Crithidia

Cristidia
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Gut microbial communities confer protection against natural pathogens in important pollinators from the genera Bombus and Apis. In commercial species B. terrestris and B. impatiens, the microbiota increases their resistance to the common and virulent trypanosomatid parasite Crithidia bombi. However, the mechanisms by which gut microorganisms protect the host are still unknown. Here, we test two hypotheses: microbiota protect the host (1) through stimulation of its immune response or protection of the gut epithelium and (2) by competing for resources with the parasite inside the gut. To test them, we reduced the microbiota of workers and then rescued the microbial community by feeding them with microbiota supplements. We then exposed them to an infectious dose of C. bombi and characterised gene expression and gut microbiota composition. We examined the expression of three antimicrobial peptide genes and Mucin-5AC, a gene with a putative role in gut epithelium protection, using qPCR. Although a protective effect against C. bombi was observed in bumblebees with supplemented microbiota, we did not observe an effect of the microbiota on gene expression that could explain alone the protective effect observed. On the other hand, we found an increased relative abundance of Lactobacillus bacteria within the gut of infected workers and a negative correlation of this genus with Gilliamella and Snodgrassella genera. Therefore, our results point to a displacement of bumblebee endosymbionts by C. bombi that might be caused by competition for space and nutrients between the parasite and the microbiota within the gut.
    La microbiota intestinal confiere protección frente a los patógenos naturales en polinizadores importantes de los géneros Bombus y Apis. En concreto, la microbiota de las especies comerciales B. terrestris y B. impatients, incrementa su resistencia frente al parásito tripanosomátido común y virulento Crithidia bombi. Sin embargo, los mecanismos por los cuales los microorganismos protegen al hospedador todavía se desconocen. Aquí probamos dos hipótesis: la microbiota protege al hospedador (1) a través de la estimulación de la respuesta inmunitaria o la protección del epitelio y (2) por competición por los recursos con el parásito dentro del intestino. Para probar estas hipótesis, redujimos la microbiota de obreras y dimos suplementos de microbiota a una parte de ellas. Las expusimos a una dosis infecciosa de C. bombi y caracterizamos la expresión génica y la composición de la microbiota intestinal. Examinamos la expresión de los genes de tres péptidos antimicrobianos (AMPs) y de Mucin‐5AC, un gen con un rol putativo en la protección del epitelio intestinal, usando la qPCR. Aunque observamos un efecto protector contra C. bombi en los abejorros suplementados con microbiota, no vimos un efecto en la expresión génica que pudiese explicar por sí solo la protección observada. Por otro lado, encontramos un incremento en la abundancia relativa de bacterias del género Lactobacillus en el intestino de obreras infectadas y una correlación negativa de este género con los géneros Gilliamella y Snodgrassella. Por tanto, nuestros resultados apuntan a un desplazamiento de los endosimbiontes por parte de C. bombi, que podría estar causado por la competición por espacio y nutrientes entre el parásito y la microbiota dentro del intestino.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Crithidiabombi是一种锥虫寄生虫,可感染多种大黄蜂(Bombusspp。),坚持他们的肠道。Crithidiabombi感染会损害学习,并降低工人的生存率和越冬皇后的适应性。尽管对这种宿主-病原体系统的生态学进行了广泛的研究,我们对介导内部感染动力学的机制知之甚少。Crithidiabombi通过鞭毛附着在后肠上感染宿主,之前的一项研究发现,花蜜的次生化合物去除鞭毛,防止依恋。然而,允许更详细观察寄生虫附着和生长的方法将使我们更好地理解介导这种宿主-病原体关系的因素。我们建立了培养的C.bombi的遗传操作和可视化技术。使用为Cristidiafasciculata建立的结构,我们使用两种不同的选择标记成功地产生了表达异位荧光转基因的C.bombi细胞。据我们所知,这是该物种的第一个基因改造。我们还引入了标记寄生虫线粒体和细胞核的构建体,表明亚细胞靶向信号可以在整个寄生虫物种中发挥作用,以突出特定的细胞器。最后,我们在体外观察了荧光标记的寄生虫的游泳和附着形式,以及在大黄蜂(Bombusimpatiens)宿主中的体内。扩展我们的细胞和分子工具包C.bombi将帮助我们更好地理解诸如宿主饮食之类的因素。免疫系统,和生理学介导这些常见寄生虫感染的结果。
