Continuous electroencephalography

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:发作间连续体(IIC)由几种在危重患者中常见的脑电图(EEG)模式组成。针对IIC的研究仅限于危重病儿童,主要集中在与心电图癫痫发作(ESs)的关联上。我们报告了儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中IIC的发生率。然后,我们将IIC模式与不符合IIC标准的节律和周期性模式(RPP)进行比较,以寻找与急性大脑异常的关联。ES,和住院死亡率。
    方法:这是一项回顾性研究,对2021年7月至2023年1月儿童国家医院PICU住院患者的前瞻性数据进行了回顾性分析,并进行了连续脑电图检查。在就诊前,我们排除了已知癫痫和脑损伤的患者。所有患者均进行RPP筛查。美国临床神经生理学会将IIC的重症监护EEG术语标准化应用于每个RPP。IIC和RPP之间的关联不符合IIC标准,临床和脑电图变量,使用比值比(OR)计算。
    结果:在201例患者中,21%(42/201)具有RPP,12%(24/201)符合IIC标准。在有IIC模式的患者中,中位年龄为3.4岁(四分位距(IQR)0.6~12岁).67%(16/24)的患者符合单一的IIC标准,而其余的则符合两个标准。在83%(20/24)的患者中发现了ESs,在96%(23/24)的IIC模式患者中发现了脑损伤。当比较IIC模式的患者与RPP不符合IIC模式的患者时,两种模式均与急性脑异常相关(IICOR26[95%置信区间{CI}3.4-197],p=0.0016vs.RPPOR3.5[95%CI1.1-11],p=0.03),然而,只有IIC与ES相关(OR121[95%CI33-451],p<0.0001)与RPP(OR1.3[0.4-5],p=0.7)。
    结论:节律和周期性模式以及随后的IIC在PICU中常见,并与脑损伤高度相关。此外,IIC,在10%以上的危重儿童中观察到,与ES相关联。RPP和IIC模式对继发性脑损伤的独立影响以及独立于ES的这些模式的治疗需要进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: The ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) consists of several electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns that are common in critically ill adults. Studies focused on the IIC are limited in critically ill children and have focused primarily on associations with electrographic seizures (ESs). We report the incidence of the IIC in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We then compare IIC patterns to rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPP) not meeting IIC criteria looking for associations with acute cerebral abnormalities, ES, and in-hospital mortality.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients admitted to the PICU at Children\'s National Hospital from July 2021 to January 2023 with continuous EEG. We excluded patients with known epilepsy and cerebral injury prior to presentation. All patients were screened for RPP. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standardized Critical Care EEG terminology for the IIC was applied to each RPP. Associations between IIC and RPP not meeting IIC criteria, with clinical and EEG variables, were calculated using odds ratios (ORs).
    RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 21% (42/201) had RPP and 12% (24/201) met IIC criteria. Among patients with an IIC pattern, the median age was 3.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.6-12 years). Sixty-seven percent (16/24) of patients met a single IIC criterion, whereas the remainder met two criteria. ESs were identified in 83% (20/24) of patients and cerebral injury was identified in 96% (23/24) of patients with IIC patterns. When comparing patients with IIC patterns with those with RPP not qualifying as an IIC pattern, both patterns were associated with acute cerebral abnormalities (IIC OR 26 [95% confidence interval {CI} 3.4-197], p = 0.0016 vs. RPP OR 3.5 [95% CI 1.1-11], p = 0.03), however, only the IIC was associated with ES (OR 121 [95% CI 33-451], p < 0.0001) versus RPP (OR 1.3 [0.4-5], p = 0.7).
