Computer-assisted decision making

计算机辅助决策
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在开发和评估一种全自动方法,该方法使用成对的口腔内扫描(IOSs)与手动方案进行比较,以可视化和测量牙齿磨损进展。
    方法:回顾性纳入了8例严重牙齿磨损进展的患者,在基线和1年时采取IOS,3年,5年随访。为了对齐,自动化方法将牙弓分割成IOS中的单独牙齿。齿对配准所选择的可能不受牙齿磨损影响的牙齿表面,并且在所选择的表面上执行点集配准。使用手动3D磨损分析(3DWA)协议和自动化方法,基于带符号距离确定从基线到每次随访的最大齿形损失。通过将牙齿分割与Dice-Sørensen系数(DSC)和交叉结合(IoU)进行比较,针对3DWA协议评估了自动方法。将牙齿轮廓损失测量值与回归图和Bland-Altman图进行比较。此外,显示了时间间隔与两种方法测量差异之间的关系。
    结果:自动方法在两分钟内完成。对于牙齿实例分割非常有效(826颗牙齿,DSC=0.947,IoU=0.907),并且在牙齿轮廓损失测量结果上观察到0.932的相关性(516对牙齿,平均差=0.021mm,95%置信区间=[-0.085,0.138])。测量差异的可变性在较大的时间间隔内增加。
    结论:与全弓IOS的手动方案相比,所提出的用于监测牙齿磨损进展的自动化方法更快,并且在准确性方面没有临床上的显着差异。
    结论:全科医生和患者可以从牙齿磨损的可视化中受益,允许有关磨损牙齿的治疗要求的量化和标准化的决定。与手动方法相比,所提出的用于牙齿磨损监测的方法将所需的时间减少到不到两分钟,至少花了两个小时.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fully automated method for visualizing and measuring tooth wear progression using pairs of intraoral scans (IOSs) in comparison with a manual protocol.
    METHODS: Eight patients with severe tooth wear progression were retrospectively included, with IOSs taken at baseline and 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups. For alignment, the automated method segmented the arch into separate teeth in the IOSs. Tooth pair registration selected tooth surfaces that were likely unaffected by tooth wear and performed point set registration on the selected surfaces. Maximum tooth profile losses from baseline to each follow-up were determined based on signed distances using the manual 3D Wear Analysis (3DWA) protocol and the automated method. The automated method was evaluated against the 3DWA protocol by comparing tooth segmentations with the Dice-Sørensen coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). The tooth profile loss measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman plots. Additionally, the relationship between the time interval and the measurement differences between the two methods was shown.
    RESULTS: The automated method completed within two minutes. It was very effective for tooth instance segmentation (826 teeth, DSC = 0.947, IoU = 0.907), and a correlation of 0.932 was observed for agreement on tooth profile loss measurements (516 tooth pairs, mean difference = 0.021mm, 95% confidence interval = [-0.085, 0.138]). The variability in measurement differences increased for larger time intervals.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed automated method for monitoring tooth wear progression was faster and not clinically significantly different in accuracy compared to a manual protocol for full-arch IOSs.
    CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners and patients can benefit from the visualization of tooth wear, allowing quantifiable and standardized decisions concerning therapy requirements of worn teeth. The proposed method for tooth wear monitoring decreased the time required to less than two minutes compared with the manual approach, which took at least two hours.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三级和四级(TQ)护理是指需要高度专业化的卫生服务的复杂病例。我们的研究旨在将自然语言处理(NLP)模型与现有的人类工作流程的能力进行比较,以预测性地识别将请求转移到学术健康中心的TQ案例。
    从电子健康记录中查询了从2020年7月1日至2020年12月31日的6个月期间的医院间转移数据。在研究期间,NLP模型被允许对与人类预测工作流程相同的病例生成预测。然后将这些预测与真实的TQ结果进行回顾性比较。
    有1895个由人类预测工作流程和NLP模型标记的转移案例,所有这些都对真实的TQ标签进行了回顾性确认.NLP模型接收器工作特性曲线的曲线下面积为0.91。使用≥0.3的模型概率阈值视为TQ为正,NLP模型的准确度为81.5%,而人类预测的准确度为80.3%(P=.198),而灵敏度为83.6%,而67.7%(P<.001).
