UNASSIGNED: Medical errors are an unfortunate certainty with emotional and psychological consequences for patients and health care providers. No standardized medical curriculum on how to disclose medical errors to patients or peers exists. The novel HEEAL (honesty/empathy/education/apology-awareness/lessen chance for future errors) curriculum addresses this gap in medical education through a multimodality workshop.
UNASSIGNED: This 6-hour, two-part curriculum incorporated didactic and standardized patient (SP) simulation education with rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP). The morning focused on provider-patient error disclosure; the afternoon applied the same principles to provider-provider (peer) discussion. Summative simulations with SPs evaluated learners\' skill baseline and improvement. Formative simulations run by expert simulation educators used RCDP to provide real-time feedback and opportunities for adjustment. Medical knowledge was measured through pre- and postintervention multiple-choice questions. Learners\' confidence and attitude towards medical errors disclosure were surveyed pre- and postintervention with assistance of the Barriers to Error Disclosure Assessment tool, revised with the addition of several questions related to provider-provider disclosure.
UNASSIGNED: Fourteen medical students participated in this pilot curriculum. Statistical significance was demonstrated in medical knowledge (p = .01), peer-disclosure skills (p = .001), and confidence in medical error disclosure (p < .001). Although there was improvement in patient-disclosure skills, this did not reach statistical significance (p = .05).
UNASSIGNED: This curriculum addresses the need for designated training in medical error disclosure. Learners gained knowledge, skills, and confidence in medical error disclosure. We recommend this curriculum for medical students preparing for transition to residency.

UNASSIGNED: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires emergency medicine (EM) residency training programs to monitor residents\' progress using standardized milestones. The first assessment of PGY 1 resident milestones occurs midway through the first year and could miss initial deficiencies. Early assessment of PGY 1 EM resident milestones has potential to identify at-risk residents prior to standard midyear evaluations. We developed an orientation syllabus for PGY 1 residents followed by a milestone assessment. Assessment scores helped predict future milestone scores and American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) In-Training Examination (ITE) scores for PGY 1 residents.
UNASSIGNED: From 2013 to 2020, we developed and implemented Milestone Evaluation Day (MED), a simulation-based day and written exam assessing PGY 1 EM residents during their first month on the 23 ACGME 1.0 milestones. MED stations included a history and physical with verbal presentation, patient simulation, vascular access, wound management, and airway management. MED, Clinical Competency Committee-generated (CCC-generated) milestone, and ABEM ITE scores were averaged and compared utilizing Pearson\'s correlation coefficient.
UNASSIGNED: Of 112 PGY 1 EM residents, 110 (98%) were analyzed over an 8-year period. We observed a moderate positive correlation of MED and CCC-generated milestone scores (r = .34, p < .001). There was a nonstatistically significant weak positive correlation of MED and ABEM ITE scores (r = .13, p = .17).
UNASSIGNED: An early assessment of EM milestones in the PGY 1 year can assist in the prediction of CCC-generated milestone scores for PGY 1 residents.

UNASSIGNED: Most health care providers will be involved in a medical error during their careers. It is critical that future physicians receive formal training on error disclosure.
UNASSIGNED: We designed a formative skills-based objective standardized clinical exam (OSCE) for fourth-year medical students to assess competence in disclosing an error during a required entrustable professional activity. Faculty observed the encounter and completed a checklist evaluating students\' performance in communication skills and content knowledge. Students received immediate formative feedback. They then participated in a facilitated case-based experience, discussed the critical elements of disclosure, utilized role-play to reinforce skills, and reflected on self-care practices. Finally, students completed a survey evaluating their perception of the OSCE\'s impact on their disclosure knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
UNASSIGNED: Ninety-two students participated in the OSCE. Of those, 67 (73%) completed a retrospective pre/post survey assessing their disclosure knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Forty-one (62%) did not identify the error. Students who identified the error (26, 39%) were more likely to use the two-patient identifier than students who did not identify the error, χ2(1) = 13.3, p < .001. Self-reported comfort and confidence in disclosure improved, as did self-care practices (ps ≤ .005).
UNASSIGNED: Students agreed that health care providers should disclose an error and know how to do so. Student self-reported comfort in disclosure and knowledge of how to disclose and how to report an error all improved following the OSCE and structured debrief. The OSCE and case-based experience can be adapted for implementation in curricula about error disclosure.