    CONCLUSIONS: Rhythmic and periodic patterns and subsequently the IIC are commonly seen in the PICU and carry a high association with cerebral injury. Additionally, the IIC, seen in more than 10% of critically ill children, is associated with ES. The independent impact of RPP and IIC patterns on secondary brain injury and need for treatment of these patterns independent of ES requires further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:迟发性脑缺血(DCI)是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后神经系统预后不良的主要决定因素。DCI的检测和治疗是初始动脉瘤修复后aSAH患者的神经重症监护的关键组成部分。
    方法:文献叙事综述。
    结果:在过去的20年里,大血管(血管造影)血管痉挛作为主要的诊断和治疗靶点已经发生了范式转变.相反,假设DCI的病理生理学源于几种前缺血病理机制。临床检查仍然是监测和治疗DCI的最可靠手段,但其价值在昏迷患者中有限。在这样的病人中,DCI的监测通常基于许多神经生理学和/或放射学诊断模式。导管血管造影仍然是检测大血管痉挛的金标准。越来越多地使用计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影代替导管血管造影,因为它的侵入性较小,并且可以与CT灌注成像结合使用。CT灌注允许半定量脑血流测量,包括微循环的评估。它可以用于预测,早期发现,和DCI的诊断,当用作筛查方式时,尚未证明对临床结果的益处。经颅多普勒可被认为是大脑中动脉血流速度的额外无创筛查工具。在其他脑动脉的准确性有限。连续脑电图能够在临床表现之前的可逆阶段检测缺血的早期体征。然而,由于所需的基础设施和数据解释方面的专业知识,其广泛使用仍然有限。近红外光谱,用于评估脑血流动力学的非侵入性和连续模式,已经显示出相互矛盾的结果,需要进一步验证。神经系统检查以外的监测技术可能有助于检测DCI,尤其是在昏迷患者中。然而,这些技术由于其侵入性和/或对局灶性脑区的测量限制而受到限制。
    结论:当前的文献综述强调需要结合现有的模式和开发新的方法来评估脑灌注,大脑新陈代谢,更准确,更全面的大脑功能。
    Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a major determinant for poor neurological outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Detection and treatment of DCI is a key component in the neurocritical care of patients with aSAH after initial aneurysm repair.
    Narrative review of the literature.
    Over the past 2 decades, there has been a paradigm shift away from macrovascular (angiographic) vasospasm as a main diagnostic and therapeutic target. Instead, the pathophysiology of DCI is hypothesized to derive from several proischemic pathomechanisms. Clinical examination remains the most reliable means for monitoring and treatment of DCI, but its value is limited in comatose patients. In such patients, monitoring of DCI is usually based on numerous neurophysiological and/or radiological diagnostic modalities. Catheter angiography remains the gold standard for the detection of macrovascular spasm. Computed tomography (CT) angiography is increasingly used instead of catheter angiography because it is less invasive and may be combined with CT perfusion imaging. CT perfusion permits semiquantitative cerebral blood flow measurements, including the evaluation of the microcirculation. It may be used for prediction, early detection, and diagnosis of DCI, with yet-to-prove benefit on clinical outcome when used as a screening modality. Transcranial Doppler may be considered as an additional noninvasive screening tool for flow velocities in the middle cerebral artery, with limited accuracy in other cerebral arteries. Continuous electroencephalography enables detection of early signs of ischemia at a reversible stage prior to clinical manifestation. However, its widespread use is still limited because of the required infrastructure and expertise in data interpretation. Near-infrared spectroscopy, a noninvasive and continuous modality for evaluation of cerebral blood flow dynamics, has shown conflicting results and needs further validation. Monitoring techniques beyond neurological examinations may help in the detection of DCI, especially in comatose patients. However, these techniques are limited because of their invasive nature and/or restriction of measurements to focal brain areas.
