Core Needle Biopsy (CNB)

芯针活检 (CNB)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,我们结合了两种技术,超声引导下穿刺活检和流式细胞术(FCM),探讨其在淋巴结肿大患者中的应用价值。
    方法:我们比较了198例FCM和病理活检的结果。42个是由(细针穿刺,FNA),剩下的156个有(芯针活检,CNB),156名患者中有36名,完成CNB后,在同一淋巴结中进行FNA。除了五种类型的病理实体,其余患者仅将检出或未检出的肿瘤区分为结局。
    结果:在198个穿刺活检中,13个是不充分的标本,而其余的185则有病理发现,包括47个良性和138个肿瘤发现。36例患者接受了FNA和CNB的穿刺,两种针头由FCM产生相同的结果,但是通过FNA获得了更多的细胞。在病理阳性结果中,FCM有23例漏诊,相比之下,在FCM图像中观察到肿瘤的证据15针活检报告良性或与病理不一致的发现,10例最终诊断与FCM一致。FCM检测血淋巴样肿瘤的敏感性为87.8%,特异性为91.9%。
    结论:FCM联合超声引导下淋巴结穿刺活检可快速为临床决策提供指导。我们建议将所有淋巴结针活检都送去FCM,最后一次用FNA穿刺即可获得标本。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we combined two techniques, ultrasound-guided needle biopsy and flow cytometry (FCM), to explore their value in patients with enlarged lymph nodes.
    METHODS: We compared the results of 198 needle biopsies on FCM and pathology. Forty-two were done by (fine needle aspiration, FNA), and the remaining 156 with (core needle biopsy, CNB), in 36 of 156 patients, a FNA was performed in the same lymph node after completion of the CNB. Except for five types of pathological entities, the rest were differentiated only detected or undetected tumours as the outcome distinction.
    RESULTS: Among the 198 needle biopsies, 13 were inadequate specimens, while the remaining 185 had pathological findings, including 47 benign and 138 neoplastic findings. Thirty-six patients underwent puncture with both FNA and CNB, both needles produced identical results by FCM, but more cells were obtained by FNA. Among the pathologically positive results, there were 23 missed diagnoses in FCM, in contrast, evidence of tumours was observed in the FCM images of 15 needle biopsies that reported benign or findings that were inconsistent with pathology, and the final diagnosis was consistent with the FCM in 10 cases. FCM detected haematolymphoid tumours with a sensitivity of 87.8% and a specificity of 91.9%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of FCM and ultrasound-guided lymph node needle biopsy can quickly provide guidance for clinical decision-making. We recommend that all lymph node needle biopsies be sent for FCM, the specimen can be obtained by the last puncture with FNA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项初步研究旨在使用新型电动驱动的内窥镜超声检查(EUS)引导的17号(G)尺寸芯针活检(CNB)仪器评估上消化道上皮下病变(SEL)的安全性和组织采样。
    研究者主导的前瞻性开放标签,性能和安全控制研究,包括7名患者(女性n=4,中位数71岁,范围28-75),具有确定的SEL(中值尺寸30毫米,上消化道(胃n=6,十二指肠n=1)的范围为17-150mm),随后在索引程序后14天进行了随访。所有研究均根据协议完成,使用四次FNB22-G通过和两次EndoDrill®17-G通过和三次扇动通过。
    与17-GCNB(n=7/7)相比,样品的质量为“可见碎片”(>5mm):FNB(n=5/7)(碎片/血液吸收n=1,组织数量不良n=1)。可以获得最终诊断的组织学结果(平滑肌瘤n=2,腺癌n=1,神经鞘瘤n=1,神经内分泌肿瘤n=1,韧带样肿瘤n=1和胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)n=1)。所有7例患者的17-GCNB仪器。FNB技术在6例患者中达到了正确的诊断。无严重不良事件记录。
    通过使用电动驱动的17-G活检装置,可以在一次穿刺中从感兴趣的区域获得真正的核心组织圆柱体,从而减少对第二次采样的需要。EUS引导的CNB的绝对好处是可以以与标准经皮芯针样品相同的方式处理和组织学制备样品,例如,乳腺癌和前列腺癌.
