Cranial fossa, anterior

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前颅窝(ACF)的硬脑膜动静脉瘘(dAVF)并不常见,但出血的风险很高,并且对治疗提出了很大的挑战。血管内治疗(EVT)的最新进展,包括引入新型液体栓塞剂,显著增强了EVT在管理ACF-dAVF中的作用,在过去的五年中出版了著名的系列。我们的目的是评估可行性,安全,EVT对ACF-dAVF的疗效。我们搜查了Medline,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆数据库遵循PRISMA指南。符合条件的研究包括≥5例患者接受ACF-dAVFs栓塞治疗,详细说明血管造影和临床结果。我们在随机效应模型下使用95%置信区间的单比例分析,I2评估异质性,和Baujat和敏感性分析,以解决高异质性问题。通过漏斗图分析和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。结果包括栓塞后完全闭塞,血管内栓塞尝试失败,栓塞后不完全闭塞,栓塞后症状缓解或临床改善,复发;手术相关并发症,发病率,和死亡率。此外,对专门使用Onyx™栓塞系统的研究进行了亚分析。18项研究包括231项ACF-dAVF。血管内栓塞尝试失败率为2%。完全闭塞率为85%,4%的并发症。不完全闭塞率为10%。成功栓塞的患者在94%的病例中经历了症状缓解或临床改善。发病率和死亡率分别为1%和0%,分别。Onyx子分析显示,尝试失败的总比率为0%,95%为完全闭塞,不完全闭塞为5%。症状缓解或临床改善为98%,复发率为0%。ACF-dAVF的EVT是高度可行的,有效,和安全,并发症发生率低,发病率,和死亡率。与涉及所有纳入研究的主要分析结果相比,专注于Onyx栓塞的子分析显示出更好的疗效和安全性结果。
    Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas (dAVFs) of the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) are uncommon but carry a high risk of hemorrhage and pose substantial treatment challenges. Recent advancements in endovascular treatment (EVT), including the introduction of novel liquid embolic agents, have markedly bolstered EVT\'s role in managing ACF-dAVFs, with notable series published in the last five years. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EVT for ACF-dAVFs. We searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 5 patients undergoing embolization of ACF-dAVFs, detailing both angiographic and clinical outcomes. We used single proportion analysis with 95% confidence intervals under a random-effects model, I2 to assess heterogeneity, and Baujat and sensitivity analysis to address high heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by funnel-plot analysis and Egger\'s test. Outcomes included complete occlusion following embolization, unsuccessful endovascular embolization attempts, incomplete occlusion following embolization, symptom resolution or clinical improvement following embolization, recurrence; procedure-related complications, morbidity, and mortality. Additionally, a subanalysis for studies exclusively utilizing Onyx™ embolic system was done. Eighteen studies comprising 231 ACF-dAVF were included. Unsuccessful endovascular embolization attempts rate was 2%. Complete occlusion rate was 85%, with 4% of complications. Incomplete occlusion rate was 10%. Successfully embolized patients experienced either symptom resolution or clinical improvement in 94% of cases. Morbidity and mortality rates were 1% and 0%, respectively. Onyx subanalyses showed an overall rate of 0% for unsuccessful attempts, 95% for complete occlusion, and 5% for incomplete occlusion. Symptom resolution or clinical improvement was 98% and recurrence rate was 0%. EVT for ACF-dAVF is highly feasible, effective, and safe, with a low rate of complications, morbidity, and mortality. The subanalyses focusing on Onyx embolizations revealed superior efficacy and safety outcomes compared to the findings of the primary analyses involving all included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管锁孔经眶入路越来越受欢迎,它们的适应症还没有得到充分的比较研究。在这项研究中,作者将它们定义为平移入路-这意味着他们使用蝶骨翼的不同相进行颅骨入路-并试图比较四个主要的入路:1)通过外侧can骨切口(LatOrb)进行的外侧眼眶切开术;2)通过眼睑切口(ModOzPalp)改良的眼眶入路;加上其扩展版本(SupraTransOrb)。
    方法:在神经解剖学实验室进行尸体解剖。为了描绘颅底暴露,使用四个福尔马林固定头,双方致力于每种方法。通过图像指导评估外部界限,并相应地绘制和说明。第五个头是纯粹用内窥镜解剖的,只是为了便于概述转机的概念。还严格检查了定性特征。
    结果:LatOrb在中颅窝(MCF)中被证明更通用,而前颅窝(ACF)的暴露仅限于蝶骨脊上方的一小部分。前路临床切除术是可能的;然而,视神经管顶部的暴露是次优的。ModOzPalp充分暴露了ACF和MCF。它的横向轨迹允许从下到上的视野,然而,限制进入内侧前颅底(嗅沟)。ModOzEyB还提供ACF和MCF的广泛曝光,但与ModOzPalp相比,轨迹更优越,使其更适合于到达内侧前颅底甚至对侧的病理。前路临床切除术可改善视神经管的可视化。SupraOrb主要提供前颅底暴露,有最小的中间窝。可以进行前路临床切除术,但没有直接观察上眶裂缝.如果外侧蝶骨机翼向下钻孔,则可以完成一些MCF访问,导致其高度通用的变体,SupraTransOrb.
