BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy in patients with non-center involving diabetic macular edema (DME).
METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 18 patients diagnosed with non-center involving DME were included in this prospective, observational study. The patient\'s baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), maximum retinal thickness (MRT), central macular thickness (CMT), and the area of macular exudates were determined and re-evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after laser treatment.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant change in BCVA at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months compared to the baseline in the follow-up (p = 0.067, p = 0.270, p = 0.027 according to Bonferroni correction p < 0,01). 1st, 3rd, and 6th month MRT was statistically significantly lower than baseline (p = 0,009, p = 0,006, p = 0,007). No statistically significant change was detected in CMT at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months compared to the baseline in the follow-up (p = 0.384, p = 0.794, p = 0.363). No statistically significant change in the area of macular exudates was detected at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months compared to the baseline (p = 0.904, p = 0.444, p = 0.277).
CONCLUSIONS: This study observed a significant decrease in extrafoveal retinal thickness in patients with DME. There was no progression to central macular involvement, an increase in the area of exudates, and a decrease in BCVA in any patient. SML may be an effective alternative to conventional argon laser in non-center involving DME.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injection anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (IVI anti-VEGF) therapy serves as the primary treatment for centre involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Conventional laser therapy (CLT) adjunct has proven beneficial; however, it is not widely used due to significant risks of retinal scarring. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy has, however, emerged as a comparable alternative to combination therapy, offering a distinct advantage by mitigating the risk of retinal scarring.
METHODS: A search of six databases was conducted. A meta-analysis of mean differences was performed including subgroup analyses where appropriate. Primary outcome was the number of injections at 12-14 months; secondary outcomes were changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6-8 months and 12-14 months.
RESULTS: A total of ten papers including six randomised clinical trials and four retrospective clinical studies were included in our study, capturing 563 eyes of 478 patients. Overall, the risk of bias was moderate for these studies. Significantly fewer anti-VEGF therapy injections were administered in the combination therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy patients at 12-14 months who had poor visual acuity (6/18 Snellen or worse) at baseline, mean difference - 2.25 (95% CI; - 3.35, - 1.15; p < 0.05). Combination therapy was not associated with significantly fewer intravitreal injections in patients with a higher visual acuity (6/15 Snellen or better) at baseline. Our analysis also showed significant improvements to both BCVA and CMT were reached at 6 - 8 month post-baseline at the 95% confidence intervals: - 1.13 (- 2.09, - 0.16) and - 4.04 (- 7.59, - 0.50). These improvements remained statistically significant at 12-14 months: - 0.94 (- 1.67, - 0.20) and - 1.92 (- 3.52, - 0.32) respectively with combination therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that combination therapy (SML + IVI anti-VEGF) is associated with fewer intravitreal injections. We report a better BCVA and a reduction in CMT at 6 and 12 months from baseline with combination treatment compared to the IVI anti-VEGF monotherapy comparator. SML is a proven non-scarring cost-effective therapy for DMO that should be readily available in the medical retinal therapy as it may reduce the burden of care.

Short-pulse laser is popular for its advantages like less pain. However, its effectiveness is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare fundus autofluorescence (FAF) luminosity changes of laser photocoagulation scars between the conventional laser (0.2 s) and the short-pulse laser (0.02 s) for diabetic retinopathy. Conventional and short-pulse laser photocoagulations were performed in six and seven eyes, respectively. FAF images were captured at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the treatments. To evaluate FAF, individual gray-scale values of the laser scars adjacent to the retinal arcade vessels were recorded; then, the mean gray values of the scars were divided by the luminosity of arcade vein. The average luminosity ratio of laser scars at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months were 1.51 ± 0.17, 1.26 ± 0.07, 1.21 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.11, and 0.89 ± 0.05 with conventional laser and 1.91 ± 0.13, 1.50 ± 0.15, 1.26 ± 0.08, 1.18 ± 0.06, and 0.97 ± 0.04 with short-pulse laser, respectively. Findings suggest the short-pulse laser displayed delayed hypoautofluorescence progression. This implies potential postponement in post-irradiation atrophic changes, as well as metabolic amelioration delay in the ischemic retina, when compared to conventional laser treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were comprehensively searched for studies published up to April 19, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective and prospective cohort studies that compared SML with any other intervention for chronic CSC were selected. The primary outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effect model was used for pooled analysis.
RESULTS: Eleven studies including 834 eyes were included, with 428 eyes undergoing SML treatment and 406 eyes receiving other interventions. Pooled results showed no significant differences between SML and control with respect to BCVA, CMT, or complete resolution of subretinal fluid, while SML treatment was inferior to control in terms of subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) reduction [weighted mean difference (WMD)=44.75, 95% Cl, 14.31-75.20, P<0.05, I2=72%]. However, SML was not superior to photodynamic therapy with respect to SFCT (WMD=61.29, 95% Cl, 29.50-93.08, P<0.05, I2=56%), retinal sensitivity (WMD=-1.85, 95% Cl, -3.05--0.65, P<0.01, I2=0) or NEI-VFQ25 score (WMD=-2.44, 95% Cl, -4.72--0.16, P<0.05, I2=0). No serious side effects of SML treatment were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that the clinical efficacy of SML therapy is similar to other treatment modalities for chronic CSC. However, because of the lack of serious side effects, SML may be the most promising alternative therapy for chronic CSC. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021 258837).