    UNASSIGNED: This pilot study aimed to evaluate safety and tissue sampling from subepithelial lesions (SEL) in the upper gastrointestinal tract with a novel electric motor driven endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 17-gauge (G) size core needle biopsy (CNB) instrument.
    UNASSIGNED: An investigator-led prospective open label, performance and safety control study, including seven patients (female n = 4, median 71 y, range 28-75) with a determined SEL (median size 30 mm, range 17-150 mm) in the upper digestive tract (stomach n = 6, duodenum n = 1) were eligible and later followed up 14 days after index procedure. All investigations were completed according to protocol with three FNB 22-G passes with four fanning strokes and two EndoDrill® 17-G passes with three fanning strokes.
    UNASSIGNED: Quality of samples as \'visible pieces\' (>5 mm): FNB (n = 5/7) (fragmented/blood imbibed n = 1, poor tissue quantity n = 1) compared with 17-G CNB (n = 7/7). Histological result which led to final diagnosis (leiomyoma n = 2, adenocarcinoma n = 1, schwannoma n = 1, neuroendocrine tumour n = 1, desmoid tumour n = 1 and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) n = 1) could be obtained with the 17-G CNB instrument in all seven patients. FNB technique reached correct diagnosis in six patients. No serious adverse event were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: By using an electric driven 17-G biopsy device, a true cylinder of core tissue can be obtained in one single puncture from the area of interest reducing the need for a second sampling. The absolute benefit of EUS-guided CNB is that the sample can be handled and histologically prepared in the same manner as standard percutaneous core needle sample, e.g., breast and prostate cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,由于对个体化和精准医学的追求,肾脏肿块活检(RMB)重新获得了临床兴趣。肾肿块穿刺活检(RMCNB)用于组织病理学(HP),有或没有液基细胞学(LBC),我们医院越来越多地使用。本研究调查了影响RMCNBHP诊断率的因素,并比较单独HP和HP加LBC的诊断率。
    在这项回顾性横断面研究中,在国家癌症中心/国家癌症临床研究中心/肿瘤医院接受超声引导经皮RMCNB治疗的134例患者,2015年1月至2022年5月,中国医学科学院和北京协和医学院入选。所有活检均使用18号芯针活检枪进行,并将18号针槽的取样组织和脱落细胞用于HP和LBC诊断,分别。病人的人口统计,临床适应症,肿瘤特征,活检的数量,最终病理诊断,并对随访数据进行了回顾。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析以评估变量与RMCNB的HP诊断率之间的关联。使用McNemar检验比较HP和HP加LBC的诊断率,并使用Kappa评分评估一致性。
    RMCNB最常见的适应症是肾脏肿块,放射学诊断为局部晚期疾病或远处转移(86.6%)。在88.1%(118/134)的病例中建立了HP诊断率,HP加LBC的诊断率为94.0%(126/134)。Logistic回归分析显示,超过50%的非增强区域[比值比(OR):0.021,95%置信区间(CI):0.003-0.134,P<0.001]和核心活检数量(OR:9.479,95%CI:1.528-58.794,P=0.016)与RCNB的HP诊断率相关。HP加LBC的诊断率明显高于单纯HP(94.0%vs.88.1%,P=0.008),他们表现出基本一致(Kappa=0.638,P<0.001)。同时,在非增强区≥50%亚组,HP加LBC与单纯HP的诊断率有显著差异(86.7%vs.60%,P=0.008),并且协议是公平的(Kappa=0.375,P=0.009)。
    RMCNB具有较高的诊断率,至少需要两次高质量的核心活检,LBC可以单独提高HP的诊断率,特别是在大的非增强面积的群众。
    UNASSIGNED: Renal mass biopsy (RMB) has regained clinical interest in recent years due to the pursuit of individualized and precision medicine. Renal mass core needle biopsy (RMCNB) for histopathology (HP), with or without liquid-based cytology (LBC), has been used increasingly in our hospital. This study investigated factors influencing the HP diagnostic yield of RMCNB, and compared the diagnostic rate between HP alone and HP plus LBC.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, a total of 134 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous RMCNB in the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between January 2015 and May 2022 were enrolled. All biopsies were performed using an 18-gauge core needle biopsy gun, and the sampling tissues and exfoliative cells of 18-gauge core needle groove were delivered for HP and LBC diagnosis, respectively. The patient demographics, clinical indications, tumor characteristics, number of biopsies, final pathological diagnosis, and follow-up data were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between variables and HP diagnostic yield of RMCNB. The diagnostic rate between HP and HP plus LBC was compared using McNemar\'s test and agreement was evaluated using the Kappa score.
