BACKGROUND: Combat medics who are responsible for the care of injured warfighters face challenges from their reliance on medical alarms that exceed the noise levels recommended by the WHO. This is because the elevated noise levels in military facilities, particularly from vehicular units and weaponry, compromise the combat medics\' effectiveness and attentiveness to medical alarms. We previously designed a graphical (\"configural\") display to communicate patients\' vital signs and found that when the configural display and traditional numerical display were concurrently presented to participants, it produced the fastest identification of patient vital signs and triggered the fewest number of alarms. This study used eye tracking to assess how participants direct visual attention to and engage with concurrently presented numerical and configural vital sign displays.
METHODS: We recruited 30 undergraduate students with normal hearing and vision for this study. Subjects were tasked with monitoring a simulated patient\'s vital signals using simultaneously presented numerical and configural vital sign displays. Concurrently, they performed an N-back task to simulate the multitasking required in a military environment. We manipulated the eccentricity and display position of the numerical and configural displays through 4 orientations, with each orientation being used in a monitoring block lasting 12 minutes. Continuous eye tracking was utilized to collect physiological data about participant display preference.
RESULTS: We used eye tracking to analyze several metrics: Total display viewing time, total viewing time percentage, number of dwells (groups of eye fixations), mean fixations per dwell, and fixation patterns during an emergency event. Participants spent more time looking at the configural display than the numerical display during nominal monitoring and emergency events. During emergencies, the percentage of time individuals spent looking at the configural display increased from 30 to 50%, while there was no corresponding increase in the participants\' looking at the numerical display. When there were 2 concurrent emergency events instead of 1, total viewing time did not increase, suggesting that participants did not need to change their viewing strategy when the emergency situation complexity increased. Also, during emergencies, participants directed nearly half of their fixations to the configural display during the first 2 seconds of an emergency, while only directing fewer than 5% of fixations to the numerical display during that same period. The average response time for an emergency event was around 2 seconds, which suggests that participants obtained relevant information from the configural display in this time period.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that when a patient monitor contains both a configural display and a numerical display, participants look at the configural display. Furthermore, during time-sensitive situations, participants utilize the configural display to provide important information. We suggest this because the configural display integrates the relevant vital signs into one display. These findings provide justification for pursuing integrated vital sign displays to efficiently communicate patient conditions in complex environments. On the battlefield, swift decision-making is essential, as combat medics must minimize the time required to assess and act in critical situations.