    结论:所有上述方法都使用蝶骨翼作为特定方向点的颅底走廊;因此这些方法被称为平移方法。它们的特殊性要求仔细选择病例,以有效和安全地完成手术目标。
    Although keyhole transorbital approaches are gaining traction, their indications have not been adequately studied comparatively. In this study the authors have defined them also as transwing approaches-meaning that they use the different facies of the sphenoid wing for cranial entry-and sought to compare the four major ones: 1) lateral orbitocraniotomy through a lateral canthal incision (LatOrb); 2) modified orbitozygomatic approach through a palpebral incision (ModOzPalp); 3) modified orbitozygomatic approach through an eyebrow incision (ModOzEyB); and 4) supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision (SupraOrb), coupled with its expanded version (SupraTransOrb).
    Cadaveric dissections were performed at the neuroanatomy lab. To delineate the skull base exposure, four formalin-fixed heads were used, with two sides dedicated to each approach. The outer limits were assessed via image guidance and were mapped and illustrated accordingly. A fifth head was dissected purely endoscopically, just to facilitate an overview of the transwing concept. Qualitative features were also rigorously examined.
    The LatOrb proves to be more versatile in the middle cranial fossa (MCF), whereas the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) exposure is limited to a small area above the sphenoid ridge. An anterior clinoidectomy is possible; however, the exposure of the roof of the optic canal is suboptimal. The ModOzPalp adequately exposes both the ACF and MCF. Its lateral trajectory allows the inferior to superior view, yet there is restricted access to the medial anterior skull base (olfactory groove). The ModOzEyB also provides extensive exposure of the ACF and MCF, but has a more superior to inferior trajectory compared to the ModOzPalp, making it more appropriate for pathology reaching the medial anterior skull base or even the contralateral side. The anterior clinoidectomy is performed with improved visualization of the optic canal. The SupraOrb provides mainly anterior cranial base exposure, with minimal middle fossa. An anterior clinoidectomy can be performed, but without any direct observation of the superior orbital fissure. Some MCF access can be accomplished if the lateral sphenoid wing is drilled inferiorly, leading to its highly versatile variant, the SupraTransOrb.
    All the aforementioned approaches use the sphenoid wing as skull base corridor from a specific orientation point; hence these are designated as transwing approaches. Their peculiarities mandate careful case selection for the effective and safe completion of the surgical goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:作者旨在描述其优势,实用程序,以及经椎小眶(MOZ)入路治疗外侧和上眼眶肿瘤的缺点,眶尖,前斜骨,前颅窝,中颅窝,和鞍区。
    方法:描述了从皮肤切口到闭合的手术方法,同时强调了关键技术和解剖学方面的考虑,尸体解剖显示了手术步骤,并着重于重要的解剖结构。包括术中图像以补充尸体解剖。这项机构审查委员会批准的研究包括对2017年至2023年由一名神经外科医生进行的非血管病理学MOZ方法的成年人进行的回顾性审查。使用描述性统计来总结数据。包括四个代表性案例,以证明MOZ方法的实用性。
    结果:该研究包括65名患者(46名女性,19男),平均年龄54.84岁,谁经历了跨椎体MOZ手术。出现的症状包括视觉改变(53.8%的病例),视力损失(23.1%),复视(21.8%),和突起(13.8%)。视神经和视神经交叉受累分别占32.3%和10.8%,分别。最常见的病理是脑膜瘤(占病例的81.5%),在所有病例中,有50%实现了总切除。主要并发症包括感染和颈动脉损伤。92.2%的病例报告术前症状改善。12例患者视力改善。平均随访8.57±8.45个月。
    结论:MOZ方法是安全和持久的。与标准的颅底前外侧入路相比,椎管切口可提供更好的外观和功能结果。仔细考虑该方法的局限性对于逐案适当应用至关重要。进一步的定量解剖学研究可以帮助定义和比较开放式颅眶和内窥镜经眶入路的实用性。
    The authors aim to describe the advantages, utility, and disadvantages of the transpalpebral mini-orbitozygomatic (MOZ) approach for tumors of the lateral and superior orbit, orbital apex, anterior clinoid, anterior cranial fossa, middle cranial fossa, and parasellar region.