    UNASSIGNED: The most common indication of RMCNB was renal masses with a radiological diagnosis of locally advanced disease or distant metastasis (86.6%). The HP diagnostic yield was established in 88.1% (118/134) of cases, and the diagnostic rate of HP plus LBC was 94.0% (126/134). Logistic regression analyses revealed that non-enhanced area exceeding 50% [odds ratio (OR): 0.021, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.134, P<0.001] and number of core biopsies (OR: 9.479, 95% CI: 1.528-58.794, P=0.016) were associated with the HP diagnostic yield of RMCNB. The diagnostic rate of HP plus LBC was significantly higher than that of HP alone (94.0% vs. 88.1%, P=0.008), and they showed substantial agreement (Kappa =0.638, P<0.001). Meanwhile, in the non-enhanced area ≥50% subgroup, the diagnostic rate between HP plus LBC and HP alone was significantly different (86.7% vs. 60%, P=0.008), and the agreement was fair (Kappa =0.375, P=0.009).
    UNASSIGNED: RMCNB has a high diagnostic yield with a minimum of two high-quality core biopsies, LBC can improve the diagnostic yield of HP alone, especially in masses with large non-enhanced area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估超声造影(CEUS)指导乳腺病变活检的有效性,这些病变在乳腺造影(CEM)或对比增强乳腺MRI(CE-MRI)上检测到,但在B超(B-US)上并不清楚。
    方法:在本研究中,尽管在CEM(n=20)或CE-MRI(n=3)上检测到,但由于B-US显示不良,16例患者中的23个病灶被选择进行CEUS引导活检.B-US,彩色多普勒超声(CDUS),和CEUS用于可视化可疑病变,随后使用Sonazoid作为对比剂进行CEUS引导的核心针活检。根据病理学-放射学一致性和12个月的影像学随访评估活检的准确性。使用两位乳腺放射科医师商定的5点显着性量表评估病变可视化的显着性得分。
    结果:在CEM/CE-MRI上发现的增强性病变的平均大小为1.6±1.3cm,表现为肿块增强(61%)或非肿块增强(39%)。病变在B-US上的平均显眼评分为2.30,2.78onCDUS,和4.61在CEUS上,96%的病变在CEUS上显示对比增强。与B-US和CDUS相比,CEUS引导活检显示96%和91%的病变可见性增加,分别。根据与组织学和12个月随访的一致性,CEUS引导活检的总体准确性为100%。
    结论:CEUS增强了可疑CEM/CE-MRI病变的可见性,而在活检过程中,CEM/CE-MRI病变在B-US上几乎不可见。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in guiding biopsies of breast lesions that were detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) or contrast-enhanced breast MRI (CE-MRI) but were not clearly visible on B-mode ultrasound (B-US).
    METHODS: In this study, 23 lesions in 16 patients were selected for CEUS-guided biopsy due to poor visualization on B-US despite being detected on CEM (n = 20) or CE-MRI (n = 3). B-US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), and CEUS were used to visualize the suspicious lesions, followed by a CEUS-guided core needle biopsy using Sonazoid as the contrast agent. The accuracy of the biopsy was assessed based on pathology-radiology concordance and 12-month imaging follow-up. The conspicuity scores for lesion visualization were evaluated using a 5-point conspicuity scale agreed upon by two breast radiologists.
