BACKGROUND: Postoperative feeding is crucial for the recovery of children after cleft surgery. The literature outlines diverse feeding methods with varying recommendations on the duration of non-nipple feeding postsurgery. This study aims to explore reported postoperative feeding modalities for infants undergoing primary cleft lip/palate repair, concentrating on their influence on feeding improvement and complication reduction.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for original English articles without any date restrictions. This review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA. The MINORS criteria was used to assess quality of studies.
RESULTS: Of 696 abstracts, 9 full-text articles were included, consisting of 459 children with cleft lip (n = 221) & cleft lip/palate (n = 238). Feeding modalities included bottle, breastfeeding, spoon, syringe, and nasogastric tube. Two studies found a significant increase in weight with breastfeeding compared to spoon or cup. Two studies found partial wound dehiscence using spoons, and two studies reported dehiscence using bottles. Post-palatoplasty, two studies showed a decrease in hospital stay in infants breastfed (2.1 & 5.8 days) vs spoon-fed (6 days). Analgesia was reduced in the breastfed group vs spoon/nasogastric tube.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the importance of postoperative feeding in the recovery of infants with cleft lip/palate. Evidence suggests that breastfeeding may offer advantages in terms of weight gain and reduced hospital stay, while potentially minimizing the need for postoperative analgesia. The limited number of studies and variability in their outcomes underscore the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines for postoperative feeding.

OBJECTIVE: The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends patient education materials (PEMs) be written at or below a sixth grade reading level. This study seeks to determine the quality, readability, and content of available alveolar bone grafting (ABG) PEMs and determine if artificial intelligence can improve PEM readability.
METHODS: Review of free online PEMs.
METHODS: Online ABG PEMs were retrieved from different authoring body types (hospital/academic center, medical society, or private practice).
METHODS: None.
METHODS: Content was assessed by screening PEMs for specific ABG-related topics. Quality was evaluated with the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), which has measures of understandability and actionability. Open-access readability software (WebFX) determined readability with Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and Gunning-Fog Index. PEMs were rewritten with ChatGPT, and readability metrics were reassessed.
METHODS: Quality, readability, and content of ABG PEMs.
RESULTS: 34 PEMs were analyzed. Regarding quality, the average PEMAT-understandability score was 67.0 ± 16.2%, almost at the minimum acceptable score of 70.0% (p = 0.281). The average PEMAT-actionability score was low at 33.0 ± 24.1%. Regarding readability, the average Flesch Reading Ease score was 64.6 ± 12.8, categorized as \"standard/plain English.\" The average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 8.0 ± 2.3, significantly higher than AMA recommendations (p < 0.0001). PEM rewriting with ChatGPT improved Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level to 6.1 ± 1.3 (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Available ABG PEMs are above the recommended reading level, yet ChatGPT can improve PEM readability. Future studies should improve areas of ABG PEMs that are most lacking, such as actionability.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the influencing factors of syncope in patients after plastic surgery, establish a syncope risk prediction model, and verify its accuracy.
METHODS: A total of 265 patients undergoing craniomaxillofacial surgery were included and divided into a syncope group and non-syncope group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen for risk factors of syncope, and R language was used to establish a risk prediction nomogram of syncope in craniomaxillofacial surgery patients. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to evaluate the fit of the model, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive value of the model.
RESULTS: Syncope occurred in 87 of 265 patients (32.8%), and no syncope occurred in 178 patients (67.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed statistical differences in age, orthostatic heart rate, orthostatic diastolic blood pressure, syncope history, weight loss history, and medication history between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). A nomogram was constructed for predicting the risk of syncope after craniomaxillofacial surgery, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test proved that the nomogram fitted well (P = 0.431). The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the alignment graph model had high prediction accuracy; the area under the curve was 0.886 (95% confidence interval, 0.8381-0.9332).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the risk of syncope after craniomaxillofacial surgery is helpful and provides guidance for the formulation of preventive strategies.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine and analyze the presence of sexual dimorphism and symmetry/asymmetry in fixed cadaveric heads and their contributions to clinical practice.
METHODS: Measurements were conducted on 6 cadavers and 24 fixed cadaveric heads (n = 30) using a digital microcaliper to assess cranial dimensions, including surgical landmarks, facial index (FI), orbital index (OI), and the danger triangle of the face, offering crucial references for surgeons during surgical interventions.
RESULTS: Analyses were conducted on cadavers consisting of 10 females (33.3%) and 20 males (66.7%). Males demonstrated significantly higher values than females in terms of Zy-Zy (Zy = Zygion), nasal body, and width/length of the columella. Hyperleptoprosop types were the most frequently observed, followed by the leptoprosop type. Females exhibited megaseme characteristics according to OI on both sides. Additionally, the danger triangle of the face was greater in males compared than in females, suggesting a higher risk of infection in this region among males.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed sex differences in facial and nasal dimensions, along with facial indices, are crucial for customizing surgical procedures to individual patients. For example, the greater distance in the danger triangle among males highlights the importance of considering anatomical variations to avoid complications, such as septic cavernous sinus thrombosis. Integrating these measurements into preoperative planning can enhance the precision of facial reconstruction and aesthetic surgeries, thereby improving patient outcomes and safety.

