BACKGROUND: Interstitial pneumonia and emphysema may complicate patients with lung cancer. However, clinical significance of trivial and mild pulmonary abnormalities remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether trivial and mild interstitial pneumonia and emphysema, in addition to their advanced forms, impact the prognosis and lead to acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia (AEIP) in patients with lung cancer.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital and included patients with lung cancer. Computed tomography images were evaluated using the interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) score for interstitial pneumonia, which included no ILA, equivocal ILA, ILA, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the Goddard score for emphysema. Cox analyses were performed using the ILA and Goddard scores as the main explanatory variables, adjusting for multiple covariates.
RESULTS: Among 1,507 patients with lung cancer, 1,033 had no ILA, 160 had equivocal ILA, 174 had ILA, and 140 had ILD. In total, 474 patients (31.5%) exhibited interstitial pneumonia and 638 (42.3%) showed emphysema. The log-rank trend test showed that survival probability was significantly better in patients with no ILA, followed by those with equivocal ILA, ILA, and ILD (P < 0.001). After adjustment, the ILA and Goddard scores remained significant variables for increased hazard ratios (HR) for mortality: no ILA (HR, 1.00: reference), equivocal ILA (HR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.46; P < 0.001), ILA (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39-2.12; P < 0.001), ILD (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.63-3.09; P < 0.001), and Goddard score (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P < 0.010). Moreover, both scores were associated with increased cause-specific HRs for AEIP.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that approximately one-third of patients with lung cancer had interstitial pneumonia when incorporating trivial and mild cases. Because interstitial pneumonia and emphysema, ranging from trivial to severe, significantly impact mortality and AEIP in patients with lung cancer, we should identify even trivial and mild cases of these pulmonary abnormalities among patients with lung cancer in addition to the advanced ones.

Diagnosis and treatment of patients with smoking-related lung diseases often requires multidisciplinary contributions to optimize care. Imaging plays a key role in characterizing the underlying disease, quantifying its severity, identifying potential complications, and directing management. The primary goal of this article is to provide an overview of the imaging findings and distinguishing features of smoking-related lung diseases, specifically, emphysema/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease, smoking-related interstitial fibrosis, desquamative interstitial pneumonitis, combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and E-cigarette or vaping related lung injury.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) results in increased morbidity and mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Early recognition of PH in this population is essential for planning diagnostic testing, initiating therapy, and evaluating for lung transplantation. The previously developed PH-ILD Detection tool has significant potential in the evaluation and treatment of ILD patients; the aim of this study was to validate the tool in an independent, multicenter cohort of patients. We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 161 ILD patients. Patients were stratified into low- (n = 78, 48.4%), intermediate- (n = 54, 33.5%), and high-risk (n = 29, 18.0%) groups based on the score obtained with the tool. Intermediate- and high-risk patients underwent follow-up echocardiogram (TTE); 49.4% (n = 41) had an abnormal TTE suggestive of underlying PH. These patients underwent right heart catheterization; PH-ILD was diagnosed in 73.2% (n = 30) of these cases. The PH-ILD Detection tool has a sensitivity of 93.3%, specificity of 90.9%, and area-under-the-curve of 0.921 for diagnosing PH in ILD patients, validating the findings from the original study and establishing the tool as a fundamental resource for early recognition of PH in ILD patients.

Smoking-related interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of heterogeneous, diffuse pulmonary parenchymal disease processes associated with tobacco exposure. These disorders include pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, respiratory bronchiolitis-associated ILD, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. This review summarizes the current evidence of pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach, prognosis, and treatment modalities for these diseases. We also discuss the interstitial lung abnormalities incidentally detected in radiologic studies and smoking-related fibrosis identified on lung biopsies.

A 59-year-old man who had smoked for 23 pack-years was admitted to our hospital because of two-month history of back pain. The chest computed tomography scan demonstrated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) and an irregular shaped nodule in the left lower lobe of the lung. A biopsy obtained from samples from subcarinal lymph nodes revealed non-small cell lung cancer. Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibody was elevated up to 166 U/mL, although he had no symptoms suggestive connective tissue diseases. It is well known that most of CPFE patients are current or former heavy smokers, and some researchers described the relationship between CPFE and connective tissue diseases. To our best knowledge, this was the first report of lung cancer in patient with anti-ARS antibody-positive CPFE. In some anti-ARS antibody-positive patients, smoking might have a relationship with development of CPFE and lung cancer.

