The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3 (CDKN3) gene, is over expressed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the cell biology functions of RCC are not well understood. The present study aimed to verify the ability of CDKN3 to promote the proliferation and migration of RCC through in vitro experiments. Subsequently, the clinical prognostic effects were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; https://www.cancer.gov/) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The chelators, di-2-pyridylketone 4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (Dp44mT), an analogue of the anti-tumor agent, were screened through bioinformatics analysis. The expression of CDKN3 is positively correlated with the IC50 of Dp44mT. In two RCC cell lines, 786-0 and Caki-1, we conducted small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of CDKN3 and overexpression of CDKN3 by transfection plasmid. Subsequently, we administered Dp44mT to examine the resulting alterations in cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis, thereby elucidating the role of CDKN3 and Dp44mT in these processes. The results of the experiment revealed a positive association between CDKN3 expression and the proliferation of RCC cell lines. Down-regulating CDKN3 significantly increased the apoptosis rate and inhibited cell migration in 786-0 and Caki-1 cells. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis revealed a high expression of CDKN3 in RCC and a negative association between CDKN3 expression and survival. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed a significant association between high CDKN3 expression and the cell cycle pathway. Furthermore, we identified Dp44mT as a drug highly correlated with CDKN3 through the database. Subsequent addition of Dp44mT resulted in similar findings to those observed upon CDKN3 knockdown. Our findings have important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of CDKN3 in RCC. Additionally, Dp44mT is likely to be a promising candidate for future clinical applications.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor in the female reproductive system. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification are widely involved in cancer progression. Nevertheless, the cross-talk between circ-NAB1 and m6A as well as the biological functions of circ-NAB1 in EC remain unclear. Circ-NAB1 was observed to be upregulated in EC tissues and cells by RT-qPCR. MeRIP and RNA pull-down assays were utilized for detecting the m6A modification of circ-NAB1. The interaction between circ-NAB1 and RNAs was also detected. Colony formation, transwell, flow cytometry, and western blot were utilized for measuring EC cell behaviors. Mechanically, we proved the m6A demethylase alkylation repair homolog protein 5 (ALKBH5) can mediate circ-NAB1 expression through an m6A-YTHDF2-dependent manner. Circ-NAB1 overexpression can promote cell proliferation, migration, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, and cell cycle through functional assays. Circ-NAB1 knockdown exerts the opposite function on EC cells. Furthermore, we proved that circ-NAB1 can sponge miR-876-3p to upregulate the target gene cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3 (CDKN3) in EC cells. CDKN3 overexpression can reverse the impacts of circ-NAB1 depletion on EC cell behaviors. Collectively, we proved that ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification of circ-NAB1 promoted EMT process and cell cycle in EC via targeting the miR-876-3p/CDKN3 axis.

BACKGROUND: Cell cycle protein-dependent kinase inhibitor protein 3 (CDKN3), as a member of the protein kinase family, has been demonstrated to exhibit oncogenic properties in several tumors. However, there are no pan-carcinogenic analyses for CDKN3.
METHODS: Using bioinformatics tools such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the UCSC Xena database, a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of CDKN3 was conducted. The inverstigation encompassed the examination of CDKN3 function actoss 33 different kinds of tumors, as well as the exploration of gene expressions, survival prognosis status, clinical significance, DNA methylation, immune infiltration, and associated signal pathways.
RESULTS: CDKN3 was significantly upregulated in most of tumors and correlated with overall survival (OS) of patients. Methylation levels of CDKN3 differed significantly between tumors and normal tissues. In addition, infiltration of CD4 + T cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, macrophages, and endothelial cells were associated with CDKN3 expression in various tumors. Mechanistically, CDKN3 was associated with P53, PI3K-AKT, cell cycle checkpoints, mitotic spindle checkpoint, and chromosome maintenance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our pan-cancer analysis conducted in the study provides a comprehensive understanding of the involvement of CDKN3 gene in tumorigenesis. The findings suggest that targeting CDKN3 may potentially lead to novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of tumors.