    The current literature review underscores the need for incorporating existing modalities and developing new methods to evaluate brain perfusion, brain metabolism, and overall brain function more accurately and more globally.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有急性神经功能障碍的危重患儿存在多种并发症的风险,这些并发症可以通过无创的床旁神经监测来检测。连续脑电图(cEEG)是儿科重症监护病房中最广泛使用和使用的神经监测形式。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了cEEG的作用以及定量EEG(qEEG)在该患者人群中的新兴作用。cEEG早已被确立为检测危重儿童癫痫发作和评估治疗反应的黄金标准,并讨论了其在脑损伤后背景评估和神经预后中的作用。我们探索cEEG和qEEG作为特定损伤后脑功能障碍程度的生物标志物及其检测神经系统恶化和改善的能力的新兴用途。
    Critically ill children with acute neurologic dysfunction are at risk for a variety of complications that can be detected by noninvasive bedside neuromonitoring. Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is the most widely available and utilized form of neuromonitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit. In this article, we review the role of cEEG and the emerging role of quantitative EEG (qEEG) in this patient population. cEEG has long been established as the gold standard for detecting seizures in critically ill children and assessing treatment response, and its role in background assessment and neuroprognostication after brain injury is also discussed. We explore the emerging utility of both cEEG and qEEG as biomarkers of degree of cerebral dysfunction after specific injuries and their ability to detect both neurologic deterioration and improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:脑血管疾病是儿童发病和死亡的重要原因。对缺血性或出血性中风或脑窦静脉血栓形成的儿童的急性护理侧重于稳定患者,确定侮辱的原因,防止二次伤害。这里,我们回顾了有创和无创神经监测模式在动脉缺血性卒中儿科患者护理中的应用。非创伤性颅内出血,和脑窦静脉血栓形成。
    方法:关于脑血管病患儿神经监测的文献综述。
    结果:神经影像学,近红外光谱,经颅多普勒超声检查,连续和定量脑电图,有创颅内压监测,多模式神经监测可能会增强脑血管疾病患儿的急性护理。神经监测可以在早期识别动脉缺血性中风后的演变损伤中起重要作用。颅内出血,或静脉窦血栓形成,包括复发性梗死或梗死扩大,新的或复发性出血,血管痉挛和迟发性脑缺血,癫痫持续状态,颅内高压,其中,而这个,是转身,可以促进对治疗计划的实时调整。
    结论:在过去的几年中,我们对小儿脑血管疾病的了解急剧增加,部分原因是神经监测模式的进步,使我们能够更好地了解这些情况。我们现在蓄势待发,作为一个领域,利用神经监测能力的进步来确定如何最好地管理和治疗儿童急性脑血管疾病。
    Cerebrovascular disorders are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children. The acute care of a child with an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or cerebral sinus venous thrombosis focuses on stabilizing the patient, determining the cause of the insult, and preventing secondary injury. Here, we review the use of both invasive and noninvasive neuromonitoring modalities in the care of pediatric patients with arterial ischemic stroke, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and cerebral sinus venous thrombosis.
    Narrative review of the literature on neuromonitoring in children with cerebrovascular disorders.
    Neuroimaging, near-infrared spectroscopy, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, continuous and quantitative electroencephalography, invasive intracranial pressure monitoring, and multimodal neuromonitoring may augment the acute care of children with cerebrovascular disorders. Neuromonitoring can play an essential role in the early identification of evolving injury in the aftermath of arterial ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or sinus venous thrombosis, including recurrent infarction or infarct expansion, new or recurrent hemorrhage, vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia, status epilepticus, and intracranial hypertension, among others, and this, is turn, can facilitate real-time adjustments to treatment plans.
