未经评估:全球,森林景观正在迅速转变,机构在使用和管理中作为中介者的作用不断出现在文献中。然而,全球比较审查,以增进对森林管理机构(FMI)如何概念化的理解,以及合规性的不同决定因素,缺乏。所以,在FMI的新研究议程中,方法论方法是否存在知识分散,并且应该优先考虑这些方法。
未经评估:我们回顾了FMI概念化的区域差异,分析符合FMI的决定因素,并评估FMI研究中应用的方法学差距。
UNASSIGNED:对FMI进行了197项经验性研究(491例)的系统回顾,包括定向内容分析。
未经批准:首先,FMI文献正在增长;多案例和多国家研究是欧洲/北美的特征,非洲和拉丁美洲,在亚洲。第二,FMI的结构-过程概念化在亚洲和非洲占主导地位。第三,全球南部地区报告了大量遵守非正式FMI的案例,而不合规是在欧洲/北美的正式领域注册的。最后,到目前为止,混合方法方法在研究中使用最少;而仅使用定性方法随着时间的推移而增加,仅采用定量方法的情况有所下降。
UNASSIGNED:未来的研究应在澳大利亚的机构设置中进行非正式性的实证研究,同时也在全球范围内对混合方法研究进行评估。至关重要的是,未来的研究应该考虑多学科和跨学科的方法来探索森林管理机构的行为者和权力维度。
UNASSIGNED:在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s10980-022-01577-8获得。
UNASSIGNED: Globally, forest landscapes are rapidly transforming, with the role of institutions as mediators in their use and management constantly appearing in the literature. However, global comparative reviews to enhance comprehension of how forest management institutions (FMIs) are conceptualized, and the varying determinants of compliance, are lacking. And so too, is there knowledge fragmentation on the methodological approaches which have and should be prioritized in the new research agenda on FMIs.
UNASSIGNED: We review the regional variations in the conceptualization of FMIs, analyze the determinants of compliance with FMIs, and assess the methodological gaps applied in the study of FMIs.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of 197 empirically conducted studies (491 cases) on FMIs was performed, including a directed content analysis.
UNASSIGNED: First, FMIs literature is growing; multi-case and multi-country studies characterize Europe/North America, Africa and Latin America, over Asia. Second, the structure-process conceptualization of FMIs predominates in Asia and Africa. Third, global south regions report high cases of compliance with informal FMIs, while non-compliance was registered for Europe/North America in the formal domain. Finally, mixed-methods approaches have been least employed in the studies so far; while the use of only qualitative methods increased over time, the adoption of only quantitative approaches witnessed a decrease.
UNASSIGNED: Future research should empirically ground informality in the institutional set-up of Australia while also valorizing mixed-methods research globally. Crucially, future research should consider multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches to explore the actor and power dimensions of forest management institutions.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-022-01577-8.