BACKGROUND: Future multidomain operational combat environments will require combat medics to play a larger role in managing behavioral health (BH) conditions in forward environments, as soldiers in small teams may have them as their sole medical support for extended periods of time. Previously they were not expected to serve in this role, and thus, they receive minimal BH training. It is unknown to what extent combat medics consider BH tasks as falling within their scope of practice and how often they engage with their soldiers currently related to BH. Qualitative research suggests that many medics feel inadequately prepared to handle BH problems. Our aim is to further assess medic attitudes and behaviors related to BH to better understand the landscape of medic preparedness to fill an expanded role.
METHODS: Data from 292 medics were collected before their participation in the BH Guidelines for mEdic Assessment and Response training, a day-long training for medics expected to deploy to far-forward environments. We investigated whether combat medics engage with their soldiers in areas related to BH, the extent to which they consider BH-related tasks as part of their scope of practice, and how confident they feel engaging in various BH-related tasks. We explored associations between medics\' attitudes related to BH scope of practice and confidence performing BH tasks with gender, rank, component (National Guard vs. Active Duty), work-related BH experience, having suicide training in the past year, and having ever sought help for BH.
RESULTS: Results indicated that in the past month, 61.4% of medics discussed BH issues, 48.3% assessed BH problems, and 41.3% provided interventions for BH problems with at least one soldier in their unit. Assessment tasks were more frequently endorsed as falling within medic\'s scope of practice (75%-95%) than intervention tasks (62%-83%). More medics felt confident doing assessments (39%-49% moderately confident or greater) than providing interventions (31%-37% moderately confident or greater). Medics expressed highest confidence in assessing for suicide risk (49% moderate confidence or greater). Medics with a lot of prior BH work experience and non-commissioned officers (as compared to junior enlisted) reported greater confidence in most tasks. Receiving suicide training in the past year was associated with greater confidence assessing for suicide, as well as providing interventions for suicide, general BH problems, and substance abuse.
CONCLUSIONS: Most medics agreed that numerous BH tasks fell within the scope of their work, but few felt confident engaging in those tasks. These findings support a need for additional training in BH-related tasks across the force. Exploring ways to provide medics BH-related work rotations would augment their general proficiency as first-line treatment providers for soldiers in combat units, and increased training in BH-related tasks should be studied to determine its ability to increase competency and confidence. If medics can learn to assess and recognize BH concerns before they escalate to needing specialty BH care, this could potentially reduce the burden on BH clinics, as well as strengthen the overall force.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains the leading cause of potentially preventable deaths both in military and civilian pre-hospital trauma settings. Conventional extremity tourniquets do not control bleeding if an iliac artery or a common femoral artery is injured. Stopping junctional bleeding is particularly challenging and requires the use of specifically designed junctional tourniquets. SAM® Junctional Tourniquet (SJT®, United States of America) and Tactical Abdominal Junctional Tourniquet (T-AJT®, Fora Group Türkiye) have been actively used by Turkish security forces. This study questioned the effect of training on combat medics\' successful junctional tourniquet applications and application times (AT).
METHODS: Our research on two different junctional tourniquet models was designed as a prospective randomized, crossover, single-blinded study. All 40 participants in the study were attendees of a 12-week combat medic training course with updated medical approvals, which were used as an eligibility criterion. Randomization was performed by drawing T-AJT®-SJT cards. The study consisted of pretraining and after-training tourniquet application phases. In each study phase, all participants\' AT and the presence or absence of arterial flow were recorded for each group. Finally, the combat medics were presented with a 6-question survey.
RESULTS: Although training increased successful T-AJT® application rates, training was not statistically significantly associated with successful applications for any tourniquet types (p>0.05). The pretraining phase ATs for SJT® and T-AJT® were 55±11.8 and 93.8±2.9 seconds, respectively, and the difference was statistically significantly different (p<0.001). Likewise, after-training phase ATs for SJT® and T-AJT® were 49±22.6 and 79.2±17.5 seconds, respectively, and participants\' SJT® ATs were significantly shorter (p<0.001). Overall, when participants\' applied any of the tourniquet unsuccessfully, the odds of participants\' lower Visual Analogue Scale scores were 0.2 (95% CI [0.08, 0.49]. p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study basically investigates the effects of training on effective tourniquet application. Unfortunately, our after-training success rates remained unsatisfactory when compared to other studies. This is also the first study on T-AJT® tourniquet application, and further studies on its efficacy are also required.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess if a head-mounted display (HMD) providing telemedicine support improves performance of a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy by a NATO special operations combat medic (combat medic).
METHODS: Thirty-six combat medics were randomized into two groups: One group performed a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy with the assistance of an HMD, while the control group completed the procedure without guidance. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine the possible differences in release of compartments and performance scores, as assessed by a supervising medical specialist. A Fisher\'s exact test was used to compare the proportions of collateral damage between groups. An independent-samples t-test was used to interpret total procedure times. The usability and technical factors involving HMD utilization were also assessed.
RESULTS: Combat medics in the HMD group released the anterior compartment (P ≤ .001) and deep posterior compartment (P = .008) significantly better. There was significantly more iatrogenic muscle (P ≤ .001) and venous damage (P ≤ .001) in the control group. The overall performance of combat medics in the HMD group was significantly better than that of the control group (P < .001). Combat medics in the control group were significantly faster (P = .012). The combat medics were very satisfied with the HMD. The HMD showed no major technical errors.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial shows that a HMD providing telemedicine support leads to significantly better performance of a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy by a combat medic with less iatrogenic muscle and venous damage.

BACKGROUND: Combat casualty care requires learning a complex set of skills to treat patients in challenging situations, including resource scarce environments, multiple casualty incidents, and care under fire. To train the skills needed to respond efficiently and appropriately to these diverse conditions, instructors employ a wide array of simulation modalities. Simulation modalities for medical training include manikins, task trainers, standardized patient actors (i.e., role players), computer or extended reality simulations (e.g., virtual reality, augmented reality), cadavers, and live tissue training. Simulation modalities differ from one another in multiple attributes (e.g., realism, availability). The purpose of this study was to compare capabilities across simulation modalities for combat casualty care from the perspective of experienced military medics.
METHODS: To provide a more complete understanding of the relative merits and limitations of modalities, military combat medics (N = 33) were surveyed on the capabilities of simulation modalities during a 5-day technical experimentation event where they observed medical simulations from industry developers. The survey asked them to rate each of eleven modalities on each of seven attributes. To elicit additional context for the strengths, limitations, and unique considerations of using each modality, we also collected open-ended comments to provide further insight on when and how to use specific simulation modalities.
RESULTS: Results showed differences among the simulation modalities by attribute. Cadavers, role play, moulage, and live tissue all received high ratings on two or more attributes. However, there was no modality that was rated uniformly superior to the others. Instead, modalities appear to have unique strengths and limitations depending on the training context and objectives. For example, cadavers were seen as highly realistic, but not very reusable.
CONCLUSIONS: The study furthers our understanding of simulation modalities for medical training by providing insight from combat medics on the benefits, limitations, and considerations for implementing different modalities depending on the training context. These results may be helpful to instructors in selecting modalities for their programs.