    Our understanding of pediatric cerebrovascular disorders has increased dramatically over the past several years, in part due to advances in the neuromonitoring modalities that allow us to better understand these conditions. We are now poised, as a field, to take advantage of advances in neuromonitoring capabilities to determine how best to manage and treat acute cerebrovascular disorders in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    定量脑电图(qEEG)是指原始脑电图(EEG)信号的数值分析和/或视觉变换。重症监护病房(ICU)中的qEEG评估面临着独特的挑战,需要与其他环境中进行的调查分开进行。此外,病理生理学,管理,危重病的脑电图模式通常在成人和儿童之间存在显着差异。因此,区分专门在成人ICU中进行的qEEG的文献很重要.这篇综述的目的是总结过去十年(自2010年以来)使用qEEG对成人ICU患者进行临床评估的研究,并介绍这些技术的最新水平。总的来说,这些研究已经报道,qEEG可以揭示重要的信息比通常可能的传统方法,审查原始脑电图,具有合理的准确性。然而,强调qEEG必须与原始EEG结合并在了解患者临床状况的背景下进行审查是至关重要的。因为每个qEEG面板只关注整个EEG的几个方面,可能需要qEEG面板的不同组合来对每种医疗状况和个体患者进行最佳分析。目前在实践方面,QEEG可以作为补充,有价值的工具的部分脑电图,需要更详细的审查。需要进一步的多中心协作研究,以最终开发采用qEEG的标准化方法,这些方法可在机构中推广。随着qEEG技术的不断进步,包括那些涉及机器学习的,qEEG将进一步受益于特别适合于ICU的算法。
    Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) refers to the numerical analysis and/or visual transformations of raw electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Evaluation of qEEG in intensive care units (ICU) faces unique challenges that warrant investigation separate from those conducted in other settings. Additionally, the pathophysiology, management, and EEG patterns of critically ill conditions often significantly differ between adults and children. Thus, it is important to distinguish the literature on qEEGs specifically performed in adult ICUs. The aim of this review is to summarize the studies using qEEG for clinical evaluation of patients in adult ICUs performed over the past decade (since 2010), and to present the state of the art of these techniques. Overall, these studies have reported that qEEG can reveal important information faster than typically possible with traditional methods of reviewing the raw EEG only, with reasonable accuracy. However, it is crucial to emphasize that qEEG must be reviewed in conjunction with raw EEG and in context of understanding the patients\' clinical status. Because each qEEG panel only focuses on a few aspects of the entire EEG, different combinations of qEEG panels may be required for optimal analyses of each medical condition and individual patient. Currently in practical terms, qEEG can serve as a complementary, valuable tool for portions of the EEG that require more detailed review. Further multi-center collaborative studies are needed to ultimately develop standardized methods of employing qEEG that are generalizable across institutions. As qEEG techniques continue to advance, including those involving machine learning, qEEG will further benefit from algorithms specifically suited for ICUs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后,通常使用皮质脑电图(ECoG)检测到癫痫发作和扩散去极化(SD)。已经描述了癫痫发作和SDs之间的密切关系,但是检测其中一个或两个的含义尚不清楚。我们试图描述这两种现象之间的关系及其临床意义。
    我们在五个学术神经创伤中心对需要神经外科手术的严重TBI患者进行了前瞻性观察性临床研究的事后分析。术中放置硬膜下电极阵列,并在重症监护期间记录ECoG。SDs,癫痫发作,和高频背景特征使用已发布的标准和术语进行离线量化。主要结果是受伤后6个月的格拉斯哥结果扩展量表评分。
    有138例患者有有效的ECoG记录;平均年龄为47±19岁,104人(75%)是男性。总的来说,2,219例ECoG检测到的癫痫发作发生在138例患者中的38例(28%),呈双峰模式,损伤后1.7-1.8天和3.8-4.0天的发病率最高。在头皮脑电图(EEG)上检测到的癫痫发作仅在138人中有18例(13%)通过标准临床护理被诊断出来。在15例ECoG检测到癫痫发作和同期头皮脑电图的患者中,7人(47%)没有明确的头皮脑电图相关性。ECoG检测到的癫痫发作与SDs的严重程度和数量显着相关,发生在138例患者中的83例(60%)。在24名患者中的17名(70.8%)中观察到有ECoG检测到的癫痫发作和SDs的时间相互作用。在控制已知的预后协变量和SD的存在后,在ECoG或头皮EEG中检测到的癫痫发作与6个月的功能结局没有独立关联,但预示着在聚集或等电SD患者中结局更差.
    对于需要神经外科手术的严重TBI患者,癫痫发作的发生率是SDs的一半.如果没有对20%的患者进行ECoG监测,癫痫发作就不会被发现。尽管在该队列中,癫痫发作并不影响6个月的功能结局,它们与心电图恶化和手术后缺乏运动改善独立相关.ECoG检测到的癫痫发作和SD之间的时间相互作用是常见的,并具有预后意义。一起,癫痫发作和SDs可能伴随着对继发性脑损伤发展至关重要的因素的动态连续体发生。ECoG提供了TBI患者临床管理不可或缺的信息。
    Both seizures and spreading depolarizations (SDs) are commonly detected using electrocorticography (ECoG) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). A close relationship between seizures and SDs has been described, but the implications of detecting either or both remain unclear. We sought to characterize the relationship between these two phenomena and their clinical significance.
