Conservative Treatment

保守治疗
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:剖宫产子宫切除术作为胎盘植入谱(PAS)的传统治疗方法与严重的发病率有关,保守管理已在许多机构中用于治疗患有PAS的女性。本系统评价旨在根据保守治疗或剖宫产子宫切除术对胎盘植入谱系障碍妇女的产妇结局进行比较。
    方法:在MEDLINE进行了系统的文献检索,EMBASE,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,WebofScience,和四个中文数据库(中国生物医学文献数据库,中国国家知识基础设施,中国万方数据库和VIP数据库)至2024年5月。纳入的研究将是回顾性或前瞻性的设计,并根据保守管理(胎盘部分或完全留在原位)或剖宫产子宫切除术对PAS妇女进行比较和报告相关的产妇结局。对于分类结果,计算具有95%置信区间(95%CI)的风险比(RR),对于连续结果,计算具有95%CI的加权平均差(WMD)。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表对观察性研究进行评估。所有分析均使用STATA18.0版进行。
    结果:8项研究纳入荟萃分析。与剖宫产子宫切除术相比,接受保守治疗的PAS妇女显示出较低的估计失血量[WMD-1623.83;95%CI:-2337.87,-909.79],需要较少的红细胞单位[WMD-2.37;95%CI:-3.70,-1.04]和输注的新鲜冷冻血浆单位[WMD-0.40;95%CI:-0.62,-0.19],需要较短的平均运行时间[WMD-73.69;95%CI:-90.52,-56.86],并呈现膀胱损伤风险降低[RR0.24;95%CI:0.11,0.50],ICU入院[RR0.24;95%CI:0.11,0.52]和凝血病[RR0.20;95%CI:0.06,0.74],但子宫内膜炎风险增加[RR10.91;95%CI:1.36,87.59]和再入院风险增加[RR8.99;95%CI:4.00,12.21].在保守治疗中,原发性或延迟子宫切除术的发生率为25%(95%CI:19-32,I2=40.88%),使用子宫动脉栓塞的发生率为78%(95%CI:65-87,I2=48.79%)。
    结论:当患有PAS的妇女希望保留子宫并了解保守管理的局限性时,保守管理可能是剖宫产子宫切除术的有效替代方法。
    CRD42023484578。
    BACKGROUND: Cesarean hysterectomy as a traditional therapeutic maneuver for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has been associated with serious morbidity, conservative management has been used in many institutions to treat women with PAS. This systematic review aims to compare maternal outcomes according to conservative management or cesarean hysterectomy in women with placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and four Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Wanfang database and VIP database) to May 2024. Included studies were to be retrospective or prospective in design and compare and report relevant maternal outcomes according to conservative management (the placenta left partially or totally in situ) or cesarean hysterectomy in women with PAS. A risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for categorical outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the observational studies. All analyses were performed using STATA version 18.0.
    RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with cesarean hysterectomy, PAS women undergoing conservative management showed lower estimated blood loss [WMD - 1623.83; 95% CI: -2337.87, -909.79], required fewer units of packed red blood cells [WMD - 2.37; 95% CI: -3.70, -1.04] and units of fresh frozen plasma transfused [WMD - 0.40; 95% CI: -0.62, -0.19], needed a shorter mean operating time [WMD - 73.69; 95% CI: -90.52, -56.86], and presented decreased risks of bladder injury [RR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.50], ICU admission [RR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.52] and coagulopathy [RR 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.74], but increased risk for endometritis [RR 10.91; 95% CI: 1.36, 87.59] and readmission [RR 8.99; 95% CI: 4.00, 12.21]. The incidence of primary or delayed hysterectomy rate was 25% (95% CI: 19-32, I2 = 40.88%) and the use of uterine arterial embolization rate was 78% (95% CI: 65-87, I2 = 48.79%) in conservative management.
    CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management could be an effective alternative to cesarean hysterectomy when women with PAS desire to preserve the uterus and are informed about the limitations of conservative management.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023484578.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨子宫内膜异位症患者治疗前和手术和/或保守治疗后3个月的生活质量。
    方法:样本由38名患者组成,其中26人接受了手术治疗,6人接受了药物治疗,6人同时接受手术和药物治疗。捷克版本的子宫内膜异位症健康状况(EHP-30)问卷和数字评定量表(NRS)用于评估生活质量。问卷在治疗前和治疗后3个月完成。
    结论:当使用EHP-30问卷比较生活质量时,治疗开始后3个月,除“不孕”领域外,所有领域的生活质量评分均显著提高。“在控制和无能为力领域观察到统计学上显著的改善,\"\"情感幸福,\"和\"疼痛\"(P<0.0001)。使用NRS的疼痛评估显示月经期间疼痛的主观改善,月经外,在性交过程中,排尿,和排便。据报道,月经期间和月经外疼痛有统计学意义的改善(P<0.0001)。
    结论:子宫内膜异位症的治疗可改善患者的生活质量,同时也可使作为该病主要症状之一的疼痛强度主观降低。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of life of women with endometriosis before treatment and 3 months after the start of surgical and/or conservative treatment.
