Clinical teaching

临床教学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以患者和疾病为中心的临床教学被认为是医学教育的基石。目前临床教学越来越多地发生在门诊,但这会给患者带来不适。尽管许多专业组织已经针对这一问题制定了一套道德考虑因素,以利用这些考虑因素来指导诊所的门诊程序,这些指南在门诊实践中没有得到很好的遵守。我作为皮肤科门诊的湿疹患者的经验就是很好的证据。在我看来,医学生在门诊环境中观察临床互动的教学没有内在的错误;真正的问题在于没有告知患者医学生的存在或允许患者行使他或她的拒绝权。因此,提出以下建议:第一,学术医疗中心应定期向医生和医学生提供培训,以确保他们充分了解专业组织制定的道德准则中包含的内容,并认识到在临床实践中遵守这些准则的重要性。第二,每项临床教学活动都应得到患者的知情同意,并应根据患者的意愿进行。最后,建议医院建立适当的评估机制,以评估医生对道德准则的遵守情况,并为未能遵守的医生和医学生提供继续教育和培训。
    Patient- and disease-focused clinical teaching is considered the cornerstone of medical education. Current clinical teaching is increasingly taking place in outpatient settings, but this can cause discomfort to patients. Although many professional organizations have developed a set of ethical considerations in response to this issue to use these considerations to guide clinics in their outpatient procedures, these guidelines are not well adhered to in outpatient practice. My experience as an eczema patient in a dermatology outpatient is good evidence of this. In my opinion, there is nothing inherently wrong with the pedagogy of medical students observing clinical interactions in outpatient settings; the real problem lies in not informing the patient of the medical student\'s presence or allowing the patient to exercise his or her right of refusal. Therefore, the following recommendations are made: First, academic medical centers should provide regular training to doctors and medical students to ensure that they are fully aware of what is contained in the ethical guidelines established by the professional organizations and that they recognize the importance of adhering to these guidelines in clinical practice. Second, each clinical teaching activity should have the informed consent of the patient and be based on the patient\'s wishes. Finally, it is recommended that hospitals establish appropriate evaluation mechanisms to assess doctors\' compliance with the ethical guidelines and provide continuing education and training for doctors and medical students who fail to comply.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本文旨在以本科护生为样本,检验修订版《自我效能感临床教学量表》的心理测量学特性。
    背景:在临床教学中提高护生的自我效能感对于培养护生的临床教学能力具有重要意义。这最终有助于安全优质的医疗保健。在临床教学中对护生的自我效能感知之甚少,可能是由于缺乏经过验证的工具来衡量他们在临床教学中的自我效能感。
    方法:本研究采用横断面调查设计。
    方法:在2022年,澳大利亚护理学士学位课程的2年级和3年级护理学生的便利样本完成了修改的自我效能感量表。量表的结构效度使用已知的群体测量(年水平和同伴教学经验)和验证性因素分析进行评估。通过与视觉模拟量表的相关性来建立并发效度,并用Cronbachα检验信度。
    结果:分析了三百十九项调查。2年级参与者在临床教学中的平均总自我效能感得分明显低于3年级参与者(均差=-11.13,95%CI[-16.33,-5.93])。与没有同伴教学经验的参与者相比,具有同伴教学经验的参与者的平均总分明显更高(平均差异=15.32,95%CI[8.74,21.91])。量表的相对卡方检验是可接受的(CMIN/df=4.69);其他拟合指数在可接受的参数之内或之外(RMSEA=.11;SRMR=.039;NFI=.89;RFI=.88;FI=.91;TLI=.90;CFI=.91)。参与者在临床教学成绩中的总自我效能感与他们的视觉模拟评分之间存在很强的相关性(r=.83,n=314,p<.001[双尾])。克朗巴赫的总规模的阿尔法是.98。
    结论:改良的临床教学自我效能感量表对学生年水平和同伴教学经验敏感。当进行验证性因素分析时,量表的模型在几个指数中都是可以接受的。这些发现支持了量表结构效度的论据。总自我效能感得分与视觉模拟量表密切相关,建议并行有效性。使用Cronbach的Alpha,该量表被认为是可靠的,然而,可能会受益于项目编号的减少。修订后的临床教学自我效能感量表可以支持未来对本科护生临床教学自我效能感的调查,有助于理解健康专业学生在跨学科临床教学中的自我效能感。
    OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a modified version of the Self-Efficacy in Clinical Teaching Scale with a sample of undergraduate nursing students.