    We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective observational clinical study of patients with severe TBI requiring neurosurgery at five academic neurotrauma centers. A subdural electrode array was placed intraoperatively and ECoG was recorded during intensive care. SDs, seizures, and high-frequency background characteristics were quantified offline using published standards and terminology. The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score at 6 months post injury.
    There were 138 patients with valid ECoG recordings; the mean age was 47 ± 19 years, and 104 (75%) were men. Overall, 2,219 ECoG-detected seizures occurred in 38 of 138 (28%) patients in a bimodal pattern, with peak incidences at 1.7-1.8 days and 3.8-4.0 days post injury. Seizures detected on scalp electroencephalography (EEG) were diagnosed by standard clinical care in only 18 of 138 (13%). Of 15 patients with ECoG-detected seizures and contemporaneous scalp EEG, seven (47%) had no definite scalp EEG correlate. ECoG-detected seizures were significantly associated with the severity and number of SDs, which occurred in 83 of 138 (60%) of patients. Temporal interactions were observed in 17 of 24 (70.8%) patients with both ECoG-detected seizures and SDs. After controlling for known prognostic covariates and the presence of SDs, seizures detected on either ECoG or scalp EEG did not have an independent association with 6-month functional outcome but portended worse outcome among those with clustered or isoelectric SDs.
    In patients with severe TBI requiring neurosurgery, seizures were half as common as SDs. Seizures would have gone undetected without ECoG monitoring in 20% of patients. Although seizures alone did not influence 6-month functional outcomes in this cohort, they were independently associated with electrographic worsening and a lack of motor improvement following surgery. Temporal interactions between ECoG-detected seizures and SDs were common and held prognostic implications. Together, seizures and SDs may occur along a dynamic continuum of factors critical to the development of secondary brain injury. ECoG provides information integral to the clinical management of patients with TBI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)和创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后,扩散去极化(SD)与较差的结果相关。但是金标准检测需要使用硬膜下条状电极进行皮质电图检查。脑电图(EEG)发作间连续体异常与TBI后不良预后相关,与迟发性脑缺血(DCI)和SAH后不良预后相关。我们检查了使用实质内和硬膜下电极的SAH和TBI患者的SD检出率,并评估了哪些连续EEG(cEEG)测量与颅内定量的SD相关。
    在这个单中心队列中,我们纳入了SAH和TBI患者,这些患者通过8-接触式脑实质内或6-接触式硬膜下带状铂电极或两者进行≥24h的可解释颅内监测.根据既定的共识标准对SD进行评级,并与根据美国临床神经生理学会重症监护脑电图监测共识标准评估的cEEG结果进行比较:横向节律性δ活动,广义节律性三角洲活动,横向定期放电,广义周期性放电,任何发作-发作间连续体,或用于癫痫发作风险估计的复合头皮脑电图工具:2HELPS2B评分。在SAH患者中,cEEG评估了有效的DCI生物标志物:新的或恶化的癫痫样异常和新的背景恶化。
    超过6年,在使用实质内电极记录的28例患者中的5例(18%)和使用硬膜下条状电极记录的10例患者中的4例(40%)中记录了SD。SDs的发生与第1天的cEEG发现之间没有显着关联(美国临床神经生理学会的主要术语为横向周期性放电,广义周期性放电,横向节律性三角洲活动,或癫痫发作,单独或组合)。SAH后,已建立的cEEGDCI预测因子与SD无关。
    实质内记录产生低的SD率,和记录的SD与发作间连续异常或其他cEEGDCI预测因子无关。识别SD的头皮EEG相关性可能需要训练计算EEG分析并使用金标准硬膜下条带皮质电图记录。
    Spreading depolarizations (SDs) are associated with worse outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and traumatic brain injury (TBI), but gold standard detection requires electrocorticography with a subdural strip electrode. Electroencephalography (EEG) ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities are associated with poor outcomes after TBI and with both delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor outcomes after SAH. We examined rates of SD detection in patients with SAH and TBI with intraparenchymal and subdural strip electrodes and assessed which continuous EEG (cEEG) measures were associated with intracranially quantified SDs.
