Continuous renal replacement therapy

连续性肾脏替代疗法
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    急性肾损伤(AKI)是多发伤患者常见且严重的并发症,发病率从6%到50%不等。多发性创伤是一种复杂的病理状况,涉及各种专家的合作。一方面,通过液体治疗和氨气支持稳定血流动力学,有了特定的攻击协议,由麻醉师管理。另一方面,如有必要,开始肾脏替代疗法,如连续性肾脏替代疗法(CRRT),由肾病学家管理。选择CRRT既可以管理流体平衡,又可以确保去除有毒物质,以及适当控制电解质和酸碱平衡。
    The development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in polytrauma patients is a common and serious complication, with an incidence ranging from 6% to 50%. Polytrauma is a complex pathological condition that involves the collaboration of various specialists. On one hand, hemodynamic stabilization through fluid therapy and aminic support, with specific attack protocols, managed by anesthetists. On the other hand, if necessary, the initiation of renal replacement therapy such as Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), managed by nephrologists. CRRT is chosen both for managing fluid balance and ensuring the removal of toxic substances, as well as for proper control of electrolytes and acid-base balance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)是一种针对无法耐受常规血液透析的重症患者的透析形式。然而,因为病人一开始通常病得很重,他们在CRRT治疗期间或之后是否会存活总是存在不确定性.由于结果的不确定性,大部分接受CRRT治疗的患者无法生存,利用稀缺资源,提高患者及其家人的虚假希望。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种基于机器学习的算法来预测接受CRRT的患者的短期生存率.我们使用从多个机构接受CRRT的患者的电子健康记录中提取的信息来训练预测CRRT生存结果的模型;在保留的测试集上,该模型的接收器工作曲线下面积为0.848(CI=0.822-0.870)。特征重要性,错误,子群分析为模型预测提供了对偏差和相关特征的洞察。总的来说,我们展示了预测机器学习模型的潜力,以帮助临床医生减轻CRRT患者生存结果的不确定性,通过进一步的数据收集和高级建模,有机会进行未来的改进。
    Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a form of dialysis prescribed to severely ill patients who cannot tolerate regular hemodialysis. However, as the patients are typically very ill to begin with, there is always uncertainty whether they will survive during or after CRRT treatment. Because of outcome uncertainty, a large percentage of patients treated with CRRT do not survive, utilizing scarce resources and raising false hope in patients and their families. To address these issues, we present a machine learning-based algorithm to predict short-term survival in patients being initiated on CRRT. We use information extracted from electronic health records from patients who were placed on CRRT at multiple institutions to train a model that predicts CRRT survival outcome; on a held-out test set, the model achieves an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.848 (CI = 0.822-0.870). Feature importance, error, and subgroup analyses provide insight into bias and relevant features for model prediction. Overall, we demonstrate the potential for predictive machine learning models to assist clinicians in alleviating the uncertainty of CRRT patient survival outcomes, with opportunities for future improvement through further data collection and advanced modeling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年急性肾损伤(AKI)患者需要持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)时,高龄是否与不良预后相关仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估接受CRRT的老年AKI患者的年龄效应和死亡率预测因素。对
    480例接受CRRT的老年AKI患者资料进行回顾性分析。根据年龄将受试者分为两组:年龄较小(年龄,65-74岁;n=205)和老年人(年龄,≥75岁;n=275)。使用多变量Cox回归分析和倾向评分匹配分析了28天和90天死亡率和年龄影响的预测因子。
    CRRT开始时的尿液输出(调整后的危险比[aHR],0.99;95%置信区间[CI],0.99-1.00;p=0.04),操作(AHR,0.53;95%CI,0.30-0.93;p=0.03),和使用主动脉内球囊泵(aHR,3.60;95%CI,1.18-10.96;p=0.02)是28天死亡率的预测因子。缺血性心脏病(aHR,1.74;95%CI,1.02-2.98;p=0.04)和呼吸机的使用(aHR,0.56;95%CI,0.36-0.89;p=0.01)是90天死亡率的预测因子。在多变量或倾向得分匹配的模型中,老年组的28天或90天死亡率未表现出比年轻组更高的风险。
    高龄不是接受CRRT的老年AKI患者死亡的危险因素,提示在需要CRRT的AKI危重老年患者的治疗决策中不应考虑高龄.