    RESULTS: The enhancing lesions detected on CEM/CE-MRI had an average size of 1.6 ± 1.3 cm and appeared as mass-enhancing (61%) or non-mass-enhancing (39%). The lesions had mean conspicuity scores of 2.30 on B-US, 2.78 on CDUS, and 4.61 on CEUS, with 96% of the lesions showing contrast enhancement on CEUS. CEUS-guided biopsy showed increased visibility in 96% and 91% of the lesions compared to B-US and CDUS, respectively. The overall accuracy of CEUS-guided biopsy was 100% based on concordance with histology and 12-month follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: CEUS enhances the visibility of suspicious CEM/CE-MRI lesions that are poorly visible on B-US during biopsy procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:回顾性比较接受超声(US)引导的16号弹簧式芯针活检(CNB)或12号弹簧式真空辅助活检(VAB)的乳腺肿块和非肿块性病变的临床和病理特征。
    方法:我们回顾性比较了16号CNB(Magnum™)或12号VAB(Celero®)在美国指导下进行诊断性乳腺活检的结果。检查每个设备的患者背景和病理特征。
    结果:在453例患者中,有500个病灶,373个病灶接受了CNB,127个病灶接受了VAB。VAB的阳性活检率(阳性预测值3)(92/127;72.4%)明显高于CNB(231/373;61.9%)(P=0.032)。VAB(57/127;47.4%)比CNB(27/378;7.14%)更频繁地活检非肿块性病变(P=0.000)。CNB从高危到恶性病变的升级率(5/19;26.3%)明显高于VAB(1/8;12.5%)(P=0.043)。有5个(1.34%)样品与CNB和一个(0.78%)与VAB,18例(4.82%)用CNB再活检,3例(2.36%)用VAB再活检,11/21(52.4%)从导管原位癌(DCIS)升级为CNB的浸润性导管癌(IDC),11/30(36.7%)从VAB升级为浸润性导管癌。尽管CNB的这些比率往往高于VAB,差异不显著。
    结论:尽管VAB的非肿块性病变活检率明显较高,VAB从高危到恶性病变的升级率显著低于CNB.US引导的12号弹簧加载VAB可能更适合非肿块性病变的活检。
    OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively compare the clinical and pathological characteristics of breast masses and non-mass lesions that underwent ultrasound (US)-guided 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy (CNB) or 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB).
    METHODS: We retrospectively compared the results from US-guided diagnostic breast biopsy performed with a 16-gauge CNB (Magnum™) or a 12-gauge VAB (Celero®). The patients\' backgrounds and pathological features for each device were examined.
    RESULTS: In 453 patients with 500 lesions, 373 lesions underwent CNB and 127 underwent VAB. The positive biopsy rate (positive predictive value 3) was significantly higher for VAB (92/127; 72.4%) than for CNB (231/373; 61.9%) (P = 0.032). Non-mass lesions were biopsied more frequently with VAB (57/127; 47.4%) than with CNB (27/378; 7.14%) (P = 0.000). The upgrade rate from high-risk to malignant lesions was significantly higher for CNB (5/19; 26.3%) than for VAB (1/8; 12.5%) (P = 0.043). There were five (1.34%) specimen failures with CNB and one (0.78%) with VAB, 18 (4.82%) re-biopsies with CNB and three (2.36%) with VAB, and 11/21 (52.4%) upgrades from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with CNB and 11/30 (36.7%) with VAB. Although these rates tended to be higher with CNB than with VAB, the difference was not significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although VAB had a significantly higher rate of non-mass lesion biopsies, the upgrade rate from high-risk to malignant lesions was significantly lower for VAB than for CNB. US-guided 12-gauge spring-loaded VAB may be more appropriate for biopsy of non-mass lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的大多数乳腺疾病表现为可触及的肿块。结合临床检查可提高其诊断的准确性,乳房X线照相术,细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC),术前进行芯针活检(CNB)。乳腺肿块的FNAC或CNB的最终目的是在术前确认癌症的诊断,这可能有助于避免良性疾病的不必要手术。组织病理学是建立乳腺肿块诊断的金标准。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(NPV),FNAC与Trucut活检的诊断准确性,并提供FNAC和CNB对可疑乳腺恶性肿瘤切除乳腺肿块的最终组织病理学诊断的联合评估。材料和方法这是一个前瞻性的,观察,为期一年的横断面研究,涉及42例疑似乳腺癌患者接受FNAC,CNB,手术切除后进行组织病理学检查。收集数据,并在灵敏度方面进行分析,特异性,PPV,NPV,与组织病理学相比,FNAC和CNB的诊断准确性。结果研究中的大多数患者(78.6%)年龄在31-50岁之间。在我们的研究中,FNAC表现出敏感性,特异性,PPV,NPV,诊断准确率为74.1%,76.9%,87.0%,64.7%,分别为75%。CNB有一种敏感性,特异性,PPV,NPV,诊断准确率为85.2%,92.8%,95.8%,76.5%,分别为87.8%。两种模式(FNAC和CNB)之间的一致性水平中等且具有统计学意义(k=0.543;p<0.001)。在FNAC和CNB针对恶性肿瘤/临界诊断的最终组织病理学诊断的联合评估中,灵敏度,特异性,PPV,NPV,诊断准确率为89.3%,85.7%,92.6%,80%,分别为88.1%。结论FNAC和CNB联合评估对恶性肿瘤/临界诊断的最终组织病理学诊断的诊断准确性优于FNAC或CNB。这一发现表明,这两种技术是相辅相成的。FNAC和CNB分别作为病理诊断的一线和二线方法。