    BACKGROUND: Enhancing nursing students\' self-efficacy in clinical teaching is important for developing their clinical teaching capabilities, which ultimately contributes to safe quality healthcare. Little is known about nursing students\' self-efficacy in clinical teaching, potentially due to a lack of validated instruments to measure their self-efficacy in clinical teaching.
    METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional survey design.
    METHODS: In 2022, a convenience sample of Year 2 and Year 3 nursing students in an Australian Bachelor of Nursing Program completed the modified Self-Efficacy in Clinical Teaching Scale. The scale\'s construct validity was assessed using known-group measures (year level and peer teaching experience) and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was established through correlation with a visual analogue scale and reliability was tested with Cronbach\'s alpha.
    RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen surveys were analysed. The mean total self-efficacy in clinical teaching score for Year 2 participants was significantly lower than that of Year 3 participants (mean difference = -11.13, 95 % CI [-16.33, -5.93]). Participants with peer teaching experience had a significantly higher mean total score compared with those without peer teaching experience (mean difference = 15.32, 95 % CI [8.74, 21.91]). The scale\'s relative chi-square test was acceptable (CMIN/df = 4.69); other fit indices were within or just outside acceptable parameters (RMSEA =.11; SRMR =.039; NFI =.89; RFI =.88; IFI =.91; TLI =.90; CFI =.91). There was a strong correlation between participants\' total self-efficacy in clinical teaching scores and their visual analogue scale scores (r =.83, n = 314, p <.001 [two-tailed]). Cronbach\'s alpha for the total scale was .98.
    CONCLUSIONS: The modified Self-Efficacy in Clinical Teaching Scale was sensitive to student year level and peer teaching experience. When subjected to confirmatory factor analysis, the scale\'s model was an acceptable fit across several indices. These findings support an argument for the scale\'s construct validity. Total self-efficacy scores were strongly correlated with visual analogue scales, suggesting concurrent validity. Using Cronbach\'s alpha, the scale was found to be reliable, however may benefit from a reduction of item numbers. The modified Self-Efficacy in Clinical Teaching Scale may support future investigations of undergraduate nursing students\' self-efficacy in clinical teaching and contribute to an understanding of health professional students\' self-efficacy in clinical teaching across disciplines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    述评是一种特定类型的反思性学习。汇报遵循经验,目标是从经验中汲取有意义的学习。它通常在基于模拟的教育经验之后使用,但在实际的临床护理之后可以使用相同的技术。模拟的早期研究表明,在没有汇报的情况下,基于模拟的教育不会发生学习。有汇报讨论的阶段和特定的会话策略,用于吸引学习者并引发引人入胜的学习讨论。实践标准要求主持人进行专门培训,并采用基于理论的汇报方法。
    Debriefing is a specific type of reflective learning. Debriefing follows an experience, with the goal of taking meaningful learning away from the experience. It is often used following a simulation-based educational experience but the same techniques can be used following actual clinical care. Early studies in simulation suggest that learning does not occur in simulation-based education in the absence of debriefing. There are phases of a debriefing discussion and specific conversational strategies that are used to engage learners and provoke engaging learning discussions. Standards of practice call for facilitators with specialized training and a debriefing method that is theory based.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨视频反馈方式在消化内科护生临床教学中的应用效果。
    方法:在本研究中,从2021年3月至2023年3月,我们从宁波大学第一附属医院筛选了100名符合入学标准的符合条件的实习生.根据他们的个人选择,50名实习生被分配到对照组(传统教学方法),而其他50名实习生被分配到观察组(视频反馈方法)。我们比较了理论知识,实用技能,以及两组之间的综合查房能力,以及在临床实习结束时对督导教师的教学行为进行评估。
    结果:观察组在理论和实践评估方面均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组在护理询问中得分较高,考试,诊断,干预措施,健康咨询,人文关怀,组织有效性,总体评价(P<0.05)。此外,观察组批判性思维总分(267.24±16.87分)和个体维度得分均高于对照组(257.64±13.84分),(P<0.001)。
    结论:视频反馈方法可以有效提高理论知识,实用技能,以及消化内科临床护理实习生学生的整体查房表现。此外,这种方法可以规范教学行为,提高学生满意度。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate effect of a video feedback approach in clinical teaching of gastroenterology for nursing students.
