BACKGROUND: Radionecrosis is a common complication in radiation oncology, while mechanisms and risk factors have yet to be fully explored. We therefore conducted a systematic review to understand the pathogenesis and identify factors that significantly affect the development.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases. The complete search strategy can be found as a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42023361662).
RESULTS: We included 83 studies, most involving healthy animals (n = 72, 86.75 %). High doses of hemispherical irradiation of 30 Gy in rats and 50 Gy in mice led repeatedly to radionecrosis among different studies and set-ups. Higher dose and larger irradiated volume were associated with earlier onset. Fractionated schedules proved limited effectiveness in the prevention of radionecrosis. Distinct anatomical brain structures respond to irradiation in various ways. White matter appears to be more vulnerable than gray matter. Younger age, more evolved animal species, and genetic background were also significant factors, whereas sex was irrelevant. Only 13.25 % of the studies were performed on primary brain tumor bearing animals, no studies on brain metastases are currently available.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified various factors that significantly affect the induction of radionecrosis. The current state of research neglects the utilization of animal models of brain tumors, even though patients with brain malignancies constitute the largest group receiving brain irradiation. This latter aspect should be primarily addressed when developing an experimental radionecrosis model for translational implementation.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and risk factors for facial nerve dysfunction (FND) following CyberKnife® therapy for vestibular schwannoma (VS) remain poorly understood. This study investigates whether differential radiation doses to vulnerable segments of the facial nerve may be associated with FND outcomes.
METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent CyberKnife® radiosurgery for VS at a single institution. Basic demographics, tumor characteristics, and facial nerve function were collected. Total radiation doses to tumor, internal auditory canal (IAC), and labyrinthine segment of facial nerve (LSFN) were evaluated.
RESULTS: Six out of 64 patients experienced FND following CyberKnife® treatment for VS (9.38%, 6/64). Patients with FND were compared to those without FND (control). Of the 64 patients, complete radiation records were obtained for 30 patients (6 FND vs. 24 control). There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor characteristics between control and FND cohorts. More severe FND (HB ≥ 4) had significantly larger tumors (3.74 vs. 1.27 cm3, p = 0.037) with directionally decreased time to FND (3.50 vs. 33.5 months, p = 0.106) than patients with HB < 4, respectively. There were directionally, nonsignificant differences between maximum radiation doses to the LSFN (2492.4 vs. 2557.0 cGy, p = 0.121) and IAC (2877.3 vs. 2895.5 cGy, p = 0.824) between the control and FND cohorts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: FND may represent an underrecognized sequelae of CyberKnife® radiosurgery for VS that can occur many months following treatment. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of differential radiation exposure to the facial nerve with FND following treatment.
METHODS: III (Retrospective Cohort Study) Laryngoscope, 2024.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases has evolved over the last 40 years allowing centres to treat an increasing number of brain metastases in a single treatment fraction. HyperArcTMplanning optimisation technique is one such development that streamlines the treatment of multiple metastases with a single isocentre. Several studies have investigated the plan quality of HyperArc compared to CyberKnife or Gamma Knife, however there are limited number of studies that include all three modalities. It is the aim of this study to provide an assessment of plan quality between the three SRS platforms across ten patients with multiple brain metastases ranging from three to eight metastases per patient. Strict planning workflows were established to avoid bias towards any particular treatment platform. Plan quality was assessed through dose to organs at risk, Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI), global efficiency index (Gη) and dose to normal brain tissue. Results from this study found mean PCI observed across Gamma Knife plans was significantly lower than HyperArc and CyberKnife. HyperArc plans observed significantly shorter beam-on times which were 10 to 20 times faster than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife plans. Gamma Knife and CyberKnife were found to produce plans with significantly superior GI, global efficiency index and the volume of healthy brain receiving greater than 12 Gy (V12Gy) when compared to HyperArc plans. Lesion volume was seen to influence the relative difference in dose metrics between systems. The study revealed that all three treatment modalities produced high quality plans for the SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases, each with respective benefits and limitations.