    Crithidia bombi is a trypanosomatid parasite that infects several species of bumble bees (Bombus spp.), by adhering to their intestinal tract. Crithidia bombi infection impairs learning and reduces survival of workers and the fitness of overwintering queens. Although there is extensive research on the ecology of this host-pathogen system, we understand far less about the mechanisms that mediate internal infection dynamics. Crithidia bombi infects hosts by attaching to the hindgut via the flagellum, and one previous study found that a nectar secondary compound removed the flagellum, preventing attachment. However, approaches that allow more detailed observation of parasite attachment and growth would allow us to better understand factors mediating this host-pathogen relationship. We established techniques for genetic manipulation and visualization of cultured C. bombi. Using constructs established for Crithidia fasciculata, we successfully generated C. bombi cells expressing ectopic fluorescent transgenes using two different selectable markers. To our knowledge, this is the first genetic modification of this species. We also introduced constructs that label the mitochondrion and nucleus of the parasite, showing that subcellular targeting signals can function across parasite species to highlight specific organelles. Finally, we visualized fluorescently tagged parasites in vitro in both their swimming and attached forms, and in vivo in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) hosts. Expanding our cell and molecular toolkit for C. bombi will help us better understand how factors such as host diet, immune system, and physiology mediate outcomes of infection by these common parasites.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    病原体的种间传播可以在环境中频繁发生。在野生蜜蜂中,主要溢出病例是由与蜜蜂相关的病原体引起的,其殖民地可以充当水库。由于意大利的数据有限,准确评估这种现象对野生蜜蜂种群的影响和意义是一项挑战。在这项研究中,在BeeNet项目中,总共从11个意大利地区采样了3372只蜜蜂,评估主要蜜蜂病原体的患病率和丰度(DWV,BQCV,ABPV,CBPV,KBV,Nosemaceranae,Ascosphaeraapis,mellificae,LotmariaPassim,Cristidiabombi)。68.4%的样品对至少一种病原体呈阳性。DWV,BQCV,ceranae和CBPV表现出最高的患病率和丰度值,确认它们是在环境中传播的最普遍的病原体。对于这些病原体,安德丽娜,炸弹,Eucera和Seladonia的平均患病率和丰度值最高。一般来说,时间趋势显示,从4月到7月,患病率和丰度下降.为了预测野生蜜蜂感染的风险,建立了统计模型。观察到养蜂场密度对病原体发生的影响较小,而气象条件和农业管理对环境中病原体的持久性有更大的影响。野生蜜蜂的社会和生物学特征也有助于定义更高的感染风险。社区,采矿和寡分子蜜蜂。在所有测试的样本中,40.5%与两种或两种以上病原体共感染。在某些情况下,个体同时感染了多达五种不同的病原体。增加有关野生蜜蜂中病原体传播的知识以了解动态至关重要,对传粉者种群的影响和影响。实施保护野生蜜蜂物种的具体计划对于确保野生蜜蜂和人类管理蜜蜂的健康至关重要。
    The interspecific transmission of pathogens can occur frequently in the environment. Among wild bees, the main spillover cases are caused by pathogens associated with Apis mellifera, whose colonies can act as reservoirs. Due to the limited availability of data in Italy, it is challenging to accurately assess the impact and implications of this phenomenon on the wild bee populations. In this study, a total of 3372 bees were sampled from 11 Italian regions within the BeeNet project, evaluating the prevalence and the abundance of the major honey bee pathogens (DWV, BQCV, ABPV, CBPV, KBV, Nosema ceranae, Ascosphaera apis, Crithidia mellificae, Lotmaria passim, Crithidia bombi). The 68.4% of samples were positive for at least one pathogen. DWV, BQCV, N. ceranae and CBPV showed the highest prevalence and abundance values, confirming them as the most prevalent pathogens spread in the environment. For these pathogens, Andrena, Bombus, Eucera and Seladonia showed the highest mean prevalence and abundance values. Generally, time trends showed a prevalence and abundance decrease from April to July. In