    Background and objective Most breast diseases present as palpable lumps. The accuracy of their diagnosis can be enhanced by a combination of clinical examination, mammography, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and core needle biopsy (CNB) preoperatively. The ultimate aim of FNAC or CNB of the breast mass is to confirm the diagnosis of cancer preoperatively, which may help avoid unnecessary surgeries for benign conditions. Histopathology is the gold standard to establish the diagnosis of a breast mass. In this study, we aimed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC with those of trucut biopsy, and provide a combined assessment of FNAC and CNB against the final histopathological diagnosis of excised breast mass in suspected breast malignancies. Materials and methods This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study conducted for a duration of one year involving 42 patients with suspected breast cancer cases who underwent FNAC, CNB, and surgical excision followed by a histopathological examination. Data were collected and analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC and CNB in comparison with histopathology. Results The majority of the patients in the study (78.6%) were in the age group of 31-50 years. In our study, FNAC showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of 74.1%, 76.9%, 87.0%, 64.7%, and 75% respectively. CNB had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of 85.2%, 92.8%, 95.8%, 76.5%, and 87.8% respectively. The level of agreement between the two modalities (FNAC and CNB) was moderate and statistically significant (k=0.543; p<0.001). In the combined assessment of FNAC and CNB against final histopathological diagnosis for malignancy/borderline diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were 89.3%, 85.7%, 92.6%, 80%, and 88.1% respectively. Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of the combined assessment of FNAC and CNB against final histopathological diagnosis for malignancy/borderline diagnosis was better than that of FNAC or CNB alone. This finding shows that both the techniques complement each other. FNAC and CNB are used as the first- and second-line methods of pathological diagnosis respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在常规胸部成像和肺癌筛查研究中经常发现小的肺结节(≤1.5cm)。我们的目标是确定CT引导的芯针活检(CNB)在评估此类结节中的临床价值。在这项单中心研究中,我们回顾性分析了2017年5月至2020年3月在我们的活检中心进行的肺结节(≤1.5cm)CNBs的患者数据(n=44).我们分析了病理诊断率,分子/生物标志物分析,并发症,以及活检后60个月内临床管理和结果的变化。在该队列中,有97.9%的活检组织获得了恶性或良性病变的病理诊断。并发症的发生率很低,只有6.8%的患者需要插入临时的小轮廓介入放射学(IR)猪尾胸管治疗气胸。在送去组织分子分析的活检标本中,90%在初始病理分析后保留了足够的组织以获得至少一种分子标记。我们的数据表明,CT引导的CNB是安全可靠的,并且应该考虑小的评价,在常规筛查中发现可疑的肺结节,以早期发现和评估恶性病变。
    Small pulmonary nodules (≤1.5 cm) are frequently detected on routine chest imaging and lung cancer screening studies. Our goal was to determine the clinical value of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in the evaluation of such nodules. In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed patient data (n = 44) for CNBs on lung nodules (≤1.5 cm) performed at our biopsy center between May 2017 and March 2020. We analyzed for the rate of pathology diagnosis, molecular/biomarker analysis, complications, and change in clinical management and outcome over a period ranging up to 60 months after biopsy. A pathology diagnosis of malignancy or benign lesion was obtained in 97.9% of biopsies in this cohort. The rate of complications was low with only 6.8% of patients requiring the insertion of a temporary small profile interventional radiology (IR) pigtail chest tube for pneumothorax. Out of the subset of biopsy specimens that were sent for tissue molecular analysis, 90% had enough tissue preserved after initial pathological analysis to obtain at least one molecular marker. Our data show that CT-guided CNB is safe and reliable, and should be considered for the evaluation of small, suspicious lung nodules found on routine screenings for the early detection and evaluation of malignant lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超声(US)引导下的粗针活检(CNB)广泛应用于乳腺癌可疑腋窝淋巴结(ALN)的病理诊断。然而,活检期间切除的标本数量目前基于个体放射科医师的偏好.本研究旨在分析乳腺癌中可疑ALN的美国指导CNB的基于样本数的诊断产量。