    NLP模型与人类工作流程一样准确,但灵敏度更高。这意味着NLP模型确定的TQ案例增加了15.9%。
    将NLP模型集成到现有工作流程中,因为自动化决策支持可以转化为在转移过程开始时识别的更多TQ案例。
    UNASSIGNED: Tertiary and quaternary (TQ) care refers to complex cases requiring highly specialized health services. Our study aimed to compare the ability of a natural language processing (NLP) model to an existing human workflow in predictively identifying TQ cases for transfer requests to an academic health center.
    UNASSIGNED: Data on interhospital transfers were queried from the electronic health record for the 6-month period from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The NLP model was allowed to generate predictions on the same cases as the human predictive workflow during the study period. These predictions were then retrospectively compared to the true TQ outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 1895 transfer cases labeled by both the human predictive workflow and the NLP model, all of which had retrospective confirmation of the true TQ label. The NLP model receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve of 0.91. Using a model probability threshold of ≥0.3 to be considered TQ positive, accuracy was 81.5% for the NLP model versus 80.3% for the human predictions (P = .198) while sensitivity was 83.6% versus 67.7% (P<.001).
    UNASSIGNED: The NLP model was as accurate as the human workflow but significantly more sensitive. This translated to 15.9% more TQ cases identified by the NLP model.
    UNASSIGNED: Integrating an NLP model into existing workflows as automated decision support could translate to more TQ cases identified at the onset of the transfer process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    高性能计算(HPC)的进步,高性能数据分析(HPDA)和AI及其与工作流程的协同集成彻底改变了许多行业,除其他外,医疗和制药部门。在这个技术和医疗保健的特殊部分,我们深入研究了HPC的显着进步和潜力,HPDA和AI(统称为HPC+)推动创新,改善患者预后,加速药物发现。本期文章揭示了HPC+在解决几个关键领域的潜力,包括医学成像,个性化医疗,药物发现,以及临床和政治决策支持。
    The advance of high-performance computing (HPC), high-performance data analytics (HPDA) and AI and their synergetic integration into workflows has revolutionized numerous industries, amongst others the medical and pharmaceutical sectors. In this special section of Technology and Health Care, we delve into the remarkable advancements and potential of HPC, HPDA and AI (together termed HPC+) in driving innovation, improving patient outcomes, and accelerating drug discovery. The articles in this issue shed light onto the potential of HPC+ in addressing several critical areas, including medical imaging, personalized medicine, drug discovery, and clinical as well as political decision support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    知识转换过程涉及癫痫的诊断和治疗指南,以可执行和可计算的知识库作为决策支持系统的基础。我们提出了一个透明的知识表示模型,该模型有助于技术实现和验证。知识用普通表格表示,在执行简单推理的软件的前端代码中使用。简单的结构对于非技术人员来说也是足够和可理解的(即,临床医生)。
    The knowledge transformation process involves the guideline for the diagnosis and therapy of epilepsy to an executable and computable knowledge base that serves as the basis for a decision-support system. We present a transparent knowledge representation model which facilitates technical implementation and verification. Knowledge is represented in a plain table, used in the frontend code of the software where simple reasoning is performed. The simple structure is sufficient and comprehensible also for non-technical persons (i.e., clinicians).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多重用药的主要并发症,这被称为同时使用五种以上的药物,是潜在的不适当的药物(PIMs),药物-药物,和药物-疾病相互作用。它的目的是准备一个辅助工具,以减少并发症的多重用药和支持合理用药(RDU),通过评估患者的年龄,毒品,和慢性疾病在这项研究中。
    在本研究的第一阶段,作为方法论研究,根据当前和有效的6个老年患者PIM标准,使用包含430种最常用药物和老年病慢性病的相互作用信息的数据库生成了一种最新和全面的辅助工具作为参考方法,和药物说明书,相关文章,和指导方针。然后,设计和开发了一个人工智能(AI)支持的Web应用程序,以促进该工具的实际使用。之后,一项横断面观察性单中心研究的数据被用于通过Web应用程序检测PIM的速率和时间以及药物相互作用.拟议的Web应用程序可在https://fastrational.com/上公开获得。
    虽然建议工具的PIM覆盖率为75.3%,欧盟(7)-PIM的PIM覆盖率,美国-FORTA,停止时间,啤酒2019,STOPP,Web应用程序数据库中的Priscus标准分别从最高到最低(63.5%-19.5%)。拟议的工具包括所有PIM,药物-药物,和其他标准检测到的药物-疾病相互作用信息。全科医生平均在2278秒内检测到没有网络应用程序的患者的交互,虽然使用Web应用程序的时间平均减少到33.8秒,这种情况具有统计学意义。
    在文献和本研究中,仅PIM标准不足以纳入积极使用的药物,且显示异质性.此外,许多研究表明,药物监管在实践中的最大障碍是“时间限制”。“提出的综合辅助工具分析年龄,毒品,和专门针对患者的疾病比手动方法快60倍,它提供了对相关参考文献的快速访问,并最终为临床医生支持RDU,第一个也是唯一一个AI支持的Web应用程序。
    UNASSIGNED: The main complications of polypharmacy, which is known as the simultaneous use of more than five drugs, are potentially inappropriate medicines(PIMs), drug-drug, and drug-disease interaction. It is aimed to prepare an auxiliary tool to reduce the complications of polypharmacy and to support rational drug use(RDU), by evaluating the patient with age, drugs, and chronic diseases in this study.