UNASSIGNED: Often, interns are expected to teach medical students early in their residency, but most are not formally taught how to be effective teachers before residency. Currently, there is emphasis on developing teaching skills of residents rather than students before they become residents. Most published student-as-teacher courses are voluntary and do not assess skill acquisition.
UNASSIGNED: We taught 290 fourth-year medical students across two academic years (2020-2022) the tenets of the One-Minute Preceptor (OMP) using a 2-hour workshop during their transition to residency course. A variety of role-play cases allowed students to practice the different parts of the OMP in isolation and combined. Then, we assessed their teaching skills after the workshop using an objective structured teaching exam (OSTE).
UNASSIGNED: Two hundred seventy-eight students (96%) completed the self-assessment of their confidence demonstrating the skills of the OMP before and after the workshop. Their confidence improved in all domains, with ps < .001. Additionally, all students successfully demonstrated competency on the OSTE.
UNASSIGNED: We used a 2-hour workshop based on the OMP to improve fourth-year medical students\' confidence in their teaching skills and allow them to demonstrate competence in those skills before starting their intern year.

Telemedicine training for medical students is critical as that modality becomes integral to patient care. This formative standardized patient (SP) objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) lets students discuss miscarriage diagnosis and treatment virtually.
The SP OSCE was a mandatory session during the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Students received immediate feedback and optional individual reviews with clerkship directors. Students completed a nonmandatory survey at the end to describe their experience. SPIKES protocol student responses (i.e., proportion of correct responses) from in-person and remote SP versions were compared.
Between July 2019 and March 2020, 79 students completed the in-person OSCE. Between July 2020 and June 2021, 149 students completed the remote SP encounter OSCE. Students who participated in the remote versus the in-person OSCE were more likely to admit their lack of knowledge when not equipped (p = .02), be seated during the encounter (p = .03), show listening body language (p = .13), assess the SP\'s perception (p = .19) and understanding (p = .20), and correct the SP\'s misunderstandings (p = .14). Of 84 students from eight rotations, including both in-person and remote formats, 99% believed learning objectives were clear, 91% felt preparation material was adequate, 95% thought the instructor summarized important points, 97% learned something in caring for gynecological patients, and 96% perceived the OSCE to be a worthwhile educational experience.
The remote OSCE was well received by students. Breaking bad news virtually met assessment goals. Telemedicine training should be incorporated into medical school curricula.

UNASSIGNED: Over-the-counter (OTC) products are widely used by families with young children. To educate future pediatricians on OTC product counseling and support the health and safety of children under their care, modern, accessible, and engaging curricula are needed.
UNASSIGNED: We developed an OTC product curriculum consisting of seven videos and one facilitated group discussion using a flipped classroom pedagogy to educate students on counseling parents about OTC product use. Fourth-year medical students pursuing pediatric training from four institutions participated in the curriculum during their end-of-year transition-to-residency course. We measured effectiveness via a pre/post comparison using a student self-assessment with multiple-choice questions. A simulated parent call OSCE provided participants with an opportunity to apply their knowledge and receive directed formative feedback. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 41 students participated in the curriculum and completed all assessments. The majority (93%) watched all the videos. All participants (100%) agreed the videos were useful. Knowledge improved significantly (pretest mean score = 70%, posttest mean score = 87%, p < .001). No significant differences were found when comparing institution, gender, prior experience, or electives.
UNASSIGNED: We developed a feasible and effective video-based curriculum to teach OTC product guidance. Given the importance of discussing OTC medications with families and the need for convenient educational tools, this curriculum may have widespread application to medical students during clinical rotations as well as pediatric and family medicine trainees.

Procedural training is a universal concern amongst pediatric residents and their teachers. We developed and implemented formative assessments to generate direct and indirect procedural feedback. We analyzed changes in residents\' perceived procedural knowledge, skills, confidence, and entrustment.
Senior pediatric residents rotating in the pediatric emergency department participated in video-recorded formative assessments of informed consent OSCEs and simulated toddler forehead laceration repair and infant lumbar puncture. Residents reflected on their perceived procedural knowledge, skills, confidence, and entrustment through Likert and entrustment scales. Secondary outcomes of formative assessment completion rates and proportions of procedures performed by pediatric residents tracked feasibility and potential clinical impact, respectively.
Including the pilot period, 89% of residents (31 out of 35) received direct and indirect procedural feedback. Perceived composite competency and entrustment improved for laceration repair (competency: from 3.1 to 3.9, p < .001; entrustment: from 4.0 to 5.1, p < .001) and lumbar puncture (competency: from 3.5 to 4.0, p < .001; entrustment: from 4.6 to 5.6, p = .001). We observed an increase in the proportion of clinical laceration repairs (11% [97 out of 885] vs. 23% [218 out of 946], p < .001) and lumbar punctures (23% [12 out of 54] vs. 41% [21 out of 52], p = .05) performed by pediatric residents.
Integrating feasible procedural formative assessments into the pediatric emergency department rotation had a positive impact on senior pediatric residents\' perceptions of their procedural knowledge, skills, confidence, and entrustment and was associated with increased procedural engagement.

