目的:用于尺侧副韧带重建(UCLR)的双皮质纽扣技术具有优势,包括对移植物张力的显着控制,与传统的UCLR技术相比,对移植物长度的关注较少,骨隧道骨折的风险最小化。最近发现,与传统的对接技术相比,这种双皮质纽扣技术在关节强度方面的机械性能并不逊色,接头刚度,和移植物应变。然而,尚未对这些UCLR技术之间的临床结局进行比较.因此,这项研究的目的是确定与使用传统对接(对接)技术进行UCLR的棒球运动员相比,使用双皮质按钮(doublebutton)技术进行UCLR的棒球运动员是否具有相似的回归运动(RTS)结果.
方法:确定了从2011年至2020年在两个机构中接受过主要UCLR的棒球运动员。纳入的患者被联系以完成评估再次手术的随访调查,RTS,和功能结果评分。功能结果调查包括Kerlan-Jobe骨科诊所(KJOC)评分,康威-乔布得分,安德鲁斯-蒂默曼(AT)肘部得分,和单一评估数字评估(SANE)得分。
结果:总体而言,78名男棒球运动员(年龄:18.9±2.4岁),平均随访3.1±2.4年,73名球员是棒球投手。双按钮组中的玩家更频繁地接受掌骨自体移植(78%vs.30%)和较少接受gracilis自体移植(22%与58%)与对接组的球员相比(p=0.001);然而,所有其他人口统计学因素在组间相似.双按钮组的所有玩家都能够在11.1±2.6个月内进行RTS,而对接组中96%的玩家能够在13.5±3.4个月内进行RTS(p>0.05)。所有术后结果和患者报告的结果在统计学上相似。并且在仅隔离投手和将部分厚度与全厚度UCL泪液分离后保持相似(均p>0.05)。
结论:在使用双键技术和对接技术进行UCLR的棒球运动员之间,恢复运动和其他术后结果可能相似。虽然未来的研究可能有必要加强临床建议,根据最近的尸体研究发现相似的肘部力量,这些发现提供了第一个临床结果,接头刚度,和移植应变与对接技术相比。
OBJECTIVE: A double cortical button technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) has advantages including significant control over graft tensioning, less concern about graft length, and minimized risk of bone tunnel fracture compared with traditional UCLR techniques. This double cortical button technique was recently found to be noninferior in mechanical performance to the traditional docking technique regarding joint strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain. However, clinical outcomes have not been compared between these UCLR techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether baseball players who underwent UCLR with a double cortical button (double button) technique have similar return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes to baseball players who underwent UCLR with the traditional docking (docking) technique.
METHODS: Baseball players who underwent primary UCLR from 2011 to 2020 across 2 institutions were identified. Included patients were contacted to complete a follow-up survey evaluating reoperations, RTS, and functional outcome scores. Functional outcome surveys include the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, the Conway-Jobe score, the Andrews-Timmerman elbow score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score.
RESULTS: Overall, 78 male baseball players (age: 18.9 ± 2.4 years) with an average follow-up of 3.1 ± 2.4 years were evaluated, with 73 of the players being baseball pitchers. Players in the double button group more frequently received palmaris longus autografts (78% vs. 30%) and less frequently received gracilis autografts (22% vs. 58%) compared with players in the docking group (P = .001); however, all other demographic factors were similar between the groups. All players in the double button group were able to RTS in 11.1 ± 2.6 months, whereas 96% of players in the docking group were able to RTS in 13.5 ± 3.4 months (P > .05). All postoperative outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were statistically similar between the groups and remained similar after isolating pitchers only and after separating partial-thickness from full-thickness UCL tears (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: RTS and other postoperative outcomes may be similar between baseball players who underwent UCLR with the double button technique and the docking technique. Although future research may be necessary to strengthen clinical recommendations, these findings provide the first clinical outcomes in light of a recent cadaveric study finding similar elbow strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain compared with the docking technique.