    UNASSIGNED: In the first phase of this study, as methodological research, an up-to-date and comprehensive auxiliary tool as a reference method was generated with a database containing interaction information of 430 most commonly used drug agents and chronic diseases in geriatrics in the light of current and valid 6 PIM criteria for geriatric patients, and medication prospectuses, relevant current articles, and guidelines. Then, an artificial intelligence(AI) supported web application was designed and developed to facilitate the practical use of the tool. Afterward, the data of a cross-sectional observational single-center study were used for the rate and time of PIM and drug interaction detection with the web application. The proposed web application is publicly available at https://fastrational.com/.
    UNASSIGNED: While the PIM coverage rate with the proposed tool was 75.3%, the PIM coverage rate of EU(7)-PIM, US-FORTA, TIME-to-STOPP, Beers 2019, STOPP, Priscus criteria in the web application database respectively(63.5%-19.5%) from the highest to the lowest. The proposed tool includes all PIMs, drug-drug, and drug-disease interaction information detected with other criteria. A general practitioner detects interactions for a patient without the web application in 2278 s on average, while the time with the web application is decreased to 33.8 s on average, and this situation is statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: In the literature and this study, the PIM criteria alone are insufficient to include actively used medicines and it shows heterogeneity. In addition, many studies showed that the biggest obstacle to drug regulation in practice is \"time constraints.\" The proposed comprehensive auxiliary tool analyzes age, drugs, and diseases specifically for the patient 60 times faster than the manual method, and it provides quick access to the relevant references, and ultimately supports RDU for the clinician, with the first and only AI-supported web application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床实践指南是基于现有最佳证据的声明,他们的目标是提高病人护理的质量。将临床实践指南集成到计算机系统中可以帮助医生减少医疗错误并帮助他们获得最佳实践。基于指南的临床决策支持系统在支持医生的决策方面发挥着重要作用。同时,系统错误是决策支持系统设计中最关键的问题,可以影响其性能和效率。一个完善的本体可以在这个问题上有所帮助。拟议的系统审查将具体说明方法,组件,规则的语言,当前基于本体驱动的基于指南的临床决策支持系统的评价方法。
    方法:这篇综述将通过搜索MEDLINE(通过Ovid)来识别文献,PubMed,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,CINAHL,ScienceDirect,IEEEXplore,ACM数字图书馆。灰色文学,引用列表,并将检索所纳入研究的引用文章。纳入研究的质量将通过混合方法评估工具(MMAT-2018版)进行评估。至少有两名独立审稿人将进行筛选,质量评估,和数据提取。第三位审稿人将解决任何分歧。将根据系统类型和本体工程评估数据进行适当的数据分析。
    结论:该研究将为在基于指南的临床决策支持系统中应用本体提供证据。这项系统审查的结果将为决策支持系统设计人员和开发人员提供指导,技术人员,系统提供商,政策制定者,和利益相关者。本体构建者可以使用本综述中的信息为个性化医疗构建结构良好的本体。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42018106501.
