There are few reports of repeated liver resections being performed multiple times for intrahepatic recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We performed five minimally invasive liver resections and two minimally invasive lung resections for ICC with metachronous intrahepatic recurrence and lung metastases. Pathological examination revealed that all resected tumors were moderately differentiated mass-forming ICC with immunohistochemical marker expression of CK7 negative and CK20 positive. We present this as a rare case of ICC with atypical marker expression in which long-term tumor control was achieved with multiple minimally invasive liver resections over 47 months from the initial diagnosis.

UNASSIGNED: Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK 20) could be used as a biomarker in different epithelia to determine malignancy, especially in gastrointestinal, urinary tract, and Merkel cells. CK 20 could be detected in several urothelial carcinomas and was associated with bladder cancer recurrence. The study aimed to assess the utility of CK 20 expression for bladder cancer grading.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study assessing CK 20 expression in 73 bladder cancer patients who had transurethral resection of bladder tumor or cystectomy. The data were then collected and analyzed with SPSS Statistics version 20.0.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-six (76.7%) cases of high- and 17 (23.3%) cases of low-grade urothelial bladder cancer were examined for CK 20 expression. Positive expression was present in 57 (78.1%) samples. A significant difference (P = 0.034) in CK 20 expression was observed between low-grade and high-grade urothelial carcinomas. Positive expression was seen in 44 (77.2%) high-grade cases and only 13 (22.8%) low-grade cases.
UNASSIGNED: The difference in the CK 20 expression was found to be statistically significant among different grades of bladder cancer but not to metastatic bladder cancer. Further, studies are required to establish CK 20 as a diagnostic tool. We suggest a combination with several markers to compare which is superior.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. Due to the westernization of diets, young patients with CRC are often diagnosed at advanced stages with an associated poor prognosis. Improved lifestyle choices are one way to minimize CRC risk. Among diet choices is the inclusion of bee propolis, long recognized as a health supplement with anticancer activities. Understanding the effect of propolis on the gut environment is worth exploring, and especially its associated intratumoral immune changes and its anticancer effect on the occurrence and development of CRC. In this study, early stage CRC was induced with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) for one month in an animal model, without and with propolis administration. The phenotypes of early stage CRC were evaluated by X-ray microcomputed tomography and histologic examination. The gut immunity of the tumor microenvironment was assessed by immunohistochemical staining for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and further comparative quantification. We found that the characteristics of the CRC mice, including the body weight, tumor loading, and tumor dimensions, were significantly changed due to propolis administration. With further propolis administration, the CRC tissues of DMH/DSS-treated mice showed decreased cytokeratin 20 levels, a marker for intestinal epithelium differentiation. Additionally, the signal intensity and density of CD3+ and CD4+ TILs were significantly increased and fewer forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3) lymphocytes were observed in the lamina propria. In conclusion, we found that propolis, a natural supplement, potentially prevented CRC progression by increasing CD3+ and CD4+ TILs and reducing FOXP3 lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment of early stage CRC. Our study could suggest a promising role for propolis in complementary medicine as a food supplement to decrease or prevent CRC progression.

The progression and recurrence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) are correlated with carcinoma in situ and urothelial dysplasia. It is frequently challenging to distinguish dysplasia and carcinoma in situ from reactive atypia only based on histological characteristics. In daily practices, 2 of the adjunct immunohistochemistry markers (cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and p53) are used in addition to the histology to diagnose carcinoma in situ. This is accomplished by combining histological research results with immunohistochemistry. This systematic review summarizes the current findings on the diagnostic significance of p53 and CK20 as adjunct markers to urine cytology in the detection of UC. A systematic search of the relevant literature was conducted using PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and ScienceDirect databases. After screening for the eligibility criteria, a total of 14 selected articles were reviewed. Data extraction included a total number of samples, specimen samples, type of cells, and outcome parameters (mainly sensitivity and specificity). Urine cytology alone had a sensitivity of 75%-85% and specificity of 66%-95%. CK20 with urine cytology staining showed improved sensitivity and specificity in the range of 77%-94% and 71%-100%, respectively; p53 immunostaining with urine cytology showed a sensitivity of 52%-86% and specificity of 80%-98%. The dual staining in combination with urine cytology showed comparatively higher sensitivity and specificity in the range of 70%-90% and 74%-100%, respectively. This was more evident for high-grade UC (HGUC). Overall, single or dual staining combined with urine cytology was effective in this detection and can be applied as an adjunct marker in urine cytology.

Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) expression is limited to umbrella cells in the normal urothelium. Since CK20 is often upregulated in neoplastic urothelial cells including dysplasia and carcinoma in situ, immunohistochemical CK20 analysis is often used for the assessment of bladder biopsies. CK20 expression is a feature of luminal bladder cancer subtype, but its prognostic relevance is disputed. In this study, we investigated CK20 on >2700 urothelial bladder carcinomas in a tissue microarray format by immunohistochemistry. Cytoplasmic and membranous CK20 staining was seen in 1319 (51.8%) cancers. The fraction of CK20 positive and especially strongly positive cases increased from pTaG2 low grade (44.5% strongly positive) and pTaG2 high grade (57.7%) to pTaG3 high grade (62.3%; p = 0.0006) but was lower in muscle-invasive (pT2-4) carcinomas (51.1% in all pTa vs. 29.6% in pT2-4; p < 0.0001). Within pT2-4 carcinomas, CK20 positivity was linked to nodal metastasis and lymphatic vessel invasion (p < 0.0001 each) and to venous invasion (p = 0.0177). CK20 staining was unrelated to overall patient survival if all 605 pT2-4 carcinomas were jointly analyzed but subgroup analyses revealed a significant association of CK20 positivity with favorable prognosis in 129 pT4 carcinomas (p = 0.0005). CK20 positivity was strongly linked to the expression of GATA3 (p < 0.0001), another feature of luminal bladder cancer. The combined analysis of both parameters showed best prognosis for luminal A (CK20+/GATA3+, CK20+/GATA3-) and worst outcome for luminal B (CK20-/GATA3+) and basal/squamous (CK20-/GATA3-) in pT4 urothelial carcinomas (p = 0.0005). In summary, the results of our study demonstrate a complex role of CK20 expression in urothelial neoplasms including neoexpression in pTa tumors, a subsequent loss of CK20 expression in a subset of tumors progressing to muscle-invasion, and a stage dependent prognostic role in muscle-invasive cancers.