order to predict the risk of infection among wild bees, statistical models were developed. A low influence of apiary density on pathogen occurrence was observed, while meteorological conditions and agricultural management showed a greater impact on pathogen persistence in the environment. Social and biological traits of wild bees also contributed to defining a higher risk of infection for bivoltine, communal, mining and oligolectic bees. Out of all the samples tested, 40.5% were co-infected with two or more pathogens. In some cases, individuals were simultaneously infected with up to five different pathogens. It is essential to increase knowledge about the transmission of pathogens among wild bees to understand dynamics, impact and effects on pollinator populations. Implementing concrete plans for the conservation of wild bee species is important to ensure the health of wild and human-managed bees within a One-Health perspective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    微生物组因其与宿主适应性的复杂关系而越来越受到认可。大黄蜂是通过个体之间的社会接触而衍生和加强的特征性肠道微生物群落的宿主。大黄蜂微生物群是物种贫乏的,主要由少数核心类群组成,这些核心类群与较大的类群蜜蜂部落有关。实验结果支持核心大黄蜂微生物群在抵抗常见锥虫寄生虫严重感染中的作用,CristidiaBombi.然而,大多数研究规模很小,通常只考虑一种或两种大黄蜂,或者利用商业饲养的蜜蜂。为了更好地了解野生种群的微生物组多样性,在为期三年的微生物组野外调查中,我们对缅因州中部和东部发现的10种同伴物种的野外种群进行了深度采样。我们已经使用16S扩增子测序来产生微生物群落概况,和qPCR来筛选样本中的Crithidiabombi感染。我们数据集的广度使我们能够测试微生物群落中的季节性和种间趋势。控制这些外部变异源,我们已经确定了与感染和寄生虫负荷相关的微生物因素,这些因素支持核心微生物组在抵抗严重感染方面的作用.
    The microbiome is increasingly recognized for its complex relationship with host fitness. Bumblebees are host to a characteristic gut microbiome community that is derived and reinforced through social contact between individuals. The bumblebee microbiome is species-poor, and primarily composed from a small number of core taxa that are associated with the greater tribe of corbiculate bees. Experimental findings support a role for the core bumblebee microbiome in resistance to severe infections by a common trypanosomal parasite, Crithidia bombi. However, most studies have been small in scale, often considering just one or two bumblebee species, or making use of commercially-reared bees. To better understand the microbiome diversity of wild populations, we have deeply sampled field populations of ten sympatric species found throughout central and down east Maine in a three-year microbiome field survey. We have used 16S amplicon sequencing to produce microbiome community profiles, and qPCR to screen samples for infections by Crithidia bombi. The breadth of our dataset has enabled us to test for seasonal and interspecific trends in the microbiome community. Controlling for these external sources of variation, we have identified microbial factors associated with infection and parasite load that support the role of the core microbiome in resistance to severe infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:饮食和寄生虫影响大黄蜂的肠道细菌共生体,但潜在的互动效应仍然被忽视。这项研究的主要目的是评估向日葵花粉的分离和相互作用的影响,它的酚酰胺,和广泛存在的锥虫虫。在Bombusterrestris雄性的肠道细菌共生体上。
    结果:大黄蜂雄性出现在以(i)柳树花粉(对照),(ii)向日葵花粉,或(iii)柳树花粉掺有向日葵花粉的酚酰胺提取物。这些小菌落被Crithidia感染。或者没有病原体。使用16SrRNA扩增子测序(V3-V4区),与以对照花粉为食的雄性相比,以向日葵花粉为食的雄性的肠道微生物群落中,我们观察到β多样性的显着变化,而不是α多样性的变化。同样,肠道寄生虫Crithidiasp。改变了男性肠道微生物群落的β多样性,但没有改变α多样性,不管饮食。相比之下,与饲喂对照花粉的雄性相比,我们没有观察到饲喂富含苯甲酰胺花粉的雄性肠道微生物群落中β或α多样性的任何显著变化。β多样性的变化表明处理组之间细菌分类群的显著差异,而α多样性缺乏差异表明每个治疗组内没有显著变化。
    结论:大黄蜂在全球范围内拥有一致的肠道微生物群,但是我们的研究结果表明,大黄蜂的肠道细菌群落在某种程度上是由它们的饮食和肠道寄生虫以及这两个因素的相互作用所决定的。这项研究证实,大黄蜂是评估饮食和寄生虫感染对肠道微生物群落影响的合适生物替代品。
    OBJECTIVE: Diets and parasites influence the gut bacterial symbionts of bumble bees, but potential interactive effects remain overlooked. The main objective of this study was to assess the isolated and interactive effects of sunflower pollen, its phenolamides, and the widespread trypanosomatid Crithidia sp. on the gut bacterial symbionts of Bombus terrestris males.