    METHODS: The sample comprised of 38 patients, of whom 26 underwent surgical treatment, 6 had pharmacological treatment, and 6 had both surgical and pharmacological treatment. The Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) questionnaire in the Czech version and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were used to assess quality of life. The questionnaires were completed before treatment and 3 months into the treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: When comparing quality of life with the EHP-30 questionnaire, 3 months after the start of treatment, significantly better quality of life scores were found in all domains except the domain \"Infertility.\" Statistically significant improvement was observed in the domains of \"Control and powerlessness,\" \"Emotional well-being,\" and \"Pain\" (P < 0.0001). Pain assessment using NRS showed subjective improvement in pain during menstruation, outside menstruation, during intercourse, micturition, and defecation. Statistically significant improvement was reported in pain during menstruation and outside menstruation (P < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of endometriosis improves the quality of life and also leads to a subjective reduction of pain intensity as one of the main symptoms of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:输卵管异位妊娠(EP)是一种危及生命的疾病,特别是如果未诊断或误诊,在低收入国家和/或妇女获得医疗保健的机会有限。目前输卵管EP的管理方案包括手术管理,或甲氨蝶呤的医疗管理。最近的研究,虽然很少,建议来曲唑,芳香化酶抑制剂,可能在输卵管EP的药物治疗中发挥作用。
    目的:评价来曲唑单药治疗输卵管EP的有效性。
    方法:检索电子数据库直至2023年12月31日。
    方法:报告单独使用来曲唑治疗输卵管EP的回顾性或前瞻性研究被认为符合纳入标准。
    方法:合并结果表示为与95CI的OR。使用HigginsI2评估异质性。根据干预后的时间进行亚组分析以比较结果。通过χ2检验检查亚组差异。
    结果:共纳入152例患者。79例患者(51.97%)接受来曲唑治疗,39例(16.54%)甲氨蝶呤,34例(31.49%)接受手术治疗。汇总的数据分析支持来曲唑在减少β-hCG的效果的一致性,随着时间的推移,在研究中具有可比性。来曲唑治疗优于手术,疗效与甲氨蝶呤相同。然而,根据研究设计,所有纳入的研究都被认为存在高偏倚风险,样本代表性,和采样技术。此外,纳入的任何研究均未报告短期和长期副作用.
    结论:来曲唑是治疗输卵管EP的一种有希望的替代甲氨蝶呤和手术治疗的方法。尽管这项荟萃分析表明该药物的有效性和低风险,并鼓励其应用,今天可用的数据仍然非常稀疏,削弱了任何可以提出的主张,并且不足以断言来曲唑在EP的治疗中是安全有效的。绝对需要准确选择患者的随机研究,固定剂量,大样本量,并报告短期和长期副作用以反驳或证实这一假设。
    BACKGROUND: Tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a life-threatening condition, especially if undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, tipically in low income countries and/or where women have limited access to health care. The current management protocol of tubal EP consists of either surgical management, or medical management with methotrexate. Recent studies, while few, have suggested that letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, may play a role in the medical treatment of tubal EP.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of letrozole alone in the medical treatment of tubal EP.
    METHODS: Electronic databases were searched until 31 December 2023.
    METHODS: Retrospective or prospective studies reporting the treatment of tubal EP with letrozole alone were considered eligible for inclusion.
    METHODS: Pooled results were expressed as OR with 95 %CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes according to time after intervention. Subgroup differences were checked through χ2 test.
    RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included. Seventy-nine patients (51.97 %) were treated with letrozole, 39 patients (16.54 %) with methotrexate, and 34 patients (31.49 %) underwent surgical treatment. Pooled data analysis supports the consistency of the effect of letrozole in reducing β-hCG over time at a comparable rate among studies, and that treatment with letrozole is superior to surgery and has the same efficacy as methotrexate. However, all the included studies were judged at high risk of bias in terms of study design, sample representativeness, and sampling technique. Furthermore, short and long term side effects were not reported in any of the included studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole is a promising alternative to methotrexate and surgical therapy in the treatment of tubal EP. Although this meta-analysis suggests efficacy and low hazard of the drug and encourages its application, the data available today remain extremely sparse, which weakens any claims that can be made, and is not sufficient to assert that letrozole is safe and effective in the treatment of EPs. There is an absolute need for randomized studies with accurate patient selection, fixed doses, large sample sizes, and reporting of short- and long-term side effects to refute or confirm this assumption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰椎管狭窄(LSS)可引起一系列马尾神经症状,包括下背部和腿部疼痛,麻木,间歇性跛行.这种疾病影响全球约1.03亿人,尤其是老年人,会严重损害他们的健康和福祉。黄韧带肥大(LFH)是导致该病的主要因素之一。目前建议对由LFH引起的LSS进行手术治疗。对于不符合手术标准的患者,通过使用口服非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)和硬膜外类固醇注射可以缓解症状.运动疗法和针刀也可以帮助减少机械应力的影响。然而,这些方法的有效性各不相同,针对LF肥大的延迟是具有挑战性的。因此,需要进一步研究和开发新药来解决这个问题。几种新药,包括环巴胺和N-乙酰-1-半胱氨酸,目前正在接受测试,可能作为LFH引起的LSS的新疗法。
    Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can cause a range of cauda equina symptoms, including lower back and leg pain, numbness, and intermittent claudication. This disease affects approximately 103 million people worldwide, particularly the elderly, and can seriously compromise their health and well-being. Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (LFH) is one of the main contributing factors to this disease. Surgical treatment is currently recommended for LSS caused by LFH. For patients who do not meet the criteria for surgery, symptom relief can be achieved by using oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and epidural steroid injections. Exercise therapy and needle knife can also help to reduce the effects of mechanical stress. However, the effectiveness of these methods varies, and targeting the delay in LF hypertrophy is challenging. Therefore, further research and development of new drugs is necessary to address this issue. Several new drugs, including cyclopamine and N-acetyl-l-cysteine, are currently undergoing testing and may serve as new treatments for LSS caused by LFH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估胎盘植入谱(PAS)障碍患者的保守手术治疗,并提供一名外科医生的经验。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究包括2013年6月至2023年12月在大学医院手术的245例前置胎盘伴PAS疾病患者。PAS的诊断是由一名围产期专家使用经阴道和经腹超声检查的组合进行的。所有患者均由同一外科医生采用保守手术技术进行手术。患者的人口统计学和临床特征,使用的麻醉和切口类型,并评估了手术技术的细节。结果:在患者中,165在预定时间进行了手术,80人在紧急情况下进行了手术,其中232例(94.69%)在脊髓麻醉下手术。所有患者均接受Pfannenstiel切口手术,然后在胎盘上边界进行横向切口以进入子宫。每位患者平均输注0.52单位红细胞给所有患者。5例患者发生自发性腹腔内出血,8例患者发生手术并发症。无剖宫产子宫切除术,在任何情况下都没有发现孕产妇死亡。手术时间平均为54.44±11.37(30~90)min,平均住院时间为1.71±1.30(1~9)天。结论:对于伴有PAS的完整PP病例,我们建议将此方法作为一种新颖的技术,并且是围产期子宫切除术和其他保守手术治疗方法的可靠且安全的替代方法。这项技术可以保留子宫并减少失血,和输血需求,因此,PAS病例中的孕产妇发病率和死亡率。
    Background: This study is aimed at evaluating the conservative surgical treatment of patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder and at presenting the experience of a single surgeon. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 245 patients with placenta previa accompanied by PAS disorders operated at a university hospital between June 2013 and December 2023. The diagnosis of PAS was made by a single perinatologist using a combination of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography. All patients were operated with conservative surgical technique by the same surgeon. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the anesthesia and incision types used, and the details of the surgical technique were evaluated. Results: Of the patients, 165 were operated on at the scheduled time, 80 were operated on under emergency conditions, and 232 (94.69%) of them were operated on under spinal anesthesia. All patients were operated on with a Pfannenstiel incision followed by a transverse incision to the upper border of the placenta to enter into the uterus. An average of 0.52 units of red blood cells per patient was transfused to all patients. Spontaneous intra-abdominal bleeding developed in five patients, and surgical complications occurred in eight patients. No cesarean hysterectomy was performed, and no maternal mortality was detected in any of the cases. The mean time duration of surgery was 54.44 ± 11.37 (30-90) min, and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.71 ± 1.30 (1-9) days. Conclusions: We recommend this procedure as a novel technique and a robust and safe alternative to peripartum hysterectomy and other conservative surgical management procedures for cases with complete PP accompanied with PAS. This technique preserves the uterus as well as reduces blood loss, and transfusion requirement, and thus maternal morbidity and mortality in PAS cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Coronamortis,文献中记载的解剖学变体,提出了一个值得注意的关注,由于它靠近上耻骨支。因此,它仍然容易受伤,即使在稳定的,骨盆良性骨折,通常通过保守的管理来解决。稳定的骨盆骨折很少与并发症相关;因此,勤奋的监测在临床实践中经常被忽视。然而,它变得至关重要,特别是在老年人群中,因为他们的止血能力欠佳。治疗骨盆骨折相关出血的标准方法包括超选择性栓塞,具有良好结果的微创手术。我们介绍了一例涉及一名61岁女性的病例,该女性在低能量创伤后经历了稳定的骨盆骨折。尽管骨折表面上是良性的,患者表现出由于电晕出血引起的血流动力学不稳定,需要栓塞。骨盆骨折本身得到了保守的治疗,导致患者随后在稳定的情况下出院。因此,我们提倡全面体检,连续血红蛋白监测,以及基于患者临床状况的其他成像模式。
    Corona mortis, an anatomical variant documented in the literature, presents a noteworthy concern due to its proximity to the superior pubic ramus. Consequently, it remains susceptible to injury, even in stable, benign fractures of the pelvis, typically addressed through conservative management. Stable pelvic fractures are infrequently associated with complications; therefore, diligent monitoring is often overlooked in clinical practice. However, it becomes crucial, particularly in the elderly population given their suboptimal hemostatic capabilities. The standard approach for managing bleeding associated with pelvic fractures involves superselective embolization, a minimally invasive procedure with favorable outcomes. We present a case involving a 61-year-old female who experienced a stable pelvic fracture following low-energy trauma. Despite the ostensibly benign nature of the fracture, the patient exhibited hemodynamic instability attributable to bleeding from the corona mortis, necessitating embolization. The pelvic fracture itself was managed conservatively, leading to the patient\'s subsequent discharge in a stable condition. Therefore, we advocate for a comprehensive physical examination, serial hemoglobin monitoring, and additional imaging modalities based on the patient\'s clinical condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是一种常见的神经系统疾病,通常采用钻孔颅骨造口术治疗。然而,保守治疗可能导致一些患者自发性血肿消退。这项研究旨在描述保守治疗而最终不需要额外治疗的患者的特征。
    方法:回顾性收集了2008年至2018年在荷兰三家医院接受保守治疗的患者的数据。主要结果是在最初的CSDH诊断后3个月内不需要额外的治疗。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与未接受额外治疗相关的因素。
    结果:在这项研究中,83例患者纳入研究,61例患者(73%)在3个月内未接受额外治疗。在第一次介绍时,患者的Markwalder评分(MGS)为0(n=5,6%),1(n=43,52%),和2(n=35,42%)。血肿体积较小的患者接受额外治疗的频率较低(调整比值比[aOR]0.78/10mL;95%置信区间[CI]0.64-0.92)。使用抗血栓药物的患者也接受了较少的额外治疗,但这种关联并不显著(aOR2.02;95%CI0.61-6.69).
    结论:四分之三的最初保守治疗的CSDH患者没有接受额外的治疗。通常,这些患者的血肿体积较小。Further,需要前瞻性研究来区分哪些患者需要手术干预,哪些患者需要接受主要保守治疗.
    OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological condition and is typically treated with burr hole craniostomy. Nevertheless, conservative treatment may lead to spontaneous hematoma resolution in some patients. This study aims to describe the characteristics of patients who were treated conservatively without the eventual need for additional treatment.
    METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who were primarily treated conservatively in three hospitals in the Netherlands from 2008 to 2018. The Primary outcome was the nonnecessity of additional treatment within 3 months after the initial CSDH diagnosis. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with not receiving additional treatment.
    RESULTS: In this study, 83 patients were included and 61 patients (73%) did not receive additional treatment within 3 months. Upon first presentation, the patients had a Markwalder Grading Scale score (MGS) of 0 (n = 5, 6%), 1 (n = 43, 52%), and 2 (n = 35, 42%). Additional treatment was less often received by patients with smaller hematoma volumes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78 per 10 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.92). Patients using antithrombotic medication also received less additional treatment, but this association was not significant (aOR 2.02; 95% CI 0.61-6.69).