    Clinical practice guidelines are statements which are based on the best available evidence, and their goal is to improve the quality of patient care. Integrating clinical practice guidelines into computer systems can help physicians reduce medical errors and help them to have the best possible practice. Guideline-based clinical decision support systems play a significant role in supporting physicians in their decisions. Meantime, system errors are the most critical concerns in designing decision support systems that can affect their performance and efficacy. A well-developed ontology can be helpful in this matter. The proposed systematic review will specify the methods, components, language of rules, and evaluation methods of current ontology-driven guideline-based clinical decision support systems.
    This review will identify literature through searching MEDLINE (via Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, IEEEXplore, and ACM Digital Library. Gray literature, reference lists, and citing articles of the included studies will be searched. The quality of the included studies will be assessed by the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT-version 2018). At least two independent reviewers will perform the screening, quality assessment, and data extraction. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Proper data analysis will be performed based on the type of system and ontology engineering evaluation data.
    The study will provide evidence regarding applying ontologies in guideline-based clinical decision support systems. The findings of this systematic review will be a guide for decision support system designers and developers, technologists, system providers, policymakers, and stakeholders. Ontology builders can use the information in this review to build well-structured ontologies for personalized medicine.
    PROSPERO CRD42018106501.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to develop a new machine learning model for the surgery/non-surgery decision in class III patients and evaluate the validity and reliability of this model.
    METHODS: The sample consisted of 196 skeletal class III patients. All the cases were allocated randomly, 136 to the training set and the remaining 60 to the test set. Using the test set, the success rate of the artificial neural network model was estimated, along with a 95% confidence interval. To predict surgical cases, we trained a binary classifier using two different methods: random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR).
    RESULTS: Both the RF and the LR model showed high separability when classifying each patient for surgical or non-surgical treatment. RF achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9395 on the test set. 95% confidence intervals were computed by bootstrap sampling as lower bound = 0.7908 and higher bound = 0.9799. On the other hand, LR achieved an AUC of 0.937 on the test set. 95% confidence intervals were computed by bootstrap sampling as lower bound = 0.8467 and higher bound = 0.9812.
    CONCLUSIONS: RF and LR machine learning models can be used to generate accurate and reliable algorithms to successfully classify patients up to 90%. The features selected by the algorithms coincide with the clinical features that we as clinicians weigh heavily when determining a treatment plan. This study further supports that overjet, Wits appraisal, lower incisor angulation, and Holdaway H angle can be used as strong predictors in assessing a patient\'s surgical needs.
    UNASSIGNED: ZIELSETZUNG: Primäres Ziel dieser Studie war es, ein neues Machine-Learning-Modell für die Entscheidung Operation vs. nichtoperative Behandlung bei Klasse-III-Patienten zu entwickeln und die Validität und Reliabilität dieses Modells zu bewerten.
    METHODS: Die Stichprobe bestand aus 196 Patienten der skelettalen Klasse III. Alle Fälle wurden randomisiert einer Gruppe zugewiesen, 136 der Trainingsgruppe und die übrigen 60 der Testgruppe. Anhand des Testsatzes wurde die Erfolgsquote des künstlichen neuronalen Netzes mit einem Konfidenzintervall von 95% abgeschätzt. Zur Prädiktion chirurgischer Fälle wurde ein binärer Klassifikator mit 2 unterschiedlichen Methoden trainiert: Random Forest (RF) und logistische Regression (LR).
    UNASSIGNED: Sowohl das RF- als auch das LR-Modell zeigten eine hohe Trennschärfe bei der Klassifizierung der einzelnen Patienten für eine chirurgische bzw. eine nichtchirurgische Behandlung. RF erreichte eine AUC („area under the curve“) von 0,9395 in der Testgruppe. Die 95%-Konfidenzintervalle wurden mittels Bootstrap-Stichproben als untere Grenze = 0,7908 und obere Grenze = 0,9799 berechnet. Andererseits erreichte LR eine AUC von 0,937 in der Testgruppe. Die 95%-Konfidenzintervalle wurden durch Bootstrap-Sampling als untere Grenze = 0,8467 und obere Grenze = 0,9812 berechnet.