    In this single-center cohort, we included patients with SAH and TBI undergoing ≥ 24 h of interpretable intracranial monitoring via eight-contact intraparenchymal or six-contact subdural strip platinum electrodes or both. SDs were rated according to established consensus criteria and compared with cEEG findings rated according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society critical care EEG monitoring consensus criteria: lateralized rhythmic delta activity, generalized rhythmic delta activity, lateralized periodic discharges, generalized periodic discharges, any ictal-interictal continuum, or a composite scalp EEG tool for seizure risk estimation: the 2HELPS2B score. Among patients with SAH, cEEG was assessed for validated DCI biomarkers: new or worsening epileptiform abnormalities and new background deterioration.
    Over 6 years, SDs were recorded in 5 (18%) of 28 patients recorded with intraparenchymal electrodes and 4 (40%) of 10 patients recorded with subdural strip electrodes. There was no significant association between occurrence of SDs and day 1 cEEG findings (American Clinical Neurophysiology Society main terms lateralized periodic discharges, generalized periodic discharges, lateralized rhythmic delta activity, or seizures, individually or in combination). After SAH, established cEEG DCI predictors were not associated with SDs.
    Intraparenchymal recordings yielded low rates of SD, and documented SDs were not associated with ictal-interictal continuum abnormalities or other cEEG DCI predictors. Identifying scalp EEG correlates of SD may require training computational EEG analytics and use of gold standard subdural strip electrocorticography recordings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述颅内压升高儿童的定量EEG(脑电图)抑制比,将急性抑制比变化与影像学和/或检查结果进行比较。
    我们回顾性回顾了连续脑电图检查时神经影像学和/或检查发现颅内压升高的患者的抑制率。将抑制比率的第一变化的时间与第一图像和/或检查变化的时间进行比较,确认颅内压升高。
    13例中位年龄为3.1岁(四分位距1.8-6.3)的患者在首次增加抑制率后,从识别到急性神经影像学检查或检查颅内压升高的中位时间为3.12小时(四分位距2.2-33.5),抑制率升高。
    在成像和/或检查发现颅内压升高之前,可以看到急性抑制率升高。随着进一步的研究,抑制比可以通过颅内压降低药物来预防与颅内压升高相关的发病率和死亡率.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe quantitative EEG (electroencephalography) suppression ratio in children with increased intracranial pressure comparing acute suppression ratio changes to imaging and/or examination findings.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed the suppression ratio from patients with neuroimaging and /or examination findings of increased intracranial pressure while on continuous EEG. The time of the first change in the suppression ratio was compared to the time of the first image and/or examination change confirming increased intracranial pressure.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen patients with a median age of 3.1 years(interquartile range 1.8-6.3) had a rise in the suppression ratio with median time from identification to acute neuroimaging or examination of increased intracranial pressure of 3.12 hours (interquartile range 2.2-33.5) after the first increase in the suppression ratio.
