暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The Latarjet procedure transfers the coracoid process to the anterior glenoid. This prevents recurrent anterior humeral dislocation but alters the origins of the coracobrachialis (CBR) and short head of the biceps (SHB). The impact of this alteration on the moment arms of these muscles has not been examined.
METHODS: The Newcastle Shoulder Model was updated with 15 healthy cadaveric bone models to create customized shoulder models. The CBR and SHB muscles were attached to the anterior glenoid via an elliptical wrapping object. Muscle moment arms were calculated for abduction, forward flexion, scapular plane elevation, and internal rotation with 20° and 90° of abduction. Statistical comparison of moment arms between native and Latarjet shoulders was performed using spm1D.
RESULTS: By transferring the origins of the CBR and SHB to the anterior glenoid, both muscles had extension moment arms during glenohumeral elevation in the coronal, sagittal, and scapular planes. Their average moment arms during abduction (-30.4 ± 3.2 mm for CBR and -29.8 ± 3.0 mm for SHB) and forward flexion (-26.0 ± 3.1 mm for CBR and -26.2 ± 3.2 mm for SHB) suggested that their role after the Latarjet procedure changed compared with their role in the native shoulder (P < .001). At higher abduction levels, both the muscles had higher internal rotation moment arms compared with the native shoulder.
CONCLUSIONS: The Latarjet procedure affected the moment arms of the CBR and SHB. Both muscles had increased extension and internal rotation moment arms at higher degrees of elevation compared with the native shoulders. This finding suggests that these muscles act as dynamic stabilizers after the Latarjet procedure.

Most intrinsic muscles of the forelimb in dolphins are either degenerated or lost; however, the muscles around the shoulder joint are well preserved. We dissected the forelimbs of Pacific white-sided dolphins and constructed a full-scale model of the flipper to compare and examine their movements following dissection. The humerus was oriented at approximately 45° ventrally from the horizontal plane of the dolphin and 45° caudally from the frontal plane. This maintains the neutral position of the flipper. The deltoideus and pectoralis major muscles were inserted into the body of the humerus, and the flipper was moved in the dorsal and ventral directions, respectively. A large tubercle, known as the common tubercle, was observed at the medial end of the humerus. Four muscles were inserted into the common tubercle: the brachiocephalicus, supraspinatus, and cranial part of the subscapularis, which laterally rotated the common tubercle. Subsequently, the flipper swung forward, and its radial edge was lifted. Conversely, the medial rotation of the common tubercle caused by the coracobrachialis and the caudal part of the subscapularis was accompanied by backward swinging of the flipper and lowering of the radial edge. These findings suggest the function of the flipper as a stabilizer or rudder is caused by the rotation of the humerus\'s common tubercle.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the presented case is to describe an unprecedented innervation of the coracobrachialis longus muscle by the radial nerve.
METHODS: An 82-year-old body donor at death was subjected to a routine anatomical dissection for teaching and research purposes at the Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation in Lodz, Poland.
RESULTS: We have found an additional branch of the radial nerve, which departed from it just below its beginning. Its initial section ran alongside the radial nerve in the axilla, then headed medially accompanying superior ulnar collateral artery. Then, it reaches the coracobrachialis longus muscle and is the only one to innervate it.
CONCLUSIONS: The brachial plexus (BP) is very variable and well understood. Nevertheless, we must remember that there may still be variations in its structure, which may involve problems at every stage of diagnosis and treatment of diseases associated with its structures. Their knowledge is extremely important.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) alters the line of action of muscles around the glenohumeral joint. The effects of these changes have been well characterized for the deltoid, but there is limited information regarding the biomechanical changes to the coracobrachialis (CBR) and short head of biceps (SHB). In this biomechanical study, we investigated the changes to the moment arms of the CBR and SHB due to RTSA using a computational model of the shoulder.
METHODS: The Newcastle Shoulder Model, a pre-validated upper-extremity musculoskeletal model, was used for this study. The Newcastle Shoulder Model was modified with bone geometries obtained from 3-dimensional reconstructions of 15 nondiseased shoulders, constituting the native shoulder group. The Delta XTEND prosthesis, with a glenosphere diameter of 38 mm and polyethylene thickness of 6 mm, was virtually implanted in all the models, creating the RTSA group. Moment arms were measured using the tendon excursion method, and muscle length was calculated as the distance between the muscle\'s origin and insertion points. These values were measured during 0°-150° of abduction, forward flexion, scapular-plane elevation, and -90° to 60° of external rotation-internal rotation with the arm at 20° and 90° of abduction. Statistical comparisons between the native and RTSA groups were analyzed using 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (spm1D).
RESULTS: Forward flexion moment arms showed the greatest increase between the RTSA group (CBR, 25.3 ± 4.7 mm; SHB, 24.7 ± 4.5 mm) and native group (CBR, 9.6 ± 5.2 mm; SHB, 10.2 ± 5.2 mm). The CBR and SHB were longer in the RTSA group by maximum values of 15% and 7%, respectively. Both muscles had larger abduction moment arms in the RTSA group (CBR, 20.9 ± 4.3 mm; SHB, 21.9 ± 4.3 mm) compared with the native group (CBR, 19.6 ± 6.6 mm; SHB, 20.0 ± 5.7 mm). Abduction moment arms occurred at lower abduction angles in the RTSA group (CBR, 50°; SHB, 45°) than in the native group (CBR, 90°; SHB, 85°). In the RTSA group, both muscles had elevation moment arms until 25° of scapular-plane elevation motion, whereas in the native group, the muscles only had depression moment arms. Both muscles had small rotational moment arms that were significantly different between RTSA and native shoulders during different ranges of motion.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant increases in elevation moment arms for the CBR and SHB were observed in RTSA shoulders; these increases were most pronounced during abduction and forward elevation motions. RTSA also increased the lengths of these muscles.

