This issue focuses on the past, the present and the future of clozapine. Of the 43 clozapine articles, nine are historical articles dealing with the past, 29 deal with the present and five with laboratory assays which may influence its future use. These 43 articles include 219 different authors from 56 countries/regions and five continents.

BACKGROUND: Danggui Longhui is a traditional Chinese medicine made from the dried root of Angelica sinensis. It is used in psychiatric patients in China to reduce associated constipation. In a population pharmacokinetic model in olanzapine patients from Beijing Anding Hospital, we demonstrate that dangguilonghui tablets doubled olanzapine clearance, indicating the induction of olanzapine metabolism. Olanzapine metabolism is similar to clozapine metabolism.
METHODS: Two cases of possible clozapine induction using dangguilonghui tablets 4 g/day were identified in Beijing Anding Hospital. Dividing the minimum therapeutic concentration of 350 ng/mL by the concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio provides the minimum therapeutic dose.
RESULTS: Case 1 was a female smoker on clozapine for 415 days. The mean of 6 clozapine C/D ratios associated with smoking provided a minimum therapeutic dose of 267 mg/day. There were 6 steady-state concentrations on the combination of valproic acid and dangguilonghui tablets, which provided a much higher minimum therapeutic dose of 833 mg/day. Four steady-state clozapine C/D ratios based on smoking and valproate after 4 months of carbamazepine 200 mg/day provided a minimum therapeutic dose of 603 mg/day. Case 2 was a female non-smoker on clozapine for 58 days. She had 3 clozapine C/D ratios on dangguilonghui tablets with a mean of 0.30 ng/mL providing a minimum therapeutic dose of 1167 mg/day.
CONCLUSIONS: Future clinical studies with repeated measures need to replicate the possibility that dangguilonghui tablets are a moderate-to-strong inducer of clozapine metabolism as suggested by these two limited cases.

Nathan S. Kline was a pioneer in psychopharmacology in the United States (US). In 1952, Kline started a research unit at Rockland State Hospital, New York. Kline brought clozapine from Switzerland since it was not yet available in the US. At Rockland State Hospital, George Simpson had conducted antipsychotic trials and had developed scales to assess movement disorders. In 1974, Simpson published the first US clozapine trial. In 1978, he published on 1) the effect of clozapine on tardive dyskinesia and 2) high plasma clozapine concentrations in two patients with seizures. His experience of clozapine withdrawal symptoms in his first 2 trials led in the future to more articles in this area. In Philadelphia, Simpson designed a double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) with 3 doses (100, 300 and 600 mg/day) which was published in 1999. From the 50 patients started on the RCT, 47 provided repeated plasma clozapine concentrations every other week of the RCT. This rich database of plasma clozapine concentrations under controlled conditions has contributed to many of the advances in clozapine pharmacokinetics in the last 5 years including: 1) obesity can be associated with clozapine poor metabolism (PM) status, 2) a clozapine ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) with a minimum therapeutic dose of 1591 mg/day, 3) a case of clozapine intoxication dropped from the RCT due to pneumonia, 4) cases of increased plasma concentrations during clozapine-induced fever, 5) the possibility that African-Americans may need higher clozapine doses than those of European ancestry, and 6) three indices of non-adherence.

BACKGROUND: Up to 1/2 of outpatients prescribed clozapine may be partially/fully non-adherent, based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Three indices for measuring partial/full non-adherence are proposed a: 1) clozapine concentration/dose (C/D) ratio which drops to half or more of what is expected in the patient; 2) clozapine/norclozapine ratio that becomes inverted; and 3) clozapine concentration that becomes non-detectable.
METHODS: These 3 proposed indices are based on a literature review and 17 cases of possible non-adherence from 3 samples: 1) an inpatient study in a Chinese hospital, 2) an inpatient randomized clinical trial in a United States hospital, and 3) and a Uruguayan outpatient study.
RESULTS: The first index of non-adherence is a clozapine C/D ratio which is less than half the ratio corresponding to the patient\'s specific ancestry group and sex-smoking subgroup. Knowing the minimum therapeutic dose of the patient based on repeated TDM makes it much easier to establish non-adherence. The second index is inverted clozapine/norclozapine ratios in the absence of alternative explanations. The third index is undetectable concentrations. By using half-lives, the chronology of the 3 indices of non-adherence was modeled in two patients: 1) the clozapine C/D ratio dropped to ≥1/2 of what is expected from the patient (around day 2); 2) the clozapine/norclozapine ratio became inverted (around day 3); and 3) the clozapine concentration became undetectable by the laboratory (around days 9-11).
CONCLUSIONS: Prospective studies should further explore these proposed clozapine indices in average patients, poor metabolizers (3 presented) and ultrarapid metabolizers (2 presented).

