OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic distal 10q deletion at prenatal diagnosis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 40-year-old, gravida 2, para 0, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY, del(10) (q26.13)[6]/46,XY[17]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed 35% mosaicism for the 10q26.13q26.3 deletion. At 22 weeks of gestation, she underwent cordocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[16]/46,XY[24]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. At 24 weeks of gestation, she was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[4]/46,XY[22]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Molecular genetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed no uniparental disomy (UPD) 10 by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), arr 10q26.13q26.3 × 1.6 (40% mosaicism) by aCGH, and 29.8% (31/104 cells) mosaicism for the distal 10q deletion by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2,900-g male baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[6]/46,XY[34], and both the umbilical cord and the placenta had the karyotype of 46,XY. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate was normal in phenotype and development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)[5]/46,XY[35], and interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed 8% (8/102 cells) mosaicism for distal 10q deletion.
CONCLUSIONS: Mosaic distal 10q deletion with a normal cell line at prenatal diagnosis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 38-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21[4]/46,XY[34]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. At 27 weeks of gestation, she was referred for genetic counseling, and the cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 47,XY,+21[2]/46,XY[26]. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 21. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 30% (30/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.25, consistent with 20%-30% mosaicism for trisomy 21. The parental karyotypes were normal. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 3510-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis of the cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta revealed the karyotypes of 47,XY,+21[1]/46,XY[39], 47,XY,+21[2]/46,XY[38] and 46,XY in 40/40 cells, respectively. When follow-up at age 1 year and 2 months, the neonate was normal in phenotype and development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY in 40/40 cells, and interphase FISH analysis on uncultured buccal mucosal cells showed 6.4% (7/109 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 34-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [7]/46,XY [33]. At 23 weeks of gestation, repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [4]/46,XY [22], and cord blood sampling revealed the karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [5]/46,XY [35]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded UPD 21, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.3, consistent with 30% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 43.8% (35/80 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 3,340-g male baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation. The cord blood had a karyotypes of 46,XY (40/40 cells). QF-PCR on placenta showed mosaic trisomy 21. When follow-up at age three months, the neonate was normal in phenotype and development. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed 9% (10/101 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21, compared with 0% (0/100 cells) in the normal control.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 36-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, and the result was 47,XY,+21 [8]/46,XY [26]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis performed at 23 weeks of gestation revealed the result of 47,XY,+21 [3]/46,XY [21]. The parental karyotypes were normal. At repeat amniocentesis, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis using the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 21, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.4, consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 21, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 67% (67/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 1370-g male baby was delivered prematurely at 29 weeks of gestation without phenotypic abnormalities. The karyotypes of umbilical cord and placenta were 47,XY,+21 [13]/46,XY [27] and 47,XY,+21 [40], respectively. QF-PCR determined maternal origin of the extra chromosome 21 of trisomy 21 in the placenta. When follow-up at age 8½ months, the neonate was normal in appearance and development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+21 [1]/46,XY [39], and FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed 9.7% (11/113 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21, compared with 2% (2/100 cells) in the normal control.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.
METHODS: A 26-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of positive NIPT for trisomy 16 at 12 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [10]/46,XX[17], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (16) × 3 [0.43] consistent with 43% mosaicism for trisomy 16. She was referred for genetic counseling at 19 weeks of gestation, and a fetus with IUGR was noted to have a size equivalent to 16 weeks of gestation. At 23 weeks of gestation, the fetus manifested oligohydramnios, fetal cardiomegaly and severe IUGR (fetal size equivalent to 20 weeks of gestation). Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX (20/20 colonies) in cultured amniocytes and mosaic trisomy 16 by aCGH in uncultured amniocytes. aCGH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 16p13.3q24.3 × 2.3, consistent with 30% (log2 ratio = 0.2) mosaicism for trisomy 16. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays on the DNA extracted from parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 16. The parental karyotypes were normal. IUFD was noted at amniocentesis. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a 288-g female fetus was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 46,XX (40/40 cells), and the placenta had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 (40/40 cells). QF-PCR assays of the placenta confirmed a maternal origin of trisomy 16.
CONCLUSIONS: Mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis can be associated with positive NIPT for trisomy 16, placental trisomy 16, IUGR, IUFD, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, and prenatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.

OBJECTIVE: We present 45,X/46,XX at amniocentesis associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and in different amniocenteses and a favorable fetal outcome with a normal karyotype at birth.
METHODS: A 35-year-old, gravida 3, para 2, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 45,X[11]/46,XX[108], consistent with 9.2% mosaicism for 45,X. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 25 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis at 26 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 45,X[4]/46,XX[16], consistent with 20% mosaicism for 45,X. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes using SurePrint G3 Unrestricted CGH ISCA v2, 8 × 60K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) revealed arr (1-22, X) × 2, Y × 0 with no genomic imbalance. The woman was advised to continue pregnancy, and at 38 weeks of gestation, a healthy 3140-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX (40/40 cells). When follow-up at age two months, the neonate had normal development and a normal karyotype.