    RESULTS: Bumble bee males emerged in microcolonies fed on either (i) willow pollen (control), (ii) sunflower pollen, or (iii) willow pollen spiked with phenolamide extracts from sunflower pollen. These microcolonies were infected by Crithidia sp. or were pathogen-free. Using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (V3-V4 region), we observed a significant alteration of the beta diversity but not of the alpha diversity in the gut microbial communities of males fed on sunflower pollen compared to males fed on control pollen. Similarly, infection by the gut parasite Crithidia sp. altered the beta diversity but not the alpha diversity in the gut microbial communities of males, irrespective of the diet. By contrast, we did not observe any significant alteration of the beta or alpha diversity in the gut microbial communities of males fed on phenolamide-enriched pollen compared to males fed on control pollen. Changes in the beta diversity indicate significant dissimilarities of the bacterial taxa between the treatment groups, while the lack of difference in alpha diversity demonstrates no significant changes within each treatment group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Bumble bees harbour consistent gut microbiota worldwide, but our results suggest that the gut bacterial communities of bumble bees are somewhat shaped by their diets and gut parasites as well as by the interaction of these two factors. This study confirms that bumble bees are suitable biological surrogates to assess the effect of diet and parasite infections on gut microbial communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:大黄蜂是各种蔬菜授粉的重要昆虫群,水果,油籽,豆类,和饲料作物。与蜜蜂相比,他们有更多的主机选择和更长的飞行时间。这些蜜蜂特别用于温室中的植物授粉,并且为此目的在商业上生产。最近,由于病原体等各种原因,大黄蜂种群的数量严重减少,有些物种甚至面临灭绝的威胁。由于全球传粉昆虫的减少,确定大黄蜂病原体的分布和流行非常重要。因此,本研究旨在确定土耳其大黄蜂种群中病原体的发病率和患病率,以及每种病原体在大黄蜂样本中的含量.
    方法:总共172个Bombusterrestris(Linnaeus,1758)样品(21个来自商业企业的样品,从3个省(安塔利亚,梅尔辛和伊兹密尔)在土耳其密集进行温室种植。这些样本中有89个是在春季收集的,而83个是在秋季收集的。四种病原体的存在(Nosemabombi,CristidiaBombi,ApicystisBombi,和Locustacarusbuchneri)通过使用通用引物进行PCR研究。
    结果:Nosemabombi的总体患病率,CristidiaBombi,ApicystisBombi,ocustacarusbuchneri被确定为7.55%,9.3%,11.62%,和4.65%,分别。仅在野生捕获(自然)样品中检测到共感染(5.81%)。在春季样本中检测到C.bombi和A.bombi感染的发生率高于秋季样本(p<0.05)。关于N.bombi和L.buchneri的存在,春季和秋季样品之间没有显着差异(p>0.05)。
    结论:获得的结果对于确定土耳其大黄蜂疾病的患病率和传播率以及确定适当的保护措施可能很重要。收集到的信息应该增加我们对土耳其存在这些病原体的了解,并可能有助于改善专家的实践。需要更多的研究来确定这些病原体在人群之间的传播途径。此外,未来应考虑大黄蜂种群中复杂的病原体相互作用,以改善大黄蜂的健康。
    OBJECTIVE: Bumblebees are an important group of insects in the pollination of various vegetables, fruits, oilseeds, legumes, and the fodder crops. Compared to honeybees, they have a wider choice of hosts and a longer flight period. These bees are used especially for the pollination of plants in greenhouses and are commercially produced for this purpose. Recently, serious decreases have been occurring in bumblebee populations due to various reasons such as pathogens, and some of species are even threatened with extinction. Due to the worldwide decline in pollinator insects, determining the distribution and prevalence of bumblebee pathogens is of great importance. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the incidence and prevalence of pathogens in Turkish bumblebee populations and how much of each pathogen was in bumblebee samples.