    可疑淋巴结的核心活检标本是在11月之间从我们医院接受治疗的乳腺癌患者中获得的,2018年7月,2019.从每个患者获得四个样本,并按照它们被移除的顺序标记为1-4。对每个标本进行病理评估以确定是否发生了转移。计算样本的诊断率,并通过McNemar检验评估根据样本数量的诊断准确性差异。
    共纳入167名患者,CNB确定转移139例(83.2%)。诊断率为:74.2%(样本1),87.8%(试样1-2),91.2%(试样1-3),和94.6%(标本1-4)。从标本1到1-2和从标本1-2到1-4的诊断产量的增加是显著的;然而,在标本1-3和前两个之间没有检测到显著差异,或在样本1-4和前三个之间。前两个标本的较低诊断能力与US上淋巴结的长轴和短轴长度有关。
    尽管在乳腺癌的核心活检中,第二个标本对可疑腋窝淋巴结的诊断率有重要贡献,本研究无法确定最小数量。额外的标本可以提高诊断率,特别是在小结节患者中。
    UNASSIGNED: Ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is widely applied in the pathological diagnosis of suspicious axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in breast cancer. However, the number of specimens removed during biopsy is currently based on the preference of the individual radiologist. This study aims to analyze the specimen number based diagnostic yields of US guided CNB of suspicious ALNs in breast cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: Core biopsy specimens of suspicious lymph nodes were prospectively obtained from breast cancer patients treated at our hospital between November, 2018, and July, 2019. Four specimens were obtained from each patient and labeled 1-4 in the order they were removed. Each specimen underwent pathological evaluation to determine whether metastasis had occurred. The diagnostic yields of the specimens were calculated and differences in diagnostic accuracy according to the number of specimens were evaluated by McNemar\'s test.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 167 patients were enrolled, and 139 (83.2%) cases were identified as metastasis by CNB. The diagnostic yields were: 74.2% (specimen 1), 87.8% (specimens 1-2), 91.2% (specimens 1-3), and 94.6% (specimens 1-4). The increases in diagnostic yield from specimen 1 to 1-2 and from specimens 1-2 to 1-4 were significant; however, no significant differences were detected between specimens 1-3 and the first two, or between specimens 1-4 and the first three in this sample size. The lower diagnostic abilities for the first two specimens were associated with shorter long- and short-axis lengths of lymph nodes on US.
    UNASSIGNED: Although the second specimen contributed significant diagnostic yield of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in core biopsy in breast cancer, a minimum number cannot be determined by this study. Additional specimens may improve diagnostic yield particularly in patients with small nodes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)是存在于血流中的与特定肿瘤类型抗原或遗传相似的细胞,是肿瘤诊断的标志物,预后,残留疾病和转移。全球范围内不断增加的乳腺癌负担需要使用最简单的技术将这种包罗万象的标记物纳入诊断库中。
    在细针穿刺(FNA)或芯针活检(CNB)诊断的乳腺癌病例中,通过细胞块(CB)技术鉴定外周血中的CTC,并将其存在与淋巴结转移相关联。
    这项研究是在病理学系进行的,在三级护理医院。使用CB技术分析了在FNA或CNB上诊断为未经新辅助化疗的总共30例原发性乳腺癌的外周血样本。
    年龄在29-74岁之间,最常见的主诉是明显的,单身,单侧乳房肿块。在2例(6.7%)<5细胞簇的病例中检测到CTC,这两种情况都是I级乳腺癌,并且还显示淋巴结转移。
    UNASSIGNED: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cells present in the blood stream that are antigenically or genetically similar to a specific tumor type and are markers of tumor diagnosis, prognosis, residual disease and metastasis. The ever-increasing burden of breast cancer globally warrants the incorporation of this all-inclusive marker in the diagnostic repertoire using the simplest of techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify CTCs in peripheral blood by cell block (CB) technique in cases of breast cancer diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) and to correlate their presence with nodal metastasis.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, at a tertiary care hospital. Peripheral blood samples from a total of 30 cases of primary breast carcinoma diagnosed on FNA or CNB without prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed using the CB technique.