    UNASSIGNED: Whether advanced age is associated with poor outcomes of elderly patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate age effect and predictors for mortality in elderly AKI patients undergoing CRRT.
    UNASSIGNED: Data of 480 elderly AKI patients who underwent CRRT were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects were stratified into two groups according to age: younger-old (age, 65-74 years; n = 205) and older-old (age, ≥75 years; n = 275). Predictors for 28-day and 90-day mortality and age effects were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching.
    UNASSIGNED: Urine output at the start of CRRT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.00; p = 0.04), operation (aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93; p = 0.03), and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (aHR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.18-10.96; p = 0.02) were predictors for 28-day mortality. Ischemic heart disease (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.02-2.98; p = 0.04) and use of a ventilator (aHR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89; p = 0.01) were predictors for 90-day mortality. The older-old group did not exhibit a higher risk for 28-day or 90-day mortality than the younger-old group in multivariable or propensity score-matched models.
    UNASSIGNED: Advanced age was not a risk factor for mortality among elderly AKI patients undergoing CRRT, suggesting that advanced age should not be considered for therapeutic decisions in critically ill elderly patients with AKI requiring CRRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定脓毒症相关急性肾损伤(AKI)患者的危险因素并改善其死亡率预测,对于改善该患者人群的不良预后非常重要。本研究旨在比较现有全身性炎症生物标志物的预后价值,并确定接受CKRT的脓毒症相关AKI患者的最佳全身性炎症生物标志物。
    这个多中心,回顾性,观察性队列研究纳入1,500例脓毒症相关AKI患者,接受重症监护和CKRT治疗.主要预测因子是一组13种不同的全身性炎症生物标志物。主要结果是CKRT开始后28天的死亡率。次要结果包括开始CKRT后90天死亡率,CKRT持续时间,出院时依赖肾脏替代疗法,以及重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间的长短。
    添加到广泛接受的急性生理学和慢性健康评估II评分中时,血小板与白蛋白比值(PAR)和中性粒细胞-血小板评分(NPS)对28天死亡率的预测改善最大,其中C统计量的相应增加为0.01(95%置信区间[CI],0.00-0.02)和0.02(95%CI,0.01-0.03)。对于90天死亡率观察到类似的发现。对于较高的PAR和NPS四分位数,28天和90天的死亡率显着降低。即使在多变量Cox比例风险模型中调整了潜在的混杂变量后,这些关联仍然显着。
    在可用的全身性炎症生物标志物中,在常规ICU预测模型中增加PAR或NPS可改善接受重症监护和CKRT的脓毒症相关AKI患者的预后.
    UNASSIGNED: Identifying risk factors and improving prognostication for mortality among patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is important in improving the adverse prognosis of this patient population. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of existing systemic inflammation biomarkers and determine the optimal systemic inflammation biomarker in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CKRT.
    UNASSIGNED: This multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included 1,500 patients with sepsis-associated AKI treated with intensive care and CKRT. The main predictor was a panel of 13 different systemic inflammation biomarkers. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality after CKRT initiation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality after CKRT initiation, CKRT duration, kidney replacement therapy dependence at discharge, and lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays.
