UNASSIGNED: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality significantly impacts patient outcomes during cardiac arrests. With advancements in health care technology, smartwatch-based CPR feedback devices have emerged as potential tools to enhance CPR delivery.
UNASSIGNED: This study evaluated a novel smartwatch-based CPR feedback device in enhancing chest compression quality among health care professionals and lay rescuers.
UNASSIGNED: A single-center, open-label, randomized crossover study was conducted with 30 subjects categorized into 3 groups based on rescuer category. The Relay Response BLS smartwatch application was compared to a defibrillator-based feedback device (Zoll OneStep CPR Pads). Following an introduction to the technology, subjects performed chest compressions in 3 modules: baseline unaided, aided by the smartwatch-based feedback device, and aided by the defibrillator-based feedback device. Outcome measures included effectiveness, learnability, and usability.
UNASSIGNED: Across all groups, the smartwatch-based device significantly improved mean compression depth effectiveness (68.4% vs 29.7%; P < .05) and mean rate effectiveness (87.5% vs 30.1%; P < .05), compared to unaided compressions. Compression variability was significantly reduced with the smartwatch-based device (coefficient of variation: 14.9% vs 26.6%), indicating more consistent performance. Fifteen of 20 professional rescuers reached effective compressions using the smartwatch-based device in an average 2.6 seconds. A usability questionnaire revealed strong preference for the smartwatch-based device over the defibrillator-based device.
UNASSIGNED: The smartwatch-based device enhances the quality of CPR delivery by keeping compressions within recommended ranges and reducing performance variability. Its user-friendliness and rapid learnability suggest potential for widespread adoption in both professional and lay rescuer scenarios, contributing positively to CPR training and real-life emergency responses.

BACKGROUND: Medical simulation is an effective educational tool used to increase confidence, improve knowledge, and refine skills when responding to high-acuity situations. Despite established roles of the pharmacist on the hospital code team, most institutions lack formalized pharmacist training for code team responses.
OBJECTIVE: This pre-post analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of a didactic and simulation-based code response training for pharmacists on self-perceived improvement and preparedness when responding to in-hospital medical emergencies.
METHODS: An emergency response curriculum (ERC) was developed for pharmacists and pharmacy residents at our institution. The curriculum, led by 4 lead clinical pharmacy specialists, included a 60-minute didactic code competency lecture followed by 2 medical emergency simulations and a debrief after each scenario. After completion of the simulation portion of the ERC, participants were given a survey to complete that assessed their confidence using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very unconfident to 5 = very confident) in completing the course objectives before and after the ERC.
RESULTS: Seventy-two pharmacists completed the ERC and 60 completed the postcourse survey. Of those who completed the postcourse survey, 70% were pharmacy residents. Using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very unconfident to 5 = very confident), median participant confidence rose from 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4) before the session to 4 (IQR 3-5) after the session (P < 0.001). Of the participants, 95% believed the ERC training should be required annually or multiple times a year and 100% of respondents felt the ERC training was beneficial.
CONCLUSIONS: Development of a pharmacist ERC including didactic and simulation-based learning improved the confidence and preparedness of pharmacists when participating as members of the hospital code team. Future studies should continue to evaluate pharmacist training and curriculum development in code team responses.