Objectives Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with pharmacological treatment is currently one of the most acceptable alternatives for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Our primary endpoint was to report the short-term response (one month) outcomes of 10 patients with refractory TN after CyberKnife® (CK) radiosurgery; secondary endpoints were to assess early side effects and complications. Methods Ten female patients with TN refractory to pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological treatment received a single dose of 90 Gy with CyberKnife® radiosurgery. Clinical and demographic characteristics were obtained from medical records. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess facial pain before as well as seven, 15, and 30 days after treatment. Friedman test was performed to evaluate pain relief in treated patients. Results All patients responded well to the CK and experienced initial adequate pain relief during the first 30 days (p<0.001). No significant differences (p=0.661) were found between six patients who received CK radiosurgery as the first treatment option and those who underwent other non-pharmacological treatments. One patient was re-irradiated with 75 Gy. Transient facial paresthesia was observed in 3/10 patients without any other complications. Conclusion High-tech CK treatment is safe, non-invasive, fast, with minimal side effects, and effective in achieving short-term pain relief in patients with refractory TN, even in those with multiple previous interventions. Given these results, we recommend evaluating CK radiosurgery as the first-line treatment of choice for trigeminal neuralgia refractory to pharmacological treatment.

UNASSIGNED: Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with primary or secondary lung tumors.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine of patients treated for primary lung cancer or pulmonary oligometastases with SBRT from January 2013 to July 2016. We included patients at least 18 years old who had stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases and a follow-up of at least 1 month.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 294 patients were included. Tumors included 122 lung metastases, 89 stage I NSCLC, and 83 non-histologically confirmed lung lesions. The tracking methods were Synchrony® in 191 cases (119 gold seeds and 72 coils) and Xsight® Spine with 4D computed tomography in 103 cases. Median follow-up was 31.6 months [interquartile range (IQR), 18.1-50.2 months]. The two- and five-year probability of local control were respectively 92.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95] and 85.35% (95% CI: 0.79-0.99). The two- and five-year probability of overall survival were respectively 87.46% and 72.77% (P=0.586). Local control rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.685) (gold seeds, coils or Xsight® Spine) within tumors grouped by location, gross tumor volume (GTV) (respectively P=0.9, P=0.7, and P=0.4), planning target volume (PTV) (respectively P=0.4, P=0.9, and P=0.7), or PTV/GTV ratio (respectively P=0.6, P=0.6, and P=0.5). Metastasis-free survival and Overall survival rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.664 and P=0.586, respectively). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities and only one grade 3 pneumonitis and one grade 3 pneumothorax.
UNASSIGNED: Fiducial-less SBRT using Xsight® Spine is a safe alternative to Synchrony® using gold seeds or coils, with comparable local control and overall survival rates and a similar toxicity profile.

BACKGROUND: Two optimization algorithms VOLO™ and sequential optimization algorithm (SEQU) are compared in the Precision® treatment planning system from Accuray® for stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans. The aim is to compare the two algorithms to assess if VOLO™ is better of SEQU in certain treatment site.
METHODS: Sixty clinical treatment cases were compared. Entities include Acoustic neuroma (AN), lung metastases, and liver metastases. In each entity, 10 SEQU and 10 VOLO™ treatment plans were optimized. The Ray-Tracing calculation algorithm was used for all treatment plans and the treatments were planned exclusively with fixed cones (5-50 mm). The number of nodes, beams, total MU, and treatment time were compared. Conformity index (CI), new conformity index (nCI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), and target coverage were examined for agreement. Dmin , Dmean , Dmax , D100%, D98%, and D2% dose in the target volume as well as exposure to organs at risk was checked. To determine peripheral doses, the isodose volumes from V10% to V98% were evaluated.
RESULTS: AN treatment plans showed significant differences for the number of nodes, beams, total MU, treatment time, D98%, D100% for the target volume, and the doses for all organs at risk. VOLO™ achieved better results on average. Total MU, treatment time, coverage, and D98% are significantly better for VOLO™ for lung metastases. For liver metastases, a significant reduction in number of nodes, total MU, and treatment time was observed for VOLO™ plans. The mean target coverage increased slightly with VOLO™, while the mean CI deteriorated slightly. The averages of Dmin , Dmean , D98%, D100%, and V80% resulted in a significant increase for VOLO™.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that VOLO™ should be used in place of SEQU as a standard for AN cases moving forward. Despite the lack of significance in the lung and liver cases, VOLO™ optimization is recommended because OAR sparing was similar, but coverage, Dmin , and Dmean were increased, and thus better tumor control can be expected.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a locally effective treatment for lung metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease, a modern variant of which is robotic (rSBRT). Since it is unclear which factors determine the success of rSBRT, we investigated a cohort of patients with lung metastases treated with rSBRT.
METHODS: In our retrospective single-center analysis, we included patients with oligometastatic disease of different cancer types who underwent SBRT of lung metastases using an Accuray Cyberknife® device between 2012 and 2019. We evaluated local control rate (LC), progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival, and toxicity. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with the efficacy and toxicity of rSBRT.
RESULTS: A total of 70 lung metastases of 54 patients were evaluated. The 4-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for LC, PFS and OS were 72.0%, 12.4% and 49.7%, respectively. Cox regression showed that LC of metastases of colorectal carcinoma and metastases treated with a biological effective dose at an α/β-ratio of 10 (BED10) of <100 Gy was significantly worse than for other metastases. Patients suffered from grade I-II pneumonitis in 21.4% of cases treated with rSBRT (grade I: 20.0%; grade II: 1.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: rSBRT is an effective and safe therapy for lung metastases. A BED10 of >100 Gy should be aimed for, especially for potentially radioresistant histologies such as colorectal carcinoma.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330.].