    The surgical approach from skin incision to closure is described while highlighting key technical and anatomical considerations, and cadaveric dissection demonstrates the surgical steps and focuses on important anatomy. Intraoperative images were included to supplement the cadaveric dissection. A retrospective review of adults who had undergone the MOZ approach for nonvascular pathology performed by a single neurosurgeon from 2017 to 2023 was included in this institutional review board-approved study. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data. Four representative cases were included to demonstrate the utility of the MOZ approach.
    The study included 65 patients (46 female, 19 male), average age 54.84 years, who had undergone transpalpebral MOZ surgery. Presenting symptoms included visual changes (53.8% of cases), vision loss (23.1%), diplopia (21.8%), and proptosis (13.8%). The optic nerve and optic chiasm were involved in 32.3% and 10.8% of cases, respectively. The most common pathology was meningioma (81.5% of cases), and gross-total resection was achieved in 50% of all cases. Major complications included an infection and a carotid injury. Improvement of preoperative symptoms was reported in 92.2% of cases. Visual acuity improved in 12 patients. The mean follow-up was 8.57 ± 8.45 months.
    The MOZ approach is safe and durable. The transpalpebral incision provides better cosmesis and functional outcomes than those of standard anterolateral approaches to the skull base. Careful consideration of the limits of the approach is paramount to appropriate application on a case-by-case basis. Further quantitative anatomical studies can help to define and compare the utility of the approach to open cranio-orbital and endoscopic transorbital approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:肠腺癌占该地区所有恶性肿瘤的不到0.1-4%。这在木工和皮革工人中很常见。鼻窦腺癌通常起源于筛窦(40%)或鼻腔(25%)。延伸到附近的结构是常见的,但是颅内扩散非常罕见。这些肿瘤通常用手术治疗,报告的5年生存率为59%至80%。
    方法:这是一名60岁的黑人非洲男性患者,他出现了全球性头痛,睡眠时鼻塞伴有打鼾,嗅觉缺失,心理变化,有时躁动和左侧视力丧失持续一年,并在过去一个月内恶化上述症状。他不能闻到肥皂两侧;在他的左眼,他只能看到手的运动在近30厘米。在脑磁共振成像中,有一个T1低和T2高强度的前颅窝肿块,由左筛窦和蝶窦引起,并压迫了左光学结构,脑计算机断层扫描显示出异质的低密度到等密度的肿块。完成肿瘤切除并出院,并有显着改善,并与肿瘤单位进行放射治疗有关。
    结论:这些患者的管理是多学科的,涉及神经外科医生,耳鼻喉科医师,肿瘤学家,还有颌面外科医生.手术切除是主要的治疗策略,其次是放射治疗,特别是强度调节疗法。化疗的使用非常先进,转移性,和不可切除的肿瘤。
    BACKGROUND: Intestinal adenocarcinoma accounts for less than 0.1-4% of all malignancies in the region. It is common among woodworkers and leather workers. Sinonasal adenocarcinoma usually arises from the ethmoid sinus (40%) or nasal cavity (25%). Extension to nearby structures is common, but intracranial spread is very rare. These tumors are usually treated with surgery, with a reported 5-year survival rate of 59% to 80%.