As a plant-specific endoreplication regulator, the SIAMESE-RELATED (SMR) family (a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) plays an important role in plant growth and development and resistance to stress. Although the genes of the maize (Zea mays) SMR family have been studied extensively, the ZmSMR10 (Zm00001eb231280) gene has not been reported. In this study, the function of this gene was characterized by overexpression and silencing. Compared with the control, the transgenic plants exhibited the phenotypes of early maturation, dwarfing, and drought resistance. Expression of the protein in prokaryotes demonstrates that ZmSMR10 is a small protein, and the results of subcellular localization suggest that it travels functionally in the nucleus. Unlike ZmSMR4, yeast two-hybrid experiments demonstrated that ZmSMR10 does not interact strongly with with some cell cycle protein-dependent protein kinase (CDK) family members ZmCDKA;1/ZmCDKA;3/ZmCDKB1;1. Instead, it interacts strongly with ZmPCNA2 and ZmCSN5B. Based on these results, we concluded that ZmSMR10 is involved in the regulation of endoreplication through the interaction of ZmPCNA2 and ZmCSN5B. These findings provide a theoretical basis to understand the mechanism of the regulation of endoreplication and improve the yield of maize through the use of molecular techniques.

BACKGROUND: The recent advent of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors has considerably evolved hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer treatment. Palbociclib, an orally administered pyridopyrimidine derivative, was the first CDK4/6 inhibitor to be introduced into daily clinical practice in combination with classic endocrine backbone, based on progression-free survival (PFS) benefit assessed in the pivotal PALOMA series of randomized clinical trials. Regarding its safety profile, neutropenia and leukopenia are the most common and well-defined adverse effects, while cardiac complications are rather scarce.
METHODS: We present the rare case of a middle-aged female patient with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, without prior exposure to cardiotoxic antineoplastic agents, who developed Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) in the context of systemic therapy with palbociclib plus letrozole combination.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacovigilance and experimental studies are warranted to confirm any causative relationship and to explore the underlying pathophysiology, respectively.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved survival of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, patients treated with CDK4/6i eventually develop drug resistance and progress. RB1 loss-of-function alterations confer resistance to CDK4/6i, but the optimal therapy for these patients is unclear. Through a genome-wide CRISPR screen, we identify protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a molecular vulnerability in ER+/RB1-knockout breast cancer cells. Inhibition of PRMT5 blocks the G1-to-S transition in the cell cycle independent of RB, leading to growth arrest in RB1-knockout cells. Proteomics analysis uncovers fused in sarcoma (FUS) as a downstream effector of PRMT5. Inhibition of PRMT5 results in dissociation of FUS from RNA polymerase II, leading to hyperphosphorylation of serine 2 in RNA polymerase II, intron retention, and subsequent downregulation of proteins involved in DNA synthesis. Furthermore, treatment with the PRMT5 inhibitor pemrametostat and a selective ER degrader fulvestrant synergistically inhibits growth of ER+/RB-deficient cell-derived and patient-derived xenografts. These findings highlight dual ER and PRMT5 blockade as a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance to CDK4/6i in ER+/RB-deficient breast cancer.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) show anticancer activity in certain human malignancies, such as breast cancer. However, their application to other tumor types and intrinsic resistance mechanisms are still unclear. Here, we demonstrate that MYC amplification confers resistance to CDK4/6i in bladder, prostate and breast cancer cells. Mechanistically, MYC binds to the promoter of the E3 ubiquitin ligase KLHL42 and enhances its transcription, leading to RB1 deficiency by inducing both phosphorylated and total pRB1 ubiquitination and degradation. We identify a compound that degrades MYC, A80.2HCl, which induces MYC degradation at nanomolar concentrations, restores pRB1 protein levels and re-establish sensitivity of MYC high-expressing cancer cells to CDK4/6i. The combination of CDK4/6i and A80.2HCl result in marked regression in tumor growth in vivo. Altogether, these results reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying MYC-induced resistance to CDK4/6i and suggest the utilization of the MYC degrading molecule A80.2HCl to potentiate the therapeutic efficacy of CDK4/6i.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is a slowly-progressing disease in which symptoms often do not manifest until years after disease onset. In advanced stages, infection and bleeding are common. Past studies have shown that the interaction between CDK4/6 inhibitors and chemotherapy drugs can enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of drugs and limit toxicity. Therefore, in this study, the treatment effects of combining the CDK4/6 inhibitor LEE011 with chemotherapy drugs bendamustine or hydroxyurea were investigated in vitro.
METHODS: The mouse lymphocytic leukemia cell line L1210 was treated with LEE011 combined with hydroxyurea or bendamustine. Western blot and flow cytometry were performed to elucidate the mechanisms behind tumor suppression.
RESULTS: LEE011 combined with hydroxyurea or bendamustine significantly inhibited proliferation of L1210 cell lines in a concentration- and time-dependent manner as well as increased the arrest of cells in G1 and S phases. The combination of LEE011 with hydroxyurea also reduced the phosphorylation of Rb while increased the expression of total Rb protein. Furthermore, reduced expression of GPX4, which is a key protein in ferroptosis, indicates that the tumor suppression effects of this drug combination could involve ferroptosis.
CONCLUSIONS: CDK4/6 inhibitor LEE011 treatment alone may not be a suitable treatment option for lymphocytic leukemia; however, our findings in vitro support the combination of LEE011 with chemotherapy drugs to enhance anti-tumor activity in lymphocytic leukemia.