    METHODS: A total of 172 Bombus terrestris (Linnaeus,1758) samples (21 samples from commercial enterprises, 79 samples from greenhouses and 72 samples from nature) were randomly collected from 3 provinces (Antalya, Mersin and İzmir) where greenhouse cultivation is intensively carried out in Turkey. Eighty-nine of these samples were collected in the spring and eighty-three in the autumn. The presence of four pathogens (Nosema bombi, Crithidia bombi, Apicystis bombi, and Locustacarus buchneri) was investigated by PCR using universal primers.
    RESULTS: The overall prevalence of Nosema bombi, Crithidia bombi, Apicystis bombi, and Locustacarus buchneri was determined as 7.55%, 9.3%, 11.62%, and 4.65%, respectively. Co-infections (5.81%) were only detected in wild-caught (nature) samples. C. bombi and A. bombi infections were detected at higher rates in the spring samples than in the autumn samples (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the spring and autumn samples with respect to the presence of N. bombi and L. buchneri (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained could be important in determining the prevalence and spread rates of the bumblebee diseases in Turkey and to determine appropriate protection measures. The information gathered should increase our knowledge about the presence of these pathogens in Turkey and could contribute to improve apiarist\'s practice. More studies are needed to determine the transmission pathways of these pathogens between the populations. Also, complex pathogen interactions in bumblebee populations should be considered in the future to improve bumblebee health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抗dsDNA抗体(抗dsDNA)是SLE中所有分类方案的组成部分,并包含已验证的活性指数中的一个域。抗dsDNA通常在商业上通过酶免疫测定(EIA)或赤霉素免疫荧光测试(CLIFT)进行测量。为了解决通过两种不同的测定法测量这些抗体的临床影响,这项研究利用了表型良好的多种族/种族队列.
    方法:所有患者均符合SLE的分类标准,至少有一种经过验证的方案:美国风湿病学会,系统性红斑狼疮国际合作诊所和/或美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟分类标准。通过多重EIA和CLIFT鉴定具有一种或多种同时配对的抗dsDNA的患者。分析一致性或不一致性,试验的滴度可比性以及与混合SLE疾病活动指数评分的相关性,狼疮肾炎(LN)的患病率,进行了预测耀斑和分类标准的能力。
    结果:207名患者同时接受了EIA和CLIFT至少一次抗dsDNA测试,生成586个配对结果。377对是一致的,209对是不一致的。207例患者中的41例总是配对结果不一致,39例总是滴度不一致。在100例LN患者中,EIA为阳性60例,CLIFT为阳性72例。LN患者与无LN患者的敏感性和特异性分别为EIA60%和47%,和CLIFT72%和37%,分别。42名患者在配对结果的90天内进行了耀斑评估。7例轻度耀斑患者中有6例,所有4例重度耀斑患者均具有一致的阳性结果。
    结论:我们的数据表明,两种抗dsDNA测定之间的阳性不一致是相对常见的,发生在五分之一的患者和三分之一的访问。EIA阳性与LN相关的频率低于CLIFT阳性。由于抗dsDNA测定之间的结果明显不一致,同时获得CLIFT和EIA测定可能有利于SLE的分类和常规监测。
    Anti-dsDNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) are a component of all classification schemes in SLE and comprise one of the domains in validated activity indices. Anti-dsDNA is frequently measured commercially by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). To address the clinical impact of measuring these antibodies by two different assays, this study leveraged a well-phenotyped multiethnic/racial cohort.
    All patients fulfilled the classification criteria for SLE by at least one of the validated schemes: American College of Rheumatology, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics and/or American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria. Patients with one or more simultaneously paired anti-dsDNA by multiplex EIA and CLIFT were identified. Analysis of concordance or discordance, titre comparability of assays and association with hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index score, prevalence of lupus nephritis (LN), ability to predict a flare and classification criteria was performed.