    METHODS: This is a 60-year-old Black African male patient who presented with globalized headache, nasal obstruction with snoring during sleep, anosmia, change in mentation, sometimes agitation and left-side visual loss of one-year duration with worsening his above symptoms over the last one month. He couldn\'t smell soap bilaterally; in his left eye he could see only hand movement at nearly 30 cm. On brain magnetic resonance imaging, there was a T1 hypo- and T2 hyper-intense anterior cranial fossa mass arising from the left ethmoid sinuses and sphenoid sinuses and compressing the left optic structures, and brain computed tomography demonstrated heterogeneous hypo- to isodense mass. Complete tumor excision achieved and discharged with significant improvement and linked to oncology unit for radiotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The management of these patients is multidisciplinary, involving neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, oncologists, and maxillofacial surgeons. Surgical resection is the main treatment strategy, followed by radiotherapy, particularly intensity-modulated therapy. Chemotherapy is used in highly advanced, metastatic, and unresectable tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血管内治疗已越来越多地用于前颅窝硬脑膜AVF。关于不同血管内治疗策略的安全性和有效性的证据有限。我们报告了前颅窝硬脑膜AVF患者的临床和血管造影结果,这些患者接受了以n-BCA为一线方法的经动脉栓塞治疗。
    方法:回顾性纳入2010年至2023年在阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心接受前颅窝硬脑膜AVF治疗的连续患者。经动脉栓塞被用作一线方法,在经动脉栓塞不成功的情况下使用经静脉治疗和手术。根据血管造影治愈率评估治疗,手术并发症,和临床结果。
    结果:14例患者包括15例前颅窝硬脑膜AVF。所有患者均接受了原发性血管内治疗(12例经动脉,1经静脉,和1合并)。仅使用经动脉栓塞的患者达到完全闭塞69%(9/13),而79%的患者通过血管内治疗达到了总体完全闭塞(11/14).13例患者通过眼动脉进行导航和栓塞,没有手术并发症。所有患者均保持视力。3例患者在血管内治疗失败后接受了手术。随访时所有患者均完成前颅窝硬脑膜AVF闭塞。
    结论:经动脉栓塞与n-BCA作为一线方法治疗前颅窝硬脑膜AVF是一种安全可行的一线治疗策略。在这项研究中,没有发生由于眼动脉栓塞引起的视觉并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment has been increasingly used for anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatment strategies is limited. We report clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs who underwent treatment using transarterial embolization with n-BCA as a first-line approach.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing treatment for anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively included. Transarterial embolization was used as a first-line approach, while transvenous treatment and surgery were used in cases of unsuccessful transarterial embolization. Treatment was evaluated on the basis of the angiographic cure rate, procedural complications, and clinical outcome.
    RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included with 15 anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs. All patients underwent primary endovascular treatment (12 transarterial, 1 transvenous, and 1 combined). Complete occlusion using only transarterial embolization was reached in 69% of patients (9/13), while the overall complete occlusion by endovascular treatment was reached in 79% of patients (11/14). Navigation and embolization were performed through the ophthalmic artery in 13 patients, with no procedural complications. Visual acuity was preserved in all patients. Three patients underwent an operation after failed endovascular treatment. All patients had complete anterior cranial fossa dural AVF occlusion at follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs using transarterial embolization with n-BCA as a first-line approach is a safe and feasible first-line treatment strategy. No visual complications due to embolization through the ophthalmic artery occurred in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:严重的颅面骨折在治疗面部损伤的颅内病变时可能存在不同的需求。本文考察了我们战略的结果,由单阶段神经外科-颌面联合治疗组成。
    方法:对33例前颅窝和面部骨骼复杂骨折的连续患者进行了回顾性研究,需要择期手术进行颅面重建.排除因颅内凝块或穿透性伤口而需要紧急手术的患者。在所有情况下,所有或几乎所有的前颅底都因额窦复合骨折而受伤,轨道屋顶,筛板,和蝶骨平面。在所有情况下,仔细讨论了治疗的优先次序,并就手术时机和策略达成一致.
    结果:有一人死亡。术中经常发现嗅觉损伤。没有粘液囊肿,CSF泄漏复发,颅骨感染,或者神经学恶化。功能和神经结果非常令人满意。
    结论:一期手术治疗复杂的颅面骨折有许多优点,包括减少面部骨折而不存在脑脊液渗漏风险的可能性。它还消除了对脆弱患者重复手术的需要,如果稍后进行颅底修复,则需要拆除面部重建。主要问题是手术时机,考虑到颌面外科医生通常倾向于早期面部修复,而神经外科医生通常更喜欢对挫伤的额叶进行延迟操作。创伤后10-14天的时间范围对于具有优异的神经和功能结果的安全程序可能是一个很好的折衷。
    Severe craniofacial fractures may present different needs in treating intracranial lesions over facial injuries. This paper examines the results of our strategy, consisting of a single-stage combined neurosurgical-maxillofacial treatment.