BACKGROUND: To compare the effect of pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) using pattern scanning or conventional laser on subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFChT).
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (64 eyes) with advanced diabetic retinopathy (DR) who underwent PRP using pattern scanning or conventional laser were included. Changes in SFChT were compared with baseline values at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after PRP using swept-source optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: The conventional laser group showed a statistically significant decrease in SFChT at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after PRP (P < 0.001). SFChT was significantly decreased at 3 (P = 0.025), 6 (P = 0.004), and 12 (P < 0.001) months after treatment in the pattern laser group.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with advanced DR showed a significant reduction in SFChT over 12 months regardless of the type of laser used; however, the reduction was sooner after conventional laser than after pattern laser.

To investigate the differences in the mRNA and protein expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in murine retina between mice subjected to conventional laser (AG) and those subjected to Pattern Scan Laser (PASCAL) system. Male C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 (G1) receiving retinal scatter laser photocoagulation using with AG photocoagulator (n=16), Group 2 (G2) receiving retinal scatter laser photocoagulation using with PASCAL (n=16) and Group 3 (G3) served as an untreated control group (n=6). Molecular and morphological analyses of VEGF were performed on days 1, 2 and 5 by ELISA, real-time PCR and immuno-histochemical analysis. In samples which underwent AG (G1), when compared with the control group (G3), VEGF mRNA level increased 2.4 folds on day 2, whereas it decreased on day 5 (p□0.001). In samples which underwent PASCAL (G2), on the other hand, VEGF mRNA level increased 1.8 folds on day 1 and 2.2 folds on day 5 when compared with the control group (G3). In samples which underwent AG (G1), when compared with the control group (G3), VEGF protein level increased significantly on day 2, whereas it decreased on day 5 (p□0.001). In group G2, the VEGF levels in the sensory retina significantly increased as compared to control groups at both 2 and 5 days after laser photocoagulation using PASCAL laser (p=0.012, both time points). The peak expressions of VEGF protein in samples which underwent PASCAL and conventional laser were found on day 5 and day 2 respectively. In retinas of PASCAL-treated mice, VEGF immunoreactivity gradually increased during the 5-day follow-up. However, in argon laser group, the strongest VEGF immunoreactivity was detected on day 2, then started to decrease on day 5. In summary, the expression of VEGF protein and mRNA gradually increase during a 5-day follow-up period in PASCAL-treated mouse eyes, whereas in AG group they reach their peak levels on the second day of follow-up and started decreasing after then. These results may also explain why the PASCAL system is less effective in regressing neovascularization in the clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of Pascal laser photocoagulation in comparison with the conventional laser photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.
METHODS: A prospective randomized case series study was done on 120 procedures done in 120 patients divided into two main groups, group A, patients undergoing focal or modified grid macular laser and group B, patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Each of the two groups were subdivided into two subgroups randomly in the first we used conventional laser photocoagulation (groups A1 and B1) and in the other we used Pascal laser photocoagulation (groups A2 and B2).
RESULTS: Procedures in groups A1,2 and in groups B1,2 had successful outcomes. Significantly higher powers were required with the Pascal (groups A2 and B2) than with conventional laser (groups A1 and B1) (p < 0.001) in eyes that underwent PRP and focal/modified grid macular treatment with both systems. No adverse events were noted in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The Pascal photocoagulator is safe, rapid, effective, with rapid learning and had short exposure time. Although the shorter pulse duration of the Pascal necessitates the use of a higher power, it is not associated with adverse effects.