the ICU, need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), need for vasopressor use (VU), and in-hospital mortality (IHM) in 700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Biomarker data split by outcomes was compared using Mann-Whitney U tests; frequencies of biomarker values were compared using Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to look at the impact of biomarkers by outcome. Patients that suffered IHM were more likely to have reduced platelet numbers and high blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels among patients admitted to the ICU. Risk factors for mortality were related to hyper-coagulability (low platelet count and increased D-dimer) and decreased respiratory (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) and kidney function (BUN). Association with risks of other severe outcomes were as follows: ICU with hyper-inflammation (IL-6) and decreased respiratory function; IMV with low platelet count, abnormal neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with reduced respiratory function, VU with inflammatory markers (IL-6), and low platelet count with respiratory function. Our studies confirmed the association of biomarkers of hematological, inflammatory, coagulation, pulmonary and kidney functions with disease severity. Whether these biomarkers have any mechanistic or causal role in the disease progress requires further investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and efficacy of filgotinib (FIL), a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, and lanraplenib (LANRA), a spleen kinase inhibitor in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).
METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory, proof-of-concept study of LANRA (30 mg), FIL (200 mg), or placebo (PBO) once daily for 12 weeks in patients with active CLE. At week 12, PBO patients were rerandomised 1:1 to receive LANRA or FIL for up to 36 additional weeks.
RESULTS: Of 47 randomised patients, 45 were treated (N = 9 PBO, N = 19 LANRA, N = 17 FIL). The primary end point (change from baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity [CLASI-A] score at week 12) was not met. Least squares mean (standard error) CLASI-A score change from baseline was -5.5 (2.56) with PBO, -4.5 (1.91) with LANRA, and -8.7 (1.85) with FIL. Numerical differences between FIL and PBO were greater in select subgroups. A ≥ 5-point improvement in CLASI-A score at week 12 was achieved by 50.0%, 56.3%, and 68.8% in the PBO, LANRA, and FIL arms, respectively. A numerically greater proportion of patients in the FIL arm (50%) also achieved ≥50% improvement in CLASI-A score at week 12 (37.5% PBO, 31.3% LANRA). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. Two serious AEs were reported with LANRA and 1 with FIL.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point was not met. Select subgroups displayed a numerically greater treatment response to FIL relative to PBO. LANRA and FIL were generally well tolerated.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03134222.

OBJECTIVE: Apremilast monotherapy was evaluated up to 5 years in PALACE 4 DMARD-naive patients with PsA.
METHODS: Patients with active PsA were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 30 mg or apremilast 20 mg twice daily. Placebo patients were rerandomized to apremilast at week 16 or 24. Double-blind apremilast continued to week 52, with a 4-year open-label extension (≤260 weeks of exposure). Analyses through week 260 were based on observed data.
RESULTS: 527 patients were treated. Among patients randomized to apremilast 30 mg at baseline, 45.5% completed week 260. At study end, 24.8% reported csDMARD or steroid use for any reason. At week 260, 65.8%/39.0%/20.3% of apremilast 30 mg patients achieved ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses, respectively. PsA sign/symptom improvements were sustained up to week 260 with continued treatment, including reductions in swollen (84.8%) and tender (76.4%) joint counts. Among apremilast 30 mg patients with baseline enthesitis or dactylitis, 71.2% achieved a Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score of 0 and 95.1% achieved a dactylitis count of 0, respectively. Over 50% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI minimal clinically important difference (≥0.35). In patients with ≥3% baseline psoriasis-involved body surface area, 60.3% and 47.6% achieved ≥50% and ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores, respectively. Patients continuing apremilast 20 mg also demonstrated consistent, sustained improvements. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. No new safety concerns were observed long term.
CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast led to sustained PsA efficacy up to 260 weeks and was well tolerated.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT01307423.