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) have distinct clinical features, both diseases may coexist in a patient because they share similar risk factors such as smoking, male sex, and old age. Patients with both emphysema in upper lung fields and diffuse ILD are diagnosed with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), which causes substantial clinical deterioration. Patients with CPFE have higher mortality compared with patients who have COPD alone, but results have been inconclusive compared with patients who have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Poor prognostic factors for CPFE include exacerbation, lung cancer, and pulmonary hypertension. The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities, which may be an early or mild form of ILD, is notable among patients with COPD, and is associated with poor prognosis. Various theories have been proposed regarding the pathophysiology of CPFE. Biomarker analyses have implied that this pathophysiology may be more closely associated with IPF development, rather than COPD or emphysema. Patients with CPFE should be advised to quit smoking and undergo routine lung function tests, and pulmonary rehabilitation may be helpful. Various pharmacologic agents and surgical approaches may be beneficial in patients with CPFE, but further studies are needed.

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) have distinct clinical features, both diseases may coexist in a patient because they share similar risk factors such as smoking, male sex, and old age. Patients with both emphysema in upper lung fields and diffuse ILD are diagnosed with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), which causes substantial clinical deterioration. Patients with CPFE have higher mortality compared with patients who have COPD alone, but results have been inconclusive compared with patients who have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Poor prognostic factors for CPFE include exacerbation, lung cancer, and pulmonary hypertension. The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities, which may be an early or mild form of ILD, is notable among patients with COPD, and is associated with poor prognosis. Various theories have been proposed regarding the pathophysiology of CPFE. Biomarker analyses have implied that this pathophysiology may be more closely associated with IPF development, rather than COPD or emphysema. Patients with CPFE should be advised to quit smoking and undergo routine lung function tests, and pulmonary rehabilitation may be helpful. Various pharmacologic agents and surgical approaches may be beneficial in patients with CPFE, but further studies are needed.

UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the quantitative CT analysis of patients with CPFE in comparison with IPF and emphysema.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with CPFE(n:36), IPF(n:38) and emphysema(n:32) were retrospectively included in the study with the approval of the ethics committee.
UNASSIGNED: There was a positive correlation between total lung volume and FVC%, TLCO% and 6 MWT, and negative correlation between mMRC and mortality. Negative correlation was found between right, left lung density and FVC%, TLCO% and 6 MWT, and positive correlation between mortality. Also, total lung volume, right and left lung densities were significant in predicting mortality and cut-off values are ≤3831,> -778 and> -775, respectively (p = 0.040, 0.020, 0.013).
UNASSIGNED: Quantitative CT are guiding in predicting mortality of the disease.

Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension requires a laborious investigation that must be performed in accordance with international guidelines. Right-heart catheterization is the gold standard examination to assess the degree of hemodynamic impairment of post- or precapillary origin, guiding management. The presence of comorbidities is becoming rather frequent in real-life pulmonary hypertension cases, thus creating diagnostic and therapeutic complexity. We present a case of combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension in a patient with ischemic heart disease and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, in order to describe the diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary hypertension and elucidate the problematic aspects of managing this debilitating disease in a patient with several comorbidities. Current guidelines do not support the use of specific vasodilator treatment in group II - due to heart disease and group III-due to lung disease pulmonary hypertension, unless the patient presents with severe pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure > 35 mm Hg or cardiac index < 2.0 L/min) with right ventricular dysfunction and is treated in an expert center and preferably in the context of a randomized control trial. In the case presented, therapeutic management focused, firstly, on treatment of the underlying heart and lung disease and, subsequently, on specific vasoactive therapy, due to severe hemodynamic deterioration.

BACKGROUND: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is recognized as a characteristic syndrome of smoking-related interstitial lung disease that has a worse prognosis than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, outcomes after lung transplantation for CPFE have not been reported. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features and outcomes of CPFE after lung transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: What are the clinical features and outcomes of CPFE after lung transplantation?
METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with CPFE and IPF who underwent lung transplantation at our center between January 2011 and December 2016. We defined CPFE as ≥10% emphysema in the upper lung fields combined with fibrosis on high-resolution CT scan. We characterized the clinical features of patients with CPFE and compared their outcomes after lung transplantation with those with IPF.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 172 (16%) patients with IPF met criteria for CPFE. Severe pulmonary hypertension was present in 16 of 27 (59%) patients with CPFE. On logistic regression analysis, CPFE was significantly associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.18-8.37; P = .02). On competing risk regression analysis, CPFE was associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ A2, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.10-3.25; P = .02; HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.02-3.77; P = .04, respectively). Five-year survival was 79.0% for the CPFE group and 75.4% for the IPF group (log-rank P = .684).
CONCLUSIONS: After transplantation, patients with CPFE were more likely to develop PGD, ACR, and CLAD compared with those with IPF. However, survival was not significantly different between the two groups.