The effect of treatment intensification (systemic therapy [ST] + cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) vs. ST alone) is unknown regarding rates of other-cause mortality (OCM) in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC). We hypothesized that intensified treatment (ST + CN) may result in higher OCM, than when ST is used alone.
Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, all ccmRCC patients treated 2010-2018 either with ST + CN or ST alone were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, multivariable competing risks regression analyses and 6 months\' landmark analyses addressed OCM and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to treatment status.
Of 2271 ccmRCC patients, 1233 (54%) were treated with ST + CN vs 1038 (46%) with ST alone. After 1:1 PSM, OCM was 5.3 vs. 4.6 % (P = .5) and CSM was 73.4 vs. 88.4% (P < .001) in ST + CN vs. ST alone patients. In multivariable competing risks regression, the combination of ST and CN was not associated with higher OCM (HR 1.3; 95% CI 0.8-2.1; P = .4), vs. ST alone. However, the combination of ST and CN was independently associated with lower CSM (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.5-0.6; P < .001), vs. ST alone. After 6 months\' landmark analyses, these multivariable associations remained unchanged.
The current study indicates no OCM-disadvantage in ST + CN ccmRCC patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. Conversely, a strong association with lower CSM was recorded in ST + CN patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. These associations are robust and remained unchanged after strictest statistical adjustment including control for immortal time bias.

To identify candidate gene mutations to significantly predict the risk of survival prognosis after treatment with systemic first-line targeted therapy (TT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients.
Between 2005 and 2017, 168 triplet-tissue block samples from 56 mRCC patients were selected for targeted gene sequencing (TGS). Fifty-six patients\' medical records including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at the time of mRCC diagnosis were evaluated. The patients were grouped into favorable (>12 months/>3 years), intermediate (3-12/12-36 months), and poor groups according to their PFS/OS (<3 months/<12 months). We identified any significant therapeutic targeted genes relating to the survival with a significance at p<0.050.
The first line therapeutic response showed 1.8% complete remission, 14.2% partial response, 42.9% stable disease, and 41.1% progressive disease. Among the overall TGS results, the cumulative effect of CDH1, and/or PTK2 genes significantly reflected the therapeutic responses in terms of PFS/OS; CDH1 and PTK2 mutations were associated with poor prognostic outcomes (p<0.050). Among only triplet-quality check passed tissues, the SGO2, BRAF, URB1, and NEDD1 mutated genes significantly correlated with OS. Regarding metastasis, patients with liver metastasis had the worst OS (p=0.050). The combinational mutation number from these two candidate genes in the liver metastatic samples with mutated EGFR2 and FABP7 also showed a significantly worse OS than those with other metastatic lesions (p<0.050).
This study reports several significant mutated genes related to the survival prognosis in mRCC patients treated with first-line TT.

Background: In recent years, inflammation has become widely recognized as a crucial component in tumor development and progression. Neutrophils are one of the most common inflammatory markers during hematological examinations. The prognostic value of neutrophils in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil count in patients with mRCC. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for data on the association between pretreatment neutrophil count and mRCC prognosis up to October 7, 2017. We sorted out relevant studies and extracted the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 13 studies containing 3,021 patients with mRCC were summarized in the present meta-analysis. An elevated pretreatment neutrophil count yielded a worse OS (HR=2.17, 95% CI=1.68-2.79, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=1.78, 95% CI=0.91-3.49, P<0.001). Furthermore, we performed a subgroup analysis based on cut-off value, ethnicity, treatment method and analysis type. As a result, the association between pretreatment neutrophil count and survival was statistically significant in the subgroups of cut-off value, ethnicity, treatment method and analysis type. Conclusion: Our results show that the pretreatment neutrophil count is associated with mRCC outcomes and can be used as a valuable inflammatory marker for prognosis monitoring.

RECORD-4 assessed everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who progressed after 1 prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or cytokine and reinforced the clinical benefit of second-line everolimus. Because of the high percentage of patients from China enrolled in RECORD-4 (41%) and some reported differences in responses to certain targeted agents between Chinese and Western patients, this subanalysis evaluated outcomes in Asian versus non-Asian patients.
RECORD-4 enrolled patients with clear cell mRCC into 3 cohorts based on prior first-line therapy: sunitinib, other anti-VEGF (sorafenib, bevacizumab, pazopanib, other), or cytokines. Patients received everolimus 10 mg/d until progression of disease (RECIST, v1.0) or intolerance. Primary end point was progression-free survival per investigator review. Data cutoff was Sept 1, 2014.
Among Asian (n = 55) versus non-Asian (n = 79) patients, 98% versus 84% had good/intermediate MSKCC prognosis; 73% versus 65% were men, and 85% versus 73% were < 65 years of age. All (100%) Asian patients were of Chinese ethnicity. Median duration of exposure was 5.5 mo for Asian and 6.0 mo for non-Asian patients. Among Asian versus non-Asian patients, median progression-free survival (months) was 7.4 versus 7.8 overall, 7.4 versus 4.0 with prior sunitinib, and 5.7 versus 9.2 with prior other anti-VEGFs. Clinical benefit rate was similar between populations: 74.5% (95% CI 61.0-85.3) for Asian patients and 74.7% (95% CI 63.6-83.8) for non-Asian patients. Most patients achieved stable disease as best overall response (Asian, 63.6%; non-Asian, 69.6%). Overall rate of grade 3/4 adverse events appeared similar for Asian (58%) and non-Asian patients (54%).
This RECORD-4 subanalysis demonstrated comparable efficacy and adverse event profiles of second-line everolimus in Asian and non-Asian patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes by prior therapy should be interpreted with caution because of small patient numbers in some subpopulations.
Everolimus as Second-line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell. Carcinoma (RECORD-4); ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01491672 . Registration date: December 14, 2011.