OBJECTIVE: Great variability exists as to whether cleft lip (CL) repair is performed as an inpatient or outpatient surgery. This study\'s aim is to investigate the authors\' institutional experience to see if there is an increase in complications, emergency department (ED) visits, or readmissions to the hospital when performed as outpatient.
METHODS: This study reviewed patients who underwent CL repair between 2012 and 2023 at the authors\' institution. Data collected included patient demographics, perioperative details, ED visits and readmissions within thirty days of surgery, and complications.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients met inclusion measures. When the surgery was performed as outpatient, there was no significant difference in returning to the ED (p = 0.767) or readmission to the hospital (p = 0.447) within thirty days as compared to inpatient surgeries. Outpatients did not have more postoperative complications (p = 0.698). Bilateral cleft lips were more likely to be performed as inpatient (p = 0.001). Inpatients had a lower weight at time of repair (p = 0.033). Patients with a respiratory (p = .006), gastrointestinal (p = 0.003), or hematologic (p = 0.013) comorbidity had a higher readmission rate. Patients were more likely to be readmitted if they had a younger gestational age (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no increased return to the ED or readmission for patients undergoing inpatient versus outpatient CL repair. CL repair can be performed safely in an outpatient setting with careful patient selection.

In academic craniofacial surgery, gender disparities exist across various metrics including faculty positions, leadership roles, and conference representation. This study benchmarks the academic productivity of craniofacial surgeons in 2022 and surveys their perspectives regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
Total, first author, and senior author PubMed publications in 2022 were recorded for 193 craniofacial attendings and fellows. Craniofacial surgeons were also surveyed regarding academic experience, leadership roles, and DEI perceptions.
Electronic.
26 craniofacial attendings.
Total, first author, and senior author publication counts in 2022.
Women comprised 27% (n = 53) of the craniofacial surgeon cohort. Men led total publications (81% vs 19%, p < 0.001), senior-author publications (84% vs 16%, p < 0.001), average total publications (6.6 vs 4.0, p = 0.043), and average senior-author publications (3.1 vs 1.5, p = 0.02). Sub-analysis of craniofacial fellows showed a higher proportion of women (65%) with no statistical difference in total or average publication counts. Survey responses (n = 26) included a perceived lack of female representation in academic and leadership roles. Barriers included inadequate support from current leadership, systemic issues, and biases. Recommendations for improvement included mentorship programs, targeted recruitment, and equitable conference speaker selection.
Ongoing gender disparities are evident in craniofacial surgery, particularly in academic metrics. However, trends in younger cohorts exhibit more balanced gender representation, publication records, and leadership positions, indicating potential improvements. Further studies are needed to examine these cohorts more comprehensively and longitudinally. Sustained commitment, including mentorship programs and enhanced DEI efforts, is needed to continue this progress.