    UNASSIGNED: When added to the widely accepted Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) and neutrophil-platelet score (NPS) had the highest improvements in prognostication of 28-day mortality, where the corresponding increases in C-statistic were 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.02) and 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.03). Similar findings were observed for 90-day mortality. The 28- and 90-day mortality rates were significantly lower for the higher PAR and NPS quartiles. These associations remained significant even after adjustment for potential confounding variables in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the available systemic inflammation biomarkers, the addition of PAR or NPS to conventional ICU prediction models improved the prognostication of patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving intensive care and CKRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    连续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)已成为危重患者肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的标准方式。然而,关于停止CRRT的标准缺乏共识。在这里,我们验证了多中心回顾性队列中成功停止CRRT的预测模型的有用性。
    一个时间队列和四个外部队列包括1,517例急性肾损伤患者,他们在2018年至2020年接受了CRRT>2天。该模型由四个变量组成:尿量,血尿素氮,血清钾,和平均动脉压。CRRT的成功停止被定义为此后7天没有RRT要求。
    受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.74(95%置信区间,0.71-0.76)。成功停药的概率约为17%,35%,70%在低分中,中级分数,和高分组,分别。四个队列的模型性能良好(AUROC,0.73-0.75),但在一个队列中较差(AUROC,0.56)。在一个表现不佳的队列中,主治医生主要控制CRRT处方和停药,而在其他四个队列中,肾脏病学家确定了CRRT手术的所有重要步骤,包括CRRT停药的筛查。
    我们的预测模型使用四个简单变量成功停止CRRT的总体性能良好,除了一个肾脏科医师没有积极参与CRRT手术的队列.这些结果表明,需要积极参与肾脏病学家和对CRRT停药的规范化管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become the standard modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients. However, consensus is lacking regarding the criteria for discontinuing CRRT. Here we validated the usefulness of the prediction model for successful discontinuation of CRRT in a multicenter retrospective cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: One temporal cohort and four external cohorts included 1,517 patients with acute kidney injury who underwent CRRT for >2 days in 2018 to 2020. The model was composed of four variables: urine output, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium, and mean arterial pressure. Successful discontinuation of CRRT was defined as the absence of an RRT requirement for 7 days thereafter.
    UNASSIGNED: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.76). The probabilities of successful discontinuation were approximately 17%, 35%, and 70% in the low-score, intermediate-score, and high-score groups, respectively. The model performance was good in four cohorts (AUROC, 0.73-0.75) but poor in one cohort (AUROC, 0.56). In one cohort with poor performance, attending physicians primarily controlled CRRT prescription and discontinuation, while in the other four cohorts, nephrologists determined all important steps in CRRT operation, including screening for CRRT discontinuation.
    UNASSIGNED: The overall performance of our prediction model using four simple variables for successful discontinuation of CRRT was good, except for one cohort where nephrologists did not actively engage in CRRT operation. These results suggest the need for active engagement of nephrologists and protocolized management for CRRT discontinuation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    建议在连续肾脏替代疗法(CKRT)期间进行抗凝治疗,以延长过滤器的使用寿命,以实现最佳的过滤器性能。我们旨在评估CKRT期间抗凝对重症监护病房(ICU)入院90天内透析依赖性和死亡率的影响。
    我们的回顾性观察性研究评估了2017年4月至9月新加坡急性肾损伤(AKI)危重患者的首次CKRT治疗。主要结局是透析依赖或ICU入住90天内死亡的复合结果;主要暴露变量是抗凝使用(局部柠檬酸抗凝[RCA]或全身肝素)。进行了多变量逻辑回归以调整可能的混淆因素:年龄,女性性别,急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHEII)评分,肝功能障碍,凝血病(国际标准化比率[INR]>1.5)和血小板计数小于100,000/uL)。
    该研究队列包括来自14个参与的成人ICU的276名患者,其中176人(63.8%)在入住ICU后90天内出现透析依赖或死亡(19人出现透析依赖,157死亡)。抗凝治疗显著降低了主要结局的几率(调整后的比值比[AOR]0.47,95%置信区间[CI]0.27-0.83,P=0.009)。使用抗凝作为3水平指标变量的Logistic回归分析显示RCA与死亡率降低相关(AOR0.46,95%CI0.25-0.83,P=0.011),肝素具有一致的趋势(AOR0.51,95%CI0.23-1.14,P=0.102)。
    在患有AKI的危重患者中,CKRT期间使用抗凝治疗与ICU入住后90天透析减少或死亡相关,这对于局部枸橼酸抗凝具有统计学意义,对于全身性肝素抗凝具有相同的获益方向.应尽可能考虑CKRT期间的抗凝治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Anticoagulation is recommended during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) to prolong the filter lifespan for optimal filter performance. We aimed to evaluate the effect of anticoagulation during CKRT on dialysis dependence and mortality within 90 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission.
    UNASSIGNED: Our retrospective observational study evaluated the first CKRT session in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) in Singapore from April to September 2017. The primary outcome was a composite of dialysis dependence or death within 90 days of ICU admission; the main exposure variable was anticoagulation use (regional citrate anticoagulation [RCA] or systemic heparin). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for possible confounders: age, female sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, liver dysfunction, coagulopathy (international normalised ratio[INR] >1.5) and platelet counts of less than 100,000/uL).