    UNASSIGNED: Acute suppression ratio increase is seen prior to imaging and/or examination findings of increased intracranial pressure. With further study, the suppression ratio can be targeted with intracranial pressure-lowering agents to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with increased intracranial pressure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    连续脑电图(cEEG)是危重新生儿护理中的基本神经诊断工具,越来越受到推荐。cEEG通过评估背景大脑活动来增强预后,在结合临床因素预测哪些新生儿有癫痫发作风险时,并允许准确诊断和管理新生儿癫痫发作。连续脑电图是诊断新生儿惊厥的金标准方法,在临床高危情况下应用于惊厥的检测,阵发性事件的鉴别诊断,以及对治疗反应的评估。与cEEG相关的高成本是其广泛实施的限制因素。集中式远程cEEG解释,自动癫痫发作检测,产前脑电图是这种神经诊断工具的潜在未来应用。
    Continuous EEG (cEEG) is a fundamental neurodiagnostic tool in the care of critically ill neonates and is increasingly recommended. cEEG enhances prognostication via assessment of the background brain activity, plays a role in predicting which neonates are at risk for seizures when combined with clinical factors, and allows for accurate diagnosis and management of neonatal seizures. Continuous EEG is the gold standard method for diagnosis of neonatal seizures and should be used for detection of seizures in high-risk clinical conditions, differential diagnosis of paroxysmal events, and assessment of response to treatment. High costs associated with cEEG are a limiting factor in its widespread implementation. Centralized remote cEEG interpretation, automated seizure detection, and pre-natal EEG are potential future applications of this neurodiagnostic tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    在连续脑电图监测(cEEG)中,多达一半因中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)住院的患者中,可观察到癫痫发作和异常的周期性或节律性模式。我们旨在确定中度至重度TBI后3个月癫痫发作和异常周期性或节律性模式对认知结果的影响。
    这是对2010年至2016年在美国20个一级创伤中心进行的多中心随机对照2期INTREPID2566临床试验的事后分析。纳入非穿透性TBI和复苏后格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分4-12的患者。根据入院重症监护的方案启动床边cEEG,以及发作-发作间连续体(IIC)模式的负担,包括癫痫发作,是量化的。损伤后3个月的总体认知评分被用作主要结果。
    142例患者(年龄均值+/-标准差32+/-13岁;131[92%]男性)存活,平均总体认知评分为81+/-15;近三分之一被认为功能预后较差。142例患者中有89例(63%)接受了cEEG,其中89人中有13人(15%)有严重的IIC模式。IIC模式的定量负担与全球认知得分成反比(r=-0.57;p=0.04)。在多变量分析中,控制人口统计学后,严重IIC模式的对数转换负担与全球认知评分独立相关,病前估计的智力,损伤严重程度,镇静剂,和抗癫痫药物(比值比0.73,95%置信区间0.60-0.88;p=0.002)。
    癫痫发作和异常周期性或节律性模式的负担与TBI后3个月的认知不良独立相关。它们对长期认知终点的影响以及该人群中癫痫发作检测和治疗的潜在益处值得前瞻性研究。
    Seizures and abnormal periodic or rhythmic patterns are observed on continuous electroencephalography monitoring (cEEG) in up to half of patients hospitalized with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aimed to determine the impact of seizures and abnormal periodic or rhythmic patterns on cognitive outcome 3 months following moderate to severe TBI.
    This was a post hoc analysis of the multicenter randomized controlled phase 2 INTREPID2566 clinical trial conducted from 2010 to 2016 across 20 United States Level I trauma centers. Patients with nonpenetrating TBI and postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale scores 4-12 were included. Bedside cEEG was initiated per protocol on admission to intensive care, and the burden of ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) patterns, including seizures, was quantified. A summary global cognition score at 3 months following injury was used as the primary outcome.
    142 patients (age mean + / - standard deviation 32 + / - 13 years; 131 [92%] men) survived with a mean global cognition score of 81 + / - 15; nearly one third were considered to have poor functional outcome. 89 of 142 (63%) patients underwent cEEG, of whom 13 of 89 (15%) had severe IIC patterns. The quantitative burden of IIC patterns correlated inversely with the global cognition score (r =  - 0.57; p = 0.04). In multiple variable analysis, the log-transformed burden of severe IIC patterns was independently associated with the global cognition score after controlling for demographics, premorbid estimated intelligence, injury severity, sedatives, and antiepileptic drugs (odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.88; p = 0.002).
    The burden of seizures and abnormal periodic or rhythmic patterns was independently associated with worse cognition at 3 months following TBI. Their impact on longer-term cognitive endpoints and the potential benefits of seizure detection and treatment in this population warrant prospective study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号