    UNASSIGNED: Mithilfe von RF- und LR-Modellen für maschinelles Lernen lassen sich genaue und zuverlässige Algorithmen erstellen, die Patienten in bis zu 90% der Fälle erfolgreich klassifizieren. Die von den Algorithmen ausgewählten Merkmale stimmen mit den klinischen Merkmalen überein, die wir als Kliniker bei der Festlegung eines Behandlungsplans stark gewichten. Diese Studie belegt außerdem, dass Overjet, Wits-Appraisal, die Angulation der unteren Inzisiven und der Holdaway-H-Winkel als starke Prädiktoren für die Beurteilung des Operationsbedarfs eines Patienten verwendet werden können.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:患者人数增加,随着复杂性的增加,挑战当前术前流程的可持续性。我们评估了电子筛查应用程序是否可以将需要术前咨询的患者与手术当天可以首次见到的低风险患者区分开来。
    方法:前瞻性队列研究。
    方法:某三级专科医院术前门诊。
    方法:1395名接受手术或手术镇静的成年患者。
    方法:我们评估了一种新的电子术前筛查应用,该应用包括一份问卷,最多涉及185个关于患者病史和当前健康状况的问题。该应用程序提供了一个广泛的健康报告,包括美国麻醉医师协会(ASA-PS)的身体状态分类和建议麻醉医师在术前诊所咨询或批准在手术当天进行筛查。
    方法:使用诊断准确性和一致性的措施,将电子筛查系统的建议与常规术前评估进行比较。次要结果包括ASA-PS分类,患者满意度,以及麻醉医师对筛查报告的完整性和质量的意见。
    结果:检测需要额外咨询的患者的敏感性为97.5%(95CI91.2-99.7),阴性似然比为0.08(95CI0.02-0.32)。电子筛查和麻醉师都批准了407例(29.2%)患者进行手术。在909例(65.2%)中,电子筛查系统建议进一步会诊,而麻醉师批准患者(特异性30.9%(95CI28.4-33.5);一致性水平差(=0.04)).关于ASA-PS分类评分的一致性较弱(=0.48)。大多数患者(78.0%)对电子筛查代替常规术前评估感到积极。
    结论:电子筛查可以可靠地识别在手术当天首次与麻醉师接触的患者,可能允许大部分患者安全地绕过术前诊所。
    OBJECTIVE: Rising patient numbers, with increasing complexity, challenge the sustainability of the current preoperative process. We evaluated whether an electronic screening application can distinguish patients that need a preoperative consultation from low-risk patients that can be first seen on the day of surgery.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study.
    METHODS: Preoperative clinic of a tertiary academic hospital.
    METHODS: 1395 adult patients scheduled for surgery or procedural sedation.
    METHODS: We assessed a novel electronic preoperative screening application which consists of a questionnaire with a maximum of 185 questions regarding the patient\'s medical history and current state of health. The application provides an extensive health report, including an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) classification and a recommendation for either consultation by an anesthesiologist at the preoperative clinic or approval for screening on the day of surgery.
    METHODS: The recommendation of the electronic screening system was compared with the regular preoperative assessment using measures of diagnostic accuracy and agreement. Secondary outcomes included ASA-PS classification, patient satisfaction, and the anesthesiologists\' opinion on the completeness and quality of the screening report.