    A retrospective review was conducted of 33 consecutive patients with complex fractures of the anterior cranial fossa and facial skeleton, who required elective surgery for craniofacial reconstruction. Patients who required emergency surgery for intracranial clots or penetrating wounds were excluded. In all cases, all or almost all the anterior skull-base was injured with compound fractures of the frontal sinus, the orbital roofs, the lamina cribrosa, and the planum sphenoidale. In all cases, the prioritization of treatment was carefully discussed, and surgical timing and strategy were agreed.
    There was 1 dead. Olfactory injuries were always found intraoperatively. There were no mucoceles, CSF-leak recurrences, cranial infections, or neurologic worsening. The functional and neurologic results were highly satisfactory.
    The one-stage surgical treatment of complex craniofacial fractures has numerous advantages, including the possibility of reducing facial fractures without the risk of CSF leaks. It also eliminates the need for repeated procedures in fragile patients, and the need to dismantle the facial reconstruction if the skull base repair is performed later. The main issue is the surgical timing, considering that the maxillofacial surgeon usually favors early facial repair, whereas the neurosurgeon generally prefers delayed manipulation of the contused frontal lobes. A timeframe of 10-14 days after trauma may be a good compromise for safe procedures with excellent neurologic and functional outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Video-Audio Media
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可以通过不同的方法到达前颅底病变(额下,翼点,半球间,等。).在某些情况下,额叶经窦方法是传统技术的有效替代方法。
    方法:我们介绍了我们的技术,该技术可在患有大型嗅沟脑膜瘤的患者中进行额叶经鼻窦入路。
    结论:额叶经鼻窦入路可以安全地入路正中前颅窝的病变。这种方法提供了较低的大脑收缩,更容易接近嗅觉凹槽,和早期的肿瘤血管离断术.然而,它仍然限于大型额窦患者,并带来一些术后风险,如黏液囊肿或脑脊液漏.
    Anterior skull base lesions could be reached by different approaches (subfrontal, pterional, interhemispheric, etc.). In selected cases, the frontal trans-sinusal approach is an effective alternative to conventional techniques.
    We present our technique to perform a frontal trans-sinusal approach in a patient affected by a large olfactory groove meningioma.
    The frontal trans-sinusal approach allows to approach safely lesions of the median anterior cranial fossa. This approach provides lower brain retraction, easier access to olfactory grooves, and earlier tumor devascularization. However, it remains limited to patients with large-sized frontal sinuses and entails some postoperative risks such as mucocele or CSF leak.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:神经鞘瘤是由雪旺氏细胞产生的良性肿瘤。罕见的病例显示是由嗅神经引起的。嗅沟神经鞘瘤(OGS)的起源仍然令人困惑。Yusda等人假设嗅鞘细胞肿瘤(OECT)可能是OGS的起源。
    方法:这里,作者报告了一例59岁女性,她出现阵发性头痛1年。肿瘤在T1加权图像上表现为低张力,T2加权的高强度,并表现出强大,异质增强。通过眶上外侧入路切除肿瘤。最终病理诊断为神经鞘瘤。术后4个月时间顺利,头痛消失了。
    OGS和OECT极为罕见。临床表现有许多相似之处,images,和病理结果。OGS很难与OECT区分开来。
    BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are benign tumors that arise from Schwann cells. Rare cases are shown to arise from the olfactory nerve. The genesis of Olfactory groove schwannoma (OGSs) is still puzzling. Yusda et al hypothesized that olfactory ensheathing cell tumors (OECTs) might be the origin of OGSs.
    METHODS: Here, the authors report the case of a 59-year-old woman who presented with a paroxysmal headache for 1 year. The tumor appeared as hypointensity on T1-weighted images, hyperintensity on T2-weighted, and exhibited strong, heterogeneous enhancement. The tumor was removed through a lateral supraorbital approach. The final pathologic diagnosis was schwannoma. The postoperative period was uneventful after 4 months, and the headache disappeared.
    UNASSIGNED: OGSs and OECTs are extremely rare. There are many similarities in clinical manifestations, images, and pathologic findings. OGSs are difficult to distinguish from OECTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号