    UNASSIGNED: The age ranged between 29-74 years with the most common presenting complaint being a palpable, single, unilateral breast lump. CTCs were detected in 2 (6.7%) cases with a <5 cell cluster with both the cases being grade I breast carcinomas and also displaying nodal metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)B32试验报道,芯针活检(CNB)对前哨淋巴结的检出率高于节段性切除术。然而,关于真空辅助乳腺活检(VABB)前哨淋巴结检出率的报道很少.因此,我们分析了术前活检方法对我们中心3,966例乳腺癌患者手术方式的影响.
    总共,3,966名女性乳腺癌患者[临床肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)I-III期]被纳入本研究。术前病理诊断方法包括细针穿刺活检(FNA),CNB,切除活检,和VABB。根据诊断时间。数据经卡方检验分析,SPSS22.0中的方差分析和Kaplan-Meier时间序列。
    随着时间的推移,接受切除活检(7.3%至2.7%)和术中冷冻(89.4%至28.9%)的患者数量有所减少,而CNB呈增加趋势(1.6%至55.3%)。VABB的阳性率,CNB,切除活检,FNA为99.5%,97.1%,97.9%,和82.2%,分别,假阴性率为0%,1.8%,0.34%,和8.9%,分别。整体保乳率为36.7%,而VABB的保乳率为57.1%。cN0患者腋窝前哨淋巴结活检率为48.3%,术中冰冻组(36.7%)和切除活检组(39.5%)均低于CNB组(57.1%)和VABB组(77.9%)。截至2019年12月,共有350例肿瘤复发或转移。活检方法与累积生存时间无关。
    乳腺癌诊断和治疗的变化对肿瘤活检的方法产生了深远的影响。VABB活检提供的优势,如准确的诊断,一次采集更大体积的组织,微创和可重复,不影响患者的手术方式和预后。它将逐步成为乳腺癌术前病理评价的主要办法。
    UNASSIGNED: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B32 trial reported that the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes by core needle biopsy (CNB) is higher than that by segmental resection. However, there are few reports regarding the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes by vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Therefore, we analyzed the impact of preoperative biopsy methods on the surgical modes of 3,966 patients with breast cancer in our center.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 3,966 female breast cancer patients [clinical tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage I-III] were enrolled in this study. Preoperative pathological diagnosis methods included fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, CNB, excision biopsy, and VABB. According to the time of diagnosis. The data were analysis by chi square test, variance analysis and the Kaplan-Meier time series in SPSS 22.0.
    UNASSIGNED: There was a decrease in the number of patients that underwent excision biopsy (7.3% to 2.7%) and intraoperative freezing (89.4% to 28.9%) over time, while CNB exhibited an increasing trend (1.6% to 55.3%). The positive rates of VABB, CNB, excision biopsy, and FNA were 99.5%, 97.1%, 97.9%, and 82.2%, respectively, and the false negative rates were 0%, 1.8%, 0.34%, and 8.9%, respectively. The overall breast-conserving rate was 36.7%, while the breast-conserving rate for VABB was 57.1%. The axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy rate of cN0 patients was 48.3%, and the intraoperative frozen group (36.7%) and excision biopsy group (39.5%) were lower than the CNB (57.1%) and VABB (77.9%) groups. Until December 2019, there were 350 cases with tumor recurrence or metastasis. The methods of biopsy were not correlated to the cumulative survival time.
    UNASSIGNED: Changes to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer has a profound impact on the method of tumor biopsy. VABB biopsy offers advantages such as accurate diagnosis, a greater volume of tissue taken at one time, minimally invasive and repeatable, and does not affect the surgical approach and prognosis of patients. It will gradually become the primary method of preoperative pathological evaluation of breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号