    207 patients were simultaneously tested by EIA and CLIFT at least once for anti-dsDNA, generating 586 paired results. 377 pairs were concordant and 209 were discordant. 41 of 207 patients always had discordant paired results and 39 patients always had results with titre discordance. In 100 patients with LN, 60 were positive by EIA and 72 by CLIFT. Sensitivities and specificities for patients with LN versus patients without LN were EIA 60% and 47%, and CLIFT 72% and 37%, respectively. 42 patients had flare assessment within 90 days of their paired result. Six of seven patients with mild flares and all four patients with severe flares had concordant positive results.
    Our data demonstrate that discordance of positivity between both assays for anti-dsDNA is relatively common, occurring in a fifth of patients overall and a third of visits. EIA positivity is associated with LN less often than CLIFT positivity. With the significant discordance of results between anti-dsDNA assays, obtaining both CLIFT and EIA assays may be beneficial for classification and routine monitoring of SLE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抗双链DNA(dsDNA)抗体对于系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断和随访至关重要。为了确保最佳诊断方法,大多数医疗保健实验室选择高度敏感的方法的组合,如固相免疫测定,和非常具体的方法,如Crithidialucliae间接免疫荧光试验(CLIFT)。即便如此,不一致的结果很常见,从而阻碍了诊断过程。因此,本研究旨在对2016-2018年间dsDNA荧光酶免疫测定(FEIA)和CLIFT结果不一致的一组患者进行定性,并对患者进行随访至2021年12月.
    方法:我们进行了观察,对257例疑似结缔组织疾病转诊或诊断后随访的患者的417个样本进行纵向和回顾性研究.在Hep-2细胞上使用间接免疫荧光测定(IFA),所有这些抗体均为抗核抗体(ANA)阳性,我们实验室的进入标准,FEIAdsDNA呈阳性。然后根据我们的常规方案用CLIFT测试样品,其中包括FEIAdsDNA结果≥10UI/ml后的CLIFT测试。经过对数据质量的评估,最终分析基于222例患者.
    结果:83例患者(37.4%)在两项测试中均有阳性结果,符合SLE的诊断标准。然而,139例患者(62.6%)的结果不一致(FEIA+,CLIFT-).其中,58例(41.7%)诊断为SLE,其中47人(33.8%)先前已被诊断并正在接受治疗。其余11例患者(7.9%)新诊断为SLE,这是最初筛查后4年内完成的。在随访期间,139例结果不一致的患者中有81例(57.5%)不符合狼疮标准。
    结论:研究表明,CLIFT在治疗和新诊断的SLE中均可能为阴性,因此强调了使用固相测试对dsDNA阳性结果进行随访的重要性。因此,FEIA等定量检测可以为疑似SLE患者的诊断和治疗增加价值.
    Antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies are essential for diagnosis and follow-up of systemic lupus erythematous (SLE). To ensure the best diagnostic approach, most healthcare laboratories opt for a combination of highly sensitive methods, such as solid-phase immunoassays, and highly specific methods, such as the Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). Even so, discordant results are common, thus hindering the diagnostic process. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise a cohort of patients with discrepant results for a dsDNA fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) and CLIFT during 2016-2018 and to follow patients up until December 2021.
    We performed an observational, longitudinal and retrospective study on 417 samples from 257 patients who had been referred for suspected connective tissue diseases or followed up after diagnosis. All of them were positive for antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) using an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) on Hep-2 cells, the entry criterion in our laboratory, and positive for FEIA dsDNA. Samples were then tested with CLIFT according to our routine protocol, which includes CLIFT testing after FEIA dsDNA results ≥10 UI/ml. After the assessment of data quality, the final analysis was based on 222 patients.
    Eighty-three patients (37.4%) had positive results in both tests and met the diagnostic criteria for SLE. However, 139 patients (62.6%) had discrepant results (FEIA+, CLIFT-). Of these, 58 patients (41.7%) had a diagnosis of SLE, with 47 (33.8%) having been previously diagnosed and under treatment. The remaining 11 patients (7.9%) had a new diagnosis of SLE, which was made up within 4 years of the initial screening. A total of 81 of the 139 patients (57.5%) with discrepant results did not meet lupus criteria during the follow-up period.