    METHODS: In this study, we selected 100 eligible student interns who meet the enrollment criteria from The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University from March 2021 to March 2023. According to their personal choices, 50 interns were assigned to a control group (traditional teaching methods), while the other 50 interns were assigned to an observation group (video feedback methods). We compared theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and comprehensive ward-round abilities between the two groups, as well as doing an evaluation of teaching behaviors of the supervising teachers at the end of the clinical internship.
    RESULTS: The observation group significantly outperformed the control group in theoretical and practical assessments (P<0.05). The observation group also scored higher in nursing inquiry, examination, diagnosis, interventions, health consultation, humanistic care, organizational effectiveness, and overall evaluation (P<0.05). In addition, the total score of critical thinking (267.24±16.87 points) and scores of the individual dimensions in the observation group were higher than those of the control group (257.64±13.84 points), (P<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The video feedback method can effectively improve the theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and overall ward-round performance of students in clinical nursing interns in the field of gastroenterology. Additionally, this approach can standardize teaching behaviors and enhance student satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:模拟是非洲的一种新教学方法,强调了将其付诸实施并产生有关非洲临床模拟的特定环境奖学金的必要性。尽管在医学教育中使用模拟有优越的学习成果,它在发展中国家的使用往往是有限的,加上与非洲背景特别相关的模拟奖学金有限。该研究旨在探索本科生对模拟使用的看法。方法:采用混合方法融合并行设计,目前采用定量和定性方法来探索本科生对在教学中使用临床模拟的看法。定量方法从强烈不同意到强烈同意的五点李克特评估了学生的看法,而定性方法则采用了集中的小组讨论来探索学生对临床模拟的看法。使用Stata版本17分析定量数据。定性结果由Brauna和Clark通过主题分析进行分析。结果:298名参与者被纳入研究。参与者的平均年龄为27岁,标准差为5.81岁。大多数152(51.01%)的参与者是男性。大多数111(37.25%)的参与者正在攻读医学学士学位和外科学士学位。学生对在临床教学中使用模拟的感知得分的总平均值为3.875269±0.5281626。参与者强烈同意,在完成一个场景后,让一个在现场工作的人向他们汇报是非常有帮助的,他们对此的总体看法很高(平均值=4.65241±0.6617337)。结论这项探索性研究表明,医学,护理,来自Busitema和Lira农村大学的助产学生对在教学中使用临床模拟表现出积极的看法。结果得出结论,模拟可以帮助学生更好地理解临床环境中的概念,为他们提供宝贵的学习经验,并帮助他们激发批判性思维能力。Further,参与者认为模拟是真实的,获得的知识可以转移到临床领域。
    UNASSIGNED: Simulation is a new pedagogical method in Africa that underscores the need to operationalize it and generate context-specific scholarship regarding clinical simulation in Africa. Despite the superior learning outcomes of using simulation in medical education, its use in developing countries is often limited, compounded by limited scholarship on simulation especially relevant to an African context. The research aimed to explore perceptions surrounding the use of simulation among undergraduate students.
    UNASSIGNED: A mixed method convergent parallel design was used in which both the quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed currently to explore the perception of the undergraduate students towards the use of clinical simulation in teaching and learning. The quantitative approach assessed the perception of the students on a five-point Likert from strongly disagree to strongly agree scale while the qualitative approach employed a focused group discussion to explore the perception of the students in regards to clinical simulation. Quantitative data was analyzed using Stata Version 17. Qualitative results were analyzed through thematic analysis by Brauna and Clark.
    UNASSIGNED: 298 participants were recruited into the study. The mean age of the participants was 27 years with a standard deviation of 5.81 years. The majority 152(51.01%) of the participants were males. Most 111(37.25%) of the participants were pursuing Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery. The grand mean of the perception scores of the students towards the use of simulation in clinical teaching was 3.875269 ±0.5281626. The participants strongly agreed that it is incredibly helpful to have someone who works in the field debrief with them after completing a scenario and their overall perception towards this was high (Mean =4.65241±0.6617337).