A Clinical Decision Support System that provides just-in-time medical guidance at the point of injury is being developed. To develop a user interface, a user-centered design approach was taken.
To evaluate the system, personas of the users were created, a comparative analysis of the system against the Tactical Combat Casualty Care Card and Battlefield Assisted Trauma Distributed Observation Kit was completed, and user testing was performed.
Many design recommendations were gathered from the user-centered design approach including replacing buttons with a homunculus, replacing prompts with a tree and node system, and allowing more user freedom in working with the system.
Through multiple different evaluations, design recommendations for a clinical decision support system were implemented in an iterative process. More iterations and more formalized user testing are planned to maximize the usability of the system.

BACKGROUND: During tactical combat casualty care, life- and limb-saving procedures might also be performed by combat medics. This study assesses whether it is feasible to use a head-mounted display (HMD) to provide telemedicine (TM) support from a consulted senior surgeon for combat medics when performing a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy.
METHODS: Nine combat medics were randomized into groups to perform a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy. One group used the Vuzix M400 and the second group used the RealWear HMT-1Z1. A third, control, group received no guidance. In the Vuzix M400 group and RealWear HMT-1Z1 group, a senior surgeon examined the results after the two-incision lower leg fasciotomy was finished to assess the release of compartments, possible collateral damage, and performance of the combat medics. In the control group, these results were examined by a surgical resident with expertise in two-incision lower leg fasciotomies. The resident\'s operative performance questionnaire was used to score the performance of the combat medics. The telehealth usability questionnaire was used to evaluate the usability of the HMDs as perceived by the combat medics.
RESULTS: Combat medics using an HMD were considered competent in performing a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy (Vuzix: median 3 [range 0], RealWear: median 3 [range 1]). These combat medics had a significantly better score in their ability to adapt to anatomical variances compared to the control group (Vuzix: median 3 [range 0], RealWear: median 3 [range 0], control: median 1 [range 0]; P = .018). Combat medics using an HMD were faster than combat medics in the control group (Vuzix: mean 14:14 [SD 3:41], RealWear: mean 15:42 [SD 1:58], control: mean 17:45 [SD 2:02]; P = .340). The overall satisfaction with both HMDs was 5 out of 7 (Vuzix: median 5 [range 0], RealWear: median 5 [range 1]; P = .317).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that it is feasible to use an HMD to provide TM support performance from a consulted senior surgeon for combat medics when performing a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy. The results of this study suggest that TM support might be useful for combat medics during tactical combat casualty care when performing life- and limb-saving procedures.

Multi-domain operational combat environments will likely restrict key components of current behavioral health (BH) service delivery models. Combat teams in far-forward outposts or extended missions may need to rely on their own internal assets to manage combat and operational stress reactions for extended periods of time. As such, combat medics are expected to take on additional responsibilities as providers of BH support for isolated teams. As they receive limited BH training, medics require additional training to sufficiently respond to combat and operational stress reactions in their assigned teams. This study provided combat medics with a BH training and a mobile application-based support tool that would assist them in identifying and responding to BH concerns in their soldiers. The current analysis examines pre- to post-training changes in attitudes related to utilizing BH skills.
We created a brief training aimed to increase medics\' ability and confidence regarding managing BH issues. Its development was part of a study on the feasibility of the Soldier and Medic Autonomous Connectivity Independent System for Remote Environments (AIRE) apps (NOCTEM, LLC), a digital system designed for far-forward BH and sleep monitoring and management. Participants were combat medics from two Army combat brigades preparing for a training rotation through a combat training center (CTC). A total of 16 medics consented to participation with nine medics available at the follow-up after the field exercise. Medics were surveyed before the training and after their return from the CTC.
In pre-training surveys, most medics indicated it was within their scope to assess for stress/anxiety, suicidal risk, stress reaction, and sleep problems; assist soldiers with optimizing work performance; and provide interventions for BH concerns and sleep problems. Less than half believed it was within their scope to assess and address team communication issues or provide intervention for stress reactions. After the CTC rotation, more medics endorsed that it was in their scope to provide interventions for acute stress reactions to traumatic events. Before the CTC rotation, at most 60% of the group felt at least moderately confident in utilizing the BH skills of discussing problems, assessing for concerns, and providing interventions. After CTC, the confidence levels for each skill increased or remained the same for most medics. Intervention skills had the highest proportion of medics (66%) reporting increased confidence in using the skills.
A larger proportion of medics believed it was within their scope of work and felt confident in assessing BH problems, and a smaller proportion believed it is within their scope of work and felt confident in applying interventions. The training increased most medics\' confidence to administer interventions for BH and team communication issues. Similar training programs can help medics serve as support for a wide variety of circumstances when the brigade\'s mental health teams are inaccessible. Additionally, the Medic AIRE app expanded the ability to evaluate and provide interventions without extensive training in treatment modalities or BH conditions. This concept shows promise for providing medics with actionable tools when training time is limited such as during preparation for extended deployments.