Lymphoedema is a chronic disease affecting millions. Standard treatment is Complex Decongestive Therapy (CDT) which entails physical interaction with a therapist to imitate the drainage of the edematous fluid along with training to continue self-care at home. We present a case study of initiating CDT totally online. The result showed that, though totally online lymphoedema care is possible, hurdles do exist. It can be an option to exercise even after the COVID period.

UNASSIGNED: Lymphedema is the most common complication of breast cancer patients. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) is often recommended but the efficacy varies due to the complexity of management. This study investigated a novel model of CDT based on a mobile application with the aim of improving the management of lymphedema in China.
UNASSIGNED: We developed a novel model of CDT for breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, including 5 days of CDT therapy with training provided by medical staff in the outpatient clinic and 3 weeks of self-administrated CDT with daily online instructions during phase I, and a life-long maintenance treatment with online instructions once a week for phase II, which delivered by WeChat public accounts. The breast cancer and lymphedema symptom experience index (BCLE-SEI) and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used to assess lymphatic symptoms and quality of life. Arm volume and lymphatic symptoms were assessed at baseline, and at 5 days, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment. The quality of life was assessed at baseline and at 3 months post-treatment.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 88 patients with lymphedema were recruited, of whom, 61 followed the protocols and were further analyzed for this study. The mean relative excess arm volume (EAV) was reduced from a baseline value of 30.72% to 22.05%, 18.46%, and 16.67% at 5 days, 1 month, and 3 months post-therapy, respectively (P=0.000). The BCLE-SEI scores of lymphatic pain, heaviness, and impaired limb mobility were all significantly improved after 3 months of treatment (P<0.05). Moreover, according to the subscale of SF-36, the general health and vitality were significantly improved after 3 months of therapy (56.64 vs. 62.93, P=0.008; and 64.26 vs. 70.08, P=0.024, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: The proposed model of CDT based on the mobile application WeChat achieved promising outcomes. The volume of the affected arm, the lymphedema symptoms, and the quality of life were all significantly improved.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is a major public health issue. More than one out of five women treated for breast cancer will develop lymphedema in an upper extremity. Current evidence advocates transdisciplinary oncological rehabilitation. Therefore, research in this area is necessary since limited consensus having been reached with regard to the basic essential components of this rehabilitation. Consensus has, however, been reached on the use of decongestive lymphedema therapy (DLT), but due to a lack of tests, the necessary dosages are unknown and its level is moderately strong. This study attempts to verify both the efficacy of activity-oriented proprioceptive antiedema therapy (TAPA), as compared to conventional treatments such as DLT or Complex Physical Therapy (CPT), as well as its efficiency in terms of cost-effectiveness, for patients affected by breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
METHODS: Controlled, randomized clinical trial with dual stratification, two parallel arms, longitudinal and single blind. 64 women with breast cancer-related arm lymphedema will take part in the study. The experimental group intervention will be the same for stage I and II, and will consist of neuro-dynamic exercises oriented to the activity, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation activities and proprioceptive anti-edema bandaging. The control group intervention, depending on the stage, will consist of preventive measures, skin care and exercise-prescribed training in the lymphedema workshop as well as compression garments (Stage I) or conservative Complex Decongestive Therapy treatment (skin care, multi-layer bandaging, manual lymphatic drainage and massage therapy) (Stage II).
RESULTS: Sociodemographic and clinical variables will be collected for the measurement of edema volume and ADL performance. Statistical analysis will be performed on intent to treat.
CONCLUSIONS: It has been recommended that patient training be added to DLT, as well as a re-designing of patient lifestyles and the promotion of health-related aspects. In addition, clinical trials should be undertaken to assess neural mobilization techniques and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation should be included in the therapy. Cohesive bandaging will also be performed as an early form of pressotherapy. The proposed study combines all of these aspects in order to increased comfort and promote the participation of individuals with lymphedema in everyday situations.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have proposed the assessment of the experimental treatment for stages I and II. One possible limitation is the lack of awareness of whether or not this treatment would be effective for other stages as well as the concern for proper hand cleansing during use of bandages, given the current COVID-19 pandemic situation.
BACKGROUND: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03762044 ). Date of registration: 23 November 2018. Prospectively Registered.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the professional experience of caring for children and adolescents with lymphedema and to explore the way in which they understand and implement self-management strategies and the influence of their own self-efficacy beliefs on this process. Methods and Results: Participants were recruited during an educational camp for children with lymphedema. Three individual semistructured focus groups were undertaken in English, French, and Italian with simultaneous translation. Data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Analysis of the data produced three superordinate themes: professional concepts of self-management, professional practice, and redefining the cornerstone of lymphedema care. An additional seven subthemes were as follows: readiness to self-management, professional perspectives on self-management, defining success and treatment failure, emotional burden, traditional views on complex decongestive therapy, new ways to practice, and sole practitioner versus multidisciplinary teams. Conclusions: The purpose of the study was to explore the challenges professionals face when introducing self-management to children and adolescents with lymphedema and their parents and to explore their own sense of self-efficacy in approaching this. The research allowed in-depth discussion about the ways they conceptualize self-management and faced professional challenges. The research highlighted the need to define what is considered an acceptable outcome within a complex and uncertain condition and the self-management strategies that are needed to support this.