A 31-year-old primiparous woman underwent non-invasive prenatal testing. The result was trisomy 13 (T13) positive. The chromosome 13 t-statistics (Z-score) was significantly high. The result of amniocentesis was normal karyotype (46,XX). Detailed ultrasound showed no fetal structural abnormalities. We suspected T13 confined placental mosaicism (CPM) and observed the course naturally. From the late second trimester, severe fetal growth restriction manifested followed by proteinuria and hypertension, diagnosing her with preeclampsia (PE). At 35 + 5 weeks, emergent cesarean section was required, yielding a 1480 g female infant. We sampled five locations of chorionic villi in the placenta. T13 cells dominated cells with normal karyotypes in all parts and the rate of trisomic cells ranged from 57% to 96%, which were generally high rate. None developed PE in reported T13 CPM cases and this is the first case of PE. The dominancy of T13 cells can be associated with PE development.

A high frequency of single nucleotide somatic mutations in the placenta has been recently described, but its relationship to placental dysfunction is unknown.
We performed a pilot case-control study using paired fetal, maternal, and placental samples collected from healthy live birth controls (n = 10), live births with fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to placental insufficiency (n = 7), and stillbirths with FGR and placental insufficiency (n = 11). We quantified single nucleotide and structural somatic variants using bulk whole genome sequencing (30-60X coverage) in four biopsies from each placenta. We also assessed their association with clinical and histological evidence of placental dysfunction.
Seventeen pregnancies had sufficiently high-quality placental, fetal, and maternal DNA for analysis. Each placenta had a median of 473 variants (range 111-870), with 95 % arising in just one biopsy within each placenta. In controls, live births with FGR, and stillbirths, the median variant counts per placenta were 514 (IQR 381-779), 582 (450-735), and 338 (245-441), respectively. After adjusting for depth of sequencing coverage and gestational age at birth, the somatic mutation burden was similar between groups (FGR live births vs. controls, adjusted diff. 59, 95 % CI -218 to +336; stillbirths vs controls, adjusted diff. -34, -351 to +419), and with no association with placental dysfunction (p = 0.7).
We confirmed the high prevalence of somatic mutation in the human placenta and conclude that the placenta is highly clonal. We were not able to identify any relationship between somatic mutation burden and clinical or histologic placental insufficiency.

Mosaicism for autosomal trisomy is uncommon in clinical practice. However, despite its rarity among both prenatally and postnatally diagnoses, there are a large number of characterized and published cases. Surprisingly, in contrast to regular trisomies, no attempts at systematic analyses of mosaic carriers\' demographics were undertaken. This is the first study aimed to address this gap. For that, we have screened more than eight hundred publications on mosaic trisomies, reviewing data including gender and clinical status of mosaic carriers, maternal age and reproductive history. In total, 596 publications were eligible for analysis, containing data on 948 prenatal diagnoses, including true fetal mosaicism (TFM) and confined placental mosaicism (CPM), and on 318 cases of postnatally detected mosaicism (PNM). No difference was found in maternal age between normal pregnancy outcomes with appropriate birth weight and those with intrauterine growth restriction. Unexpectedly, a higher proportion of advanced maternal ages (AMA) was found in normal outcomes compared to abnormal ones (abnormal fetus or newborn) and fetal losses, 73% vs. 56% and 50%, p = 0.0015 and p = 0.0011, correspondingly. Another intriguing finding was a higher AMA proportion in mosaic carriers with concomitant uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosomes 7, 14, 15, and 16 compared to carriers with biparental disomy (BPD) (72% vs. 58%, 92% vs. 55%, 87% vs. 78%, and 65% vs. 24%, correspondingly); overall figures were 78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0026. Analysis of reproductive histories showed a very poor reporting but almost two-fold higher rate of mothers reporting a previous fetal loss from PNM cohort (in which almost all patients were clinically abnormal) compared to mothers from the TFM and CPM cohorts (with a large proportion of normal outcomes), 30% vs. 16%, p = 0.0072. The occurrence of a previous pregnancy with a chromosome abnormality was 1 in 13 in the prenatal cohort and 1 in 16 in the postnatal cohort, which are five-fold higher compared to published studies on non-mosaic trisomies. We consider the data obtained in this study to be preliminary despite the magnitude of the literature reviewed since reporting of detailed data was mostly poor, and therefore, the studied cohorts do not represent \"big data\". Nevertheless, the information obtained is useful both for clinical genetic counseling and for modeling further studies.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) investigates placental DNA and may detect confined placental mosaicism (CPM). The aim of this study was to confirm CPM in the term placenta in cases with abnormal NIPT but normal follow-up cytogenetic studies of fetus and mother. Additionally we examined the distribution of abnormal cells over the placenta.
Four chorionic villus (CV) biopsies from four placental quadrants were requested in cases where CPM was assumed. Both cell lineages of the CV, cytotrophoblast (CTB) and mesenchymal core (MC), were analyzed separately with SNP array.
The chromosome aberration was confirmed in 67 % of the placentas. Three quarters of the CTB and MC biopsies from these mosaic placentas were uniformly normal (57 %) or abnormal (20 %), and a minority showed mosaicism. Among 16 cases of CPM where first trimester CV were examined as well, 11 had chromosomally normal results during pregnancy.
Cytogenetic investigations of term placental biopsies suspected to be affected with CPM did not reveal the chromosome aberration in one third of the placentas. This is caused by the patchy pattern in which chromosomally abnormal cells are distributed over the placenta with the majority of the biopsies being uniformly normal. Further CPM research, including its clinical impact, requires the analysis of more than four biopsies to get insight into the extent of the affected part. Moreover, a subset of CPM type 1 and 3 seems to be only detectable with NIPT and not with first trimester CVS.

Confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is thought to be one of the main sources of false-positive prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, but extensive and systematic studies to prove this statement are limited. We evaluate the contribution of CPM to false-positive prenatal cfDNA screening results in the largest cohort published to date.
We systematically offered postnatal analysis on placenta and umbilical cord to women who had a negative amniocentesis following a positive prenatal cfDNA screening result. A standardized protocol was used in which (when available) biopsies were taken at five locations in the placenta and umbilical cord.
We analyzed a series of 99 placentas. CPM could be confirmed in 32.3 % of cases (32/99). CPM was detected across all subtypes of chromosomal aberrations (common and rare autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome abnormalities, copy number variations and autosomal monosomies). A lower detection rate was present in umbilical cord biopsies in comparison with placental biopsies. When comparing different sections of the placenta, no clear difference could be observed with regard to the probability of CPM being present nor to the grade of mosaicism.
We confirm an important role for CPM in explaining false-positive prenatal cfDNA screening results. Placental regional differences are common. Given its limited clinical relevance, we do however not advocate placental studies in a diagnostic setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT)for detecting rare autosomal trisomies in fetuses.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of cases with rare autosomal trisomies detected by NIPT in our hospital from January, 2019 to April, 2023.Invasive prenatal diagnostic tests including chromosome karyotype analysis, chromosome microarray analysis, copy number variation sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed in all the cases after clinical counseling, and their test results and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 25 282 women receiving NIPT, 56(0.22%)were found to have high risks for rare autosomal trisomies in circulating plasma DNA.Trisomy 7 was the most frequently detected trisomy, accounting for 45% of the total cases(25/56), while trisomies 1, 4, 17, and 19 were not detected.Among the 46 cases with genetic results of the fetuses, 10 were identified to have true fetal mosaicism.The overall positive predictive value of NIPT was 22%(10/46)for rare autosomal trisomies, and 10% for trisomy 7(2/20).Of the 52 cases followed up for pregnancy outcomes, 33(63%)cases without fetal mosaicism resulted in normal live births, while 10 had unfavorable outcomes including fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and maternal complications, and among them fetal growth restriction was the most typical and the earliest condition observed in these cases.Among the 22 followed up cases of non-true mosaicism for trisomy 7, 82% resulted in normal live births.
CONCLUSIONS: NIPT increases the detection rate of true fetal mosaicism but with a low positive predictive value.Most of the cases with non-true mosaicism, particularly trisomy 7, can have favorable outcomes.NIPT can also be useful in identifying causes of fetal growth restriction in the second and third trimesters when invasive prenatal testing does not reveal abnormalities.

The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly considering the increasing uptake of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism, whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of confined placental mosaicism and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy-affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing.