    UNASSIGNED: The study cohort included 276 patients from 14 participating adult ICUs, of whom 176 (63.8%) experienced dialysis dependence or death within 90 days of ICU admission (19 dialysis dependence, 157 death). Anticoagulation significantly reduced the odds of the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.83, P=0.009). Logistic regression analysis using anticoagulation as a 3-level indicator variable demonstrated that RCA was associated with mortality reduction (AOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.83, P=0.011), with heparin having a consistent trend (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.14, P=0.102).
    UNASSIGNED: Among critically ill patients with AKI, anticoagulation use during CKRT was associated with reduced dialysis or death at 90 days post-ICU admission, which was statistically significant for regional citrate anticoagulation and trended in the same direction of benefit for systemic heparin anticoagulation. Anticoagulation during CKRT should be considered whenever possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项实验研究的目的是阐明在连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)期间,中心静脉导管尖端之间的不同距离是否会影响药物清除。中心静脉导管(CVC)广泛用于重症监护患者的药物输注。如果患者接受CRRT,需要第二个中央透析导管(CDC)。在指南指导下插入CVC的地方,但是关于如何放置多个导管的建议很少。有迹象表明,在CVC中注入的药物的尖端靠近CDC的尖端,可以直接吸入透析机,有增加间隙的风险。然而,关于清除是否受不同CVC和CDC尖端位置影响的研究,当两个导管在同一血管中时,很少。
    方法:在这个有18只仔猪的模型中,在CRRT期间通过CVC输注庆大霉素(GM)和万古霉素(VM)。CVC尖端从尾部放置在与CDC尖端相关的不同位置,即,靠近心脏,到颅骨,即,在心脏的远端.在四个不同位置进行CRRT大约30分钟后,对血清和透析液浓度进行采样:当CVC尖端尾端为2厘米(2)时,在同一级别(0),和2(-2)和4(-4)厘米头端CDC。计算了间隙。进行了混合线性模型,显著性水平设定为p<0.05。
    结果:GM的间隙在+2厘米处有中值,0厘米,-2厘米和-4厘米的17.3(5.2),18.6(7.4),20.0(16.2)和26.2(12.2)ml/min,分别(p=0.04)。VM间隙的中值为+2cm,0厘米,-2厘米和-4厘米的16.2(4.5),14.7(4.9),19.0(10.2)和21.2(11.4)ml/min,分别(p=0.02)。
    结论:CVC和CDC尖端之间的距离可以影响CRRT期间的药物清除。CVC相对于CDC尖端的颅端与尾端位置导致最高间隙。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this experimental study was to elucidate whether different distances between central venous catheter tips can affect drug clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in intensive care patients for drug infusion. If a patient receives CRRT, a second central dialysis catheter (CDC) is required. Where to insert CVCs is directed by guidelines, but recommendations regarding how to place multiple catheters are scarce. There are indications that a drug infused in a CVC with the tip close to the tip of the CDC, could be directly aspirated into the dialysis machine, with a risk of increased clearance. However, studies on whether clearance is affected by different CVC and CDC tip positions, when the two catheters are in the same vessel, are few.
    METHODS: In this model with 18 piglets, gentamicin (GM) and vancomycin (VM) were infused through a CVC during CRRT. The CVC tip was placed in different positions in relation to the CDC tip from caudal, i.e., proximal to the heart, to cranial, i.e., distal to the heart. Serum and dialysate concentrations were sampled after approximately 30 min of CRRT at four different positions: when the CVC tip was 2 cm caudally (+ 2), at the same level (0), and at 2 (- 2) and 4 (- 4) cm cranially of the tip of the CDC. Clearance was calculated. A mixed linear model was performed, and level of significance was set to p < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Clearance of GM had median values at + 2 cm, 0 cm, - 2 cm and - 4 cm of 17.3 (5.2), 18.6 (7.4), 20.0 (16.2) and 26.2 (12.2) ml/min, respectively (p = 0.04). Clearance of VM had median values at + 2 cm, 0 cm, - 2 cm and - 4 cm of 16.2 (4.5), 14.7 (4.9), 19.0 (10.2) and 21.2 (11.4) ml/min, respectively (p = 0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: The distance between CVC and CDC tips can affect drug clearance during CRRT. A cranial versus a caudal tip position of the CVC in relation to the tip of the CDC led to the highest clearance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结核病(TB)是一个重要的全球健康问题,特别是在发展中国家。诊断血液透析患者的潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)至关重要,因为由于免疫反应减弱,该人群中有发展为活动性结核的风险。在这里,我们评估了血液透析患者中LTBI的患病率.