CONCLUSIONS: Confirmation of 45,X/46,XX at amniocentesis should include conventional cytogenetic analysis and karyotyping on cultured amniocytes, and sole molecular analysis on uncultured amniocytes may miss the diagnosis of 45,X/46,XX.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 31-year-old primigravid woman underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at 12 weeks of gestation, and the result was normal. She underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of fetal choroid plexus cyst, and the result was 47,XX,+21[5]/46,XX[32]. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 19 weeks of gestation, and the result was 47,XX,+21[5]/46,XX[15]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (21) × 3 [0.10], consistent with 10% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 22 weeks of gestation, and the third amniocentesis was performed at 25 weeks of gestation, and the result was 46,XX (20/20 colonies). The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 21. aCGH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 21q11.2q22.3 × 2.1 (log2 ratio = 0.1), consistent with 10-15% mosaicism for trisomy 21. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 30% (30/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2800-g female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The karyotype of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 47,XX,+21[1]/46,XX[39]. 47,XX,+21[4]/46,XX[36] and 46,XX (40/40 cells), respectively. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[1]/46,XX[39], and FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells revealed 8.4% (7/83 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 21, compared with 0% in the normal control.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis can be associated with a negative NIPT result, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result suspicious of trisomy 13, a chorionic villus sampling (CVS) result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.
METHODS: A 29-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of a positive NIPT result (Z-score = 20.9, positive ≥3) suspicious of trisomy 13 at 11 weeks of gestation and a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13 at 14 weeks of gestation. At 14 weeks of gestation, CVS revealed the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) result of rea X,Y (P095) × 1, 13 (P095) × 3, 18,21 (P095) × 2/X,Y (P095) × 1, 13,18,21 (P095) × 2 and a karyotype of 48,XY,+13,+mar [9]/47,XY,+mar[16]. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 15 weeks of gestation, and cytogenetic analysis of parental blood revealed 47,XY,+mar in the father and 46, XX in the mother. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on the paternal blood showed that the extra dicentric marker was derived from chromosome 15 without the locus SNRPN (15q11.2), and the result was 47,XY,+mar.ish dic(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-)[20]. Amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar pat (20/20). Simultaneous interphase FISH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 32% (32/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis using the DNA extracted from the parental bloods and uncultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 13. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. The woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a phenotypically normal 2708-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation, The cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotypes of 47,XY,+mar pat and did not have UPD 13. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was phenotypically normal. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells detected 5.3% (5/95 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 13, compared with 0% in the normal control.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 13 at amniocentesis can be associated with a positive NIPT result suspicious of trisomy 13, a CVS result of mosaic trisomy 13, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes and perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line.
METHODS: A 37-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[11]/46,XY[32], and simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (X,Y) × 1, (1-22) × 2 without genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[5]/46,XY[19], and simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3q34.3 × 2.1 (log2 ratio = 0.1) compatible with 10-15% mosaicism for trisomy 9. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) assays excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 9. A third amniocentesis at 29 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+9[5]/46,XY[18], and simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 9p24.3q34.3 × 2.1 (log2 ratio = 0.1) compatible with 10-15% mosaicism for trisomy 9. Interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 9% (9/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9. IUGR was noted on prenatal ultrasound. The pregnancy was carried to 38 weeks of gestation, and a 2375-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered. The karyotypes of umbilical cord, cord blood and placenta were 46,XY (40/40 cells), 47,XY,+9[1]/46,XY[39] and 47,XY,+9[12]/46,XY[28], respectively. QF-PCR assays on placenta showed trisomy 9 of maternal origin. When follow-up at age two months, the neonate was normal in development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XY (40/40 cells), and the buccal mucosal cells had 7.5% (8/106 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 9 by interphase FISH analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 17 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured and uncultured amniocytes.
METHODS: A 32-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of an increased nuchal translucency thickness of 3 mm in the first trimester sonographic screening. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+17 [2]/46,XX [20]. Among 22 colonies of cultured amniocytes, two colonies had a karyotype of 47,XX,+17, whereas the rest 20 colonies had a karyotype of 46,XX. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (1-22,X) × 2 with no genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound and parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from the parental bloods and cultured amniocytes excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 17. The woman was encouraged to continue the pregnancy. A normal 3178-g female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation without any phenotypic abnormalities. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were all 46, XX (40/40 cells). When follow-up at age six months, the neonate was normal in physical and psychosomatic development.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 17 at amniocentesis can be a transient and benign condition, and can be associated with a favorable fetal outcome and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured and uncultured amniocytes.