    The study showed that CLIFT could be negative in both treated and newly diagnosed SLE, thus underlining the importance of follow-up of dsDNA-positive results using solid-phase tests. Therefore, quantitative tests such as FEIA could add value to the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected SLE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大黄蜂肠道寄生虫,CristidiaBombi,在该领域是广泛和普遍的。它与Bombusspp的相互作用。是一个完善的流行病学模型。在觅食时,通过共享使用花朵在菌落之间进行粪便-口腔传播。准确测量大黄蜂的感染水平对于评估其在野外的分布非常重要,以及进行流行病学实验时。研究通常使用2种方法中的1种用于测量感染。一种方法测量粪便中的感染,而另一种方法测量肠道中的感染。我们测试了测量感染的方法是否影响感染的估计。用标准化接种物接种大黄蜂,并在1周后使用粪便或肠方法测量感染。我们发现,当使用肠道方法来测量感染强度时,估计值与粪便方法显着不同,大约是粪便方法的两倍。这些结果对于解释先前的研究结果和规划未来的研究具有重要意义。鉴于大黄蜂作为传粉者的重要性,C.Bombi对大黄蜂健康的影响,以及它作为流行病学模型的用途,我们呼吁研究人员转向一致的感染量化,以便将来对研究进行比较和荟萃分析.
    The bumblebee gut parasite, Crithidia bombi, is widespread and prevalent in the field. Its interaction with Bombus spp. is a well-established epidemiological model. It is spread faecal-orally between colonies via the shared use of flowers when foraging. Accurately measuring the level of infection in bumblebees is important for assessing its distribution in the field, and also when conducting epidemiological experiments. Studies generally use 1 of 2 methods for measuring infection. One approach measures infection in faeces whereas the other method measures infection in guts. We tested whether the method of measuring infection affected the estimation of infection. Bumblebees were inoculated with a standardized inoculum and infection was measured 1 week later using either the faecal or gut method. We found that when the gut method was used to measure infection intensity estimates were significantly different to and approximately double those from the faecal method. These results have implications for the interpretation of previous study results and for the planning of future studies. Given the importance of bumblebees as pollinators, the impact of C. bombi on bumblebee health, and its use as an epidemiological model, we call on researchers to move towards consistent quantification of infections to enable future comparisons and meta-analyses of studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于最初认为这些生物对蜜蜂没有致病性,因此尚未对蜜蜂进行广泛研究。然而,近年来,锥虫与蜜蜂群体的冬季死亡率增加有关,并且已经表明,这些病原体可以在实验室条件下缩短蜜蜂工人的寿命。这些研究发现,这种死亡率与剂量依赖性感染相对应。尽管Lotmariapassim是世界上最普遍的物种,殖民地的自然负荷仍然缺乏研究。在这里,我们描述了一种新的高度特异性和灵敏的qPCR方法,该方法可以区分和定量迄今为止在蜜蜂菌落中描述的三种最常见的锥虫属物种中的每一种的寄生负荷:L.passim,mellificae,还有CristidiaBombi.我们已经使用这种新方法来分析西班牙中部的蜜蜂殖民地,并确认L.passim是最常见的物种,并且在殖民地中具有较高的寄生负荷,这些年来有所增加,春天比秋天高。研究过程中出现了mellificae,患病率最高的是2019年秋季,最近仅在不可量化的负荷中发现。在分析的任何菌落中均未检测到Crithidiabombi。
    Bee trypanosomatids have not been widely studied due to the original belief that these organisms were not pathogenic to honey bees. However, trypanosomatids have been linked to increased winter mortality in honey bee colonies in recent years and it has been shown that these pathogens can shorten a honey bee worker\'s lifespan in laboratory conditions. These studies found that this mortality corresponded to dose-dependent infection. Although Lotmaria passim is the most prevalent species worldwide, the natural load in colonies remains poorly investigated. Here we describe a new highly specific and sensitive qPCR method that allows the differentiation and quantification of the parasitic load of each of the three most common trypanosomatid species described to date in honey bee colonies: L. passim, Crithidia mellificae, and Crithidia bombi. We have used this new method to analyze honey bee colonies in central Spain and confirm that L. passim is the most common species and the one with higher parasitic loads in the colonies, which increased over the years, being higher in spring than in autumn. Crithidia mellificae was present along the study, with the highest prevalence in autumn 2019 and lately it was only found in non-quantifiable loads. Crithidia bombi was not detected in any of the colonies analyzed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号