UNASSIGNED: In our institution, stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases is performed with the CyberKnife® (CK) device, using fixed/Iris collimators. In this study, nineteen fixed/Iris plans were recalculated with the multileaf collimator (MLC), to assess if it is possible to produce plans with comparable dosimetric overall quality.
UNASSIGNED: For consistent comparisons, MLC plans were re-optimized and re-normalized in order to achieve the same minimum dose for the total planning target volume (PTVtot). Conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and dose gradient index (DGI) metrics were evaluated. The dose to the brain was evaluated as the volume receiving 12 Gy (V12) and as the integral dose (ID). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for brain radionecrosis was calculated as a function of V12.
UNASSIGNED: The reoptimized plans were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and were found clinically acceptable according to the The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group-101 protocol. However, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly higher CN (+8.6%), HI (+2.2%), and DGI (+44.0%) values, and significantly lower ID values (-35.9%). For PTVtot less than the median value of 2.58cc, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly lower NTCP values. On the other side, MLC plans provided significantly lower treatment times (-18.4%), number of monitor units (-33.3%), beams (-46.0%) and nodes (-21.3%).
UNASSIGNED: CK-MLC plans for the stereotactic treatment of brain multi metastases could provide an important advantage in terms of treatment duration. However, to contain the increased risk for brain radionecrosis, it could be useful to calculate MLC plans only for patients with large PTVtot.

UNASSIGNED: Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) of brain metastases has gained importance, but it is not routinely performed. While awaiting the results of prospective studies, we aimed to analyze the changes in the volume of brain metastases irradiated pre- and postoperatively and the resulting dosimetric effects on normal brain tissue (NBT).
UNASSIGNED: We identified patients treated with SRS at our institution to compare hypothetical preoperative gross tumor and planning target volumes (pre-GTV and pre-PTV) with original postoperative resection cavity volumes (post-GTV and post-PTV) as well as with a standardized-hypothetical PTV with 2.0 mm margin. We used Pearson correlation to assess the association between the GTV and PTV changes with the pre-GTV. A multiple linear regression analysis was established to predict the GTV change. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases was created to assess the volume effect on the NBT exposure. We performed a literature review on NaSRS and searched for ongoing prospective trials.
UNASSIGNED: We included 30 patients in the analysis. The pre-/post-GTV and pre-/post-PTV did not differ significantly. We observed a negative correlation between pre-GTV and GTV-change, which was also a predictor of volume change in the regression analysis, in terms of a larger volume change for a smaller pre-GTV. In total, 62.5% of cases with an enlargement greater than 5.0 cm3 were smaller tumors (pre-GTV < 15.0 cm3), whereas larger tumors greater than 25.0 cm3 showed only a decrease in post-GTV. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases to evaluate the volume effect resulted in a median NBT exposure of only 67.6% (range: 33.2-84.5%) relative to the dose received by the NBT in the postoperative SRS setting. Nine published studies and twenty ongoing studies are listed as an overview.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with smaller brain metastases may have a higher risk of volume increase when irradiated postoperatively. Target volume delineation is of great importance because the PTV directly affects the exposure of NBT, but it is a challenge when contouring resection cavities. Further studies should identify patients at risk of relevant volume increase to be preferably treated with NaSRS in routine practice. Ongoing clinical trials will evaluate additional benefits of NaSRS.