目的:评估医学生对通过核心文员课程中的促进研讨会提供的新型眼科资源的看法。
方法:我们创建了www.2020sim.com,免费的基于案例的学习(CBL)眼科工具,改编自NephSIM(www.nephsim.com)。该工具首先在内科(IM)居民中试用。在确认需要之后,我们通过扩展20/20SIM内容并与神经病学(试点学年[AY]2020-2021)和儿科教务员(试点AY2021-2022)合作,专注于本科医学教育(UME),在每个教务员的教学课程中提供一个便利的一小时眼科研讨会。我们使用前后调查和知识评估来评估该工具。
结果:在80名IM居民中,33人(41.3%)完成了需求评估。在参加研讨会的25名居民中,23人(92.0%)完成了出口调查。IM住院医师报告了多个眼科领域的不适(14个评级平均得分<3.0),确认需要。大多数(n=21/23,91.3%)将该工具评为良好/优秀。在145名神经科学生中,125(86.2%)和至少88(60.7%)学生完成了测试前和测试后/退出调查,分别。平均而言,参与者对该工具的评价很高,感知20/20SIM与他们的教育相关[4.1(0.8)]。测试前后的平均知识分数从7.5分增加到8.5/10.0分(p<0.001)。在136名儿科文员中,67人(49.3%)和51人(37.5%)完成了调查前和调查后,分别。在研讨会之后,受访者认为对眼科主题的舒适度增加[3.8(0.8)]。测试前后的平均知识分数从1.8分趋势到2.0/5.0分(p=0.30)。总的来说,20/139(14.4%)的退出调查受访者在研讨会后1个月内访问了www.2020sim.com。
结论:在确定了居民最需要的区域后,我们与核心职员合作,在UME中提供跨学科眼科内容。我们发现20/20SIM卡的参与度很高,随着知识增长的趋势。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical student perceptions of a novel ophthalmology resource delivered through facilitated workshops in the core clerkship curriculum.
METHODS: We created www.2020sim.com, a free case-based learning (CBL) ophthalmology tool, adapted from NephSIM (www.nephsim.com). The tool was first piloted with the internal medicine (IM) residents. After confirming a need, we focused on undergraduate medical education (UME) by expanding the 20/20 SIM content and partnering with the neurology (pilot academic year [AY] 2020-2021) and pediatric clerkships (pilot AY 2021-2022) to deliver a facilitated one-hour ophthalmology workshop within each clerkship\'s didactic curriculum. We evaluated the tool using pre- and post-surveys and knowledge assessments.
RESULTS: Of 80 IM residents, 33 (41.3%) completed the needs assessment. Of the 25 residents who attended the workshop, 23 (92.0%) completed the exit survey. IM residents reported discomfort in several ophthalmology domains (9 of 14 rated mean score < 3.0), confirming a need. Most (n = 21/23, 91.3%) rated the tool as good/excellent. Of 145 neurology clerkship students, 125 (86.2%) and at least 88 (60.7%) students completed the pre- and post-test/exit surveys, respectively. On average, participants highly rated the tool, perceiving 20/20 SIM to be relevant to their education [4.1 (0.8)]. Mean pre- to post-test knowledge scores increased from 7.5 to 8.5/10.0 points (p < 0.001). Of the 136 pediatric clerkship students, 67 (49.3%) and 51 (37.5%) completed the pre- and post-surveys, respectively. Respondents perceived increased comfort with ophthalmology topics after the facilitated workshop [3.8 (0.8)]. Mean pre- to post-test knowledge scores trended from 1.8 to 2.0/5.0 points (p = 0.30). Collectively, 20/139 (14.4%) of exit survey respondents visited www.2020sim.com within 1 month after the workshop.
CONCLUSIONS: After identifying areas of greatest need with residents, we partnered with core clerkships to deliver cross-disciplinary ophthalmology content in UME. We found high engagement with 20/20 SIM, with trends toward increased knowledge.