Given the growing population of older adults, it is of utmost importance for all future physicians to be trained in the core skills of conducting geriatric assessment.
We designed an interactive, skills-based session introducing core competencies for geriatric assessment for second-year medical students (MS2s). We organized our curriculum for early learners based on the 4Ms framework: mind/memory, medications, mobility, and matters most. The session consisted of brief didactics with integration of real-time skills-based practice. Students completed pre- and postsession surveys to assess their confidence in their knowledge and skills. All students completed a geriatric assessment during a clinical skills encounter as part of a multistation, end-of-course, summative clinical skills examination (CSE). The session was conducted virtually over 2 academic years, and the CSE was conducted virtually in 2020 and in person in 2021.
One hundred ninety-nine MS2s participated in the session (100 in 2020, 99 in 2021). All students surveyed (33%) reported improved confidence in geriatric knowledge and skills by the end of the session (ps < .001). Students were more likely to use a cognitive screening tool, ask about advance care planning, and assess medication adherence on the CSE in 2021 compared to 2020 (ps < .001).
We provide an interactive curriculum for MS2s to develop geriatric assessment skills. The curriculum and assessment tools are versatile, can be easily integrated into any medical school curriculum, and can be effectively delivered in person or on a virtual platform.

The overdose crisis remains a critical public health problem, creating an urgent need to train physicians in the treatment and management of opioid use disorder (OUD). Our medicine clerkship module aimed to close this gap by training and assessing students\' motivational interviewing skills, harm reduction knowledge, and use of nonstigmatizing language in the treatment of patients with OUD.
We evaluated the impact of a small-group, case-based activity and patient panel on the clinical documentation skills of students in a medicine clerkship. Clinical documentation was based on an observed structured clinical examination of a standardized patient with OUD and was evaluated using a grading rubric that followed the module learning objectives. Students also submitted reflections on the curriculum.
Qualitative responses (n = 40) from students evaluating the small-group activity and patient panel exercise revealed overall student satisfaction with the patient panel and exposure to patients living with OUD. Three themes emerged from student reflections: (1) humanity, (2) different paths to recovery, and (3) using nonstigmatizing language. For the quantitative test, students\' (n = 39) mean clinical documentation scores before and after the small-group activity and patient panel increased from 10.1 to 11.3 out of 13.5 possible points. There was a significant difference between mean pretest and posttest scores (p < .001).
The medicine clerkship provided an acceptable and feasible opportunity for implementing a multifaceted educational experience for students with significant immediate impact on their evaluation of patients with OUD.

Due to the introduction of cell-free DNA genetic testing options, the number of clinical ultrasound procedures has greatly diminished in recent years. With fewer real-life ultrasound-guided procedures being performed, it is difficult for OB/GYN and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) trainees to achieve competency in doing them. Simulation can be utilized to address this issue and supplement a learner\'s real-life training.
We developed a simulation workshop incorporating previously described ultrasound guidance task trainers and simulators of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. The workshop had three parts: needle guidance basics, targeting task performance, and procedure-specific simulation. A form of this workshop has been held at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine since 2015 and as a regional course for MFM fellows since 2017. During the 2019 and 2020 courses, participants completed Likert-scale surveys evaluating the course.
Since the workshops began in 2015, approximately 300 people have participated. In 2019-2020, 41 MFM attending physicians, 136 MFM fellows, and three OB/GYN residents took our course and completed a postcourse survey. Participants rated the course highly and thought it was highly effective.
We created an introductory simulation workshop for obstetric ultrasound-guided invasive procedures that participants rated highly and thought was very effective. Objective clinical assessment of skill improvement after completion of this course is needed to verify its true impact. Repeated exposure to this introductory simulation and creation of more challenging workshops are needed to achieve a sustained high level of procedural skill.