During weak induction (from smoking and/or valproate co-prescription), clozapine ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs) need very high daily doses to reach the minimum therapeutic concentration of 350 ng/ml in plasma; clozapine UMs need clozapine doses higher than: 1) 900 mg/day in patients of European/African ancestry, or 2) 600 mg/day in those of Asian ancestry. Published clozapine UMs include 10 males of European/African ancestry, mainly assessed with single concentrations. Five new clozapine UMs (two of European and three of Asian ancestry) with repeated assessments are described. A US double-blind randomized trial included a 32-year-old male smoking two packages/day with a minimum therapeutic dose of 1,591 mg/day from a single TDM during open treatment of 900 mg/day. In a Turkish inpatient study, a 30-year-old male smoker was a possible clozapine UM needing a minimum therapeutic dose of 1,029 mg/day estimated from two trough steady-state concentrations on 600 mg/day. In a Chinese study, three possible clozapine UMs (all male smokers) were identified. The clozapine minimum therapeutic dose estimated with trough steady-state concentrations >150 ng/ml was: 1) 625 mg/day, based on a mean of 20 concentrations in Case 3; 2) 673 mg/day, based on a mean of 4 concentrations in Case 4; and 3) 648 mg/day, based on a mean of 11 concentrations in Case 5. Based on these limited studies, clozapine UMs during weak induction may account for 1-2% of clozapine-treated patients of European ancestry and <1% of those of Asian ancestry. A clozapine-to-norclozapine ratio <0.5 should not be used to identify clozapine UMs.

Objectives: An international guideline recently provided certain personalized schedules for titrating clozapine in adult inpatients by considering: 1) DNA ancestry group, 2) sexsmoking subgroup, and 3) presence/absence of clozapine poor metabolizer (PM) status. Measuring CRP levels at baseline and during the first 4 weeks is recommended. Titrations too fast for the metabolism of specific patients can lead to clozapine-induced inflammations and CRP elevations. Methods: Three published cases are reinterpreted. Better outcomes might have been obtained by using the guideline. Results: Case 1 was a Chinese male non-smoker, a clozapine PM due to an underlying inflammation. Case 2 was a Turkish female non-smoker who developed clozapine-induced myocarditis in the context of 4 risk factors (undiagnosed infl ammation, obesity, valproate and olanzapine co-prescription). Case 3 was a United States patient of European ancestry with no known risk factors who developed myocarditis after a routine titration and had an unsuccessful rechallenge with 12.5 mg/day. Application of the international clozapine titration guideline may have prevented: 1) Case 1 by recommending against clozapine titration for a patient with an abnormal CRP level, 2) Case 2 by considering 4 risk factors and using a slow titration for clozapine PMs, and 3) Case 3 by using CRP elevations for early identification of a possible genetic PM. Conclusions: When baseline or prior CRPs are normal and then become abnormal during a clozapine titration, this indicates: 1) clozapine-induced inflammation associated with too-rapid titration for that specific patient, and/or 2) co-occurrence of an infection. Prospective studies need to verify this hypothesis.

Clozapine-induced myocarditis or any clozapine-induced inflammation may be a hypersensitivity reaction due to titration that was too rapid for the patient\'s clozapine metabolism. Clozapine metabolism is influenced by ancestry, sex, smoking and the presence of confounders including obesity, infections, and inhibitors (e.g., valproate) causing the patient to behave as a clozapine poor metabolizer (PM). A published study in a Turkish hospital identified 1 case of clozapine-induced pancreatitis and hepatitis and 9 cases of clozapine-induced myocarditis. To explore the hypothesis that the 10 patients were clozapine PMs, their serum clozapine concentrations were investigated using concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios and their titrations carefully reviewed.
Dividing the trough serum concentration by the dose produces the clozapine C/D ratio. The dose required to reach 350ng/ml was considered the minimum therapeutic dosage and was used to classify patients according to clozapine PM status. Titration speed was assessed.
All 10 patients were possibly clozapine PMs (3 of them had as minimum therapeutic doses: 72, 82 or 83mg/day). Nine of the 10 patients may have behaved as clozapine PMs due to obesity and/or valproate co-prescription during titration. One also had an undiagnosed infection. Of the 10 patients, 9 had at least 1 of 3 factors: too-rapid titration in the first or second weeks, or a final dosage that was too high.
Future studies using clozapine levels and considering the role of clozapine PM status should explore whether or not all cases of clozapine-induced inflammation could be explained by lack of individualized titration.

暂无摘要。

Objective Serious infections or inflammations have been associated with serum clozapine concentration increases and sometimes with clozapine toxicity. Method These two cases describe Chinese patients (Case 1: a 57-year-old female nonsmoker with severe dermatitis and Case 2: a 47-year-old male nonsmoker with influenza and secondary infection). Results In both cases, the Drug Interaction Probability Scale established the presence of a probable drug-drug interaction. In both cases, the clozapine and the total clozapine concentration-to-dose ratios followed a temporal pattern (normal-high-normal), consistent with an inhibition of clozapine metabolism during peak inflammation. In the first case, the total clozapine concentration-to-dose ratio (8 with no/low inflammation: median of 3.10 and 2 at peak inflammation: median of 3.90) provided a significant difference (P = 0.044). In the second patient, because of the smaller sample size and reduced statistical power (4 with no infection: a median of 1.59 and 2 at peak infection: 3.46), the increase did not reach significance (P = 0.13). In the first case, the median baseline clozapine concentration-to-dose ratio increased by a factor of 1.45 from 2.00 to a peak of 2.89. To compensate for the inhibition of clozapine metabolism, the dose correction factor was 0.69 (1/1.45) or a decrease in dose of approximately one-third. In the second case, the median baseline clozapine concentration-to-dose ratio increased by a factor of 2.56 from 1.15 to a peak of 2.94. Conclusion This provided a dose correction factor of 0.40 (1/2.56) or approximately half the dose, similar to published cases in Caucasians with serious respiratory infections.