The cell cycle is a highly regulated process in which proteins involved in cell cycle progression exhibit periodic expression patterns, controlled by specific mechanisms such as transcription, translation, and degradation. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the oscillations of mRNA levels in cell cycle regulators are not fully understood. In this study, we observed that the stability of cyclin D1 (CCND1) mRNA fluctuates during the cell cycle, with increased stability during interphase and decreased stability during the M phase. Additionally, we identified a key RNA binding protein, positive coactivator 4 (PC4), which plays a crucial role in stabilizing CCND1 mRNA and regulating its periodic expression. Moreover, the binding affinity of PC4 to CCND1 mRNA is modulated by two cell cycle-specific posttranslational modifications: ubiquitination of K68 enhances binding and stabilizes the CCND1 transcript during interphase, while phosphorylation of S17 inhibits binding during the M phase, leading to degradation of CCND1 mRNA. Remarkably, PC4 promotes the transition from G1 to S phase in the cell cycle, and depletion of PC4 enhances the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting that PC4 could serve as a potential therapeutic target. These findings provide valuable insights into the intricate regulation of cell cycle dynamics.

Individual trials of abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib show a similar impact on progression-free survival yet differing statistical significance for overall survival (OS). A robust comparative evaluation of OS, safety, and tolerability of the three drugs is warranted. A systematic literature search identified phase 3 randomized clinical trials reporting OS of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Trial-level data on OS and common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each drug. In the absence of direct comparisons, a network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pairwise comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of each of the CDK4/6i. Seven studies comprising of 4415 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 73.3 months (range: 48.7-97.2 months). There were no statistically significant differences in OS between any of the CDK4/6i. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib both showed significantly higher GI toxicity (grade 1-2 vomiting OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.37-2.56] and OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.59-3.23] respectively). Compared to palbociclib, abemaciclib was associated with more grade 3-4 diarrhea OR 118.06 [95% CI 7.28-1915.32]. In contrast, palbociclib was associated with significantly more neutropenia than ribociclib and abemaciclib but significantly lower risk of grade 3-4 infections. Abemaciclib had significantly less grade 3-4 transaminitis and grade 3-4 neutropenia than ribociclib. Treatment discontinuation and death due to AE were significantly higher with abemaciclib than palbociclib and ribociclib. There is no statistically significant difference in OS between CDK4/6i despite differing statistical significance levels of individual trials. Real-world data analyses may help to identify if there is a meaningful inter-drug difference in efficacy. Significant differences between CDK4/6i are observed for safety and tolerability outcomes.