Introduction Several clinical peculiarities mark urothelial carcinomas and their biological behavior. Key in these are its relatively indolent course before manifestation and its high recurrence rate. So far, no biomarker has been identified as a predictor for these factors. The current study aims to evaluate the role of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) in non-invasive urothelial carcinomas (pTa and pT1) of the urinary bladder and its diagnostic and predictive role in tumor staging and recurrence. Materials and methods The study utilizes a retrospective, non-clinical approach via immunohistochemical marking of the paraffin-embedded tumor tissues for the initial diagnosis. Expression patterns were compared with tumor grade and stage, as well as the incidence of recurrence within a five-year follow-up period. Results A strong statistical correlation was established between expression and tumor grade, with high-grade tumors showing weak to moderate expression of CK20 while low-grade tumors showed an intensive expression pattern. No correlation was noted between the expression pattern, patient age and gender, tumor stage, and the likelihood of local recurrence. Conclusion While CK 20 is a reliable diagnostic marker when used together with other markers, its expression pattern in our study correlated only with bladder urothelial carcinoma grade.

Accurate risk prediction of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) is currently an unmet clinical need. This study sought to analyze whether three plasma proteins expressed in a largely skin- and gut-restricted manner would be affected by the development of acute cutaneous and gastrointestinal aGvHD. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic value of plasma cytokeratin-15 (KRT15) cytokeratin-20 (KRT20), and occludin (OCLN) were evaluated in a discovery and a validation cohort using ELISA in comparison with elafin (PI3) and regenerating family member 3 alpha (REG3A), two established markers of skin- and gut aGvHD. The discovery cohort (n = 39) revealed that at the time of diagnosis, plasma KRT20 showed a progressive decrease from unaffected individuals to patients with single-, and patients with multi-organ aGvHD. KRT20 was affected by cutaneous (p = 0.0263) and gastrointestinal aGvHD (p = 0.0242) independently and in an additive manner. Sensitivity and specificity of KRT20 for aGvHD involving both target organs (AUC = 0.852) were comparable to that of PI3 for skin-aGvHD (AUC = 0.708) or that of REG3A for gut-aGvHD (AUC = 0.855). Patient follow-up in the validation cohort (n = 67) corroborated these observations (p < 0.001), and linked low KRT20 to grade 2+ disease (p < 0.001), but failed to confirm low KRT20 as an independent risk factor. These data established a link between low plasma KRT20 levels and moderate to severe aGvHD involving multiple target organs.

Transitional cell carcinoma of the endometrium is a rare cancer. We present a 58-year-old Caucasian female was diagnosed with high-grade polyploid transitional cell carcinoma of the endometrium. The pathological findings included a dense serosal adhesion over the fundus and the posterior wall, necrotic and polyploid papillary mass in the endometrial cavity, serosal adhesions and unremarkable parenchyma in the fallopian tubes. Others were the presence of cancer antigen 125 and cytokeratin 7 and absence of cytokeratin 20, actin, estrogen receptor, soluble protein 100, vimentin, and cytokeratin high molecular weight. The case is relevant to practice as it identifies the histological patterns for primary transitional cell carcinoma of the endometrium, including expressing cytokeratin 7 instead of cytokeratin 20. The tumor showed a papillary and solid architecture and composed of undifferentiated to poorly differentiated cells with no defined glandular nor squamous differentiation.

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis can be a challenge for eosinophilic subtypes of renal cell tumors due to their overlapping histomorphological and immunohistochemical features. We aimed to investigate the frequency of rare variants of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) such as succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC (SDDRCC), hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC (HLRCC)-associated RCC, and eosinophilic, solid, and cystic RCC (ESCRCC) in our population.
METHODS: Renal tumors which could be considered in the eosinophilic tumor category were included: 91 conventional clear cell RCCs with eosinophilic cytoplasm, 72 papillary RCCs, 74 chromophobe RCCs, 88 oncocytomas, and 37 other rare subtypes. Using the tissue microarray method, succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB), fumarate hydratase (FH), and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) antibodies were performed by immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was repeated on whole block sections for selected cases. The utility of these antibodies in the differential diagnosis was also investigated.
RESULTS: Loss of SDHB expression was detected in three tumors, two of which showed typical morphology for SDDRCC. In additional two tumors, SDHB showed weak cytoplasmic expression without a mitochondrial pattern (possible-SDHB deficient). None of the tumors showed loss of FH expression. Heterogeneous reactions were observed with SDHB and FH antibodies. Only one ESCRCC was detected with diffuse CK20 positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: SDDRCCs, HLRCC-associated RCCs, and ESCRCCs are very rare tumors depending on the population. Possible weak staining and focal loss of SDHB and FH expression should be kept in mind and genetic testing must be included for equivocal results.

暂无摘要。