    CONCLUSIONS: Three quarters of the initially conservatively treated CSDH patients do not receive additional management. Typically, these patients have smaller hematoma volumes. Further, prospective research is needed to distinguish which patients require surgical intervention and in whom primary conservative treatment suffices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    淋巴水肿专家的接触以及他们与患者之间的沟通不良,无法进行适当的淋巴水肿管理。因此,远程系统的开发和传播对于改善医务人员有限或获得医疗协调的农村地区的护理是必要的。
    作者评估了为患者提供淋巴水肿保守治疗教育所需的要素,以确定远程管理的可行性。
    这项研究涉及在当地诊所(A点)中联系健康专业人员治疗淋巴水肿患者,他和临床医生在一起,与位于远程大学的专家认证的淋巴水肿治疗师(CLT)(B点)。
    CLT能够打招呼,访谈并指导患者进行保守治疗。与病人直接接触是不可能的,限制了可视化,触诊,腿部周长测量,和淋巴引流管理。
    研究结果表明,包括保守治疗的远程淋巴水肿管理方法对患者和卫生专业人员都有好处,特别是在农村地区。未来的研究需要证实这种方法的有效性,以确认适当的治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Poor access to lymphoedema specialists and communication between them and patients prevents appropriate lymphoedema management. Therefore, development and dissemination of remote systems is necessary to improve care in rural areas with limited medical personnel or access to medical coordination.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors evaluated the elements required for providing patient education on conservative therapy for lymphoedema, to determine the feasibility of remote management.
    UNASSIGNED: The study involved connecting a health professional in a local clinic (point A) treating a patient with lymphoedema, who was present alongside the clinician, with a specialist certified lymphoedema therapist (CLT) located remotely in a university (point B).
    UNASSIGNED: The CLT was able to greet, interview and provide guidance to the patient on conservative therapy. Direct contact with the patient was not possible, which limited visualisation, palpation, leg circumference measurement, and lymphatic drainage management.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that remote a lymphoedema management approach involving conservative therapy benefits both patients and health professionals, particularly in rural regions. Future studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this approach to confirm adequate treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这里,我们报告了一名左下肢全层烧伤患者,约占全身表面积的8%。初始治疗包括坏死切除术和用分裂厚度移植物覆盖伤口。患者出现铜绿假单胞菌伤口感染,导致皮肤移植物无法完全愈合。该病例因患者并发贫血而进一步复杂化,入院后第11天的血细胞比容水平为19.8%。此外,病人拒绝接受任何输血,给管理策略增加了一层重要的复杂性。总之,病人的危重状态需要立即干预。由于进一步手术清创和自体移植的禁忌症,我们将治疗策略改为保守治疗.首先,入院后17天,采用the疗法清创伤口。随后,第45天使用脱细胞鱼皮敷料完成游离软组织覆盖。这种方法产生了令人满意的伤口闭合。经过大约两个月的住院期(入院后第52天),病人伤口情况稳定出院,接近完全愈合。
    Here we report about a patient with a full thickness burn injury of the left lower extremity with approximately 8% of total body surface area affected. Initial therapy consisted of necrosectomy and wound coverage with split thickness graft. The patient developed a wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resulting in the failure of the skin graft to achieve complete healing. The case was further complicated by the patient\'s concurrent presentation of anemia, characterized by a hematocrit level of 19.8% on 11th day after admission. Additionally, the patient refused acceptance of any blood transfusion, adding a significant layer of complexity to the management strategy. In summary, the patient\'s critical state required an immediate intervention. Due to the contraindication for a further surgical debridement and autograft, we changed the treatment strategy to a conservative approach. First, the wound was debrided employing maggot therapy 17 days after admission. Subsequently, free soft tissue coverage was accomplished using decellularized fish skin dressings on 45th day. This approach yielded satisfactory wound closure. Following an approximately two-month hospitalization period (52nd day after admission), the patient was discharged with a stable wound condition, nearing complete healing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    当老年人发展为慢性肾衰竭时,医生,病人,和家庭成员面临的决定是:如果透析(仍然)开始,还是应该选择保守姑息治疗策略?共同决策的先决条件是关于各种选择的结构化教育,确保传达所有必要的信息和后果。本文概述了血液透析和腹膜透析的优缺点,以及保守-姑息治疗。此外,它讨论了试验透析的选择和停止持续透析的选择.
    When elder individuals develop chronic kidney failure, doctors, patients, and family members are faced with the decision: Should dialysis (still) be initiated, or should a conservative-palliative therapy strategy be chosen? A prerequisite for shared decision-making is structured education about the various options, ensuring all necessary information and consequences are communicated. This article outlines the advantages and disadvantages of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, as well as conservative-palliative therapy. Additionally, it discusses the option of a trial dialysis and the choice to discontinue ongoing dialysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号