OBJECTIVE: While previous literature has investigated the psychosocial impact and aesthetic satisfaction associated with post-operative scarring for certain pediatric craniofacial conditions, the impact of the scar burden resulting from craniosynostosis surgery has not been adequately studied.
METHODS: SCAR-Q was shared with patients ages 8 and older. Thirty-two complete patient responses were recorded.
METHODS: SCAR-Q is a PROM that consists of three independent scales - appearance, symptoms, and psychosocial impact - associated with a scar.
METHODS: Mann-Whitney U, linear regression, and Pearson correlation tests were used to evaluate associations between the scales, in addition to patient characteristics such as sex and suture involvement.
RESULTS: Mean ages at time of surgery and survey completion were 9.65 ± 10.10 months and 12.10 ± 3.92 years, respectively. Mean scale scores were 81.5 ± 17.9 for appearance, 86.8 ± 12.4 for symptoms, and 79.3 ± 25.7 for psychosocial impact. Higher patient dissatisfaction with scar appearance correlated with more scar-related symptoms (r = 0.389; p = 0.028) and a greater psychosocial impact (r = 0.725; p < 0.001). SCAR-Q scales did not significantly correlate with age at surgery, age at survey completion, type of synostosis, or type of surgery; however, female patients reported lower mean appearance (65.4 vs. 86.0; p = 0.012) and psychosocial impact (57.3 vs. 85.5; p = 0.010) scores when compared to their male counterparts.
CONCLUSIONS: It is vital that surgeons discuss patients\' aesthetic satisfaction following craniosynostosis surgery in order to appropriately address and limit deleterious, long-term physical and psychosocial outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of surgical protocols is an evolving issue owing to the low incidence of rare craniofacial clefts. In this article, we present our surgical management technique for repair of rare craniofacial clefts and evaluate the postoperative results.
METHODS: This study was conducted from 2013 to 2022 and included patients who presented with craniofacial clefts. The results were assessed based on parents\' satisfaction and objective evaluations by two independent observers.
RESULTS: A total of 3679 patients presented with cleft anomalies; of these, 61 patients with 89 rare craniofacial clefts were observed with a prevalence of 2.42/100. The male to female ratio was 1:1.35. Craniofacial cleft \"4\" and \"5\" were the most common, with 17 (19.1%) and 16 (17.98%) patients, respectively. Multiple craniofacial clefts were observed in 37.7% of the patients. Associated craniofacial anomalies were found in 39.34% of the patients. The parents of 71.6% of the patients were very satisfied with the results. Based on the scores of two independent observers, 70.27% of the patients showed good results.
CONCLUSIONS: The rare nature of craniofacial clefts and involvement of various structures make the standardization of surgical procedures very challenging. Our experience with these clefts will help new surgeons both in didactics and in technical aspects of patient management.
CONCLUSIONS: 1. We share our experience with rare craniofacial clefts. 2. Each cleft presents with its own unique reconstructive challenges. The literature describes many techniques for each type of cleft, all with multiple permutations. We present a simplified technique that has worked for us over the years for all Tessier clefts.

OBJECTIVE: In managing sagittal craniosynostosis, strip craniectomy of the affected suture is commonly paired with barrel-stave osteotomies to allow for additional cranial remodeling. However, the effect of these osteotomies is not well-established. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the length of barrel-stave osteotomies on outcomes in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of operative records and pre-operative and one-year post-operative three-dimensional images.
METHODS: Tertiary care pediatric institution.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with sagittal craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Sagittal strip craniectomy and either long, medium, or short barrel-stave osteotomy lengths followed by helmet therapy.
METHODS: Operative and three-dimensional craniometric outcomes.
RESULTS: Operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay were significantly decreased in the short group (P = .003; 0.002; 0.027). The cranial index was normalized in all groups, but the long group was significantly lower (P = .007; 0.025). Head circumference was similar between groups. All indexes were within the normal percentiles in all groups. The medium group had a significantly decreased scaphocephalic index (P = .031; .035). The short group had significantly greater occipital bulleting than the medium group (P = .001). The long group had significantly greater narrowing than the short group (P = .036).
CONCLUSIONS: Strip craniectomy with the addition of long, medium, or short barrel staves all resulted in clinically successful outcomes. Our findings suggest that increased barrel-stave osteotomy length may not be necessary for a successful outcome while avoiding more extensive dissection, potential risk, increased operative time, and hospital length of stay.

The field of frontofacial surgery has advanced considerably, building on the pioneering techniques of Paul Tessier, with computerized surgical planning (CSP) emerging as a critical component. CSP has enhanced the precision and efficiency of surgeries for craniofacial dysostoses and hypertelorism, resulting in improved outcomes. This review delves into the importance of understanding orbital anatomy and the crucial bony and soft tissue landmarks essential to the application of CSP in frontofacial procedures, encompassing Le Fort III and monobloc advancements, as well as the correction of hypertelorism.