UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the acceptability of two co-designed mobile applications Mit Sygehus [a knowledge-based solution] and Genoptræn.dk [a self-training solution] to support a cross-sectoral, person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation.
UNASSIGNED: The applications were implemented and tested throughout two stroke rehabilitation trajectories in Southern Denmark, comprising two acute, two sub-acute and two municipal stroke rehabilitation settings.
UNASSIGNED: A process evaluation focusing on acceptability was conducted. Individual and dyadic interviews were performed with ten stroke survivors (three women and seven men, aged 50-84) with moderate stroke and seven significant others (five women and two men, aged 50-78) post-rehabilitation. A constructivist Grounded Theory analysis was used to explore what, why, when, and how the apps worked or did not work throughout the stroke rehabilitation trajectory and if adaptions were needed.
UNASSIGNED: Participants found that Mit Sygehus provided adequate and sufficient knowledge and was easy to use, however, acceptability of Mit Sygehus declined throughout the rehabilitation process. Also, knowledge on \'return-to-work\' and \'re-gaining driver\'s license/permission to drive\' needed to be developed. The content in Genoptræn.dk was perceived as acceptable, through content being person-centred, motivating and meaningful. Genoptræn.dk furthermore, supported the transfer between rehabilitation settings, provided a sense of progress throughout the rehabilitation process, facilitated positive habits regarding self-training, and relieved the burden on significant others. Genoptræn.dk was perceived most acceptable in the sub-acute rehabilitation setting and declined when rehabilitation continued in the municipal setting.
UNASSIGNED: Stroke survivors and their significant others found Mit Sygehus and Genoptræn.dk acceptable to support cross-sectoral, person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation, however acceptability declined throughout the rehabilitation process. Further investigations are required to determine how cognitive rehabilitation can play a greater role in app-supported stroke rehabilitation and how the need for more long-term follow-up can be supported.
By using process evaluation, the user acceptability of newly developed and complex interventions can be evaluated.ICT and app-based solutions can support cross-sectoral person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation.Therapists play an important role in implementing and supporting stroke survivors using app-based solutions to support person-centred and empowering stroke rehabilitation.

UNASSIGNED: To meet the needs of people with mild stroke, multidisciplinary, person-centred, cross-sectoral rehabilitation is internationally recommended. However, there seem to be gaps in the rehabilitation process. The aim of this study was to investigate how occupational therapists and physiotherapists experience working in cross-sectoral rehabilitation for people with mild stroke.
UNASSIGNED: Data were generated through interviews with occupational therapists and physiotherapists working in four different Danish rehabilitation settings. Four group interviews and two individual interviews with a total of 19 participants were conducted. Ricoeur\'s theory of interpretation was used to interpret and discuss the data.
UNASSIGNED: Four themes were identified: the risk of overlooking symptoms: better safe than sorry; varying degrees of involvement of people with mild stroke; spontaneous involvement of relatives; and contextual challenges for coherence in the rehabilitation process.
UNASSIGNED: The therapists experienced challenges in coordinating rehabilitation across sectors due to the timing of the needs assessment and contextual challenges. They used a preventive strategy of sending a plan or referral for later re-assessment. The therapists involved people with mild stroke to varying degrees. They involved relatives spontaneously. For successful rehabilitation, ongoing assessment, recognition of collaboration factors and relative involvement are essential.
It is crucial to continuously evaluate needs and establish goals throughout the entirety of the rehabilitation process.Recognizing that the capacity and resources of people with mild strokes to collaborate with professionals are contextually, relationally, and individually determined is important.Involvement of relatives should be strengthened on many levels from the institutional level to the personal level.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent claudication (IC) caused by peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common cardiovascular disease. Patients with IC have reduced walking capacity, restricted activity levels and mobility, and reduced health-related quality of life. The disease leads to social isolation, the risk of cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality. Non-operative management of IC requires exercise therapy and studies show that supervised exercise training is more effective than unsupervised training, yet many patients with IC lack motivation for changes in health behaviour. No studies investigating the effects of existing cardiac rehabilitation targeted patients with IC have been published. The aim of this article is to present the rationale and design of the CIPIC Rehab Study, which examines the effect of a cross-sectoral rehabilitation programme versus usual care for patients in non-operative management for IC.
METHODS: A randomised clinical trial aims to investigate whether cardiac rehabilitation for patients with IC in non-operative management versus usual care is superior to treatment as usual. The trial will allocate 118 patients, with a 1:1 individual randomisation to either the intervention or control group. The primary outcome is maximal walking distance measured by the standardised treadmill walking test. The secondary outcome is pain-free walking distance measured by the standardised treadmill walking test, healthy diet measured by a fat-fish-fruit-green score, and level of physical activity measured by an activity score within official recommendations. Statistical analyses will be blinded. Several exploratory analyses will be performed. A mixed-method design is used to evaluate qualitative and quantitative findings. A qualitative and a survey-based complementary study will be undertaken to investigate patients\' post-discharge experiences. A qualitative post-intervention study will explore experiences of participation in rehabilitation.
CONCLUSIONS: The study is the first to assess the effect of a cardiac rehabilitation programme designed for patients with IC. The study will describe how to monitor and improve rehabilitation programmes for patients with IC in a real-world setting. Mixed-method strategies can allow for both exploration and generalisation in the same study, but the research design is a complex intervention and any effects found cannot be awarded a specific component.
BACKGROUND: Retrospectively registered in Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03730623.