Evidence regarding placental function in pregnancies complicated by confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is conflicting. We aimed to compare placental function between CPM and non-CPM pregnancies prenatally and at birth. A secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between placental function and chromosomal subtype of CPM.
This was a retrospective study of pregnancies with CPM and control pregnancies delivered at a tertiary hospital in Denmark between 2014 and 2017. Placental volume and placental transverse relaxation time (T2*) were estimated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fetal weight and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) were estimated on ultrasound and fetoplacental ratio was assessed on MRI and at birth. These estimates of placental function were adjusted for gestational age and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Within the group of CPM pregnancies, measures of placental function were compared between those at high risk (chromosome numbers 2, 3, 7, 13 and 16) and those at low risk (chromosome numbers 5, 18 and 45X).
A total of 90 pregnancies were included, of which 12 had CPM and 78 were controls. MRI and ultrasound examinations were performed at a median gestational age of 32.6 weeks (interquartile range, 24.7-35.3 weeks). On MRI assessment, CPM placentae were characterized by a lower placental T2* Z-score (P = 0.004), a lower fetoplacental ratio (P = 0.03) and a higher UtA-PI Z-score (P = 0.03), compared with non-CPM placentae. At birth, the fetoplacental ratio was significantly lower (P = 0.02) and placental weight Z-score was higher (P = 0.01) in CPM pregnancies compared with non-CPM pregnancies. High-risk CPM pregnancies showed a reduced placental T2* Z-score (P = 0.003), lower birth-weight Z-score (P = 0.041), earlier gestational age at delivery (P = 0.019) and higher UtA-PI Z-score (P = 0.028) compared with low-risk CPM pregnancies. Low-risk CPM pregnancies did not differ in any of these parameters from non-CPM pregnancies.
CPM pregnancies are characterized by an enlarged and dysfunctional placenta. Placental function was highly related to the chromosomal type of CPM; placental dysfunction was seen predominantly in high-risk CPM pregnancies in which chromosomes 2, 3, 7, 13 or 16 were involved. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

We aimed to identify the causes of inconsistent results between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive testing methods for trisomy 21. In the first case, NIPT was performed at 11 weeks of pregnancy, and the result showed a high risk of trisomy 21 [fetal fraction (FF) = 6.98%, 21 chromosome Z-score = 3.6]. The patient underwent quantitative fluorescent (QF)-PCR and karyotyping at 14 + 0 weeks of pregnancy through CVS showing mosaicism of 47, XX, + 21[11] and 46, XX [39] in karyotyping. The patient underwent amniocentesis at 15 + 6 weeks, showing a normal pattern in QF-PCR and 46, XX karyotyping in long term culture. The second case underwent NIPT at 16 + 5 weeks of pregnancy (FF = 7.52%, 21 chromosome Z-score = 2.503). She underwent an invasive test at 19 weeks through amniotic fluid sampling. As a result, trisomy 21 was detected by QF-PCR, and mosaicism of XX, +21[22]/46, XX [4] was identified by karyotyping. Despite significant advances in fetal chromosome analysis using NIPT, invasive testing is still needed as placenta-derived DNA does not reflect 100% fetal genetic information. Placental mosaicism can be detected by NIPT, but more research is needed to increase its sensitivity. Therefore, if the NIPT result is positive, an invasive test can confirm the result, and continuous monitoring is required even if the NIPT result is negative.

BACKGROUND: Confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is one of the major reasons for discrepancies between the results of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and fetal karyotype analysis.
METHODS: We encountered a primiparous singleton pregnant woman with a rare CPM consisting of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY; and 46,XY, who obtained a false-positive result on NIPT with a high risk for trisomy 21. Copy-number variation sequencing on amniotic fluid cells, fetal tissue, and placental biopsies showed that the fetal karyotype was 47,XXY, while the placenta was a rare mosaic of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY; and 46,XY.
CONCLUSIONS: The patient had a rare CPM consisting of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY; and 46,XY, which caused a discrepancy between the result of NIPT and the actual fetal karyotype. It is important to remember that NIPT is a screening test, not a diagnostic test. Any positive result should be confirmed with invasive testing, and routine ultrasound examination is still necessary after a negative result.