Numerous snapping syndromes have been reported in the musculoskeletal system. Identifying the cause of these symptoms can often be challenging as the underlying abnormality may not be appreciable on routine static examinations. We report a 30-year-old female who presented with an unusual snapping sensation in her right anterior shoulder. This was readily reproducible during shoulder abduction with a palpable clicking evident on clinical examination. Dynamic ultrasound revealed this to be secondary to an accessory coracobrachialis muscle, which subluxed suddenly over the anterior subscapularis tendon during abduction. An accessory coracobrachialis muscle is a rare normal variant that is often asymptomatic. Extra-articular causes of shoulder snapping have been rarely reported, and this is the first case report of an accessory coracobrachialis muscle causing a snapping shoulder phenomenon.

暂无摘要。

Neural and vascular variations in the axilla and upper limb area are usually paired, but coexistence of muscular aberration on top of this is uncommon. The current case report emphasizes on the unilateral coexistence of a three-headed (tricipital) biceps brachii muscle, a two-headed coracobrachialis with an accessory muscle bundle joining the superficial and deep heads of coracobrachialis muscle. On the ipsilateral side of the 72-year-old male cadaver, a connecting branch originated from the musculocutaneous nerve and joined the median nerve after surpassing the accessory muscle bundle. A large diameter subscapular trunk originated from the 2nd part of the axillary artery and after giving off the 1st lateral thoracic artery trifurcated into a common stem which gave off the 2nd and 3rd lateral thoracic arteries, the circumflex scapular artery and a common branch that gave off the 4th and 5th lateral thoracic arteries and the thoracodorsal artery, as the ultimate branch. All lateral thoracic arteries were accompanied by multiple intercostobra- chial nerves. Documentation of such muscular and neurovascular variants and their embryologic origin increases awareness of their potential impact on diagnosis and treatment of upper limb pathology. To the best of our knowledge, the currently reported cadaveric observations seem to constitute a unique finding.

OBJECTIVE: Coracobrachialis (CBM) is a complex muscle with a wide range of variations in its morphology and innervation. The goal of this study was to elucidate the morphology, morphometry, gender differences of CBM and precise anatomical position of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) with reference to surrounding anatomical landmarks in an adult Sri Lankan population.
METHODS: Cadaveric upper limbs (n = 312) were examined for the proximal and distal attachments, length, width, thickness of CBM and its relationship with the MCN.
RESULTS: The CBM originated from the tip of the coracoid process of the scapula and lateral, posterior and medial aspects of the tendon of short head of biceps brachii. Gender differences were observed in all morphometrical parameters of CBM. In 83.33 %, MCN perforated the CBM. In 50 % the MCN pierced the middle one-third of CBM while none pierced the lower one-third. The distance from the coracoid process to the point of entry of MCN into CBM (distance P) was 50.62 mm. A positive correlation was observed between the arm length and distance P indicating that arm length provides an accurate and reliable means of gauging the distance P of an individual.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides new evidence pertaining to the origin of CBM. Further, it was revealed that the predicted distance P of any upper extremity can be calculated by dividing the arm length by 5. Precise anatomical location of MCN in relation to CBM using unequivocal and well-defined anatomical landmarks will be imperative in modern surgical procedures.

Rupture of the coracobrachialis is a rare entity, in isolation or in combination with other muscular or tendinous structures. When described, it is often a result of direct trauma to the anatomic area resulting in rupture of the muscle belly. The authors present a case of a 57-year-old female who suffered a proximal coracobrachialis tendon rupture from its origin at the coracoid process, with concomitant subscapularis tear and medial dislocation of the long head of biceps tendon after first time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Two weeks after injury, magnetic resonance imaging suggested the diagnosis, which was confirmed during combined arthroscopic and open technique. Soft-tissue tenodesis of coracobrachialis to the intact short head of the biceps, tenodesis of the long head of biceps to the intertubercular groove, and double-row anatomic repair of the subscapularis were performed. The patient did well postoperatively, and ultimately at 6 months follow-up, she was without pain, and obtained 160° of active forward elevation, 45° of external rotation, internal rotation to T8, 5/5 subscapularis and biceps strength. Scoring scales had improved from the following preoperative to final follow-up: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 53.33-98.33; constant, 10-100; visual analogue scale-pain, 4-0. DASH score was 5.