    RESULTS: Sensitivity to detect patients who needed additional consultation was 97.5% (95%CI 91.2-99.7) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95%CI 0.02-0.32). 407 (29.2%) patients were approved for surgery by both electronic screening and anesthesiologist. In 909 (65.2%) cases, the electronic screening system recommended further consultation while the anesthesiologist approved the patient (specificity 30.9% (95%CI 28.4-33.5); poor level of agreement (ĸ = 0.04)). Agreement regarding ASA-PS classification scores was weak (ĸ = 0.48). The majority of patients (78.0%) felt positive about electronic screening replacing the regular preoperative assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Electronic screening can reliably identify patients who can have their first contact with an anesthesiologist on the day of surgery, potentially allowing a major proportion of patients to safely bypass the preoperative clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结构化摘要目的:颅内压(ICP)的异常升高可导致危险甚至致命的结果。早期发现高颅内压事件对于挽救重症监护病房(ICU)的生命至关重要。尽管机器学习(ML)技术与临床诊断相关的许多应用,用于连续ICP检测或短期预测的ML应用很少报道。本研究提出了一种有效的方法,将人工递归神经网络应用于TBI患者ICP评估的早期预测。方法:ICP数据预处理后,为13名患者生成学习模型,通过输入前20分钟的ICP信号,连续预测ICP信号发生,并对即将到来的10分钟内的事件进行分类.结果:作为整体模型性能,平均准确率为94.62%,平均灵敏度为74.91%,平均特异性为94.83%,平均均方根误差约为2.18mmHg。结论:这项研究解决了颅脑外伤患者管理的重要临床问题。机器学习模型数据支持实时连续预测ICP,这对于适当的临床干预至关重要。结果表明,我们基于机器学习的模型具有较高的自适应性能,准确度,和效率。
    Structured Abstract-Objective: Abnormal elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP) can cause dangerous or even fatal outcomes. The early detection of high intracranial pressure events can be crucial in saving lives in an intensive care unit (ICU). Despite many applications of machine learning (ML) techniques related to clinical diagnosis, ML applications for continuous ICP detection or short-term predictions have been rarely reported. This study proposes an efficient method of applying an artificial recurrent neural network on the early prediction of ICP evaluation continuously for TBI patients. Methods: After ICP data preprocessing, the learning model is generated for thirteen patients to continuously predict the ICP signal occurrence and classify events for the upcoming 10 minutes by inputting the previous 20-minutes of the ICP signal. Results: As the overall model performance, the average accuracy is 94.62%, the average sensitivity is 74.91%, the average specificity is 94.83%, and the average root mean square error is approximately 2.18 mmHg. Conclusion: This research addresses a significant clinical problem with the management of traumatic brain injury patients. The machine learning model data enables early prediction of ICP continuously in a real-time fashion, which is crucial for appropriate clinical interventions. The results show that our machine learning-based model has high adaptive performance, accuracy, and efficiency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床决策支持系统通常采用并实施现有的临床实践指南,从而提高指南的可用性。提高指导方针的依从性,和数据集成。这些系统中的大多数使用临床实践指南的基于内部状态的模型来导出推荐,但不向用户提供对模型的全面洞察。
    目的:在这里,我们提出了一种基于动态指南可视化的新方法,该方法结合了个体患者当前的治疗背景。
    方法:我们得出了通过这种增强的指南可视化来满足的多个要求。使用业务流程和模型符号作为计算机可解释指南的表示格式,采用基于图形的表示和逻辑推断的组合来进行指南处理。使用业务规则引擎来推断上下文特定的指南可视化。
    结果:我们实施并试验了一种用于指南解释和处理的算法方法。由于这种解释,得出并可视化了特定于上下文的指南。我们的实现可以用作软件库,但也提供了代表性的状态转移接口。春天,卡蒙达,和Drools是实现的主要框架。使用可视化的演示工具的形成性可用性评估在临床医生中获得了很高的接受度。
    结论:新的指南处理和可视化概念被证明在技术上是可行的。该方法解决了基于指南的临床决策支持系统的已知问题。需要进一步研究以评估该方法在特定医疗用例中的适用性。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems often adopt and operationalize existing clinical practice guidelines leading to higher guideline availability, increased guideline adherence, and data integration. Most of these systems use an internal state-based model of a clinical practice guideline to derive recommendations but do not provide the user with comprehensive insight into the model.
    OBJECTIVE: Here we present a novel approach based on dynamic guideline visualization that incorporates the individual patient\'s current treatment context.
    METHODS: We derived multiple requirements to be fulfilled by such an enhanced guideline visualization. Using business process and model notation as the representation format for computer-interpretable guidelines, a combination of graph-based representation and logical inferences is adopted for guideline processing. A context-specific guideline visualization is inferred using a business rules engine.
    RESULTS: We implemented and piloted an algorithmic approach for guideline interpretation and processing. As a result of this interpretation, a context-specific guideline is derived and visualized. Our implementation can be used as a software library but also provides a representational state transfer interface. Spring, Camunda, and Drools served as the main frameworks for implementation. A formative usability evaluation of a demonstrator tool that uses the visualization yielded high acceptance among clinicians.
    CONCLUSIONS: The novel guideline processing and visualization concept proved to be technically feasible. The approach addresses known problems of guideline-based clinical decision support systems. Further research is necessary to evaluate the applicability of the approach in specific medical use cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号