    UNASSIGNED: This exploratory study revealed that medical, nursing, and midwifery students from the rural Universities of Busitema and Lira demonstrated a positive perception of the use of clinical simulation in teaching and learning. The results conclude that simulations help students better understand concepts in clinical settings, provide them with valuable learning experiences, and help them stimulate critical thinking abilities. Further, the participants perceive simulation to be realistic, and knowledge gained could be transferred to the clinical areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究探讨了影响马拉维护理和助产教育中模拟教育(SBE)实施的因素。
    本研究旨在确定影响选定培训机构和临床场所的护理和助产教育者的因素。
    这项研究涵盖了一个地区和四个中心医院,五所专业培训机构,卫生部以及马拉维护士和助产士委员会官员。
    使用混合方法方法,从293名参与者那里收集了定量数据,包括149名最后一年的护理和助产学生,和144位临床指导员.定性数据来自24名教职员工,11名临床指导员和两名关键线人。研究人员进行了37次深入访谈,10次焦点小组讨论和8次案头审查。描述性统计用于分析定量数据,而内容分析用于定性结果。
    从定性数据中出现了五个主题:监管机构教学大纲中缺乏模拟,正规培训不够,对知识渊博的临床指导员的需求,人力和物力资源不足,和对变革的抵制。调查结果表明,83%的参与者具有理论SBE知识,但缺乏实践技能,只有13%的人认为SBE是目前的教学方法。教育者强调缺乏基础设施,技能实验室,教学医院,设备,以及正式培训的不足是SBE实施的关键障碍。
    研究得出的结论是,熟练的教育工作者,适当的基础设施和资源可以促进SBE在马拉维的实施。
    建议包括监管机构支持,对教育工作者的正式培训,利用低保真模拟器,以及在卫生设施中建立SBE中心和角落。
    UNASSIGNED: The study explored factors influencing implementation of simulation-based education (SBE) in nursing and midwifery education in Malawi.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify factors influencing nursing and midwifery educators in selected training institutions and clinical sites.
    UNASSIGNED: The study covered one district and four central hospitals, five professional training institutions, Ministry of Health and Nurses and Midwives Council of Malawi officials.
    UNASSIGNED: Using mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were gathered from 293 participants, including 149 final-year nursing and midwifery students, and 144 clinical instructors. Qualitative data were obtained from 24 faculty members, 11 clinical instructors and two key informants. Researchers conducted 37 in-depth interviews, 10 focus group discussions and eight desk reviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data, while content analysis was used for qualitative findings.
    UNASSIGNED: Five themes emerged from qualitative data: absence of simulation in regulatory body syllabi, insufficient formal training, demand for knowledgeable clinical instructors, inadequate human and material resources, and resistance to change. Survey results indicated that 83% of the participants had theoretical SBE knowledge but lacked practical skills, with only 13% considering SBE as a current teaching method. Educators emphasised lack of infrastructure, skills laboratories, teaching hospitals, equipment, and a deficit in formal training as critical barriers to SBE implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: The study concluded that skilled educators, appropriate infrastructure and resources could facilitate SBE implementation in Malawi.
