Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is a topical compound approved for use with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) and field cancerization in certain countries. There exists a high burden of disease for patients with AK: repeated treatments are required, there is a known risk of progression to keratinocyte carcinoma, and cosmetic appearance is affected. Delivery of PDT using MAL is a flexible treatment strategy available in many forms; red light, daylight, or artificial daylight can be used for illumination, all of which result in high AK clearance rates and low recurrence. MAL-PDT protocols continue to evolve to further improve adherence and treatment outcomes. Here, we used PubMed to search MEDLINE to identify guidelines, consensus recommendations, and studies describing the use of MAL for the treatment of AK. The aim of this targeted review is to consider various MAL-PDT treatment strategies on the basis of published literature, with a focus on personalizing treatment for the heterogeneous AK population.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is the biologic precursor of invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vermilion, and different treatment options have been investigated, but their efficacy is hampered by local inflammation, pain and slow recovery. Daylight photodynamic therapy (dl-PDT) has been demonstrated to represent a valuable treatment option for AC, but its feasibility is limited by weather conditions and latitude.
METHODS: Our study proposed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of conventional photodynamic therapy (c-PDT) and indoor daylight photodynamic therapy (idl-PDT) with a white LED lamp for the treatment of AC. Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study: 8 (50%) treated with c-PDT and 8 (50%) treated with idl-PDT. All patients completed the study protocol.
RESULTS: Both idl-PDT and c-PDT were demonstrated to be highly effective in terms of reduction of the cumulative lesional area and severity of the clinical score. Neither treatment was inferior to the other. The inflammatory reaction and the pain scores were milder with idl-PDT, whereas the cosmetic outcome was not different.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings confirm that idl-PDT can represent a valid therapeutic strategy for AC patients as well, despite the procedural difficulties and the risk of poor tolerability related to the body site.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: facial flat warts (FFWs) are a superficial viral skin disease, extremely common in childhood. Recently, conventional photodynamic therapy (C-PDT) has been used for the treatment of FFWs with good outcome. The efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has not yet been evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: to investigate and assess the efficacy and safety of C-PDT versus DL-PDT using 10% aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in the treatment of recalcitrant FFWs in a paediatric setting.
METHODS: 30 consecutive patients aged <18 years with FFWs of the face were included and randomly divided into two groups: group A (15 patients) was treated with C-PDT and group B (15 patients) with DL-PDT. Patients underwent treatments for three times with 1-month intervals. The response was assessed on week 4,812 and 24 (T4,T8,T12,T24) and scored as excellent (75-100% reduction of total wart count), very good (74-50% reduction), good (49-25% reduction), poor (<25% reduction or no response). Any adverse event occurring during/after ALA application/irradiation as well as pain intensity were recorded at each visit.
RESULTS: at T4 and T8 no excellent response was achieved in both groups. At week 12, excellent response was observed in 53.3% of group A patients vs 0% of group B patients, although in the latter 66.7% of patients achieved a very good response. Excellent outcome raised to 73.3% and 80% in group A and B, respectively, at week 24. Poor response to therapy was observed in 26.7% of patients in group A and 20% in group B. Both treatment modalities were well tolerated, with transient pain, irritation and hyperpigmentation as main side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: ALA-PDT is effective and safe for FFWs, with striking cosmetic results and no recurrence. Compared with conventional modality, DL-PDT is better tolerated, time-saving, nearly painless and greatly appreciated by young patients.

FFW are among the most frequent infectious skin conditions. Although several pharmacological and physical topical treatments are available, results are often unsatisfactory in terms of efficacy (frequent recurrence) and cosmetic outcome (risk of scars, hyper- or hypopigmentation). We describe the case of multiple recalcitrant facial flat warts treated by daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) in an otherwise health 8-year-old female child, with complete clearance and excellent cosmetic result. The advantages of DL-PDT over conventional PDT in terms of tolerability, time and cost, especially in paediatric setting are discussed.