    方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们纳入了Kohgiluyeh和Boyer-Ahmad省血液透析中心的所有患者,伊朗西南部,2018年通过人口普查抽样。使用结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)对患者进行LTBI筛查。所有步骤均由训练有素的医生完成。
    结果:总计,183名患者(平均年龄:59.3,SD=16.0)被纳入研究,其中76名(41.5%)为女性,男性107人(58.5%)。患者及其家庭成员均无结核病史。假设超过5毫米的持续时间为阳性TST结果,22例患者(12%)有LTBI。TST阴性和阳性组之间的人口统计学或临床特征均无差异。
    结论:由于多种免疫和环境因素,血液透析患者容易发生LTBI。筛查LTBI可能有利于预防该人群中的活动性结核病。
    BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant global health concern, particularly in developing countries. Diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in hemodialysis patients is crucial because of the risk of developing active tuberculosis in this population due to attenuated immune response. Herein, we assessed the prevalence of LTBI in hemodialysis patients.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included all patients referred to hemodialysis centers in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, southwest Iran, in 2018 through census sampling. Tuberculin skin test (TST) was utilized to screen the patients for LTBI. All steps were done by trained physicians.
    RESULTS: In total, 183 patients (mean age: 59.3, SD= 16.0) were included in the study of which 76 (41.5%) were females, and 107 (58.5%) were males. Neither the patients nor their family members had a history of tuberculosis. Assuming an above 5-millimeter enduration as a positive TST result, 22 patients (12%) had LTBI. None of the demographic or clinical features differed between TST -negative and -positive groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis patients are prone to LTBI due to several immunological and environmental factors. Screening for LTBI may be beneficial to prevent active tuberculosis in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在接受连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)的脓毒症相关急性肾损伤(AKI)患者中,容量控制的最佳策略和实现容量控制的临床意义尚不清楚。这项随机对照试验旨在比较接受CRRT的脓毒症相关AKI患者根据常规或生物电阻抗分析(BIA)指导的容量控制策略的生存率。作为事后分析,我们还根据已达到的体积积累率([3天期间的累积液体平衡×100]/BIA在登记时测量的液体超负荷)比较了患者的生存率。我们将患者随机分配到常规容量控制策略(n=39)或BIA指导的容量控制策略(n=34)。28天死亡率没有差异(HR,1.19;95%CI,0.63-2.23)或90天死亡率(HR,0.99;95%CI0.57-1.75)在常规和BIA引导容量对照组之间。在次要分析中,已达到的容积累积率与患者生存率显著相关.与达到的体积积累率≤-50%相比,90天死亡率风险的HR(95%CI)为1.21(0.29-5.01),0.55(0.12-2.48),和7.18(1.58-32.51),其中-50-0%,1-50%,>50%,分别。因此,在接受CRRT的脓毒症相关AKI患者中,BIA引导的容量控制并未改善患者预后。在次要分析中,已达到的容积累积率与患者生存率相关.
    Optimal strategy for volume control and the clinical implication of achieved volume control are unknown in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the survival according to conventional or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided volume control strategy in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT. We also compared patient survival according to achieved volume accumulation rate ([cumulative fluid balance during 3 days × 100]/fluid overload measured by BIA at enrollment) as a post-hoc analysis. We randomly assigned patients to conventional volume control strategy (n = 39) or to BIA-guided volume control strategy (n = 34). There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.63-2.23) or 90-day mortality (HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.57-1.75) between conventional and BIA-guided volume control group. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was significantly associated with patient survival. Compared with the achieved volume accumulation rate of ≤  - 50%, the HRs (95% CIs) for the risk of 90-day mortality were 1.21 (0.29-5.01), 0.55 (0.12-2.48), and 7.18 (1.58-32.51) in that of  - 50-0%, 1-50%, and > 50%, respectively. Hence, BIA-guided volume control in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CRRT did not improve patient outcomes. In the secondary analysis, achieved volume accumulation rate was associated with patient survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号