    UNASSIGNED: Recommendations included regulatory body support, formal training for educators, utilisation of low-fidelity simulators, and establishment of SBE centres and corners in health facilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于工作场所的评价是最重要的,但医学教育具有挑战性。目的是改善对纳米比亚大学(UNAM)本科3年级和4年级家庭医学学生的农村社区临床培训的评估,并实施无纸化程序。在Moodle平台上开发了一个在线模块,其中包括一个学习指南,一个电子投资组合,和电子资源(电子书和应用程序),以取代当前纸质版的日志。我们通过与学生和临床培训师就如何最好地进行初步实施,探索了当地资源。参与还需要激励学生积极参与实施过程。所有3年级和4年级社区教育最终服务(COBES)的学生现在都以电子方式提交临床学习证明,并在其在线投资组合中使用手机并使用在线资源。此外,自2023年以来的第6年引入的实用家庭医学模块的学生现在也在使用电子作品集和这些评估工具。贡献:学生和主管的总体反馈表明了积极的学习氛围和所有团队成员对绩效的建设性反馈,希望改善基于工作的评估并最终改善患者护理。更多的初级卫生保健团队成员参与其中,碳足迹也有所减少。
    Workplace-based evaluation is one of the most important, but challenging aspects of medical education. The aim was to improve the assessment of the rural community-based clinical training for undergraduate 3rd and 4th year family medicine students at the University of Namibia (UNAM) and implement a paperless process. An online module was developed on the Moodle platform to include a study guide, an electronic portfolio, and electronic resources (e-books and apps) to replace the current paper version of the logbook. We explored local resources by engaging with students and clinical trainers on how to best conduct the initial implementation. Engagement also entailed motivating students to actively participate in the implementation process. All 3rd and 4th year community-based education end service (COBES) students are now submitting proof of clinical learning electronically with the use of their phones in their online portfolio and using online resources. In addition, students in the practical family medicine module that has been introduced in the 6th year since 2023 are now also using an electronic portfolio and these assessment tools.Contribution: Overall feedback from students and supervisors indicates a positive atmosphere of learning and constructive feedback on performance from all team members, hopefully improving work-based assessments and ultimately patient care. More members of the primary health care team were involved and the carbon footprint has also been decreased.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的这项横断面分析研究旨在评估医学生对过去12个月在沙特国王大学(KSU)临床教学中使用基于模拟的学习(SBL)方法的认识和满意度。它旨在了解这种学习方法如何提高学生的自我满意度和临床技能,促进所学知识的应用,并评估教师在技能实验室提供充足实践机会的作用。此外,该研究旨在评估学生在临床前和临床年度对分配给技能实验室课程的时间以及在KSU基于模拟的培训计划中整合高保真技术的满意度。方法在这项横断面研究中,来自KSU医学院的306名男女医学生参加了会议,包括196名临床前学生(第一,第二,和三年级)和110名临床学生(第四和五年级)。定量数据是通过5点Likert量表的结构化问卷收集的,该量表显示了满意度。满意度是根据5点Likert量表测量的,该量表显示了来自(非常不满意,不满意,既不满意也不满意,满意,非常满意),我们基于独立的t检验计算了p值,百分比代表选择满意和非常满意的学生的百分比。结果对SBL的总体满意度为3.98,71.10%,它被认为是学习技能的有用和有效的方法。据报道,它帮助学生实现了他们学到的东西。同时,在分配给技能实验室的时间较少的地区,满意度较低。此外,据报道,缺乏可访问性和缺乏训练有素的工作人员,应该通过为员工提供适当的培训来解决这些问题。结论本研究的结果将有助于理解如何解决学生的学习需求。此外,提供基于模拟的培训是符合最佳教育标准的途径,应根据每个机构的独特性进行调整。除了提供进一步的结果,这项研究提出了进一步研究的建议。
    Objectives This cross-sectional analytical study aims to evaluate medical students\' awareness and satisfaction regarding the utilization of simulation-based learning (SBL) as a method for clinical teaching at King Saud University (KSU) over the past 12 months. It seeks to understand how such learning methods enhance students\' self-satisfaction and clinical skills, facilitate the application of learned knowledge, and assess the role of instructors in providing ample practice opportunities in the skills laboratory. Furthermore, the study aims to assess the satisfaction levels of students in both preclinical and clinical years regarding the time allocated for skills laboratory sessions and the integration of high-fidelity technology in simulation-based training programs at KSU. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a total of 306 male and female medical students from the College of Medicine at KSU participated, comprising 196 preclinical students (first, second, and third years) and 110 clinical students (fourth and fifth years). Quantitative data was collected through a structured questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale that showed degrees of satisfaction. The satisfaction was measured based on a 5-point Likert scale that shows the degree of satisfaction from (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, satisfied, and very satisfied), and we calculated the p-value based on an independent t-test, and the percentage represented the percentage of students who chose satisfied and very satisfied. Results The results showed overall satisfaction with SBL (mean: 3.98, 71.10%), and it was recognized as a useful and effective method of learning skills. It is reported that it helped the students implement what they learned. At the same time, lower satisfaction was identified in areas with less allocated time for skill labs. Moreover, lack of accessibility and lack of trained staff were reported, and they should be addressed by providing staff with proper training. Conclusion The results of the study will help to understand how students\' learning needs should be addressed. Moreover, providing simulation-based training is a pathway compliant with the best educational standards that should be adapted according to each institution\'s singularities. Besides offering further results, the study presents suggestions for further research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号